RESUMEN
BACKGROUND Many patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present in cardiac arrest. Mechanical chest compressions are a common tool in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and have their benefits as well as disadvantages and reported complications. In recent years, veno-arterial extracorporeal oxygenation membrane (VA-ECMO) has proven to be a promising tool in these circumstances and is now considered part of the treatment algorithm in emergent and refractory cases. The combination of mechanical compressions and the ECMO lead to "new" complicated situations in the patients. We discuss such a patient, who required emergent surgery due to complications from his resuscitation, while under ECMO. CASE REPORT A 56-year-old man, with medical history of cardiovascular risk factors, presented to our facility due to ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. During his catheterization, he went into cardiac arrest and needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using a LUCAS3™ device. Because no rhythm was restored, he was promptly placed on VA-ECMO support with immediate, albeit transient, stabilization. After transportation to our Intensive Care Unit (ICU), he quickly deteriorated again hemodynamically and after imaging workup it was discovered he had a major laceration to his liver and was rushed emergently to the operating room where he underwent partial hepatectomy, while on full anticoagulation due to the ECMO support. CONCLUSIONS Complications from mechanical CPR are common, including liver laceration. Patients who are placed on ECMO following such measures should be carefully evaluated for such complications as they might affect the treatment and prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Paro Cardíaco , Laceraciones , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Laceraciones/complicaciones , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , HígadoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia worldwide. The number of patients undergoing ablation as treatment is increasing, as is the incidence of complications from ablation. One such complication is atrio-esophageal fistula, which is rare but life threatening. We discuss 2 cases of patients that presented with a fistula several weeks following atrial fibrillation ablation. CASE REPORT A 67-year-old man and 64-year-old woman both had cardiovascular morbidity and chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and other chronic illnesses. Both patients presented approximately 6 weeks after radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation and were admitted with varying symptoms, including fever and neurological deficits mimicking a cerebrovascular accident or massive bleeding. Both patients deteriorated very rapidly in the department, especially after certain interventions, such as endoscopy, and exhibited deteriorating neurological signs, including loss of consciousness and basic brain stem reflexes, and head computed tomography (CT) showed widespread infarcts and hemorrhages. Owing to their history, a chest CT was performed at the same time, revealing an atrio-esophageal fistula, which was determined to be the cause of their illness and led to their eventual deaths. CONCLUSIONS A rare complication of atrial fibrillation ablation procedure is atrio-esophageal fistula, which if left untreated, is almost uniformly fatal, and even survivors are usually left with significant sequelae. It is important to recognize the rapid deterioration and possible signs and symptoms, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, fever, or even neurological abnormalities, and make the connection to the ablation procedure in terms of timeline for rapid diagnosis and prompt treatment.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Fístula Esofágica , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Fístula Esofágica/etiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , FiebreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Cardiac output (CO) measurements in the ICU are usually based on invasive techniques, which are technically complex and associated with clinical complications. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from a noninvasive photoplethysmography-based device to a pulse contour cardiac output device in ICU patients. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, comparative clinical trial. SETTING: Single-center general ICU. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the general ICU monitored using a pulse contour cardiac output device as per the decision of the attending physician. INTERVENTIONS: Parallel monitoring of CO using a photoplethysmography-based chest patch device and pulse contour cardiac output while the medical team was blinded to the values obtained by the noninvasive device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven patients (69 measurements) were included in the final analysis. Mean CO were 7.3 ± 2.0 L/m and 7.0 ± 1.5 L/m for thermodilution and photoplethysmography, respectively. Bland-Altman showed that the photoplethysmography has a bias of 0.3 L/m with -1.6 and 2.2 L/m 95% limit of agreement (LOA) and a bias of 2.4% with 95% LOA between -25.7% and 30.5% when calculating the percentage of difference from thermodilution. The values obtained by thermodilution and photoplethysmography were highly correlated (r = 0.906). CONCLUSIONS: The tested chest patch device offers a high accuracy for CO compared to data obtained by the pulse contour cardiac output and the thermodilution method in ICU patients. Such devices could offer advanced monitoring capabilities in a variety of clinical settings, without the complications of invasive devices.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accurate pulse oximetry reading at hospital admission is of utmost importance, mainly for patients presenting with hypoxemia. Nevertheless, there is no accepted or evidence-based protocol for such structured measuring. OBJECTIVES: To devise and assess a structured protocol intended to increase the accuracy of pulse oximetry measurement at hospital admission. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective comparison of protocol-based pulse-oximetry measurement with non-protocol based readings in consecutive patients at hospital admission. They also calculated the relative percentage of improvement for each patient (before and after protocol implementation) as a fraction of the change in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) from 100%. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were recruited during a 6 month period. Implementation of a structured measurement protocol significantly changed saturation values. The SpO2 values of 24.7% of all study participants increased after protocol implementation (ranging from 1% to 21% increase in SpO2 values). Among hypoxemic patients (initial SpO2 < 90%), protocol implementation had a greater impact on final SpO2 measurements, increasing their median SpO2 readings by 4% (3-8% interquartile range; P < 0.05). Among this study population, 50% of the cohort improved by 17% of their overall potential and 25% improved by 50% of their overall improvement potential. As for patients presenting with hypoxemia, the median improvement was 31% of their overall SpO2 potential. CONCLUSIONS: Structured, protocol based pulse-oximetry may improve measurement accuracy and reliability. The authors suggest that implementation of such protocols may improve the management of hypoxemic patients.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Hipoxia/diagnóstico , Oximetría/métodos , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Admisión del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoxia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Myocardial injury and anemia are common among patients in internal medicine departments. Nevertheless, the level of anemia in which blood should be given to these patients is ill defined. We conducted a retrospective, cohort analysis. A total of 209 patients hospitalized to internal medicine, with myocardial injury (troponin Iâ>â0.2âmcg/L, not diagnosed as ACS, acute coronary syndrome) and anemia (Hbâ<â10âg/dL, without overt bleeding) were included. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20.7%. A total of 37 patients (17.8%) had severe anemia (Hbâ<â8âg/dL). A total of 73 patients (34.9%) were transfused. Severe anemia was not associated with increased long-term mortality in the whole cohort while survival of patients with severe anemia that were not transfused was significantly reduced compared to transfused patients (44% vs 80%; Pâ=â0.03). Mortality rates were similar for all patients with Hbâ≥â8âg/dL, regardless of transfusion (54% vs 49%; Pâ=â0.60). Consistently, lack of blood transfusion in patients with severe anemia was independently associated with a 2.27 (1.08-4.81) greater adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (P-value for interactionâ=â0.04), whereas it did not significantly increase in patients with Hbâ≥â8âg/dL. Avoidance of blood transfusion is associated with unfavorable outcomes among patients with myocardial injury and severe anemia.