Factors predicting survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients on non-invasive ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: Non invasive ventilation (NIV) improves quality of life and extends survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. However, few data exist about the factors related to survival. We intended to assess the predictive factors that influence survival in patients after NIV initiation. METHODS: Patients who started NIV from 2000 to 2014 and were tolerant (compliance ≥ 4 hours) were included; demographic, disease related and respiratory variables at NIV initiation were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier test and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: 213 patients were included with median survival from NIV initiation of 13.5 months. In univariate analysis, the identified risk factors for mortality were severity of bulbar involvement (HR 2), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % (HR 0.99) and ALSFRS-R (HR 0.97). Multivariate analysis showed that bulbar involvement (HR 1.92) and ALSFRS-R (HR 0.97) were independent predictive factors of survival in patients on NIV. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the two prognostic factors in ALS patients following NIV were the severity of bulbar involvement and ALSFRS-R at the time on NIV initiation. A better assessment of bulbar involvement, including evaluation of the upper airway, and a careful titration on NIV are necessary to optimize treatment efficacy.

Sleep in hypercapnic critical care patients under noninvasive ventilation: conventional versus dedicated ventilators.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sleep quality between two types of ventilators commonly used for noninvasive ventilation: conventional ICU ventilators and dedicated noninvasive ventilators; and to evaluate sleep during and between noninvasive ventilation sessions in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Physiological sleep study with a randomized assessment of the ventilator type. SETTING: Medical ICU in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients admitted for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring noninvasive ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive noninvasive ventilation with either an ICU ventilators (n = 12) or a dedicated noninvasive ventilators (n = 12), and their sleep and respiratory parameters were recorded by polysomnography from 4 PM to 9 AM on the second, third, or fourth day after noninvasive ventilation initiation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sleep architecture was similar between ventilator groups, including sleep fragmentation (number of arousals and awakenings/hr), but the dedicated noninvasive ventilators group showed a higher patient-ventilator asynchrony-related fragmentation (28% [17-44] vs. 14% [7.0-22]; p = 0.02), whereas the ICU ventilators group exhibited a higher noise-related fragmentation. Ineffective efforts were more frequent in the dedicated noninvasive ventilators group than in the ICU ventilators group (34 ineffective efforts/hr of sleep [15-125] vs. two [0-13]; p < 0.01), possibly as a result of a higher tidal volume (7.2 mL/kg [6.7-8.8] vs. 5.8 [5.1-6.8]; p = 0.04). More sleep time occurred and sleep quality was better during noninvasive ventilation sessions than during spontaneous breathing periods (p < 0.05) as a result of greater slow wave and rapid eye movement sleep and lower fragmentation. CONCLUSIONS: There were no observed differences in sleep quality corresponding to the type of ventilator used despite slight differences in patient-ventilator asynchrony. Noninvasive ventilation sessions did not prevent patients from sleeping; on the contrary, they seem to aid sleep when compared with unassisted breathing.