Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
mBio ; 10(5)2019 10 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615956

RESUMEN

Tail-anchored membrane proteins (TAMPs) are a distinct subset of inner membrane proteins (IMPs) characterized by a single C-terminal transmembrane domain (TMD) that is responsible for both targeting and anchoring. Little is known about the routing of TAMPs in bacteria. Here, we have investigated the role of TMD hydrophobicity in tail-anchor function in Escherichia coli and its influence on the choice of targeting/insertion pathway. We created a set of synthetic, fluorescent TAMPs that vary in the hydrophobicity of their TMDs and corresponding control polypeptides that are extended at their C terminus to create regular type II IMPs. Surprisingly, we observed that TAMPs have a much lower TMD hydrophobicity threshold for efficient targeting and membrane insertion than their type II counterparts. Using strains conditional for the expression of known membrane-targeting and insertion factors, we show that TAMPs with strongly hydrophobic TMDs require the signal recognition particle (SRP) for targeting. Neither the SecYEG translocon nor YidC appears to be essential for the membrane insertion of any of the TAMPs studied. In contrast, corresponding type II IMPs with a TMD of sufficient hydrophobicity to promote membrane insertion followed an SRP- and SecYEG translocon-dependent pathway. Together, these data indicate that the capacity of a TMD to promote the biogenesis of E. coli IMPs is strongly dependent upon the polypeptide context in which it is presented.IMPORTANCE A subset of membrane proteins is targeted to and inserted into the membrane via a hydrophobic transmembrane domain (TMD) that is positioned at the very C terminus of the protein. The biogenesis of these so-called tail-anchored proteins (TAMPs) has been studied in detail in eukaryotic cells. Various partly redundant pathways were identified, the choice for which depends in part on the hydrophobicity of the TMD. Much less is known about bacterial TAMPs. The significance of our research is in identifying the role of TMD hydrophobicity in the routing of E. coli TAMPs. Our data suggest that both the nature of the TMD and its role in routing can be very different for TAMPs versus "regular" membrane proteins. Elucidating these position-specific effects of TMDs will increase our understanding of how prokaryotic cells face the challenge of producing a wide variety of membrane proteins.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Escherichia coli/biosíntesis , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/química , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/biosíntesis , Interacciones Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Proteínas de la Membrana/química , Unión Proteica
2.
J Mol Biol ; 430(3): 389-403, 2018 02 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246766

RESUMEN

Tail-anchored membrane proteins (TAMPs) are relatively simple membrane proteins characterized by a single transmembrane domain (TMD) at their C-terminus. Consequently, the hydrophobic TMD, which acts as a subcellular targeting signal, emerges from the ribosome only after termination of translation precluding canonical co-translational targeting and membrane insertion. In contrast to the well-studied eukaryotic TAMPs, surprisingly little is known about the cellular components that facilitate the biogenesis of bacterial TAMPs. In this study, we identify DjlC and Flk as bona fide Escherichia coli TAMPs and show that their TMDs are necessary and sufficient for authentic membrane targeting of the fluorescent reporter mNeonGreen. Using strains conditional for the expression of known E. coli membrane targeting and insertion factors, we demonstrate that the signal recognition particle (SRP), its receptor FtsY, the chaperone DnaK and insertase YidC are each required for efficient membrane localization of both TAMPs. A close association between the TMD of DjlC and Flk with both the Ffh subunit of SRP and YidC was confirmed by site-directed in vivo photo-crosslinking. In addition, our data suggest that the hydrophobicity of the TMD correlates with the dependency on SRP for efficient targeting.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/metabolismo , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/metabolismo , Partícula de Reconocimiento de Señal/metabolismo , Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Escherichia coli/citología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/análisis , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/análisis , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/análisis , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/análisis , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/análisis , Partícula de Reconocimiento de Señal/análisis
3.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1586: 109-126, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28470601

RESUMEN

Optimizing the conditions for the production of membrane proteins in E. coli is usually a laborious and time-consuming process. Combining the Lemo21(DE3) strain or the pReX T7-based expression vector with membrane proteins C-terminally fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) greatly facilitates the optimization of membrane protein production yields. Both Lemo21(DE3) and pReX allow precise regulation of expression intensities of genes encoding membrane proteins, which is critical to identify the optimal production condition for a membrane protein. The use of GFP-fusions allows direct monitoring and visualization of membrane proteins at any stage during the production optimization process.


Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli/genética , Proteínas Fluorescentes Verdes/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Animales , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , Clonación Molecular/métodos , Expresión Génica , Vectores Genéticos/genética , Humanos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/genética , Transformación Genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA