Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Staging patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) with conventional imaging of computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) is suboptimal. Therefore, we aimed to compare the accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) with conventional imaging to stage patients with HRPCa. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed HRPCa (prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml and/or Grade Group ≥4). Patients underwent BS, CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and WBMRI within 30 days of evaluation. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performances of detecting metastatic disease to the lymph nodes and bone for WBMRI and conventional imaging. The reference standard was defined by histopathology or by all available clinical information at 6 months of follow-up. To compare diagnostic tests, Exact McNemar's test and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curves were utilized. RESULTS: Among 92 patients enrolled, 15 (16.3%) and 8 (8.7%) patients were found to have lymphatic and bone metastases, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WBMRI in detecting lymphatic metastases were 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.84), 0.84 (0.74-0.92), and 0.80 (0.71-0.88), respectively, while CT were 0.20 (0.04-0.48), 0.92 (0.84-0.97), and 0.80 (0.71-0.88). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WBMRI to detect bone metastases were 0.25 (0.03-0.65), 0.94 (0.87-0.98), and 0.88 (0.80-0.94), respectively, while CT and BS were 0.12 (0-0.53), 0.94 (0.87-0.98), and 0.87 (0.78-0.93). For evaluating lymphatic metastases, WBMRI demonstrated a higher sensitivity (p = 0.031) and discrimination compared to CT (0.72 versus 0.56, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: For staging patients with HRPCa, WBMRI outperforms CT in the detection of lymphatic metastases and performs as well as CT and BS in the detection of bone metastases. Further studies are needed to assess the cost effectiveness of WBMRI and the utility of combined PSMA PET and WBMRI.

Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility of 18F-Flotufolastat Image Interpretation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Data from Two Phase 3 Prospective Multicenter Studies.

Interreader and intrareader reproducibility of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans in newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer patients was assessed from masked image evaluations from two phase 3 studies. Methods: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images of newly diagnosed (n = 352) or recurrent (n = 389) patients were evaluated by 3 masked readers. Cohen κ was used to assess pairwise patient- and region-level interreader agreement. Agreement among all readers was assessed using Fleiss κ. Intrareader agreement between the first and repeat read (20% of images, ≥4 wk later) was assessed using Cohen κ. Results: Pairwise interreader agreement was 95% or better (newly diagnosed) and 75% or better (recurrent). The κ coefficients were impacted by the high-agreement-low-κ paradox: Cohen κ ranged from not estimable to 0.55, whereas Fleiss κ was 0.50 (newly diagnosed) and 0.41 (recurrent). Agreement was highest in the prostate of newly diagnosed patients (≥95%) and in the pelvic lymph nodes in recurrent patients (≥87%). Intrareader agreement was 86% or better across both populations. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images can be reliably interpreted, with a high degree of inter- and intrareader agreement.

Assessing the effectiveness of MRI, 18F-fluciclovine PET, SUVmax, and PSA in detecting local recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy.

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and combinations of these diagnostic modalities for detecting local prostate cancer recurrence in the setting of rising PSA after radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: Patients were characterised for clinical features such as Gleason score, PSA at surgery, PSA at follow-up, follow-up MRI result, follow-up PET result, follow-up SUVmax, and follow-up disease status. The utility of diagnostic parameters for detecting disease recurrence at the prostatectomy bed was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to determine the area under the curve (AUC) for each model. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were also calculated. Optimal cut-off points for continuous variables were determined based on maximum Youden's J statistics. Results: The study found that MRI had the highest concordance (96%), sensitivity (100%), specificity (91%), positive predictive value (93%), and negative predictive value (100%) among the diagnostic modalities. The AUC for MRI was 0.9545, indicating a high discriminatory ability for detecting prostate cancer local recurrence. When combined, PET and SUVmax (cut-off value of 2.85) showed an improved performance compared to using them individually, with an AUC of 0.8925. Conclusions: The analysis suggests that MRI is the most effective imaging modality for detecting local prostate cancer recurrence, with 18F-fluciclovine PET and SUVmax also showing promising combined results. PSA has moderate discriminatory utility at follow-up but can still provide valuable information in detecting prostate cancer recurrence. Further research and recent references are needed to support these findings.

Diagnostic Performance and Safety of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 Positron Emission Tomography in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Results From a Phase 3, Prospective, Multicenter Study (SPOTLIGHT).

PURPOSE: SPOTLIGHT (NCT04186845) evaluated diagnostic performance and safety of radiohybrid 18F-rhPSMA-7.3, a novel high-affinity positron emission tomography radiopharmaceutical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with prostate cancer recurrence underwent positron emission tomography/CT 50-70 minutes after intravenous administration of 296±20% MBq 18F-rhPSMA-7.3. To assess the coprimary end points (verified detection rate and combined region-level positive predictive value), 3 blinded, independent central readers evaluated the scans. Verified detection rate is equivalent to the overall detection rate × positive predictive value. Standard of truth was established for each patient using histopathology or confirmatory imaging. Statistical thresholds (lower bounds of the confidence intervals) of 36.5% and 62.5% were prespecified for verified detection rate and combined region-level positive predictive value, respectively. Additional end points included detection rate, verified detection rate, and combined region-level positive predictive value in patients with histopathology standard of truth, and safety. RESULTS: The overall 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 detection rate among all 389 patients with an evaluable scan was 83% (majority read). Among the 366 patients (median prostate-specific antigen 1.27 ng/mL) for whom a standard of truth (histopathology [n=69]/confirmatory imaging only [n=297]) was available, verified detection rate ranged from 51% (95% CI 46.1-56.6) to 54% (95% CI 48.8-59.3), exceeding the prespecified statistical threshold. Combined region-level positive predictive value ranged from 46% (95% CI 42.0-50.3) to 60% (95% CI 55.1-65.5) across the readers, not meeting the threshold. In the subset of patients with histopathology standard of truth, the verified detection rate and combined region-level positive predictive value were both above the prespecified thresholds (majority read, 81% [95% CI 69.9-89.6] and 72% [95% CI 62.5-80.7], respectively). No significant safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 offers a clinically meaningful verified detection rate for localization of recurrent prostate cancer. Despite missing the coprimary end point of combined region-level positive predictive value, the totality of the data support the potential clinical utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3.

The Role of Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Imaging and ADC Treatment.

ABSTRACT: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are designed to deliver cytotoxic payloads to distinctive target-expressing cancer cells. Following internalization, the ADCs are routed to different compartments in the cells, where cleavage of the linker causes release of the cytotoxic cargo. With such a delivery system, more effective payloads can reach cancer cells, allowing for more efficient treatment and dosing schedule. The monoclonal antibody (mAb) component of ADC plays a crucial role in the effective targeting of cancer cell-specific antigens while minimizing binding to normal cells. Often, the same mAbs used in ADCs can be labeled instead with radionuclides suitable for positron emission tomography or gamma-camera scintigraphy. To achieve high sensitivity and specificity for imaging, radiolabeled mAbs must have high affinity for the antigen, favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and a low toxicity profile. The use of radiolabeled mAbs permits the noninvasive interrogation of specific target expression on tumor cells and assessment of tumor heterogeneity in vivo by a simple diagnostic imaging scan that may include the whole body in the field of view. With this approach, radiolabeled mAbs can serve as important imaging biomarkers to predict the optimal delivery of ADCs to tumors and be used to monitor therapy with follow-up scans. Moreover, the same mAb can then be radiolabeled with an analogous radionuclide for the delivery of ß-emitters, α-particles, or Auger electrons as part of a radioimmunotherapy approach. The purpose of this review is to introduce key concepts regarding radiolabeled mAbs targeting various tumor antigens (CD20, CDH3, type I insulinlike growth factor receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) that are being used in the clinical setting or undergoing development.

18F-Fluciclovine-Avid Reactive Axillary Lymph Nodes After COVID-19 Vaccination.

ABSTRACT: A 74-year-old man presenting with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer 9 months after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for restaging to determine subsequent treatment strategy. Serum prostate-specific antigen was 0.7 ng/mL at the time of imaging. Images demonstrated foci of abnormal increased 18F-fluciclovine uptake corresponding to prominent round lymph nodes in the left axilla, some of which with fatty hila. Due to recent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in the ipsilateral arm and the low likelihood of nodal metastases to the axilla from prostate cancer in this patient, the lymph nodes were considered to be benign, reactive to the vaccine.

Monoclonal antibody based radiopharmaceuticals for imaging and therapy.

The concept of personalized medicine has been steadily growing for the past decades. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are undoubtedly playing an important role in the transition away from conventional medical practice to a more tailored approach to deliver the best therapy with the highest safety margin to a specific patient. In certain instances, mAbs and antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) may represent the preferred therapeutic option for several types of cancers due to their high specificity and affinity to the antigen. Monoclonal antibodies can be labeled with specific radionuclides well-suited for PET (Positron Emission Tomography) or gamma camera scintigraphy. The use of radiolabeled mAbs allows the interrogation of specific biomarkers and assessment of tumor heterogeneity in vivo by a single diagnostic imaging scan that includes the whole-body in the field-of-view. Moreover, the same mAb can then be radiolabeled with an analogous radionuclide for the delivery of beta-minus radiation or alpha-particles as part of a radioimmunotherapy (RIT) approach. However, the path to develop, validate, and implement mAb-based radiopharmaceuticals from bench-to-bedside is complex due to the extensive pre-clinical experiments and toxicological studies required, and the necessity of labor-intensive clinical trials that often require multi-time-point imaging and blood draws for internal radiation dosimetry and pharmacokinetics. As more mAb-based radiopharmaceuticals have been developed and evaluated, the opportunities and limitations offered by mAbs have become better defined. Our aim with this manuscript is therefore to provide an overview of the recent advances in the development of mAb-based radiopharmaceuticals and their clinical applications in Oncology.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with rising PSA level ≤ 0.5 ng/ml after multiple treatment failures.

This retrospective study is to assess the performance of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in prostate cancer (PC) patients with multiple treatment failures and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 0.5 ng/mL. PC patients with multiple treatment failures who had PSA level within 2-week interval of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT (PSAPET) ≤ 0.5 ng/mL were identified in retrospective review of our institution's database (n=28). Patient, tumor, treatment, PSA and castration characteristics as well as findings on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT were collected and compared between positive and negative 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT subgroups by using Fisher's exact test. The overall detection rate of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT was 7 of 28 studies (25%). PSAPET > 0.2 ng/mL was associated with higher detection rates in all (33.3 vs 10%, P=0.172), castration-resistant (CR) (50 vs 20%, P=0.343) and castration-sensitive (CS) (28.6 vs 0%, P=0.179) patients. Sites of recurrence were local 42.9% (3/7), nodal 42.9% (3/7) and bone metastases 14.3% (1/7). Higher Gleason score (GS 8-10) (33.3 vs 14.5%, P=0.396), advanced tumor stage (T3-T4) (35.7 vs 20%, P=0.653), second-line androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) uses (66.7 vs 20%, P=0.145), chemotherapy uses (50 vs 23.1%, P=0.444) and CRPC (33.3 vs 21.1%, P=0.483) related to positivity of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT but none reached statistical significance. Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with multiple treatment failures and PSAPET ≤ 0.5 ng/mL was acceptable particularly in patients with PSAPET ≥ 0.3 ng/mL, CRPC, initial GS ≥ 8 or T3-T4.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals in Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer to affect men in the United States and the second most common cancer in men worldwide. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has become increasingly popular as a novel molecular imaging technique capable of improving the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer. To date, several 68Ga and 18F-labeled PSMA-targeted molecules have shown promising results in imaging patients with recurrent prostate cancer using PET/computed tomography (PET/CT). Studies of involving PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals also suggest a higher sensitivity and specificity, along with an improved detection rate over conventional imaging (CT scan and methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy) and 11C/18F-choline PET/CT. In addition, PSMA-617 and PSMA I&T ligands can be labeled with α- and ß-emitters (e.g., 225Ac, 90Y, and 177Lu) and serve as a theranostic tool for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. While the clinical impact of such concept remains to be verified, the preliminary results of PSMA molecular radiotherapy are very encouraging. Herein, we highlighted the current status of development and future perspectives of PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals and their clinical applications.

Incidental 18F-Fluciclovine Uptake in a Desmoid Tumor Detected in a Patient Undergoing PET/CT Imaging for Prostate Cancer.

ABSTRACT: A 74-year-old man with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for restaging to determine subsequent treatment strategy. 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging demonstrated incidental focal heterogeneous increased 18F-fluciclovine uptake corresponding to a soft tissue nodule within the musculature of the left anterior abdominal wall. Subsequent ultrasound-guided biopsy of the lesion revealed histopathology compatible with a desmoid tumor. Consequently, the patient underwent surgical resection with wide local excision of the lesion.

Fully automated preparation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 at curie level quantity using cyclotron-produced 68Ga for clinical applications.

68Ga-PSMA-11 is currently one of the most investigated PET agents for imaging both recurrent prostate cancer and relevant metastases; however, the production and distribution of 68Ga-PSMA-11 is limited to a supply of only a few daily doses when using a commercially available 68Ge/68Ga generator. 68Ge/68Ga generators deliver only a modest amount of activity, up to 1850 MBq (50 mCi), when new, but it decreases with time. Additionally, the production of 68Ga/68Ge generators has not been able to meet the increasing demand of 68Ga radiotracers. In response to the need for a more economically viable alternative, the focus of this study was to provide a simple and efficient method for producing 68Ga-PSMA-11, using cyclotron-produced 68Ga that is ready for routine clinical practice.

The use of PET/CT in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has recently emerged as a promising diagnostic imaging platform for prostate cancer. Several radiolabelled tracers have demonstrated efficacy for cancer detection in various clinical settings. In this review, we aim to illustrate the diverse use of PET/CT with different tracers for the detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE using the terms 'prostate cancer', 'PET', 'PET/CT' and 'PET/MR'). The current review was limited to 18F-NaF PET/CT, choline-based PET/CT, fluciclovine PET/CT and PSMA-targeted PET/CT, as these modalities have been the most widely adopted. RESULTS: NaF PET/CT has shown efficacy in detecting bone metastases with high sensitivity, but relatively low specificity. Currently, choline PET/CT has been the most extensively studied modality. Although having superior specificity, choline PET/CT suffers from low sensitivity, especially at low PSA levels. Nevertheless, choline PET/CT was found to significantly improve upon conventional imaging modalities (CIM) in the detection of metastatic lesions at biochemical recurrence (BCR). Newer methods using fluciclovine and PSMA-targeted radiotracers have preliminarily demonstrated great promise in primary and recurrent staging of prostate cancer. However, their superior efficacy awaits confirmation in larger series. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT has emerged as a promising staging modality for both primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Newer tracers have increased detection accuracies for small, incipient metastatic foci. The clinical implications of these occult PET/CT detected disease foci require organized evaluation. Efforts should be aimed at defining their natural history as well as responsiveness and impact of metastasis-directed therapy.

An Assessment of Early Response to Targeted Therapy via Molecular Imaging: A Pilot Study of 3'-deoxy-3'[(18)F]-Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography 18F-FLT PET/CT in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

Fluorothymidine is a thymidine analog labeled with fluorine-18 fluorothymidine for positron emission tomography (18F-FLT-PET) imaging. Thymidine is a nucleic acid that is used to build DNA. Fluorine-18 fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) utilizes the same metabolic pathway as does thymidine but has a very low incidence of being incorporated into the DNA (<1%). 18F-FLT-PET could have a role in the evaluation of response to targeted therapy. We present here a pilot study where we investigated cellular metabolism and proliferation in patients with prostate cancer before and after targeted therapy. Seven patients with Stage IV prostate adenocarcinoma, candidates for targeted therapy inhibiting the hepatocyte growth factor/tyrosine-protein kinase Met (HGF/C-MET) pathway, were included in this study. The HGF/C-MET pathway is implicated in prostate cancer progression, and an evaluation of the inhibition of this pathway could be valuable. 18F-FLT was performed at baseline and within four weeks post-therapy. Tumor response was assessed semi-quantitatively and using visual response criteria. The range of SUVmax for 18F-FLT at baseline in the prostate varied from 2.5 to 4.2. This study demonstrated that 18F-FLT with positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (18F-FLT PET/CT) had only limited applications in the early response evaluation of prostate cancer. 18F-FLT PET/CT may have some utility in the assessment of response in lymph node disease. However, 18F-FLT PET/CT was not found to be useful in the evaluation of the prostate bed, metastatic skeletal disease, and liver disease.

Quantitative comparison between regularized time-of-flight and OSEM PET reconstructions for small 18F-FDG-avid lesions.

OBJECTIVE: We seek to quantitatively assess the relationship between lesion size and maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) differences for small fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lesions through the comparison of regularized time-of-flight (R-ToF) PET and standard ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 30 patients (male to female ratio 8 : 7, 15 different primary malignancies) who underwent noncontrast PET-CT in October 2015 through February 2016 were evaluated. For each patient, multiple reconstructions of the PET data, including R-ToF, time-of-flight (ToF), and non-ToF, were constructed using OSEM of three iterations and 24 subsets. Volumes of interest were contoured for lesions up to 3 cm in size, and SUVmax measurements and lesion size were recorded for a total of 64 lesions. Liver measurements were also recorded for background analysis. A comparative statistical analysis was subsequently carried out. RESULTS: R-ToF showed the highest SUVmax for all 64 lesions and the highest SUVmax mean (P<0.0001) among all lesions, followed by ToF and non-ToF. R-ToF also showed a statistically significant negative correlation (P<0.001) between lesion size and SUVmax versus ToF and non-ToF PET; the smaller the lesion, the greater the disparity. R-ToF also showed the largest mean background signal to noise ratio (P<0.0001), mean lesion signal to noise ratio (P<0.001), and mean lesion signal to background ratio (P<0.0001) versus ToF and non-ToF PET. CONCLUSION: R-ToF shows higher SUVmax values than standard OSEM reconstructions for all fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose -avid lesions, with greater differences for increasingly smaller lesions. R-ToF offers improved suppression of background noise versus OSEM and therefore increased signal to noise and background ratios. These findings offer potential for improved small lesion visibility and characterization.

Increased 18F-FDG Uptake Associated With Gastric Banding Surgical Mesh on PET/CT.

Surgical mesh was used in the 1980s and early 1990s for vertical banded gastroplasty as treatment for morbid obesity. This procedure was replaced by the more popular laparoscopic gastric banding in the mid-1990s. Surgical mesh, commonly used in hernioplasty, has been associated with increased F-FDG uptake related to an inflammatory foreign body reaction and is a known cause of false-positive PET scans. We present a case of increased F-FDG uptake related to surgical mesh in a patient who had undergone vertical banded gastroplasty.

Prognostic value of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in progressing metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and bone scans (BS) in the assessment of osseous lesions in patients with progressing prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a prospective imaging trial, 43 patients underwent FDG-PET and BS prior to experimental therapies. Bone scan index (BSI) and standardized uptake value (SUV) on FDG-PET were recorded. Patients were followed until death (n = 36) or at least 5 years (n = 7). Imaging findings were correlated with survival. RESULTS: Osseous lesions were detected in 39 patients on BS and 32 on FDG-PET (P = 0.01). Follow-up was available for 105 FDG-positive lesions, and 84 (80%) became positive on subsequent BS. Prognosis correlated inversely with SUV (median survival 14.4 versus 32.8 months if SUVmax > 6.10 versus ≤ 6.10; P = 0.002) and BSI (14.7 versus 28.2 months if BSI > 1.27 versus < 1.27; P = 0.004). Only SUV was an independent factor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study of progressive prostate cancer confirms earlier work that BSI is a strong prognostic factor. Most FDG-only lesions at baseline become detectable on follow-up BS, suggesting their strong clinical relevance. FDG SUV is an independent prognostic factor and provides complementary prognostic information.

Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation.

PURPOSE: To determine utility of multiparametric imaging performed at 3 T for detection of prostate cancer by using T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR spectroscopy, and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging, with whole-mount pathologic findings as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospectively designed, HIPAA-compliant, single-institution study was approved by the local institutional review board. Seventy consecutive patients (mean age, 60.4 years; mean prostate-specific antigen level, 5.47 ng/mL [5.47 microg/L]; range, 1-19.9 ng/mL [1-19.9 microg/L]) were included; informed consent was obtained from each patient. All patients had biopsy-proved prostate cancer, with a median Gleason score of 7 (range, 6-9). Images were obtained by using a combination of six-channel cardiac and endorectal coils. MR imaging and pathologic findings were evaluated independently and blinded and then correlated with histopathologic findings by using side-by-side comparison. Analyses were conducted with a raw stringent approach and an alternative neighboring method, which accounted for surgical deformation, shrinkage, and nonuniform slicing factors in pathologic specimens. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to estimate the predictive value of region-specific, pathologically determined cancer for all three modalities. This approach accounts for the correlation among multiple regions in the same individual. RESULTS: For T2-weighted MR imaging, sensitivity and specificity values obtained with stringent approach were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 0.47) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.86), and for the alternative neighboring approach, sensitivity and specificity values were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.78) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93), respectively. The combined diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and MR spectroscopy for peripheral zone tumors was examined by calculating their predictive value with different combinations of techniques; T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and MR spectroscopy provided significant independent and additive predictive value when GEEs were used (P < .001, P = .02, P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MR imaging (T2-weighted MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging) of the prostate at 3 T enables tumor detection, with reasonable sensitivity and specificity values.