Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care. / Utilidad de la ecografía en el cribado del aneurisma de aorta abdominal en atención primaria.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) constitutes a pathology with high mortality. There is currently no screening program implemented in primary care in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound in the detection of AAA in the at-risk population in primary care. Secondarily, to identify subjects whose vascular risk (VR) should be reclassified and to determine whether AAA is associated with the presence of carotid plaque and other risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter, national, descriptive study in primary care. SUBJECTS: A consecutive selection of hypertensive males aged between 65 and 75 who are either smokers or former smokers, or individuals over the age of 50 of both sexes with a family history of AAA. MEASUREMENTS: Diameter of abdominal aorta and iliac arteries; detection of abdominal aortic and carotid atherosclerotic plaque. VR was calculated at the beginning and after testing (SCORE). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were analyzed (age: 68.3±5 years; 89.3% male). Baseline RV was high/very high in 55.3%. AAA was detected in 12 patients (8%; 95% CI: 4-12); aortic ectasia in 13 (8.7%); abdominal aortic plaque in 44% and carotid plaque in 62% of the participants. VR was reclassified in 50% of subjects. The detection of AAA or ectasia was associated with the presence of carotid plaque, current smoking and lipoprotein(a), p<0.01. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AAA in patients with VR is high. Ultrasound in primary care allows detection of AAA and subclinical atherosclerosis and consequently reclassification of the VR, demonstrating its utility in screening for AAA in the at-risk population.

Evaluation of the atherosclerotic burden in hypertensive patients with prediabetes. / Evaluación de la carga aterosclerótica en hipertensos con prediabetes.

AIM: To assess the atherosclerotic burden in hypertensive patients with prediabetes without cardiovascular disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included patients with hypertension and prediabetes (fasting blood glucose: 100-125mg/dL and/or glycohemoglobin A1c: 5.7-6.4%), excluding those with established cardiovascular disease or those at very high risk. We recorded major vascular risk factors. Subclinical arteriosclerosis was measured by the ankle/brachial index (ABI) and carotid intima-medial thickness (IMT). Subclinical arteriosclerosis was mild if IMT was >75p adjusted by age and sex and/or ABI was 0.7-0.9 and was considered moderate-severe when there was plaque and/or ABI<0.7. RESULTS: We included 53 patients, 63±7 years-old; women: 50,9% (95%CI: 36.8-64.9). Atherosclerotic burden was detected in 66.0% (95%CI: 51.7-78.5) of subjects. 24,5% (95%CI: 13.8-38.3) of patients had mild arteriosclerosis disease and 41.5% (95%CI: 28.1-55.9) had moderate-severe. This allowed us to re-stratified as very high vascular risk the 41.5% (95%CI: 28.1-55.9) of patients. 45.4% (95%CI: 16-74.8) of subjects with moderate initial risk were considered high or very high risk. In multivariate analyses, only smoking was associated with atherosclerotic burden (P=.07). CONCLUSIONS: Two thirds of hypertensive patients with prediabetes had subclinical arteriosclerotic disease when they were evaluated by the ankle/brachial index and carotid ultrasonography. Approximately forty percent of patients were re-stratified as very high vascular risk. Nearly half of the prediabetic hypertensive patients initially classified as moderate risk were considered high or very high risk.