Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Low Flow Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Low-flow (LF) aortic stenosis (AS) is common among older adults and associated with worse outcomes than AS with normal stroke volume. It is unknown whether left ventricular (LV) remodeling identifies patients with LF AS at higher risk of complications. LV remodeling was evaluated in 463 patients with severe LF AS referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and classified as adaptive (normal geometry and concentric remodeling) or maladaptive (concentric and eccentric hypertrophy) using the American Society of Echocardiography gender-specific criteria. Of these, the 390 patients who underwent TAVR were followed for the end points of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The mean patient age was 79 (74.5 to 84) years. LV remodeling was adaptive in 57.4% (62 normal geometry, 162 concentric remodeling) and maladaptive in 42.6% (127 concentric hypertrophy, 39 eccentric hypertrophy). During a median follow-up of 3 years, 45 patients (11.5%) were hospitalized for HF and 73 (18.7%) died. After adjustment for widely used echocardiographic parameters, maladaptive remodeling was independently associated with HF hospitalization and death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.75, confidence interval 1.03 to 3.00). There was no significant difference between men and women in the association of maladaptive LV remodeling with the composite outcome (p = 0.40 for men and p = 0.06 for women). In conclusion, in patients with LF AS, maladaptive LV remodeling before TAVR is independently associated with higher incidences of postprocedural HF rehospitalization and death in both men and women. Assessment of LV remodeling has prognostic value over and above LV ejection fraction and may improve risk stratification for patients with LF AS.

Do we still need intra-procedural TTE during Transcatheter aortic valve replacement? A high volume, single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has undergone significant advances in recent years, with the development of improved pre-planning tools and devices. These advances have led to a reduction in the rate of paravalvular leak (PVL), a complication that is associated with poor outcomes even when mild. As some centers around the world are moving to solely fluoroscopy-focused implantation, we aimed to describe the clinical impact of intra-procedural transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) during TAVI in a high volume hospital. METHODS: Observational study during a 3-month period. A limited TTE examination was performed immediately after deployment to assess the existence of PVL and grade its severity. Complete TTE was performed a day after the procedure. In case of ≥mild PVL after valve deployment, a decision was made according to the severity of the PVL, patient anatomy and extent of annular calcification to preform balloon post-dilation. If done, an additional limited TTE was performed to assess possible complication and the degree of PVL post dilatation. RESULTS: 115 patient were included in the study. Intra-procedural TTE identified 16 patients (14 %) with at least mild PVL, three of them with moderate (3 %). Post balloon dilatation was performed in 10 patients (9 % of the cohort) with significant improvement in the degree of PVL. CONCLUSION: Intra-procedural TTE immediately after TAVI deployment can accurately identify PVL, allowing operators to perform post balloon dilatation with improvement in early echocardiographic results. Our findings support the routine use of TTE during procedures, without relying solely on fluoroscopy.

Severe functional mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

An 83-year-old woman with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis was referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Diagnostic left heart catheterization documented diffuse 3-vessel coronary artery disease.

Management of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Cardiovascular Interventions. Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Implications.

A substantial number of patients may experience systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and related adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Although a clear etiology has not been established, endothelial disruption and tissue-ischemic response secondary to the foreign material may represent the trigger events. A latency period (0 to 48 hours) may occur between the initial injury and onset of symptoms mirroring an initial local response followed by a systemic response. Clinical presentation can be mild or severe depending on external triggers and characteristics of the patient. Diagnosis is challenging because it simulates an infection, but lack of response to antibiotics, negative cultures are supportive of SIRS. Increased in-hospital stay, readmissions, major cardiovascular events, and reduced durability of the device used are the main complications. Treatment includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. In conclusion, further studies are warranted to fully explore pathophysiologic mechanisms underpinning SIRS and the possibility of enhancing device material immune compatibility to reduce the inflammatory reaction of the host tissue.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in patients with low-flow very low-gradient aortic stenosis.

AIMS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), low-flow low-gradient (LG) is a known predictor of worse outcomes. However, very LG may represent a distinct population with further cardiac dysfunction. It is unknown whether this population benefits from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to describe the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of low-flow very LG severe AS. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre study included all patients with low-flow severe AS between 2019 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups with very LG [mean pressure gradient (MPG) ≤ 20 mmHg], LG (20 < MPG < 40 mmHg), and high-gradient (HG) (MPG ≥ 40 mmHg). Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization was compared. A total of 662 patients [very LG 130 (20%); LG 339 (51%); HG 193 (29%)] were included. Median follow-up was 12 months. Very LG cohort had a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45% vs. 57% vs. 60%; P < 0.001). There was a graded increase in the risk of composite endpoint in the lower MPG strata (P < 0.001). Among those who underwent TAVR, very LG was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (adjusted HR 2.42 [1.29-4.55]). While LG and HG cohorts had decreased risk of composite endpoint after TAVR compared with conservative management, very LG was not associated with risk reduction (adjusted HR 0.69 [0.35-1.34]). CONCLUSION: Low-flow very LG severe AS represents a distinct population with significant comorbidities and worse outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the short- and long-term benefits of TAVR in this population.

Echo HALT: do we really need a cardiac CT?

Leaflet thrombosis is usually an incidental finding and Cardiac CT is the gold standard for its diagnosis, but the classic features of hypoattenuation leaflet thickening (HALT) and hypoattenuation affecting motion (HAM) can also be seen on echocardiography and more specifically on trans-esophageal echocardiography. We describe a case of transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis where both the diagnosis and treatment were based exclusively on the echocardiographic evaluation, without the need of cardiac CT, with good outcome for the patient.