RESUMEN
PROBLEM: Migration continues to play a role in determining health outcomes related to pregnancy and childbirth in Sweden. BACKGROUND: Migrant women have, compared to Swedish-born women, increased risks of adverse birth outcomes. Previous research suggests that migrant women seek care for decreased fetal movements less than Swedish-born women. Given these documented risks, understanding midwives' perspectives in this context is crucial to address maternal health inequities. AIM: To explore midwives' experiences conveying information about fetal movement to migrant women in antenatal healthcare settings. METHODS: Semi-structured, individual interviews with midwives (n=15) experienced in providing information about fetal movements to migrant women. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The midwives' efforts to compensate for the deficiencies within the antenatal healthcare organisation and to ensure that all women received access to information and care regarding fetal movements are described in four themes: (a) building a trusting relationship; (b) empowering women through guidance and support; (c) overcoming communication challenges; and d) navigating safety measures. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the standard antenatal care programme does not support midwives to provide holistic and individualised care that aligns with midwifery care philosophy. CONCLUSION: To reduce health inequities for migrant women, this study highlights the need for more flexible guidelines within the standard antenatal care programme. These guidelines should prioritise the individual woman's needs over institutional protocols, acknowledge the midwife-woman relationship as the core of midwifery practice and support midwives to build a partnership with women through continuity of care.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Entrevistas como Asunto , Partería , Atención Prenatal , Investigación Cualitativa , Migrantes , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Suecia , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Migrantes/psicología , Enfermeras Obstetrices/psicología , Consejo/métodos , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios de Salud MaternaRESUMEN
Maternal reports of decreased fetal movement (DFM) are a common reason to present to maternity care and are associated with stillbirth and other adverse outcomes. Promoting awareness of fetal movements and prompt assessment of DFM has been recommended to reduce stillbirths. However, evidence to guide clinical management of such presentations is limited. Educational approaches to increasing awareness of fetal movements in pregnant women and maternity care providers with the aim of reducing stillbirths have recently been evaluated in a several large clinical trials internationally. The International Stillbirth Alliance Virtual Conference in Sydney 2021 provided an opportunity for international experts in fetal movements to share reports on the findings of fetal movement awareness trials, consider evidence for biological mechanisms linking DFM and fetal death, appraise approaches to clinical assessment of DFM, and highlight research priorities in this area. Following this workshop summaries of the sessions prepared by the authors provide an overview of understandings of fetal movements in maternity care at the current time and highlights future directions in fetal movement research.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Mortinato , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Movimiento Fetal , Mujeres Embarazadas , EscolaridadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore how Swedish Somali migrant women perceive fetal movements, process information about fetal movements, and take actions if decreased fetal activity occurs. DESIGN: A qualitative study based on individual semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. SETTING: The study was conducted in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Swedish Somali migrant women (n=15) pregnant in their third trimester or recently given birth. FINDINGS: The analysis led to the main category: tailored information about fetal movements enhances the possibility to seek care if the movements decrease. The results are described in the generic categories: explanatory models determine action; and understand and interpret information. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Miscommunication on fetal movements can be a hurdle for Swedish Somali migrant women that may have impact on stillbirth prevention and the quality of care. Improved communication and information tailored to individual needs is essential to achieve equality for women and their newborns. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The midwife can be used as a hub for reassuring that adequate information about fetal movements reaches each individual woman in antenatal care. Individualised information on fetal movements based on the women's own understanding is suggested to increase the possibility that the pregnant woman will seek care if the movements decrease. Somali women's verbal communication can be used to spread accurate information in the Somali community on the importance of seeking care if fetal movements decrease.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Migrantes , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Suecia , Somalia , Investigación Cualitativa , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The proportion of overweight or obese pregnant women is increasing in many countries and babies born to a mother who is overweight or obese are at higher risk for complications. Our primary objective was to describe sociodemographic and obstetric factors across Body Mass Index (BMI) classifications, with secondary objective to investigate stillbirth and other pregnancy outcomes in relation to BMI classifications and gestational week. METHODS: This population-based cohort study with data partly based on a cluster-randomized controlled trial includes 64,632 women with singleton pregnancy, giving birth from 28 weeks' gestation. The time period was January 2016 to 30 June 2018 (2.5 years). Women were divided into five groups according to BMI: below 18.5 underweight, 18.5-24.9 normal weight, 25.0-29.9 overweight, 30.0-34.9 obesity, 35.0 and above, severe obesity. RESULTS: Data was obtained for 61,800 women. Women who were overweight/obese/severely obese had lower educational levels, were to a lesser extent employed, were more often multiparas, tobacco users and had maternal diseases to a higher extent than women with normal weight. From 40 weeks' gestation, overweight women had a double risk of stillbirth compared to women of normal weight (RR 2.06, CI 1.01-4.21); the risk increased to almost four times higher for obese women (RR 3.97, CI 1.6-9.7). Women who were obese or severely obese had a higher risk of almost all pregnancy outcomes, compared to women of normal weight, such as Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (RR1.54, CI 1.24-1.90), stillbirth (RR 2.16, CI 1.31-3.55), transfer to neonatal care (RR 1.38, CI 1.26-1.50), and instrumental delivery (RR 1.26, CI 1.21-1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Women who were obese or severely obese had a higher risk of almost all adverse pregnancy outcomes and from gestational week 40, the risk of stillbirth was doubled. The findings indicate a need for national guidelines and individualized care to prevent and reduce negative pregnancy outcomes in overweight/obese women. Preventive methods including preconception care and public health policies are needed to reduce the number of women being overweight/obese when entering pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo Prolongado , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Mortinato/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Suecia/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Índice de Masa CorporalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Presentations for decreased fetal movements comprise a significant proportion of acute antenatal assessments. Decreased fetal movements are associated with increased likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes including stillbirth. Consensus-based guidelines recommend pregnant women routinely receive information about fetal movements, but practice is inconsistent, and the information shared is frequently not evidence-based. There are also knowledge gaps about the assessment and management of fetal movement concerns. Women have indicated that they would like more accurate information about what to expect regarding fetal movements. DISCUSSION: Historically, fetal movement information has focussed on movement counts. This is problematic, as the number of fetal movements perceived varies widely between pregnant women, and no set number of movements has been established as a reliable indicator of fetal wellbeing. Of late, maternity care providers have also advised women to observe their baby's movement pattern, and promptly present if they notice a change. However, normal fetal movement patterns are rarely defined. Recently, a body of research has emerged relating to maternal perception of fetal movement features such as strength, presence of hiccups, and diurnal pattern as indicators of fetal wellbeing in addition to frequency. CONCLUSION: Sharing comprehensive and gestation-appropriate information about fetal movements may be more satisfying for women, empowering women to identify for themselves when their baby is doing well, and importantly when additional assessment is needed. We propose a conversational approach to fetal movement information sharing, focusing on fetal movement strength, frequency, circadian pattern, and changes with normal fetal development, tailored to the individual.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Servicios de Salud Materna , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Resultado del Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Atención Prenatal , MortinatoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the proportion of pregnant women who use epidural analgesia during birth differed between women registered at a maternity clinic randomised to Mindfetalness or to routine care. DESIGN: An observational study including women born in Sweden with singleton pregnancies, with spontaneous onset of labour from 32 weeks' gestation. Data used from a cluster-randomised controlled trial applying the intention-to-treat principle in 67 maternity clinics where women were randomised to Mindfetalness or to routine care. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02865759). INTERVENTIONS: Midwives were instructed to distribute a leaflet about Mindfetalness to pregnant women at 25 weeks' gestation. Mindfetalness is a self-assessment method for the woman to use to become familiar with the unborn baby's fetal movement pattern. When practising the method in third trimester, the women are instructed to daily lie down on their side, when the baby is awake, and focus on the movements' intensity, character and frequency (but not to count each movement). FINDINGS: Of the 18 501 women with spontaneous onset of labour, 47 percent used epidural during birth. Epidural was used to a lower extent among women registered at a maternity clinic randomised to Mindfetalness than women in the routine-care group (46.2% versus 47.8%, RR 0.97, CI 0.94-1.00, p= 0.04). Epidural was more common among primiparous women, women younger than 35 years, those with educational levels below university, with BMI ≥25 and with a history of receiving psychiatric care or psychological treatment for mental illness. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pregnant women who were informed about a self-assessment method, with the aim of becoming familiar with the unborn baby's fetal movement pattern, used epidural to a lower extent than women who were not informed about the method. Future studies are needed to investigate and understand the association between Mindfetalness and the reduced usage of epidural during birth.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Trabajo de Parto , Femenino , Movimiento Fetal , Humanos , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Atención PrenatalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of seeking care for decreased fetal movements and assess whether care-seeking behaviour is influenced by Mindfetalness. DESIGN: Observational study with data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 67 maternity clinics and 6 obstetrical clinics in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: All pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy who contacted the obstetrical clinic due to decreased fetal movements from 32 weeks' gestation of 39 865 women. METHODS: Data were collected from a cluster-randomised controlled trial where maternity clinics were randomised to Mindfetalness or routine care. Mindfetalness is a self-assessment method for women to use daily to become familiar with the unborn baby's fetal movement pattern. OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors for contacting healthcare due to decreased fetal movements. RESULTS: Overall, 5.2% (n=2059) of women contacted healthcare due to decreased fetal movements, among which 1287 women (62.5%) were registered at a maternity clinic randomised to Mindfetalness and 772 women (37.5%) were randomised to routine care. Predictors for contacting healthcare due to decreased fetal movements were age, country of birth, educational level, parity, prolonged pregnancy and previous psychiatric care (p<0.001). The main differences were seen among women born in Africa as compared with Swedish-born women (2% vs 6%, relative risk (RR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.44) and among women with low educational level compared with women with university-level education (2% vs 5.4%, RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.62). Introducing Mindfetalness in maternity care increased the number of women seeking care due to decreased fetal movements overall. CONCLUSION: Women with country of birth outside Sweden and low educational level sought care for decreased fetal movements to a lesser extent compared with women born in Sweden and those with university degrees. Future research could explore whether pregnancy outcomes can be improved by motivating women in these groups to contact healthcare if they feel a decreased strength or frequency of fetal movements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02865759.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Servicios de Salud Materna , África , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , SueciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This is a prospective cohort follow-up study based on the hypothesis that primiparous women with non-assisted vaginal deliveries and a second-degree perineal tear have more posterior compartment symptoms 1 year after delivery than those with no or first-degree tears. METHODS: A follow-up questionnaire, including validated questions on pelvic floor dysfunction, was completed 1 year postpartum by 410 healthy primiparas, delivered without instrumental assistance at two maternity wards in Stockholm between 2013 and 2015. Main outcome measures were posterior compartment symptoms in women with second-degree perineal tears compared with women with no or only minor tears. RESULTS: Of 410 women, 20.9% had no or only minor tears, 75.4% had a second-degree tear, and 3.7% had a more severe tear. Of women presenting with second-degree tears, 18.9% had bowel-emptying difficulties compared with 20.0% of women with minor tears. Furthermore, almost 3% of them with second-degree tears complained of faecal incontinence (FI) of formed stool, 7.2% of FI of loose stool compared with 1.2% and 3.5% respectively in women with no or only minor tears. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic pelvic floor dysfunction is common among primiparous women within 1 year following uncomplicated vaginal delivery, and there are no significant differences between second-degree perineal tears and minor tears. These symptoms should be addressed in all women after delivery to improve pelvic floor dysfunction and quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Perineo , Calidad de Vida , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico , Episiotomía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Information given to pregnant women about fetal movements is important in maternity care and decreased fetal movements is associated with fetal growth restriction and stillbirth. The fetal movement pattern is different for every fetus and women perceive different types of movements. Mindfetalness is a self-assessment method for a woman to use to become familiar with her unborn baby's fetal movement pattern. AIM: We aimed to explore midwives' perceptions about informing pregnant women about fetal movements and their experiences of working with Mindfetalness in their daily work. METHODS: A web-questionnaire was distributed to midwives who participated in a randomized controlled trial evaluating Mindfetalness, a method for the observation of fetal movements. In total, 67 maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, were randomized to Mindfetalness or routine care. Of the 144 midwives working in maternity clinics randomized to Mindfetalness, 80% answered the questionnaire. FINDINGS: The midwives thought that the leaflet about Mindfetalness was supportive in their work when informing women about fetal movements and the majority wanted to continue to distribute the leaflet when the trial ended. The midwives also expressed that the study increased their own knowledge about fetal movements. Women embraced the information about Mindfetalness positively and appreciated the written material. The midwives thought that talking about fetal movements in maternity care is an important but challenging task. CONCLUSION: Mindfetalness is a useful tool to use in maternity clinics when informing pregnant women about fetal movements. The written information was appreciated by both pregnant women and midwives.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Partería , Femenino , Movimiento Fetal , Humanos , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Atención PrenatalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements is commonly used to assess fetal well-being. However, there are different opinions on whether healthcare professionals should encourage maternal observation of fetal movements, as researchers claim that raising awareness increases unnecessary interventions, without improving perinatal health. We aimed to investigate whether cesarean sections and labor induction increase by raising women's awareness of fetal movements through Mindfetalness. Further, we aimed to study perinatal health after implementing Mindfetalness in maternity care. METHODS: In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 67 maternity clinics were allocated to Mindfetalness or routine care. In the Mindfetalness group, midwives distributed a leaflet telling the women to focus on the character, strength and frequency of the fetal movements without counting each movement. The instruction was to do so for 15 min daily when the fetus was awake, from gestational week 28 until birth. In this sub-group analysis, we targeted women born in Sweden giving birth from 32 weeks' gestation. We applied the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The Mindfetalness group included 13,029 women and the Routine-care group 13,456 women. Women randomized to Mindfetalness had less cesarean sections (18.4% vs. 20.0%, RR 0.92, CI 0.87-0.97) and labor inductions (19.2% vs. 20.3%, RR 0.95, CI 0.90-0.99) compared to the women in the Routine-care group. Less babies were born small for gestational age (8.5% vs. 9.3%, RR 0.91, CI 0.85-0.99) in the Mindfetalness group. Women in the Mindfetalness group contacted healthcare due to decreased fetal movements to a higher extent than women in the Routine care group (7.8% vs. 4.3%, RR 1.79, CI 1.62-1.97). The differences remain after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Raising awareness about fetal movements through Mindfetalness decreased the rate of cesarean sections, labor inductions and small-for-gestational age babies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02865759 ). Registered 12 August 2016, www.clinicaltrials.gov .
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Movimiento Fetal , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Plena , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Suecia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies report that women born in some African countries, after migrating to the Nordic countries, have worse pregnancy outcomes than women born in the receiving countries. With the aim of identifying unmet needs among Somali-born women, we here study this subgroup. OBJECTIVE: We compared pregnancy outcomes among women born in Somalia to women born in Sweden. Further, we investigated whether the proactive maternal observation of fetal movements has effects on birth outcomes among women born in Somalia. METHODS: In Stockholm, half of the maternity clinics were randomized to intervention, in which midwives were instructed to be proactive towards women by promoting daily self-monitoring of fetal movements. Data for 623 women born in Somalia and 26 485 born in Sweden were collected from a population-based register. RESULTS: An Apgar score below 7 (with stillbirth counting as 0) at 5 minutes was more frequent in babies of women born in Somalia as compared to babies of women born in Sweden (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.25-3.77). Babies born small for gestational age were more common among women born in Somalia (RR 2.22, CI 1.88-2.61), as were babies born after 41 + 6 gestational weeks (RR 1.65, CI 1.29-2.12). Somali-born women less often contacted obstetric care for decreased fetal movements than did Swedish-born women (RR 0.19, CI 0.08-0.36). The differences between women born in Somalia and women born in Sweden were somewhat lower (not statistically significant) among women allocated to proactivity as compared to the Routine-care group. CONCLUSIONS: A higher risk of a negative outcome for mother and baby is seen among women born in Somalia compared to women born in Sweden. We suggest it may be worthwhile to investigate whether a Somali-adapted intervention with proactivity concerning self-monitoring of fetal movements may improve pregnancy outcomes in this migrant population.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Conducta Materna , Resultado del Embarazo , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Grupos de Población , Embarazo , Somalia/etnología , Suecia/epidemiología , Migrantes , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Usually, parents remain at the hospital for two or three days after a stillbirth in Sweden, and the routine until recently has been to place the baby in a refrigerator during the night. A device, the Cubitus Baby, a specially designed cot with cooling blocks, was implemented in all 47 delivery wards during 2013 and 2014. AIM: To investigate the midwives' experiences of using the device when supporting parents after the stillbirth. METHOD: Questionnaires were completed by midwives, and a single open-ended question was analysed using content analysis. FINDINGS: 154 midwives responded. Four categories were identified, with two subgroups in each category: Feelings of dignity (Satisfactory feelings in working with grief; Design and function), Caring cooling (The cooling function; A cold baby), Time for farewell (Time together; Time to make your own choice) and Satisfying feelings for the parents (The parents and Cubitus Baby; The possibility for bonding). CONCLUSIONS: The midwives found that this practice provided a more dignified and worthwhile form of care. There is no need to separate the stillborn baby from the parents during their stay at the hospital. In modern perinatal palliative care, it is not justifiable to place a stillborn baby in a refrigerator.
Asunto(s)
Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Mortinato/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Pesar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Padres/psicología , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary incontinence (UI) is associated with pregnancy and parity and can cause health problems for women. Our objective was to explore risk factors for UI and its effect on women's daily activities, psychological health and wellbeing 9-12 months postpartum in a low-risk primiparous population. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, first-time mothers in a low-risk population with a spontaneous vaginal birth reported the occurrence of UI and its effect on daily activities and on their psychological health and wellbeing in a questionnaire completed 1 year after birth. Descriptive and comparative statistics were employed for the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 410 women (75.7%) completed the questionnaire. The self-reported rates of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence were 45.4%, 38.0% and 27.0% respectively. Neither the duration of the second stage of labour, the baby's head circumference or its birth weight were associated with the incidence of UI. There was an association between reported negative impact on daily activities and more negative psychological wellbeing (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary incontinence was common among primiparous women at 9-12 months postpartum. Women whose symptoms had a negative impact on their daily activities reported more psychological suffering.
Asunto(s)
Parto , Incontinencia Urinaria , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Paridad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the prevalence of perineal pain related to the perineal injury within the first year after childbirth. The study further explored the rates of postpartum check-up attendance, and whether they had undergone a vaginal examination, pelvic floor assessment and exercise advice. RESEARCH DESIGN: The primary outcome was women's self-perceived and selfreported occurrence of pain related to perineal injuries (within three, six and 12 months) after birth. Secondary outcomes were uptake of postpartum check-up six to 12 weeks after birth and care received at the check-up. A postal questionnaire was completed one year after birth. Descriptive data was used to present data. FINDINGS: A total of 461 Swedish women (77%) were included in the study. The majority of women with severe perineal injuries (75.0%), and 61.8% of those with moderate injuries II suffered from perineal pain three months postpartum, while 60% with severe injuries and 38.7 with moderate injuries II still had perineal pain six months after birth. The postpartum check-up was attended by 90.6%. However, one out of four had not been given a pelvic examination or advised about pelvic floor exercises. KEY CONCLUSION: Many primiparas suffer from pain related to perineal injuries during the first year after birth. One out of ten women has problems with perineal pain one year postpartum. It is essential to investigate and recognize the impact of perineal pain on women's daily life and psychological and emotional wellbeing at the postpartum checkup.
Asunto(s)
Dolor/psicología , Perineo/lesiones , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Parto/psicología , Perineo/fisiopatología , Periodo Posparto , Estudios Prospectivos , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated how women, seeking care due to decreased movements, had paid attention to fetal movements and if the method of monitoring was associated with pregnancy outcome. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to women from gestational week 28, who had sought care due to decreased fetal movements in Stockholm between January 1st and December 31st, 2014. Women were included in the study if the examination did not reveal any signs of a compromised fetus requiring immediate intervention. Birth outcome and sociodemographic data were collected from the obstetric record register. RESULTS: There were 29166 births in Stockholm in 2014, we have information from 2683 women who sought care for decreased fetal movements. The majority (96.6%) of the women stated that they paid attention to fetal movements. Some women observed fetal movements weekly (17.2%) and 69.5% concentrated on fetal movements daily (non-structured group). One in ten (9.9%) used counting methods daily for observing fetal movements (structured group). Women in the structured group more often had caesarean section before onset of labor (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and a lower risk of their baby being transferred to neonatal nursery (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03-0.94) compared to women in the non-structured group. CONCLUSIONS: Women, who had a daily and structured approach to awareness of fetal movements, were more likely to have a caesarean section but their babies were less likely to be transferred to a neonatal nursery as compared with women who used a non-structured method daily.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Movimiento Fetal , Observación/métodos , Resultado del Embarazo , Adolescente , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Women's awareness of fetal movements is important as perception of decreased fetal movements can be a sign of a compromised fetus. We aimed to study rate of labor induction in relation to number of times women seek care due to decreased or altered fetal movements during their pregnancy compared to women not seeking such care. Further, we investigated the indication of induction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective population-based cohort study including all obstetric clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. Questionnaires were distributed to women who sought care due to decreased or altered fetal movements ≥ 28 week's gestation in 2014, women for whom an examination did not indicate a compromised fetus that required induction of labor or cesarean section when they sought care. Women who gave birth at ≥ 28 weeks' gestation in 2014 in Stockholm comprises the reference group. RESULTS: Labor was induced more often among the 2683 women who had sought care due to decreased or altered fetal movements (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5). In women who presented with decreased or altered fetal movements induction of labor occurred more frequently for fetal indication than those with induction of labor and no prior fetal movement presentation (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.8). The rate of induction increased with number of times a woman sought care, RR 1.3 for single presentation to 3.2 for five or more. CONCLUSIONS: We studied women seeking care for decreased or altered fetal movements and for whom pregnancy was not terminated with induction or caesarean section. Subsequent (median 20 days), induction of labor and induction for fetal indications were more frequent in this group compared to the group of women with no fetal movement presentations. Among women seeking care for altered or decreased fetal movements, the likelihood of induction of labor increased with frequency of presentation.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal/fisiología , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/tendencias , Adulto , Cesárea , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SueciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Sweden, three to four out of every 1000 pregnancies end in stillbirth each year. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women who had experienced stillbirth perceived that they had received an explanation of the death and whether they believed that healthcare professionals were responsible for the death of the baby. METHODS: An online survey of 356 women in Sweden who had experienced a stillbirth from January 2010 to April 2014. A mixed-methods approach with qualitative content analysis was used to examine the women's responses. RESULTS: Nearly half of the women (48.6%) reported that they had not received any explanation as to why their babies had died. Of the women who reported that they had received an explanation, 84 (23.6%) had a specific explanation, and 99 (27.8%) had a vague explanation. In total, 73 (30.0%) of the 243 women who answered the question "Do you believe that healthcare personnel were responsible for the stillbirth?" stated Yes. The women reported that the healthcare staff had not acknowledged their intuition that the pregnancy was proceeding poorly. Furthermore, they perceived that the staff met them with nonchalance and arrogance. Additionally, the midwife had ignored or normalised the symptoms that could indicate that their pregnancy was proceeding poorly. Some women added that neglect and avoidance among the healthcare staff could have led to a lack of monitoring, which could have been crucial for the outcome of the pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Half of the women surveyed reported that they had not received an explanation of their baby's death, and more than one-fourth held healthcare professionals responsible for the death.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Causas de Muerte , Mortinato/epidemiología , Femenino , Muerte Fetal , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and severity of haemorrhoids after birth among first-time mothers in relation to management during the second stage of labour and to describe the women's experiences with haemorrhoids. METHOD: A mixed method explanatory sequential design was used. Nulliparous women were allocated to an intervention group for whom the second-stage of labour practice followed the MIMA model (Midwives management during second stage of labour) or to a control group for whom standard-care practice was followed. Data were collected three weeks and 1.5â¯years after birth. RESULT: A total of 496 (82.1%) women responded to the questionnaire three weeks after birth, 120 (70%) responded to the questionnaire 1.5â¯years after the birth. The women in the intervention group had fewer symptoms from haemorrhoids three weeks after birth compared to the women in the control group (adj. OR 0.6 95% CI 0.4-0.9). Half of the women in the intervention and control group (50.8%) who reported problems with haemorrhoids three weeks after birth still experienced problems after 1.5â¯years. The majority of all women did not seek medical care due to their symptoms. The women who described that they experienced haemorrhoids as a problem after birth felt neglected by the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: A substantial percentage of women had symptoms from haemorrhoids after birth. Many of these women felt that their problems were neglected. Women who experienced a slow birth of the baby's head and spontaneous pushing suffered less from haemorrhoids 3â¯weeks after birth.