RESUMEN
The use of new technologies, such as virtual reality (VR), represents a promising strategy in the rehabilitation of subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We present the results obtained by administering the IAmHero tool through VR to a cohort of subjects with ADHD between 5 and 12 years of age. The trial time was approximately 6 months. In order to assess the beneficial effects of the treatment, standardised tests assessing both ADHD symptoms and executive functions (e.g., Conners-3 scales) were administered both before and at the end of the sessions. Improvements were observed at the end of treatment in both ADHD symptoms (especially in the hyperactivity/impulsivity domain) and executive functions. One of the strengths of the VR approach is related above all to the acceptability of this tool and its flexibility. Unfortunately, to date, there are still few studies on this topic; therefore, future studies are essential to expand our knowledge on the utility and benefits of these technologies in the rehabilitation field.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Función EjecutivaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic are documented in the general population. Such heterogeneity has not been systematically assessed in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). To identify distinct patterns of the pandemic impact and their predictors in ASD/NDD youth, we focused on pandemic-related changes in symptoms and access to services. METHODS: Using a naturalistic observational design, we assessed parent responses on the Coronavirus Health and Impact Survey Initiative (CRISIS) Adapted For Autism and Related neurodevelopmental conditions (AFAR). Cross-sectional AFAR data were aggregated across 14 European and North American sites yielding a clinically well-characterized sample of N = 1275 individuals with ASD/NDD (age = 11.0 ± 3.6 years; n females = 277). To identify subgroups with differential outcomes, we applied hierarchical clustering across eleven variables measuring changes in symptoms and access to services. Then, random forest classification assessed the importance of socio-demographics, pre-pandemic service rates, clinical severity of ASD-associated symptoms, and COVID-19 pandemic experiences/environments in predicting the outcome subgroups. RESULTS: Clustering revealed four subgroups. One subgroup-broad symptom worsening only (20%)-included youth with worsening across a range of symptoms but with service disruptions similar to the average of the aggregate sample. The other three subgroups were, relatively, clinically stable but differed in service access: primarily modified services (23%), primarily lost services (6%), and average services/symptom changes (53%). Distinct combinations of a set of pre-pandemic services, pandemic environment (e.g., COVID-19 new cases, restrictions), experiences (e.g., COVID-19 Worries), and age predicted each outcome subgroup. LIMITATIONS: Notable limitations of the study are its cross-sectional nature and focus on the first six months of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitantly assessing variation in changes of symptoms and service access during the first phase of the pandemic revealed differential outcome profiles in ASD/NDD youth. Subgroups were characterized by distinct prediction patterns across a set of pre- and pandemic-related experiences/contexts. Results may inform recovery efforts and preparedness in future crises; they also underscore the critical value of international data-sharing and collaborations to address the needs of those most vulnerable in times of crisis.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Trastorno Autístico , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Salud Mental , COVID-19/epidemiología , Trastorno Autístico/epidemiología , Pandemias , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/terapia , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
Objectives: We designed a multicentre open prospective randomized trial to evaluate the risk-benefit profile of two different initial treatment schemes with levothyroxine (L-T4), 10-12.5 µg/kg/day vs 12.6-15 µg/kg/day, on growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) detected by neonatal screening to identify the best range dose to achieve optimal neurocognitive development. Design patients and methods: Children detected by neonatal screening were randomly assigned to receive an initial L-T4 dose of 10-12.5 µg/kg/day (Low) or 12.6-15 µg/kg/day (High). All patients underwent periodical clinical examination with measurement of growth parameters and measurement of TSH and FT4. Neurocognitive development was evaluated at the age of 24 months using Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS) and cognitive and behavioral assessment was performed at 48 months of age using Wechsler Preschool and Primary scale of Intelligence (WIPPSI-III). The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05371262). Results: Treatment schemes below or above 12.5 µg/kg/day were both associated with rapid normalization of TSH and thyroid hormone levels in most patients with no differences in the risk of over- and under-treatment episodes in the first months of life. Growth parameters were normal and comparable between the two groups. Developmental quotients at 24 months of age were normal in both groups (Low 100.6 ± 15.5 vs High 96.9 ± 16.6). Likewise, at 4 years of age IQ and subtest scores were comparable between patients from Low and High (Total IQ 104.2 ± 11.4 vs 101.0 ± 20.3, Verbal IQ 103.9 ± 11.5 vs 98.7 ± 15.1, Performance IQ 105.3 ± 10.4 vs 100.3 ± 19.8). 6/45 CH patients (13.3%) showed a total IQ below 85 (73.7 ± 5.9) regardless of age at diagnosis, L-T4 starting dose, time of FT4 and TSH normalization and episodes of over and undertreatment. Worse socioeconomic status and delayed bone age at diagnosis were the only predictors of an increased risk of having suboptimal IQ at 24 and IQ at 48 months. Conclusions: Our results indicate that initial treatment with L-T4, 10-12.5 µg/kg/day vs 12.6-15 µg/kg/day, are both associated with normal growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with CH detected by neonatal screening. Further studies with a long-term follow-up on a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these results. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05371262?term=NCT05371262&draw=2&rank=1 identifer NCT05371262.
Asunto(s)
Hipotiroidismo Congénito , Tiroxina , Preescolar , Hipotiroidismo Congénito/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Hormonas Tiroideas/uso terapéutico , Tirotropina , Tiroxina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term consequences of mild subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) in children are still unclear, and the need for levothyroxine (L-T4) supplementation remains controversial. We designed a 2-year, case-control, prospective study of a cohort of children with SH to evaluate the effects of L-T4 therapy on neurocognitive outcome. METHODS: Thirty-four children, age 9.1â ±â 2.6 years, with long-lasting, idiopathic, and mild SH, and 34 healthy matched controls, were enrolled. Twenty SH children underwent a 2-year L-T4 treatment (group A), whereas 14 refused treatment and were reevaluated after a 2-year-follow-up (group B). IQ and specific cognitive domains were evaluated in all children at study entry and after 2 years of therapy (group A) or observation (group B) in SH individuals. RESULTS: In SH children baseline IQ scores were normal and comparable to controls (full-scale IQ [FSIQ] 100.4â ±â 11.3 vs 101.8â ±â 14.2, verbal IQ [VIQ] 99.7â ±â 13.7 vs 98.3â ±â 14.9 and performance IQ [PIQ] 101.2â ±â 10.4 vs 105â ±â 10.4).In group A, L-T4 treatment was associated with normalization of thyrotropin (6.3â ±â 1.0 mIU/L at baseline vs 2.8â ±â 1.4 mIU/L at 2 years, Pâ <â .001). However, 2-year L-T4 therapy was not associated with a change in IQ scores (FSIQ 104.4â ±â 13.8 vs 102.7â ±â 11.0; VIQ 101.8â ±â 14.9 vs 102.3â ±â 11.9; and PIQ 106.5â ±â 13.9 vs 102.7â ±â 10.7) or in verbal or performance subtest scores. No significant differences were found in IQ scores after 2 years of treatment in group A compared to group B after a 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest neurocognitive function in children is not impaired by persistent, mild, untreated SH and is not significantly modified by 2-year L-T4 supplementation.
Asunto(s)
Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Hipotiroidismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Inteligencia/efectos de los fármacos , Tiroxina/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The treatment of children with subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) is controversial for TSH values between 4.5 and 10âmU/l. The aim of this cross-sectional, controlled study was to evaluate growth and intellectual outcome in children with persistent SH who have never been treated with levothyroxine. DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical and auxological parameters, thyroid function, and intellectual outcome were evaluated in 36 children with persistent SH at the age of 9.7±0.6 (range 4-18.0) years. Children had been followed longitudinally for 3.3±0.3 (range 2.0-9.3) years, from first diagnosis of SH until enrollment in the study. Thirty-six age- and sex-matched children were enrolled in the study as controls. RESULTS: At study entry, height (-0.8±0.2 SDS), bone age/chronological age (BA/CA ratio 0.92±0.6), and body mass index (BMI -0.1±0.2 SDS) in SH children were normal. Despite long-term duration of SH, none of these parameters showed a worsening with respect to height (-0.7±0.2 SDS), BA/CA (0.97±0.03), and BMI (-0.1±0.2) at the time of first SH detection. None of the children showed overt signs or symptoms of hypothyroidism during the follow-up. Verbal (99.1±2.2), performance (100.4±1.9), and full-scale (99.7±1.9) intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in SH children were normal and comparable to those of controls. No relationship was detected between IQ scores and the degree or duration of SH. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent SH in children is not associated with alterations in growth, bone maturation, BMI, and cognitive function or other complaints that could be ascribed to SH even after several years without therapeutic intervention.