RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan in the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence after radically treated prostate cancer (PCa), as compared to histology. The secondary goal is to depict spreading patterns of metastatic LNs in recurrent PCa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single center retrospective study comprising of 30 patients who underwent retroperitoneal and/or pelvic salvage lymph node dissection (LND) due to 11C-choline PET/CT-positive nodal recurrences after radical treatment (median Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) 1.5 ng/ml, range 0.2-11.4). Positive nodes on the preoperative PET/CT scans were mapped and compared to post-operative pathology results.LNs were marked as true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative and a patient- and a region-based analysis was performed. Sensitivity, specificity and positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty positive LNs were detected on PET/CT with a median number of two positive nodes per patient (range 1-6). In 29 patients, a super-extended pelvic LND (PLND) was performed combined with a retroperitoneal LND (RPLND) in 13 of those cases. One patient underwent an inguinal LND. One hundred thirty-seven of 644 resected LNs contained metastases. The 11C-choline PET/CT scan correctly predicted 31 positive nodes (55%) while 25 nodes were falsely positive (45%). One hundred and six histologically proven metastatic nodes were not detected on the 11C-choline PET/CT scan (77%). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the 11C-choline PET/CT were 23%, 95%, 55% and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 11C-choline PET/CT has a relatively low detection rate and a moderate PPV for metastatic LNs in patients with biochemical recurrence after radically treated PCa.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopy is a widespread surgical approach for many urological conditions. Achieving prof-ciency in laparoscopic surgery requires considerable effort due to the steep learning curve. Several residency programs include standardized laparoscopic training periods in their curricula. Our aim was to systematically analyze the evidence on the current status of training in laparoscopy in different residency programs in urology. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane library, in February 2018, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Statement. Identified reports were reviewed according to the previously defined inclusion criteria. Eight publications, comprising a total of 985 urology residents, were selected for inclusion in this analysis. RESULTS: There was a wide variation between training programs in terms of exposure to laparoscopy. Most residents considered that training in lap-aroscopy was inadequate during residency and had a low degree of confidence in independently performing laparo-scopic procedures by the end of the residency. Only North American residents reported high degrees of confidence in the possibility of performing laparoscopic procedures in the uture, whereas the remaining residents, namely from European countries, reported considerably lower degrees of confidence. CONCLUSION: There were considerable differences between national urology residency programs in terms of exposure to laparoscopy. Most residents would prefer higher exposure to laparoscopy throughout their residencies.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this paper is to compare oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) versus radical nephrectomy (RN) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) clinical stages ≥T1b, in a retrospective propensity-score matched cohort of a high-volume, tertiary referral center. This paper also aims to compare renal function and complication rates between groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our single-institution RCC database was queried to select patients with clinical stages defined by tumor size (T), lymph nodes(N), and metastasis (M) scores of T1b-4 N0 M0, that underwent PN or RN between 2000 and 2014. All images of patients that underwent RN were reviewed, and only patients deemed eligible for PN were included. Medical records were reviewed to obtain data on tumor characteristics, comorbidities, renal function, and complications. After propensity score matching, 152 patients (76 per group) were included in the final analysis. Primary outcomes were cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and clinical progression-free survival (CPFS). Secondary outcomes were renal function preservation and post-operative complication rates. RESULTS: Groups were propensity-score matched. The only parameters that were significantly different between groups were the median follow-up time (RN: 79 months, range 24.1-100.5 vs. PN: 38.5 months, range 20.5-72.1) and a better performance status in the RN group (p = 0.002). The five-year CPFS, CSS, and OS rates were 77.2%, 90.5%, and 86.4%, respectively, in the RN group, and 83.6%, 91.1%, and 82.0%, respectively, in the PN group (p = 0.33, p = 0.55, and p = 0.33, respectively). In the multivariate Cox model, the surgical method was not an independent predictor of CPFS, CSS, or OS. The RN group showed a significantly greater reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (RN: 14.1 vs. PN: 5.4 ml/min per 1.73 m²; p <0.03). There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.3). The main limitations of this study were its retrospective design and the medium-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the efficacy and safety of PN in patients with RCC in clinical stages ≥T1b. We observed no significant difference in oncological outcomes between the PN and RN groups at medium-term follow ups. The surgical method did not influence these outcomes. Renal function was preserved significantly more frequently in the PN than in the RN group, but the groups had similar complication rates.These findings suggested that PN could be considered an oncologically safe procedure for treating large RCC tumors; thus, PN should always be considered, when technically feasible, regardless of tumor stage.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: ⢠To investigate the pathological characteristics and the rates of biochemical recurrence (BCR) -free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: ⢠Of 4760 patients treated with RP for prostate cancer at three institutions, 293 patients (6.2%) had clinical stage T3, 269 (5.7%) had a biopsy Gleason sum ≥ 8, 370 (7.8%) had preoperative PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and 887 (18.6%) were considered high-risk according to the D'Amico classification (clinical stage ≥ T2c or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL or biopsy Gleason sum ≥ 8). ⢠Actuarial BCR-free survival probabilities after RP and the rate of favourable pathology (organ-confined cancer, negative surgical margin and Gleason ≤ 7) were assessed. RESULTS: ⢠Median follow up was 2.4 years and 1179 (24.8%) patients had follow up beyond 5 years. ⢠The rate of favourable pathology increased in the following order: clinical stage T3 (13.7%), biopsy Gleason ≥ 8 (16.4%), the D'Amico high-risk group (21.4%) and PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (21.6%). ⢠The 5-year BCR-free survival probabilities were 35.4% for Gleason ≥ 8, 39.8% for PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL, 47.4% for D'Amico high-risk group and 51.6% for clinical stage T3. ⢠Patients with only one risk factor had the most favourable 5-year BCR-free survival (50.3%), relative to patients with two or more risk factors (27.5%) CONCLUSIONS: ⢠Men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer do not have a uniformly poor prognosis after RP. ⢠The rate of favourable pathology and of BCR-free survival may vary substantially, depending on the definition used. ⢠RP should be considered a valid treatment modality for high-risk prostate cancer patients, as many can be surgically down-staged.