Urologists' proficiency in various donor nephrectomy approaches: a real-life survey, systematic review, and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Donor nephrectomy (DN) is a unique surgical procedure in urological practice, as it involves exposing a healthy individual to the potential risks of surgery. This type of surgery exhibits heterogeneity in terms of approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), each with its unique set of advantages and disadvantages. Consequently, there is currently a lack of universally agreed upon clear guidelines. In these settings, this study aims to evaluate transplantation surgeons' knowledge through a real-life survey and compare it with data from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The study is divided into two parts, with the first part focusing on the outcomes of the real-life survey designed to assess surgeons' knowledge about different DN approaches and their real-world practices during the surgery. The second part involves a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, specifically examining the outcomes of different surgical approaches to DN. The systematic review followed the PRISMA Guidelines and involved a search of PubMed and Web of Science for RCTs comparing the outcomes of different DN approaches. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. The random effect model was mainly used to assess the mean difference of the included studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022 and surveyed 50 surgeons, of which 35 participants (70%) completed the survey. Regarding various approaches to DN, 97.14% of surgeons reported having experience with live DN, and 45.72% performed over 15 cases per year. The most performed approach was pure laparoscopic DN (68.57%). Pure laparoscopic DN was the preferred approach for 77.42% of respondents. The review process resulted in 335 articles, of which 35 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. In summary, most studies found that laparoscopic approaches, including standard, hand-assisted, LESS-DN, and mini-LDN, resulted in less postoperative pain, better cosmetic, and quicker recovery times compared to open approaches. The main limitation of the current study is the heterogeneity of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides valuable insights into the practices of renal transplantation surgeons, offering a comprehensive comparison to level 1 studies (RCTs) in the field. It underscores the continued significance of ODN in contemporary practice, particularly in light of recommendations from the EAU guidelines on renal transplantation. This reaffirms the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches, including factors such as cost, postoperative pain, and cosmetic outcomes. While robotic-assisted DN holds promise, their adoption remains variable, potentially due to limited robust evidence.

External validation of a nomogram for outcome prediction in management of medium-sized (1-2 cm) kidney stones.

BACKGROUND: Stone nomogram by Micali et al., able topredict treatment failure of shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the management of single 1-2 cm renal stones, was developed on 2605 patients and showed a high predictive accuracy, with an area under ROC curve of 0.793 at internal validation. The aim of the present study is to externally validate the model to assess whether it displayed a satisfactory predictive performance if applied to different populations. METHODS: External validation was retrospectively performed on 3025 patients who underwent an active stone treatment from December 2010 to June 2021 in 26 centers from four countries (Italy, USA, Spain, Argentina). Collected variables included: age, gender, previous renal surgery, preoperative urine culture, hydronephrosis, stone side, site, density, skin-to-stone distance. Treatment failure was the defined outcome (residual fragments >4 mm at three months CT-scan). RESULTS: Model discrimination in external validation datasets showed an area under ROC curve of 0.66 (95% 0.59-0.68) with adequate calibration. The retrospective fashion of the study and the lack of generalizability of the tool towards populations from Asia, Africa or Oceania represent limitations of the current analysis. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current findings, Micali's nomogram can be used for treatment prediction after SWL, RIRS and PNL; however, a lower discrimination performance than the one at internal validation should be acknowledged, reflecting geographical, temporal and domain limitation of external validation studies. Further prospective evaluation is required to refine and improve the nomogram findings and to validate its clinical value.

Development and validation of metrics for a new RAPN training model.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a complex and index procedure that urologists need to learn how to perform safely. No validated performance metrics specifically developed for a RAPN training model (TM) exist. A Core Metrics Group specifically adapted human RAPN metrics to be used in a newly developed RAPN TM, explicitly defining phases, steps, errors, and critical errors. A modified Delphi meeting concurred on the face and content validation of the new metrics. One hundred percent consensus was achieved by the Delphi panel on 8 Phases, 32 Steps, 136 Errors and 64 Critical Errors. Two trained assessors evaluated recorded video performances of novice and expert RAPN surgeons executing an emulated RAPN in the newly developed TM. There were no differences in procedure Steps completed by the two groups. Experienced RAPN surgeons made 34% fewer Total Errors than the Novice group. Performance score for both groups was divided at the median score using Total Error scores, into HiError and LoError subgroups. The LowErrs Expert RAPN surgeons group made 118% fewer Total Errors than the Novice HiErrs group. Furthermore, the LowErrs Expert RAPN surgeons made 77% fewer Total Errors than the HiErrs Expert RAPN surgeons. These results established construct and discriminative validity of the metrics. The authors described a novel RAPN TM and its associated performance metrics with evidence supporting their face, content, construct, and discriminative validation. This report and evidence support the implementation of a simulation-based proficiency-based progression (PBP) training program for RAPN.

Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty with HUGO™ Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-Up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center.

Background: In February 2021 Medtronic® (Minneapolis, MN) launched the HUGO™ Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System in the global market. The aim of the current study is to describe the first case series and the optimal setup of robot-assisted pyeloplasty procedure, performed with HUGO RAS system in a tertiary referral robotic center. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted pyeloplasty at Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) were recorded. Baseline characteristics, and perioperative and surgical outcomes were collected. Results: Overall, 10 robot-assisted pyeloplasties were performed (October 2022-September 2023). Based on our expertise, the following minor setting changes have been made, relative to the official setup guide: the endoscope port and, subsequently, the left and right-hand ports were positioned more laterally. Additionally, the reserve/4th port was placed more laterally and cranially, and adjusted the arm cart's tilt angle, reducing it from -30° to -15°. The median docking time was 8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.2-9.8) minutes, and the median active console time was 89.5 (80.0-95.8) minutes. No conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery or perioperative complications was encountered. A single technical problem was recorded in 1 (10%) procedure. Specifically, one arm was blocked, and the procedure was accomplished with three arms without compromising the procedure success. Conclusions: This study represents the first worldwide series of robot-assisted pyeloplasty performed with the HUGO RAS system and shows promising results. The procedure might be safely performed with this robotic platform achieving optimal perioperative outcomes.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots.

BACKGROUND: In the field of robotic surgery, there is a lack of comparative evidence on surgical and functional outcomes of different robotic platforms. OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at a high-volume robotic center with daVinci and HUGO robot-assisted surgery (RAS) surgical systems. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed the data of 542 patients undergoing RARP ± extended pelvic lymph node dissection at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2021 and 2023. All procedures were performed by six surgeons using daVinci or HUGO RAS robots; the use of one platform rather than the other did not follow any specific preference and/or indication. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable analyses investigated the association between robotic system (daVinci vs HUGO RAS) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors. Urinary continence recovery was defined as the use of no/one safety pad. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 378 (70%) and 164 (30%) patients underwent RARP with daVinci and HUGO RAS surgical systems, respectively. Despite a higher rate of palpable disease in the HUGO RAS group (34% vs 25%), baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups (all p > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 16.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.35, 39.78; p = 0.12), estimated blood loss (estimate: 3.12; 95% CI: -67.03, 73.27; p = 0.9), and postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% CI: 0.34, 8.15; p = 0.5). On final pathology, 55 (15%) and 20 (12%) men in, respectively, the daVinci and the HUGO RAS group had positive surgical margins (PSMs; p = 0.5). On multivariable analyses, we did not find evidence of an association between a robotic system and PSMs (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.07; p = 0.8). Similarly, the odds of recovering continence did not differ between daVinci and HUGO RAS cases after both 1 mo (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.38; p = 0.4) and 3 mo (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.79; p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients receiving RARP with daVinci or HUGO RAS surgical platforms, we did not find differences in surgical and functional outcomes between the robots. This may be a result of a standardized surgical technique that allowed surgeons to transfer their skills between robotic systems. Awaiting future investigations with longer follow-up, these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and health care policymakers. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared surgical and functional outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with daVinci versus HUGO robot-assisted surgery (RAS) robots. The two platforms were able to achieve similar outcomes, suggesting that the introduction of HUGO RAS is safe and allows for optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: Step-by-step technique and surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center.

Objective: In the last years, robotic surgery was introduced in several different settings with good perioperative results. However, its role in the management of adrenal masses is still debated. In order to provide a contribution to this field, we described our step-by-step technique for robotic adrenalectomy (RA) and related modifications according to the type of adrenal mass treated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 27 consecutive patients who underwent RA at Onze-Lieve-Vrouw hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between January 2009 and October 2022. Demographic, intra- and post-operative, and pathological data were retrieved from our prospectively maintained institutional database. Continuous variables are summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables are reported as frequencies (percentages). Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent RA were included in the study. Median age, body mass index, and Charlson's comorbidity index were 61 (IQR: 49-71) years, 26 (IQR: 24-29) kg/m2, and 2 (IQR: 0-3), respectively, and 16 (59.3%) patients were male. Median tumor size at computed tomography scan was 6.0 (IQR: 3.5-8.0) cm. Median operative time and blood loss were 105 (IQR: 82-120) min and 175 (IQR: 94-250) mL, respectively. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Overall postoperative complications rate was 11.1%, with a postoperative transfusion rate of 3.7%. A total of 10 (37.0%) patients harbored malignant adrenal masses. Among them, 3 (11.1%) had adrenocortical carcinoma, 6 (22.2%) secondary metastasis, and 1 (3.7%) malignant pheochromocytoma on final pathological exam. Only 1 (10.0%) patient had positive surgical margins. Conclusion: We described our step-by-step technique for RA, which can be safely performed even in case of high challenging settings as malignant tumors, pheochromocytoma, and large masses. The standardization of perioperative protocol should be encouraged to maximize the outcomes of this complex surgical procedure.

Transitioning from Da Vinci Si to Xi: assessing surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center.

PURPOSE: In the emerging field of robotics, only few studies investigated the transition between different robotic platforms in terms of surgical outcomes. We aimed at assessing surgical outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at a high-volume robotic center during the transition from Si to Xi Da Vinci surgical systems. METHODS: We analyzed data of 1884 patients undergoing RARP (n = 1437, 76%) and RAPN (n = 447, 24%) at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2011 and 2021. For both procedures, we assessed operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and positive surgical margins. For RARP, we investigated length of catheterization and PSA persistence after surgery, whereas warm ischemia time, clampless surgery, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were assessed for RAPN. Multivariable analyses (MVA) investigated the association between robotic platform (Si vs. Xi) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors. RESULTS: A total of 975 (68%) and 462 (32%) patients underwent RARP performed with the Si vs. Xi surgical system, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. On MVA, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 1.07) or estimated blood loss (estimate: 32.39; both p > 0.05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of stay was 6 (3, 6) and 4 (3, 5) days in the Si vs. Xi group, respectively (p < 0.0001). On MVA, men treated with the Xi vs. Si robot had lower odds of PSM (Odds ratio [OR]: 0.58; p = 0.014). A total of 184 (41%) and 263 (59%) patients received RAPN with the Si and Xi robotic system, respectively. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, functional data, and tumor-related features did not differ between the groups. On MVA, operative time was longer in the Xi vs. Si group (estimate: 30.54; p = 0.006). Patients treated with the Xi vs. Si system had higher probability of undergoing a clampless procedure (OR: 2.56; p = 0.001), whereas the risk of AKI did not differ between the groups (OR: 1.25; p = 0.4). On MVA, patients operated with the Xi robot had shorter length of stay as compared to the Si group (estimate: - 0.86; p = 0.003), whereas we did not find evidence of an association between robotic system and PSM (OR: 1.55; p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: We found that the Xi robot allowed for improvements in peri-operative outcomes as compared to the Si platform, with lower rate of positive margins for RARP and higher rate of off-clamp procedures for RAPN. Hospital stay was also shorter for patients operated with the Xi vs. Si robot, especially after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Awaiting future investigations-in particular, cost analyses-these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers.

A comparative analysis of the HUGOTM robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the outcomes of Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) performed using the novel HUGOTM Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System with the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system. METHODS: Data from 38 women undergoing RASC for a ≥ 2-grade pelvic organ prolapse were collected (2021-2023). RESULTS: Overall, 23 (60.5%) and 15 (39.5%) procedures were performed using the DaVinci® Xi and the HUGOTM RAS system, respectively. The median total operative time was 123 (IQR:106.5-140.5) minutes for the DaVinci® Xi versus 120 (IQR:120-146) minutes for the HUGOTM RAS cases (p = 0.5). No conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery, perioperative complications, or system failures occurred. No differences were recorded according to day of catheter removal and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first worldwide comparison of RASC executed using the HUGOTM RAS versus the Da Vinci® Xi System. Our data suggest that RASC might be performed with both robotic platforms with similar perioperative outcomes.

Different approaches for bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the Aalst technique

ABSTRACT Introduction: Bladder neck dissection is one of the most delicate surgical steps of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) [1, 2], and it may affect surgical margins rate and functional outcomes [3, 4]. Given the relationship between outcomes and surgical experience [5-7], it is crucial to implement a step-by-step approach for each surgical step of the procedure, especially in the most challenging part of the intervention. In this video compilation, we described the techniques for bladder neck dissection utilized at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium). Surgical Technique: We illustrated five different techniques for bladder neck dissection during RARP. The anterior technique tackles the bladder neck from above until the urethral catheter is visualized, and then the dissection is completed posteriorly. The lateral and postero-lateral approaches involve the identification of a weakness point at the prostate-vesical junction and aim to develop the posterior plane - virtually until the seminal vesicles - prior to the opening of the urethra anteriorly. Finally, we described our techniques for bladder neck dissection in more challenging cases such as in patients with bulky middle lobes and prior surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. All approaches follow anatomic landmarks to minimize positive surgical margins and aim to preserve the bladder neck in order to promote optimal functional recovery. All procedures were performed with DaVinci robotic platforms using a 3-instruments configuration (scissors, fenestrated bipolar, and needle driver). As standard protocol at our Institution, urinary catheter was removed on postoperative day two [8]. Conclusions: Five different approaches for bladder neck dissection during RARP were described in this video compilation. We believe that the technical details provided here might be of help for clinicians who are starting their practice with this surgical intervention.

Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy with Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Step-by-Step Description of Two Different Techniques.

Introduction: There are only a few clinical data on nononcologic procedures performed with the new Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery (RAS) system. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is a minimally invasive treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and it demonstrated equal early functional and better perioperative outcomes as compared with open simple prostatectomy. In this article, we reported the first large series of RASP performed with Hugo RAS system. Methods: This Supplementary Video S1 is a step-by-step description of two different techniques for RASP. We analyzed the data of 20 consecutive patients who underwent RASP at OLV Hospital (Belgium) between February 2022 and March 2023. Patients baseline characteristics, perioperative and pathologic, and 1-month postoperative outcomes were reported, using the median (interquartile range [IQR]) and frequencies, as appropriate. Results: Median age (IQR) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) were 72 (67-76) years, and 7.7 (5.0-13.4) ng/mL, respectively. A total of 11 patients experienced an episode of preoperative acute urinary retention, and 8 men had an indwelling bladder catheter at the time of the surgery. No intraoperative complication occurred, and there was no need for conversion to open surgery. Median operative and console time were 165 (121-180) and 125 (101-148) minutes. On the first postoperative day the urethral catheter was removed in 80% of the patients. Median length of stay was 3 (3-4) days. Three patients had minor postoperative complications. On final pathology report, median prostate volume was 120 (101-154) g. On postoperative uroflowmetry, median Qmax and postvoid residual were 16 (13-26) mL/s and 15 (0-34) mL, respectively. Conclusions: This series represents the first report of surgical outcomes of RASP executed with Hugo RAS system. Awaiting study with longer follow-up, our study suggests that Hugo RAS has multiple applications, and it can ensure optimal outcomes in nononcologic procedures.

Different approaches for bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the Aalst technique.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder neck dissection is one of the most delicate surgical steps of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) [1, 2], and it may affect surgical margins rate and functional outcomes [3, 4]. Given the relationship between outcomes and surgical experience [5-7], it is crucial to implement a step-by-step approach for each surgical step of the procedure, especially in the most challenging part of the intervention. In this video compilation, we described the techniques for bladder neck dissection utilized at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We illustrated five different techniques for bladder neck dissection during RARP. The anterior technique tackles the bladder neck from above until the urethral catheter is visualized, and then the dissection is completed posteriorly. The lateral and postero-lateral approaches involve the identification of a weakness point at the prostate-vesical junction and aim to develop the posterior plane - virtually until the seminal vesicles - prior to the opening of the urethra anteriorly. Finally, we described our techniques for bladder neck dissection in more challenging cases such as in patients with bulky middle lobes and prior surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. All approaches follow anatomic landmarks to minimize positive surgical margins and aim to preserve the bladder neck in order to promote optimal functional recovery. All procedures were performed with DaVinci robotic platforms using a 3-instruments configuration (scissors, fenestrated bipolar, and needle driver). As standard protocol at our Institution, urinary catheter was removed on postoperative day two [8]. CONCLUSIONS: Five different approaches for bladder neck dissection during RARP were described in this video compilation. We believe that the technical details provided here might be of help for clinicians who are starting their practice with this surgical intervention.

Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo RAS Surgical System: Initial Experience at a High-volume Robotic Center.

Clinical data on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed with the new Hugo robot-assisted surgery (RAS) system are scarce. We described surgical outcomes of 112 consecutive patients who underwent RARP ± extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND) at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between February and November 2022. The median age was 65 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 60-70) and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.9 ng/ml (5.8-10.7). Thirty-eight patients (34%) had International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥3 tumor on prostate biopsy. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, 26 (23%) patients had a suspicion of extraprostatic disease. The median operative time was 180 min (IQR 145-200) and 27 men (24%) underwent ePLND. On final pathology, 34 patients (31%) had extraprostatic disease and ten (9%) had positive surgical margins. The median number of nodes removed was 15 (IQR 9-19). Among men with data available on the first PSA after surgery, 88% (60/68) had undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/ml). The probability of urinary continence (UC) recovery was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-47%) at 1 mo and 81% (95% CI 72-89%) at 3 mo. The median time to UC recovery was 36 d (95% CI 34-44). This is the first report of data on UC recovery and surgical pathology for patients undergoing RARP for prostate cancer performed with the Hugo RAS robotic system. Future investigations with longer follow-up are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe surgical outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate for cancer performed with the Hugo RAS robotic system at our institution. In our experience this platform provided adequate results in terms of surgical results and early recovery of urinary continence. Studies with longer follow-up are awaited.

Robot-assisted sutureless partial nephrectomy for the treatment of fifteen bilateral renal masses in a patient with Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: a case report from a high-volume robotic center.

Renal cell carcinoma is among major causes of death in patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome, and it usually presents with multiple and bilateral lesions that may require multiple renal surgeries. This, in turn, may compromise renal function, resulting in end-stage renal disease. To minimize renal function impairment in these patients, great importance is given to the preservation of functional parenchyma with the use of nephron-sparing techniques. Furthermore, new techniques such as off-clamp surgery, selective suturing or sutureless techniques may improve long-term functional outcomes. We described the case of a 27-year-old male patient with a family history of VHL disease affected by multiple, bilateral renal masses. He received bilateral, metachronous robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN) for a total of 15 renal lesions. No intra- or post-operative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged on the second postoperative day after both procedures. Serum creatinine after the second RAPN was 0.99 mg/dl (baseline value was 1.11 mg/dl). In patients with VHL syndrome and multiple renal lesions, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, especially with the use of clampless and sutureless techniques, helps minimizing renal function impairment and should be performed when anatomically and technically feasible.

Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center.

Introduction and Hypothesis: Robotic sacropexy (RSC) emerged in the last years as a valid alternative to the laparoscopic technique. However, the robotic approach is still limited by platform availability and concerns about cost-effectiveness. Recently, new robotic platforms joined the market, lowering the costs and offering the possibility to expand the robotic approach. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of the procedure with this new platform along with the description of our surgical setting. Materials and Methods: We reported data on the first five consecutive patients who underwent RSC at Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital (Aalst, Belgium), performed with the novel HUGO™ Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System. The platform consists of four fully independent carts, an open console, and a system tower equipped for both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. We collected patients' characteristics, intraoperative data, intraoperative complications, and clashes of instruments. Results: All procedures were completed according to the same surgical setting and technique. No need for conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery and/or for additional port placement was required. No intraoperative complications, instrument clashes, or system failure that compromised the surgery's completion were recorded. Median interquartile range docking, operative, and console time were 8 (6-9), 130 (115-165), and 80 (80-115) minutes, respectively. Conclusion: This series represents the first worldwide report of a robot-assisted sacropexy executed with the novel HUGO RAS System. Awaiting future investigation, this preliminary experience provides relevant data in terms of operative room settings and perioperative outcomes that might be helpful for future adopters of this platform.

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with the novel HUGO™ RAS System: feasibility, setting, and perioperative outcomes.

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has demonstrated better peri-operative outcomes as compared to open simple prostatectomy. However, RASP is still limited by platform availability and cost-effectiveness issues. The new surgical robots increasing competition may spread the robotic approach also in non-oncological fields. We reported the first RASP executed in Europe at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) performed with the novel HUGO™ Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System. The platform consists of four independent carts, an open console, and a system tower equipped for both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Our main goal was to demonstrate the technical feasibility of RASP with the novel HUGO™ RAS along with its safety in terms of perioperative outcomes and complications. We also aimed to describe our surgical setup. We collected patient's baseline characteristics, intraoperative and perioperative complications, postoperative outcomes, docking time, operative time, clashing of the instruments, or technical errors of the system. The procedure was performed in a 72-year-old male with a prostate volume of 155 g at preoperative imaging. No need for conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery and/or for additional port placement was required. No intraoperative complications, instrument clashes, or failure of the system that compromised the completion of the surgery were recorded. Docking, operative, and console times were 9, 150, and 120 minutes, respectively. The catheter was removed on the second postoperative day. No postoperative complications occurred. The postoperative uroflowmetry revealed a maximum flow of 26.2 mL/s, without postvoid residual volume. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with the HUGO™ RAS System is a feasible and safe procedure in terms of perioperative outcomes and complications. Our setup allowed for a rapid docking procedure and a smoothly completion of the surgery.