Comparison of a Novel Human Rabies Monoclonal Antibody to Human Rabies Immunoglobulin for Postexposure Prophylaxis: A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Single-Blind, Noninferiority, Controlled Study.

Background: Lack of access to rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) contributes to high rabies mortality. A recombinant human monoclonal antibody (SII RMAb) was tested in a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimen in comparison with a human RIG (HRIG)-containing PEP regimen. Methods: This was a phase 2/3, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority study conducted in 200 participants with World Health Organization category III suspected rabies exposures. Participants received either SII RMAb or HRIG (1:1 ratio) in wounds and, if required, intramuscularly on day 0, along with 5 doses of rabies vaccine intramuscualarly on days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the day 14 geometric mean concentration (GMC) of rabies virus neutralizing activity (RVNA) as measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test for SII RMAb recipients relative to HRIG recipients. Results: One hundred ninety-nine participants received SII RMAb (n = 101) or HRIG (n = 98) and at least 1 dose of vaccine. The day 14 GMC ratio of RVNA for the SII RMAb group relative to the HRIG group was 4.23 (96.9018% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-6.94) with a GMC of of 24.90 IU/mL (95% CI, 18.94-32.74) for SII RMAb recipients and 5.88 IU/mL (95% CI, 4.11-8.41) for HRIG recipients. The majority of local injection site and systemic adverse reactions reported from both groups were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions: A PEP regimen containing SII RMAb was safe and demonstrated noninferiority to HRIG PEP in RVNA production. The novel monoclonal potentially offers a safe and potent alternative for the passive component of PEP and could significantly improve the management of bites from suspected rabid animals. Clincical Trials Registration: CTRI/2012/05/002709.

Comparative study on the immunogenicity and safety of a purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine (PCECV) administered according to two different simulated post exposure intramuscular regimens (Zagreb versus Essen).

Despite availability of effective rabies vaccines, India has the highest global mortality rate for rabies. Low socio-economic communities are most affected due to lack of awareness of the disease and poor compliance to post-exposure prophylactic regimens. Currently, the only approved intramuscular regimen for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against rabies in India is the Essen regimen, which consists of 5 injections administered over 5 separate days in a period of one month. The high number of doses and clinical visits, however, are major reasons for non-compliance, and thus a shorter regimen would be beneficial. In a simulated PEP trial in healthy, adult subjects, this study evaluated whether purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV), administered according to the WHO-recommended 4-dose/3 visit Zagreb vaccination regimen is of equal immunogenicity and safety as the standard Essen regimen in Indian subjects. Two hundred and 50 healthy adults were enrolled and randomized into a Zagreb or Essen group, each receiving PCECV according to their respective regimen. Blood samples were collected on Days 0, 7, 14 and 42 and analyzed using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). By Day 14, all subjects across both groups attained rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) concentrations of ≥ 0.5IU/ml. The Zagreb regimen was then demonstrated to be immunologically non-inferior to the Essen regimen by Day 14, which was the primary endpoint of the study. No safety issues were noted and the occurrence of adverse events was similar in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively). NCT01365494. CTRI No.: CTRI/2011/07/001857.

Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-DT): a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, phase III clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent meningococcal (groups A,C,Y,W) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-DT) in India. DESIGN: Open-label, descriptive, non-randomized study. SETTING: Three medical college hospitals, one each in New Delhi, Bengaluru and Mumbai, India. PARTICIPANTS: 300 healthy, vaccine-naïve participants (100 children aged 2-11 years, 100 adolescents aged 12-17 years, and 100 adults aged 18-55 years). INTERVENTION: One dose (0.5 mL) of MenACYW-DT administered intramuscularly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum bactericidal antibody titers against A, C, Y, and W were measured before and after MenACWY-DT vaccination. Safety data were also collected. RESULTS: Thirty days post-vaccination, geometric mean titers rose across all serogroups. Most participants had protective titers >8 (1/dil) across the four serogroups. The percentage (95% CI) achieving >8 (1/dil) in the Adolescent Group was typical - A: 96.9% (91.2%; 99.4%); C: 96.9% (91.2%; 99.4%); Y:100% (96.3%; 100%); W:100% (96.3%; 100%). In general, solicited reactions were mild and short-lived. Unsolicited events were uncommon and unrelated to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: MenACYW-DT was well tolerated and elicited a robust and protective immune response 30 days post-vaccination against meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135 in the Indian study participants aged 2-55 years.

Is the skin sensitivity test required for administering equine rabies immunoglobulin?

BACKGROUND: Rabies immunoglobulins are life-saving in patients with severe exposure to rabies. Despite the high degree of purification of equine rabies immunoglobulin (ERIG), the product inserts still recommend a skin sensitivity test before administration of this heterologous serum. A recent WHO recommendation states that there are no scientific grounds for performing a skin test before administering ERIG because testing does not predict reactions and it should be given irrespective of the result of the test. In this conflicting situation, we assessed the use of the skin sensitivity test in predicting adverse events to ERIG. METHODS: The data analysed were from the Antirabies Clinic of the Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, Bengaluru, India. The period of study was 26 months (June 2008-July 2010). The skin sensitivity test was validated by evaluating its sensitivity, specificity, predictability, falsepositive and false-negative results. RESULTS: A total of 51 (2.6%) adverse events were reported in 31 (1.5%) subjects. Most of these were mild to moderate in nature and subsided without medication. There was no serious adverse event. The sensitivity and specificity of the skin sensitivity test to predict an adverse event was 41.9% and 73.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our experience with the skin sensitivity test suggests that it may not be required before administering ERIGs, as recommended by WHO.

Assessing the safety of post-exposure rabies immunization in pregnancy.

Fourteen pregnant women who received rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) at the anti-rabies clinic (ARC) of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) were followed up for assessing the safety of modern rabies vaccines and equine rabies immunoglobulin (ERIG) in pregnancy. The women were in the age range of 18-28 years, mostly from urban area (64%) and exposed to suspect rabid dogs (86%). They had received purified vero cell rabies vaccine (Verorab = 8 and Abhayrab = 4), purified chick embryo cell vaccine (Rabipur = 2) by Essen regimen; and equine rabies immunoglobulin (Equirab = 7 and Pasteur anti-rabies serum = 1). None of the pregnant women reported any adverse events to either vaccine or equine rabies immunoglobulin. All had safe vaginal deliveries and in all cases both the mother and the child were found to be healthy and normal.

Boosting effect of purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine using the intradermal route in persons previously immunized by the intramuscular route or vice versa.

BACKGROUND: At present, in the event of re-exposure to rabies, 2 booster doses are recommended for people who have been previously vaccinated with cell culture rabies vaccines by the conventional intramuscular route. As the intradermal route of vaccination is likely to be introduced in the future, we investigated the immune response to a cell culture rabies vaccine after crossing over from the intramuscular to the intradermal route and vice versa. METHODS: Twenty healthy adult volunteers who had received a primary course of rabies vaccination with purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine by either the intramuscular (n = 10) or intradermal (n = 10) route received booster vaccination with the same vaccine by the alternative route. The regimen used was 0.1 ml of vaccine by the intradermal route at two sites (deltoid area) for the intramuscular group, or 1 ml of vaccine by the intramuscular route (deltoid muscle) to the intradermal group on days 0 and 3. RESULTS: There was a 15-fold rise in the rabies virus neutralizing antibody response both by the intradermal and intramuscular routes of booster vaccination (p < 0.0001). Thus, the change of route of purified chick embryo cell booster vaccination did not alter the anamnestic immune response to the vaccine. No side-effects were observed after vaccination with either of the routes. CONCLUSION: Purified chick embryo cell vaccine was found to be safe and immunologically efficacious following booster vaccination after cross-over from the intradermal to the intramuscular route and vice versa.