Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 637, 2024 Oct 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39358743

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine health care and antenatal and birth services globally. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) based at the Thailand-Myanmar border provides cross border antenatal care (ANC) and birth services to marginalised pregnant women. The border between the countries entered lockdown in March 2020 preventing cross-border access for women from Myanmar to Thailand. SMRU adapted by opening a new clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic in Myanmar. This study explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on access to ANC and pregnancy outcomes for marginalised pregnant women in the border regions between Thailand and Myanmar. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of all pregnancies delivered or followed at antenatal clinics of the SMRU from 2017 to the end of 2022. Logistic regression was done to compare the odds of maternal and neonatal outcomes between women who delivered pre-COVID (2017-2019) and women who delivered in the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022), grouped by reported country of residence: Thailand or Myanmar. RESULTS: Between 2017 and the end of 2022, there were 13,865 (5,576 resident in Thailand and 8,276 in Myanmar) marginalised pregnant women who followed ANC or gave birth at SMRU clinics. Outcomes of pregnancy were known for 9,748 women with an EGA ≥ 28 weeks. Unknown outcome of pregnancy among women living in Thailand did not increase during the pandemic. However, there was a high (60%) but transient increase in unknown outcome of pregnancy for women with Myanmar residence in March 2020 following border closure and decreasing back to the baseline of 20-30% after establishment of a new clinic. Non-literate women were more likely to have an unknown outcome during the pandemic. There was no statistically significant increase in known stillbirths or maternal deaths during the COVID pandemic in this population but homebirth was over represented in maternal and perinatal mortality. CONCLUSION: Decreasing barriers to healthcare for marginalised pregnant women on the Thailand-Myanmar border by establishment of a new clinic was possible in response to sudden border closure during the COVID-19 pandemic and most likely preventing an increase in maternal and perinatal mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Resultado del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Mianmar/epidemiología , Tailandia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Arch Dis Child ; 106(10): 1010-1014, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33558250

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the reporting of safety data of medication in paediatric randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in 2017-2018 compared with our earlier study. DESIGN: Literature search with a systemic appraisal of adverse drug event reporting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of reporting of safety data using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Ioannidis scores in paediatric drug RCTs. The CONSORT score consists of nine recommendations of the CONSORT Group issued to improve the quality of reporting adverse events. The Ioannidis score is based on these advices. We considered a CONSORT score of at least 6 and an Ioannidis score of at least 3 as sufficient. RESULTS: We reviewed 100 RCTs published in 2017 and 2018. Ninety-four (94%) articles mentioned adverse events compared with 78% in the earlier study. Fifty-seven per cent used a standardised method for reporting adverse events compared with 34% in our earlier study. In 26 of the articles, the expected adverse events were defined, and 27 articles had a preset standardised scale for adverse events. Of these, 62 articles (62%) had a CONSORT score of 6 or higher compared with 18% in 2010. In the present study, 67% had an Ioannidis score of 3 or higher, whereas in the earlier study this was 29%. Both differences are statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reporting safety data in paediatric RCTs has improved over the past 10 years. However, there is still room for improvement and for further improvement. Authors and editors should give more attention to methods for collecting, reporting and presenting safety data of RCTs in studies and manuscripts.


Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA