A quantitative comparison of bone resection margin distances in virtual surgical planning versus histopathology: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Positive bone margins have been shown to be associated with worse locoregional control and survival performance in oral oncology patients. With the application of computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific surgical guides, the authors can accurately execute the preoperative osteotomy plan. However, how well the authors can predict the margin distance in the final histopathology with a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, the factors associated with it, and how much leeway CT should spare when designing the osteotomy planes during virtual surgical planning (VSP) remain to be investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from January 2021 to December 2022 with benign or malignant jaw tumors and with signs of bone marrow involvement in the preoperative CT scan in our center were prospectively recruited to the study. VSP and measurement of the closest margin distance in the CT scan were performed by the single team of surgeons. The resection specimen was processed, and the margin distances were measured by a dedicated senior pathologist with the knowledge of orientation of the osteotomy planes. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were recruited, with 21 malignant and 14 benign cases. Sixty-eight bone margins were quantitatively analyzed. No significant difference in margin distances measured from the CT scan and final histopathology was detected ( P =0.19), and there was a strong correlation between the two (r s =0.74, P <0.01). A considerable amount of variance was detected in the level of discrepancy between margin distances measured in the CT scan and final histopathology (overall SD=6.26 mm, malignancy SD=7.44 mm, benign SD=4.40 mm). No significant correlation existed between the two margin distances when only maxilla tumor margins were assessed ( P =0.16). CONCLUSION: The bone margin distance in VSP is reliably correlated to the final pathological margin distance. A leeway distance of 15mm and 9mm should be considered when designing the osteotomy planes for malignancy and benign cases, respectively. Extra attention should be paid to maxilla cases when predetermining the osteotomy planes during VSP.

Current Trends in the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of Jaw following Ablative Surgery.

The reconstruction and rehabilitation of jaws following ablative surgery have been transformed in recent years by the development of computer-assisted surgery and virtual surgical planning. In this narrative literature review, we aim to discuss the current state-of-the-art jaw reconstruction, and to preview the potential future developments. The application of patient-specific implants and the "jaw-in-a-day technique" have made the fast restoration of jaws' function and aesthetics possible. The improved efficiency of primary reconstructive surgery allows for the rehabilitation of neurosensory function following ablative surgery. Currently, a great deal of research has been conducted on augmented/mixed reality, artificial intelligence, virtual surgical planning for soft tissue reconstruction, and the rehabilitation of the stomatognathic system. This will lead to an even more exciting future for the functional reconstruction and rehabilitation of the jaw following ablative surgery.

Unexpected Change of Surgical Plans and Contingency Strategies in Computer-Assisted Free Flap Jaw Reconstruction: Lessons Learned From 98 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgeries (CAS) are increasingly being adopted as the treatment of choice for jaw reconstructions with osseous free flaps. Although unexpected change of surgical plans remains a major concern of CAS, there are few studies focusing on this unfavorable clinical scenario. The aim of the present study was to investigate the rate of unexpected change of surgical plans and potential influential parameters, and to discuss the contingency strategies. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate all the patients who underwent computer-assisted jaw resections and osseous free flap reconstructions. The postoperative radiographs were reviewed and compared with the preoperative surgical plans. Operating records were examined to analyze the reasons for unexpected change of surgical plans and the management. The potential influential parameters for the change of surgical plans were analyzed using Fisher-exact test. The difference was regarded as statistically significant for a p-value less than 5%. RESULTS: From Nov 2014 to Oct 2021, a total of 98 consecutive computer-assisted free flap jaw reconstruction cases with osseous free flaps were included in this study. Our experience showed that 5.1% of the patients (five cases) needed intra-operative change of the surgical plans. We summarized the unexpected change of surgical plans and the contingency strategies as four clinical scenarios, including extended resection and reconstruction, shortened resection and reconstruction, modified resection without changing reconstruction, and modified reconstruction without changed resection. None of the potential influential parameters was identified as significant in relation to unexpected change of surgical plans intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that with the comprehensive methodology for computer-assisted free flap jaw reconstruction surgery planning, we can minimize the possibility of unexpected change of surgical plans during surgery. The lessons learned from our 98 consecutive cases can help beginners prevent unexpected change of surgical plans and rationalize contingency strategies in computer-assisted free flap jaw reconstruction.