RESUMEN
Cardiac MRI (CMR) has rich potential for future cardiovascular screening even though not approved clinically for routine screening for cardiovascular disease among patients with increased cardiometabolic risk. Patients with increased cardiometabolic risk include those with abnormal blood pressure, body mass, cholesterol level, or fasting glucose level, which may be related to dietary and exercise habits. However, CMR does accurately evaluate cardiac structure and function. CMR allows for effective tissue characterization with a variety of sequences that provide unique insights as to fibrosis, infiltration, inflammation, edema, presence of fat, strain, and other potential pathologic features that influence future cardiovascular risk. Ongoing epidemiologic and clinical research may demonstrate clinical benefit leading to increased future use. © RSNA, 2021.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is commonly performed before coronary CT angiography (CTA) based partly on its potential to influence CTA scan parameters. Encompassing the whole heart and performed at high tube potential (120 âkVp), standard (Agatston) CAC scanning adds to patient radiation exposure. Most CAC exists in the proximal and mid coronary segments and is easily visualized at low kVp. METHODS: We tested the impact of a modified calcium scan on coronary CTA acquisition decision-making and image quality in a randomized clinical trial. Providers documented planned CTA acquisition parameters prior to CAC scanning in a blinded manner. Standard Agatston CAC scans proceeded in typical fashion whereas modified scans utilized 80 âkVp and reduced z-axis length focused on the proximal-to-mid coronary arteries. CTA providers reviewed the CAC burden then documented final acquisition parameters. RESULTS: The study included 172 patients (48% female; mean age 59 â± â6.7). As planned, the calcium scan effective dose was significantly lower in the modified CAC scan group (0.14 vs. 0.74 âmSv using a 0.014 k-factor or 0.26 vs. 1.38 âmSv using a 0.026 k-factor; both p â< â0.001). Initially selected CTA parameters were changed at an identical rate following visual CAC assessment (59%). There was no significant difference in coronary CTA image quality (median quality score â= â4 in both groups, p â= â0.26), noise (31.0 vs 31.4 HU; p â= â0.81), or signal/noise ratio (17.9 vs 16.8; p â= â0.26). CONCLUSIONS: A low-kVp scan with focused field-of-view provides actionable information regarding the presence and severity of CAC prior to coronary CTA. Coronary CTA parameters based on patient variables are frequently modified after assessing CAC burden in the CTA suite. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02972242.