Creating a Culturally Safe Online Data Collection Instrument to Measure Vaccine Confidence Among Indigenous Youth: Indigenous Consensus Method.

BACKGROUND:  Participating in surveys can shape the perception of participants related to the study topic. Administering a vaccine hesitancy questionnaire can have negative impacts on participants' vaccine confidence. This is particularly true for online and cross-cultural data collection because culturally safe health education to correct misinformation is typically not provided after the administration of an electronic survey. OBJECTIVE:  To create a culturally safe, online, COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey for Indigenous youth designed to collect authentic, culturally relevant data of their vaccine experiences, with a low risk of contributing to further vaccine confusion among participants. METHODS:  Using the Aboriginal Telehealth Knowledge Circle consensus method, a team of academics, health care providers, policy makers, and community partners reviewed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy surveys used in public health research, analyzed potential risks, and created a framework for electronic Indigenous vaccine confidence surveys as well as survey items. RESULTS:  The framework for safer online survey items is based on 2 principles, a first do-no-harm approach and applying a strengths-based lens. Relevant survey domains identified in the process include sociodemographic information, participants' connection to their community, preferred sources for health information, vaccination uptake among family members and peers, as well as personal attitudes toward vaccines. A total of 44 survey items were developed, including 5 open-ended items to improve the authenticity of the data and the analysis of the experiences of Indigenous youth. CONCLUSIONS:  Using an Indigenous consensus method, we have developed an online COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey with culturally relevant domains and reduced the risk of amplifying misinformation and negative impacts on vaccine confidence among Indigenous participants. Our approach can be adapted to other online survey development in collaboration with Indigenous communities.

Culturally Safe Practices in the Co-creation of Medical Education Curriculum with Indigenous Animators: Outcomes From an Indigenous Learning Circle.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of Indigenous patient actors who co-created and enacted Indigenous patient scenarios in collaboration with medical school faculty. We critically examine the structures and systems in a medical school that mediate cultural safety for Indigenous patient actors. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada has called on medical schools and healthcare institutions to help address the intergenerational harms inflicted on Indigenous people by the Indian residential school (IRS) system. Institutions are striving to incorporate cultural competency, conflict resolution, human rights, and anti-racism education into their curricula. However, the structural inequities within undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education practices must be identified and challenged to ensure that medical education is authentic and culturally safe for those involved in the development and delivery of the Indigenous health curriculum. To explore potential structural inequities in the co-creation process of simulated cultural communication scenarios (SCCS), the Indigenous animators at Debajehmujig Storytellers and collaborating faculty and professional staff at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (NOSM U) examined cultural safety in their curriculum design and delivery process. METHODS: We utilized the qualitative Indigenous research methodology of the Learning Circle to deconstruct the co-creation process and to explore the experience of cultural safety from the Indigenous animators' perspective throughout the curriculum design and delivery process. RESULTS: A framework for culturally safe co-creation practices with Indigenous people, rooted within Indigenous teachings of the Medicine Wheel, emerged from the qualitative data. CONCLUSIONS: This framework has the potential to guide the practice of culturally safe co-creation of Indigenous patient simulations in medical education and healthcare workplace learning. While the Medicine Wheel teachings are held by specific Indigenous nations, we anticipate that the results and recommendations of this study will apply to Indigenous co-creators and academic medical educators internationally.

Teaching Culturally Safe Care in Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Virtual Visits with Indigenous Animators.

Clinical learning activities involving Indigenous patient actors that specifically address the development of culturally safe care skills among medical students are important in order to improve health care for Indigenous people. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to strict physical distancing regulations and regional lockdowns that made the in-person delivery of Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios (SCCS) with Indigenous patient actors impossible due to the disproportionate risk that public health emergencies pose for Indigenous communities. As the pandemic continued in 2021, we co-created a Virtual Visit approach to SCCS for the education of culturally safe care to pre-clerkship medical students. We report on student and tutor evaluation of these virtual sessions and contextualize our findings with our previous results delivering In-Person SCCSs. We found that Virtual Visit SCCS were highly effective in providing authentic exposure to and feedback from Indigenous patients. However, students rated their learning outcomes with Virtual Visit lower than the In-person approach to SCCS. We recommend formal training on interacting with patients in virtual care scenarios prior to Virtual Visit SCCS. We also found that exposure to SCCS with Indigenous animators has the potential to conjure up a diverse spectrum of sometimes unresolved negative feelings related to colonialism among students and tutors including discomfort, embarrassment, and anxiety. Our findings underscore the importance of resolving these sentiments within the safe environment of a classroom. To prepare Indigenous as well as non-Indigenous students and tutors adequately, it is important to acknowledge and critically deconstruct the embodiment of colonialism and Indigenous-settler relations when teaching physicians, as well as future physicians, preparedness for culturally safe care of Indigenous peoples.

Improving the response of primary care providers to rural First Nation women who experience intimate partner violence: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Some legacies of colonialism are that Indigenous women living in Canada experience higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and that violence is often more severe relative to non-Indigenous women. This results in avoidable physical, psychological, emotional, financial, sexual and spiritual harm in the lives of Indigenous women, families, and communities. Trusted primary care providers are well positioned to provide brief interventions and referrals to treatment and services, but little is known about the providers' preparedness to support Indigenous women. Information on what enables or prevents providers to respond to Indigenous patients who experience IPV is needed in order to ensure this potential lifeline for support is realized. METHODS: The purpose of this community-based participatory study was to elucidate the barriers and facilitators to care for rural Indigenous women who experience IPV from the perspectives of primary care providers and to recommend strategies to improve their preparedness. Using a Grounded Theory approach, we conducted qualitative research with 31 providers to discuss their experiences with patients affected by IPV. RESULTS: The results showed providers often feel a degree of unpreparedness to deal with IPV in a clinical setting. Underlying the feelings of unpreparedness were: Recognition of patients' under disclosure of IPV due to stigma, shame and fear Lack of formal provider training on appropriate approaches to IPV Lack of referral network due to fragmented, scarce services for IPV Lack of understanding of jurisdictional complexity of First Nations and non-First Nations specific services for IPV Uncertainty how to negotiate cultural safety around IPV Multiple-role relationship & confidentiality dilemmas characteristic of small communities Risk of jeopardizing patient-provider relationship CONCLUSIONS: Our recommendations to improve provider preparedness to address IPV include reducing the stigma of IPV; creating effective referral pathways; improving cultural safety within the referral network; developing services for perpetrators; engaging natural helpers in the community, and; developing policies, procedures and continuing education related to patients who experience IPV in the clinical and community setting. We suggest that increasing providers' comfort to respond to IPV for rural and Indigenous women will ultimately lead to improved safety and health outcomes.

Co-creating Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios with Indigenous Animators: An Evaluation of Innovative Clinical Cultural Safety Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Building on partnerships with Indigenous communities and with the support of the Northern Ontario School of Medicine, faculty created groundbreaking, authentic cultural immersion curriculum designed to foster culturally safe interpersonal skills and cultural understanding. However, structural barriers to the teaching of clinical communication skills for culturally safe care to Indigenous patients persisted. To address this challenge, faculty collaborated with Indigenous animators on the co-creation of a new teaching modality of Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios. We evaluated student learning experience, the faculty teaching experience, the attainment of teaching goals, benefits, and areas for improvement for this approach. METHODS: We piloted 9 Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios with 64 medical students and 17 tutors. We collected quantitative and qualitative data regarding their experiences and perceptions of the new curriculum. The quantitative data was statistically summarized, and the qualitative data was coded and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The emergent themes indicate that co-created Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios support the acquisition of culturally safe clinical skills because the modality fosters authentic, safe, context rich, and anti-oppressive patient dialogue with Indigenous animators. Recommendations for optimizing the sessions included ensuring tutors have a deep understanding of the significance of cultural safety in patient care. As the pedagogy is different from the familiar standardized clinical skills sessions, tutors and students benefit from education on the pedagogical approach. CONCLUSION: Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios, co-created with cultural insiders and academic educators, represent an authentic education approach to teaching culturally safe clinical encounters. The findings contribute to our understanding of translating social accountability into the clinical setting.

Developing a grounded theory for interprofessional collaboration acquisition using facilitator and actor perspectives in simulated wilderness medical emergencies.

CONTEXT: Interprofessional collaboration is a complex process that has the potential to transform patient care for the better in urban, rural and remote healthcare settings. Simulation has been found to improve participants' interprofessional competencies, but the mechanisms by which interprofessionalism is learned have yet to be understood. A rural wilderness medicine conference (WildER Med) in northern Ontario, Canada with simulated medical scenarios has been demonstrated to be effective in improving participants' collaboration without formal interprofessional education (IPE) curriculum. ISSUES: Interprofessionalism may be taught through rural and remote medical simulation, as done in WildER Med where participants' interprofessional competencies improved without any formal IPE curriculum. This learning may be attributed to the informal and hidden curriculum. Understanding the mechanism by which this rural educational experience contributed to participants' learning to collaborate requires insight into the events before, during and after the simulations. The authors drew upon feedback from facilitators and patient actors in one-on-one interviews to develop a grounded theory for how collaboration is taught and learned. LESSONS LEARNED: Sharing emerged as the core concept of a grounded theory to explain how team members acquired interprofessional collaboration competencies. Sharing was enacted through the strategies of developing common goals, sharing leadership, and developing mutual respect and understanding. Further analysis of the data and literature suggests that the social wilderness environment was foundational in enabling sharing to occur. Medical simulations in other rural and remote settings may offer an environment conducive to collaboration and be effective in teaching collaboration. When designing interprofessional education, health educators should consider using emergency response teams or rural community health teams to optimize the informal and hidden curriculum contributing to interprofessional learning.