Transformative Learning Emerging From Challenges First-Year Students Experienced.

INTRODUCTION: Doctor of physical therapy (PT) (DPT) programs are rigorous, and students report facing overwhelming challenges. Faculty may not be cognizant of the extent of these challenges and miss opportunities to support student learning. The purpose of this article is to describe factors affecting student coping abilities and the lessons they learned from managing their self-identified challenges. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: Given the growing body of evidence surrounding mental health issues in DPT students, educators are exploring ways to support student well-being and promote their professional development. SUBJECTS: This study is a component of a larger multisite study of first-year DPT students from 3 private universities. METHODS: Participants submitted written narratives in response to a critical incident questionnaire designed to better understand first-year challenges. Responses were deidentified, researchers were blinded to participation, and confidentiality was maintained throughout. A consensus-driven interpretivist approach to qualitative data analysis was used. Strategies to ensure trustworthiness included triangulation of researchers, peer review, prolonged engagement, and use of thick rich descriptions. RESULTS: Seventy responses were analyzed. Two major themes are presented: (1) students described factors internal and external to the learning environment that inhibited and facilitated their ability to cope with challenges and (2) students shared academic successes and lessons learned from overcoming challenges, including the development of new behaviors, enhanced self-awareness, and personal and professional growth. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Building on previous work, analysis of the lived experiences of first-year DPT students revealed a process of transformational learning through challenge. This process highlights the importance of recognizing and supporting the significant incidental learning that occurs in our students during their journey through PT school. Faculty focusing solely on content knowledge, skills, and even critical thinking may not recognize and support the incidental learning occurring and may be missing significant transformational learning opportunities.

How Do Standardized Patients Form Their Complex Identities? The Impact of Interactions With Medical Students.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the nature of standardized patient (SP) identity and its formation. Understanding identity and formation can have important implications for recruiting, working with, and retaining SPs. Social relational theory explains how identity is formed in a social context in relationship with others. In keeping with social relational theory, this study explored SP identity formation through the SP experience with one of the most important elements of their social context-medical students. METHODS: Using qualitative methods, we conducted four 1-hour semistructured focus group interviews with SPs (N = 18). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a constant comparative approach and consensus development to analyze the data and identify codes, categories, and ultimately themes. We used multiple methods to ensure credibility and trustworthiness of the study, as well as transparency of methods and thick rich descriptions to enable readers to judge transferability of the findings and conclusions. RESULTS: We identified 4 major themes. Through their interactions, SPs experienced: (1) identity transformation toward a new professional identity; (2) self-actualization toward their maximum potential; (3) judgmental reactions to medical student behaviors; and (4) simulation-reality interaction between their simulated and real selves. CONCLUSIONS: Through their interactions with medical students, SPs experienced a transformation into a complex identity composed of multiple roles. Within this identity, they found purpose, fulfillment, and self-actualization through fostering students', as well as their own, personal, and professional growth and through developing a higher sense of social responsibility. Within this identity, they also encountered the challenges of navigating between judging and supporting medical students, and toggling between their real and simulated selves. Guided by the SPs' perspectives, and in conjunction with professional organizational standards, we provide recommendations for training, recruitment, and retention of SPs.

Physical Therapist, Physical Therapist Assistant, and Student Response to Inappropriate Patient Sexual Behavior: Results of a National Survey.

Background: A recent survey found that 84% of physical therapist, physical therapist assistant, and student respondents experienced inappropriate patient sexual behavior (IPSB) over their careers and 47% over the prior 12 months. Prevalence data justify consideration of how to address IPSB. Objective: The objective was to determine how physical therapist clinicians (used here to mean physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and students) address IPSB and examine strategy impact. Design: The design was observational and cross-sectional. Methods: Several sections of the American Physical Therapy Association and selected education programs fielded the electronic survey. Respondents reported on the frequency and effect of IPSB response strategy. Response-strategy impact was tested for statistical significance. Open-ended comments were analyzed using qualitative methods. Results: Of 1027 respondents, 396 had experienced IPSB over the prior 12 months; 391 provided data on the frequency and effect of response strategies used. Common informal responses included distraction, ignoring IPSB, and altering treatment to avoid physical contact or being alone. Common formal responses included reporting the behavior within the facility and documenting the behavior. Successful strategies included distraction, avoidance, direct confrontation, behavioral contracts, transfer of care, and chaperone use. Experienced clinicians were more likely to be direct, whereas novice clinicians were more likely to engage in unsuccessful actions of ignoring and joking. Limitations: Limitations included self-report, clinician memory, and convenience sampling. Conclusions: The first findings in 20 years on physical therapist, physical therapist assistant, and student response to IPSB provide direction for the profession. Results indicate a need for clear workplace policies coupled with training for managers and supervisors to support clinicians in resolving IPSB. Policies on using behavioral contracts, chaperones, and transfer of care could empower staff to consider these successful options. Professional education and training for all physical therapy professionals on assertive communication and redirection strategies with IPSB appears warranted.

Preparing Interprofessional Faculty to Be Humanistic Mentors for Medical Students: The GW-Gold Mentor Development Program.

INTRODUCTION: The GW-Gold Humanistic Mentor Development Program addresses the challenge faced by medical schools to educate faculty to prepare students for humanistic practice. Grounded in Branch's Teaching Professional and Humanistic Values model, the program prepares interprofessional faculty mentoring teams in humanistic communities of practice. The teams consist of physician-psychosocial professional pairs, each mentoring a small student group in their professional development course. Through GW-Gold workshops, faculty mentors develop interprofessional humanistic communities of practice, preparing them to lead second such communities with their students. This article describes the program and its evaluation. METHODS: To assess outcomes and better understand the mentor experience, we used a mixed-method validating triangulation design consisting of simultaneous collection of quantitative (mentor and student surveys) and qualitative (open-ended survey questions and focus group) data. Data were analyzed in parallel and merged at the point of interpretation, allowing for triangulation and validation of outcomes. RESULTS: Mentors rated the program highly, gained confidence in their humanistic skills, and received high scores from students. Three themes emerged that validated program design, confirmed outcomes, and expanded on the mentor experience: (1) Interprofessional faculty communities developed through observation, collaboration, reflection, and dialogue; (2) Humanistic mentors created safe environments for student engagement; and (3) Engaging in interprofessional humanistic communities of practice expanded mentors' personal and professional identities. DISCUSSION: Outcomes support the value of the GW-Gold program's distinctive features in preparing faculty to sustain humanism in medical education: an interprofessional approach and small communities of practice built on humanistic values.

Systems Thinking and Systems-Based Practice Across the Health Professions: An Inquiry Into Definitions, Teaching Practices, and Assessment.

Phenomenon: Systems thinking is the cornerstone of systems-based practice (SBP) and a core competency in medicine and health sciences. Literature regarding how to teach or apply systems thinking in practice is limited. This study aimed to understand how educators in medicine, physical therapy, physician assistant, nursing, and speech-language pathology education programs teach and assess systems thinking and SBP. APPROACH: Twenty-six educators from seven different degree programs across the five professions were interviewed and program descriptions and relevant course syllabi were reviewed. Qualitative analysis was iterative and incorporated inductive and deductive methods as well as a constant comparison of units of data to identify patterns and themes. FINDINGS: Six themes were identified: 1) participants described systems thinking as ranging across four major levels of healthcare (i.e., patient, care team, organization, and external environment); 2) participants associated systems thinking with a wide range of activities across the curriculum including quality improvement, Inter-professional education (IPE), error mitigation, and advocacy; 3) the need for healthcare professionals to understand systems thinking was primarily externally driven; 4) participants perceived that learning systems thinking occurred mainly informally and experientially rather than through formal didactic instruction; 5) participants characterized systems thinking content as interspersed across the curriculum and described a variety of strategies for teaching and assessing it; 6) participants indicated a structured framework and inter-professional approach may enhance teaching and assessment of systems thinking. Insights: Systems thinking means different things to different health professionals. Teaching and assessing systems thinking across the health professions will require further training and practice. Tools, techniques, taxonomies and expertise outside of healthcare may be used to enhance the teaching, assessment, and application of systems thinking and SBP to clinical practice; however, these would need to be adapted and refined for use in healthcare.

Prevalence and Risk of Inappropriate Sexual Behavior of Patients Toward Physical Therapist Clinicians and Students in the United States.

BACKGROUND: For health care providers in the United States, the risk for nonfatal violence in the workplace is 16 times greater than that for other workers. Inappropriate patient sexual behavior (IPSB) is directed at clinicians, staff, or other patients and may include leering, sexual remarks, deliberate touching, indecent exposure, and sexual assault. Inappropriate patient sexual behavior may adversely affect clinicians, the organization, or patients themselves. Few IPSB risk factors for physical therapists have been confirmed. The US prevalence was last assessed in the 1990s. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine career and 12-month exposure to IPSB among US physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, physical therapist students, and physical therapist assistant students and to identify IPSB risk factors. DESIGN: This was a retrospective and observational study. METHODS: An electronic survey was developed; content validity and test-retest reliability were established. Participants were recruited through physical therapist and physical therapist assistant academic programs and sections of the American Physical Therapy Association. Inappropriate patient sexual behavior risk models were constructed individually for any, mild, moderate, and severe IPSB events reported over the past 12 months. Open-ended comments were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-two physical therapist professionals and students completed the survey. The career prevalence among respondents was 84%, and the 12-month prevalence was 47%. Statistical risk modeling for any IPSB over the past 12 months indicated the following risks: having fewer years of direct patient care, routinely working with patients with cognitive impairments, being a female practitioner, and treating male patients. Qualitative analysis of 187 open-ended comments revealed patient-related characteristics, provider-related characteristics, and abusive actions. LIMITATIONS: Self-report, clinician memory, and convenience sampling are limitations of this type of survey research. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely high prevalence of IPSB among physical therapist professionals warrants practitioner and student education as well as clear workplace policy and support.

A Cloud With a Silver Lining: Helping Students Learn About Professionalism.

PROBLEM: Educators face many challenges in teaching professionalism. Despite attempts to define professionalism, it remains abstract for students and often not fully appreciated until they are in clinic. Without a way to make it personally relevant, students will likely be less motivated to learn. INTERVENTION: We used student-generated word clouds to facilitate reflection and discussions, thereby helping students make their perceptions of professionalism more explicit. Group discussion was followed by a 5-minute written reflection. Word clouds created in Semesters 1 and 7 enabled students to compare perceptions at two points in the curriculum. CONTEXT: The George Washington University Doctor of Physical Therapy Program is a 3-year, 8-semester, 109-credit postgraduate program that includes 34 weeks of clinical practice. Reflection is foundational to the curriculum, and students reflect on their learning and professional growth each semester. Historically, students were introduced to professionalism in Semester 1 using explicit instructional strategies. Despite the wealth of resources, readings, and discussions, engagement remained challenging. OUTCOME: Student-generated word clouds created a personally relevant visual from which uniquely designed prompts were created to facilitate discussion. Having students compare word clouds across semesters enabled them to identify what, when, how, and where they learned about professionalism. Word clouds, categorized words, and 5-minute written reflections provided evidence of individual and collective changes in student perceptions. LESSONS LEARNED: Students will engage in rich discussions on professionalism if it is personally relevant. Anonymity can foster discussion on personal characteristics and biases. Visualization of student-generated, narrative data enhanced reflection and discussion. Comparing word clouds from two points in time helped students articulate changes in their perceptions of professionalism. A 5-minute reflection can be a powerful learning tool for students and faculty. Outcomes demonstrated the value of designing interventions grounded in the educational principles.

How learning transfers: a study of how graduates of a faculty education fellowship influenced the behaviors and practices of their peers and organizations.

PURPOSE: Faculty development programs have been criticized for their limited assessment methods, focused only on the learners and limited to satisfaction measures or self-reported behavior changes. Assessment of organizational impact is lacking. This study explored the impact of faculty education fellowship graduates on their organization and how that impact occurred. METHOD: The design was a qualitative study of 13 departments across three institutions, partnered with the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. In-depth interviews with 13 supervisors and 25 peers of graduates were conducted in fall 2012 to examine graduates' organizational impact related to program purposes: enhancing teaching skills, pursuing scholarship in education, and developing leadership potential. Triangulation, purposive sampling, rich descriptions, and member checks minimized bias and optimized transferability. RESULTS: A model of how graduates of a faculty education fellowship transfer learning to peers and their organizations emerged. Analysis of interview responses showed that in the presence of environmental facilitators, graduates exhibited enhanced confidence and five new behaviors. Graduates raised peer awareness, leading to changes in individual and group practices and development of shared peer understanding. Analysis suggests they facilitated a culture of continuous learning around teaching, scholarship, and leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study enhances traditional assessment of faculty education fellowship programs by examining the impact that graduates had on peers and work groups. A model is proposed for how graduates interact with and impact work group processes and practices. This model can facilitate more comprehensive program assessments, which can demonstrate program impact beyond the individual participant.

Out-of-school genomics program for young women demystifies genomics and fosters interest in biomedical sciences.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) plays a critical role in personalized medicine; however, most healthcare practitioners lack the training and confidence in PGx required to fully utilize its potential. Although continuing education and inclusion of PGx into the professional curricula will begin to address this deficiency, PGx education at the secondary and postsecondary levels would demystify PGx and pique interest at an academic stage that is key to funneling PGx curious students into the science and healthcare pipeline earlier. METHODS: This article describes the development and evaluation of a genomics outreach program targeted at young women in high school with the ultimate goal of recruiting students into an undergraduate PGx program and school of pharmacy. RESULTS: This program increased participants' genomics knowledge, influenced their careers interests, and imparted positive feelings towards a genomics-based and/or biomedical career. CONCLUSION: Genomics-based educational outreach programs geared towards secondary school students can increase interest in and confidence to pursue a PGx-centric degree/career. Original submitted 3 July 2013; Revision submitted 6 January 2014.

Learning clinical versus leadership competencies in the emergency department: strategies, challenges, and supports of emergency medicine residents.

BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine residents are expected to master 6 competencies that include clinical and leadership skills. To date, studies have focused primarily on teaching strategies, for example, what attending physicians should do to help residents learn. Residents' own contributions to the learning process remain largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to explore what emergency medicine residents believe helps them learn the skills required for practice in the emergency department. METHODS: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with emergency medicine residents at a major academic medical center. Twelve residents participated, and 11 additional residents formed a validation group. We used phenomenologic techniques to guide the data analysis and techniques such as triangulation and member checks to ensure the validity of the findings. RESULTS: We found major differences in the strategies residents used to learn clinical versus leadership skills. Clinical skill learning was approached with rigor and involved a large number of other physicians, while leadership skill learning was unplanned and largely relied on nursing personnel. In addition, with each type of skills, different aspects of the residents' personalities, motivation, and past nonclinical experiences supported or challenged their learning process. CONCLUSION: The approaches to learning leadership skills are not well developed among emergency medicine residents and result in a narrow perspective on leadership. This may be because of the lack of formal leadership training in medical school and residency, or it may reflect assumptions regarding how leadership skills develop. Substantial opportunity exists for enhancing emergency medicine residents' learning of leadership skills as well as the teaching of these skills by the attending physicians and nurses who facilitate their learning.

Peer-facilitated virtual action learning: reflecting on critical incidents during a pediatric clerkship.

OBJECTIVES: Action learning (AL) facilitates reflection, critical thinking, and learning while solving real-world problems. Virtual AL is an asynchronous collaborative process that encourages students to analyze their critical incidents and learn from these experiences. The researchers sought to: 1) determine whether medical students engaged in peer-facilitated virtual action learning (VAL) demonstrated reflection and critical thinking around complex issues during their pediatric clerkship; and 2) identify challenges students face during their clerkships. METHODS: Seventy clerkship students were introduced to reflection and participated in VAL by using an electronic discussion board. Each posted 1 critical incident and group members responded with thought-provoking questions and comments to facilitate reflection and analysis. Weekly, students who posted incidents revisited their incidents, pondered the questions posed, and wrote essays summarizing their reflections and insights gained. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Seventy incidents, 210 responses, and 70 revised incidents/essays were analyzed. Outcomes included broadened perspectives (44/70), questioned assumptions (12/70), and reconfirmed thinking (14/70). Content themes included communication, role identification, medical treatment concerns, and limited voice and power. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the students engaged in VAL demonstrated reflection on complex clinical issues. Themes portrayed struggles encountered and exposed issues in the hidden curriculum, suggesting a lack of voice and power that may lead to missed learning opportunities. Discussion threads offered the clerkship director insights into the overall student experience to improve future clerkship experiences.

Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified Bloom's Taxonomy.

OBJECTIVE: Reflection enables learners to analyze their experiences and capture the wisdom that lies within. Effective teaching requires reliable methods of assessment. Several methods of assessing reflective writing have been described; however, they often require significant training, and reliability has seldom been assessed. This study was designed to determine the interrater reliability of a method of assessing reflective writing by using a modified Bloom's Taxonomy. METHODS: Twenty-one third-year medical students maintained reflective journals throughout their pediatric clerkship. A coding schema based on Bloom's Taxonomy was developed to assess the level of cognitive processing evident in the journals. Journals were independently assessed by 3 raters. Percent agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [2,1]) were used to assess interrater reliability. RESULTS: Three hundred eight entries from 21 journals were assessed. Percent agreement ranged from 78.2% to 100%. Kappa statistic for each level ranged from 0.57 +/- 0.04 to 0.73 +/- 0.04, and for the highest level of processing evident it ranged from 0.52 +/- .04 to 0.58 +/- 0.04. ICC (2,1) for each level of cognitive processing ranged from 0.62 (F = 6.20; P = .000) to 1.00, and for the highest level of cognitive processing evident, it was 0.79 (F = 12.42; P = .000). Substantial to almost perfect agreement was attained. CONCLUSIONS: Reflective journals allow learners to revisit their experiences for critical analysis and deeper learning. This study describes a reliable method, based on Bloom's Taxonomy, of determining whether learners have achieved higher order thinking through reflective journal writing. This method can provide a baseline for facilitating higher order processing, critical thinking, and reflective practice.

A method for assessing reflective journal writing.

Reflection is widely accepted as a learning tool and is considered integral to professional practice. Journal writing is advocated in facilitating reflection, yet little is written about how to assess reflection in journals. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a method of assessing the elements of reflection in journals and to determine whether, and to what level, reflection occurs in journals. Twenty-seven physical therapy students maintained written reflective journals throughout three of their four eight-week clinical affiliations. The students were introduced to concepts of reflective practice with definitions of terms and reflective questions before their second affiliation. A coding schema was developed to assess the journals. Three raters assessed forty-three journals. The text of each journal was analyzed for evidence of nine elements of reflection, and each journal was categorized as showing no evidence of reflection, evidence of reflection, or evidence of critical reflection. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate evidence of reflection. Reliability between each pair of raters was assessed using percent agreement, phi coefficients, and gamma statistics. Interrater reliability of all raters was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC[2,1]). Results showed that the raters assessed 95.3%-100% of the journals as showing at least one element of reflection. The percent agreement between rater pairs for the nine elements of reflection ranged from 65.1% to 93.0%, the phi coefficient ranged from 0.08 to 0.81, and the ICC(2,1) values used to assess reliability among the three raters on each element ranged from 0.03 to 0.72. Averaging the assessment of the three raters for the overall journal, 14.7% of the journals were assessed as showing no evidence of reflection, 43.4% as showing evidence of reflection, and 41.9% as showing evidence of critical reflection. The percent agreement between rater pairs for the overall assessment of the journals ranged from 67.4% to 85.7%, the gamma statistic ranged from 0.88 to 0.98, and the ICC(2,1) among all raters was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.84). These results represent an acceptable level of agreement for use of this method of assessment for educational purposes. The coding schema developed provides a mechanism to assess evidence of reflection in written journals, which will enable instructors to evaluate student competency, obtain a baseline for facilitating reflective practice, and assess their own efficacy in facilitating reflection among students.