Clinical features, haemodynamics, and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in coarctation of aorta.

AIMS: There are similarities in the pathogenesis of cardiac remodelling and dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and coarctation of aorta (COA). We hypothesized that clinical HFpEF would be highly prevalent in adults with COA, and that the presence of HFpEF would increase the risk of mortality in this population. The aim of this study was to define the clinical features, haemodynamics, and prognostic implications of HFpEF in COA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive adults with repaired COA that underwent right heart catheterization were identified retrospectively. HFpEF was defined as heart failure symptoms (exertional dyspnoea or fatigue), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure at rest >15 mmHg. Of 99 COA patients, 32 (32%) had HFpEF. The correlates of HFpEF were obesity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-13.2), atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.00-10.7), total arterial compliance index (adjusted OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.41 per 1 ml/mmHg*m2), and pulmonary artery compliance index (adjusted OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.56 per 1 ml/mmHg*m2). Of 99 patients, 24 (24%) died and 5 (5%) underwent heart transplant. The 10-year cumulative incidence of death/transplant was higher in COA patients with HFpEF compared with patients without HFpEF (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.001). The presence of HFpEF was associated with increased risk of death/transplant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.16-3.11). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is common in adults with COA and is associated with greater risk of death/transplant, emphasizing a pressing need for interventions to prevent and treat HFpEF in COA.

Haemodynamic contributors to pulmonary hypertension across the spectrum of adult congenital heart disease.

AIMS: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) includes multiple disease states that predispose to pulmonary hypertension (PH). Haemodynamically, PH depends on abnormalities in three components: pulmonary blood flow (Qp), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary venous pressure (PVP). We sought to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of individual haemodynamic abnormalities in ACHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective study of ACHD patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at Mayo Clinic between 1999 and 2022 who were followed for the combined endpoint of death/heart transplantation. Among 1005 patients, 37% had mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg with more systemic ventricular disease, cyanotic disease and shunt lesions, highest N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and worse right heart remodelling/dysfunction. Among those with biventricular circulation, elevated PVP, PVR and mPAP were associated with prognosis, but not increased Qp >8 L/min. However, risk of death/transplant increased for PVR only at ≥3 Wood units (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-4.15; p < 0.0001) and for mPAP only at ≥25 mmHg (HR 3.15, 95% CI 2.17-4.58; p < 0.0001), not at current recommended lower cutpoints. Combined abnormalities in PVP and PVR were associated with worst outcome (HR 5.20, 95% CI 3.55-7.63; p < 0.0001) with intermediate risk with either abnormality (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.46-3.04; p < 0.0001). Findings were consistent across type of biventricular ACHD. Only with the Fontan (univentricular) circulation was a lower mPAP threshold (20 mmHg) associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of mPAP ≥25 mmHg in ACHD with a biventricular circulation is prognostically important regardless of disease phenotype, but milder PH of 21-25 mmHg is not associated with adverse outcome unless associated with Fontan circulation. Elevation in PVP >15 mmHg and PVR ≥3 Wood units were each individually associated with mortality with combined abnormalities associated with greatest risk. Categorizing PH in ACHD by haemodynamic mechanism (PVR, PVP or Qp) allows meaningful prognostication, and may allow more unified study of targeted therapies across heterogeneous disease states in ACHD.

An evidence-based screening tool for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFpEF-ABA score.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is under-recognized in clinical practice. Although a previously developed risk score, termed H2FPEF, can be used to estimate HFpEF probability, this score requires imaging data, which is often unavailable. Here we sought to develop an HFpEF screening model that is based exclusively on clinical variables and that can guide the need for echocardiography and further testing. In a derivation cohort (n = 414, 249 women), a clinical model using age, body mass index and history of atrial fibrillation (termed the HFpEF-ABA score) showed good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.839 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.800-0.877), P < 0.0001). The performance of the model was validated in an international, multicenter cohort (n = 736, 443 women; AUC = 0.813 (95% CI = 0.779-0.847), P < 0.0001) and further validated in two additional cohorts: a cohort including patients with unexplained dyspnea (n = 228, 136 women; AUC = 0.840 (95% CI = 0.782-0.900), P < 0.0001) and a cohort for which HF hospitalization was used instead of hemodynamics to establish an HFpEF diagnosis (n = 456, 272 women; AUC = 0.929 (95% CI = 0.909-0.948), P < 0.0001). Model-based probabilities were also associated with increased risk of HF hospitalization or death among patients from the Mayo Clinic (n = 790) and a US national cohort across the Veteran Affairs health system (n = 3076, 110 women). Using the HFpEF-ABA score, rapid and efficient screening for risk of undiagnosed HFpEF can be performed in patients with dyspnea using only age, body mass index and history of atrial fibrillation.

Cardiac function, haemodynamics, and valve competence with exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and mild to moderate secondary mitral regurgitation.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective study enrolling consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF undergoing invasive haemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography. Compared to HFpEF without MR (n = 145, 79.7%), those with mild or moderate MR (n = 37, 20.3%) were older, more likely to be women, had more left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, and more likely to have left atrial (LA) myopathy reflected by greater burden of atrial fibrillation, more LA dilatation, and poorer LA function. Pulmonary artery (PA) wedge pressure was higher at rest in HFpEF with MR (17 ± 5 mmHg vs. 20 ± 5 mmHg, p = 0.005), but there was no difference with exercise. At rest, only 2 (1.1%) patients had moderate MR, and none developed severe MR. Pulmonary vascular resistance was higher, and right ventricular (RV)-PA coupling was more impaired in patients with HFpEF and MR at rest and exercise. LV and LA myocardial dysfunction remained more severe in patients with MR during stress compared to those without MR, characterized by greater LA dilatation during all stages of exertion, lower LA emptying fraction and compliance, steeper and rightward-shifted LA pressure-volume relationships, and reduced LV longitudinal contractile function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFpEF and mild or moderate MR have more severe LV systolic dysfunction, LA myopathy, RV-PA uncoupling, and more severe pulmonary vascular disease. Mitral valve incompetence in this setting is a phenotypic marker of more advanced disease but is not a causal factor in development of HFpEF.

Screening for Unrecognized HFpEF in Atrial Fibrillation and for Unrecognized Atrial Fibrillation in HFpEF.

Because of the bidirectional relationship between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), individuals with either condition require consideration of screening for the other. In this review, we summarize current evidence and rationale for screening for occult HFpEF in adults with clinical AF; and occult AF in patients with clinically recognized HFpEF. Assessment of pretest probability for occult HFpEF in symptomatic AF patients may help guide additional testing such as exercise right heart catheterization to diagnose HFpEF and guide HFpEF-specific therapies. In patients with HFpEF, AF screening will identify cases of occult AF where anticoagulation may decrease stroke risk, and correlation of previously unknown AF episodes with paroxysmal symptoms may prompt consideration for rhythm control. Therefore, screening may help clinicians understand the etiology of the often-overlapping symptoms, and it may help guide treatments to slow progression of both conditions and their complications.

Autoimmune Disorders in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In most patients, inflammation develops secondary to cardiometabolic comorbidities, but in some, HFpEF develops in the setting of an underlying systemic inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, pathophysiology, and outcome of patients with HFpEF and autoimmune or primary inflammatory disorders. METHODS: Of 982 consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF diagnosed, 79 (8.0%) had autoimmune disorders. HFpEF was defined by invasive cardiopulmonary hemodynamic exercise testing. RESULTS: Female sex, higher heart rate, lower hemoglobin, absence of atrial fibrillation, and absence of coronary artery disease were independently associated with autoimmune disorders. Hemodynamics at rest and exercise did not differ between the groups, but peripheral oxygen extraction was lower in those with autoimmune disorders, reflected by lower arterial-venous oxygen content difference at rest (4.2 ± 0.7 mL/dL vs 4.6 ± 1.0 mL/dL; P < 0.001) and during exercise (9.3 ± 2.2 mL/dL vs 10.4 ± 2.2 mL/dL; P < 0.001), suggesting a greater peripheral deficit, and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCo2 slope, regression slope relating minute ventilation to carbon dioxide output) was also more impaired (38.0 ± 7.9 vs 36.2 ± 7.3; P = 0.043). Patients with autoimmune disorders had a higher risk of death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with those without in adjusted analyses (HR: 1.95 [95% CI: 1.17-3.27]; P = 0.011) over a median follow-up of 3.0 years, which was primarily attributable to higher risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 2.87 [95% CI: 1.09-7.57]; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFpEF and autoimmune disorders have similar hemodynamic derangements but greater peripheral deficits in oxygen transport and higher risk for adverse outcome compared with those without.

Cardiac dysfunction rather than aortic valve stenosis severity drives exercise intolerance and adverse haemodynamics.

AIMS: To study the impact of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. aortic stenosis (AS) lesion severity on left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, left atrial (LA) dysfunction, haemodynamics, and exercise capacity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 206) with at least moderate AS (aortic valve area ≤0.85 cm/m2) and discordant symptoms underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography. The population was stratified according to the probability of underlying HFpEF by the heavy, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, elder, filling pressure (H2FPEF) score [0-5 (AS/HFpEF-) vs. 6-9 points (AS/HFpEF+)] and AS severity (Moderate vs. Severe). Mean age was 73 ± 10 years with 40% women. Twenty-eight patients had Severe AS/HFpEF+ (14%), 111 Severe AS/HFpEF- (54%), 13 Moderate AS/HFpEF+ (6%), and 54 Moderate AS/HFpEF- (26%). AS/HFpEF+ vs. AS/HFpEF- patients, irrespective of AS severity, had a lower LV global longitudinal strain, impaired diastolic function, reduced LV compliance, and more pronounced LA dysfunction. The pulmonary arterial pressure-cardiac output slope was significantly higher in AS/HFpEF+ vs. AS/HFpEF- (5.4 ± 3.1 vs. 3.9 ± 2.2 mmHg/L/min, respectively; P = 0.003), mainly driven by impaired cardiac output and chronotropic reserve, with signs of right ventricular pulmonary arterial uncoupling. AS/HFpEF+ vs. AS/HFpEF- was associated with a lower peak aerobic capacity (11.5 ± 3.7 vs. 15.9 ± 5.9 mL/min/kg, respectively; P < 0.0001) but did not differ between Moderate and Severe AS (14.7 ± 5.5 vs. 15.2 ± 5.9 mL/min/kg, respectively; P = 0.6). CONCLUSION: A high H2FPEF score is associated with a reduced exercise capacity and adverse haemodynamics in patients with moderate to severe AS. Both exercise performance and haemodynamics correspond better with intrinsic cardiac dysfunction than AS severity.

Biatrial myopathy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIM: Left atrial (LA) myopathy is increasingly recognized as an important phenotypic trait in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Right atrial (RA) remodelling and dysfunction also develop in HFpEF, but little data are available regarding the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology among patients with isolated LA, RA, or biatrial myopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HFpEF underwent invasive haemodynamic exercise testing, comprehensive imaging including speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and clinical follow-up at Mayo Clinic between 2006 and 2018. LA myopathy was defined as LA volume index >34 ml/m2 and/or LA reservoir strain ≤24% and RA myopathy by RA volume index >39 ml/m2 in men and >33 ml/m2 in women and/or RA reservoir strain ≤19.8%. Of 476 consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF defined by invasive exercise testing with evaluable atrial structure/function, 125 (26%) had no atrial myopathy, 147 (31%) had isolated LA myopathy, 184 (39%) had biatrial myopathy, and 20 (4%) had isolated RA myopathy. Patients with HFpEF and biatrial myopathy had more atrial fibrillation, poorer left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, more severe pulmonary vascular disease, tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular dysfunction, and poorer cardiac output reserve with exercise. There were 94 patients with events over a median follow-up of 2.9 (interquartile range 1.4-4.6) years. Individuals with biatrial myopathy had an 84% higher risk of HF hospitalization or death as compared to those with isolated LA myopathy (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.92, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Biatrial myopathy identifies patients with more advanced HFpEF characterized by more severe pulmonary vascular disease, right HF, poorer cardiac reserve, and a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Further study is required to define optimal strategies to treat and prevent biatrial myopathy in HFpEF.

Inorganic Nitrite to Amplify the Benefits and Tolerability of Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The INABLE-Training Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether nitrite can enhance exercise training (ET) effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted at 1 urban and 9 rural outreach centers between November 22, 2016, and December 9, 2021, patients with HFpEF underwent ET along with inorganic nitrite 40 mg or placebo 3 times daily. The primary end point was peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Secondary end points included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS, range 0 to 100; higher scores reflect better health status), 6-minute walk distance, and actigraphy. RESULTS: Of 92 patients randomized, 73 completed the trial because of protocol modifications necessitated by loss of drug availability. Most patients were older than 65 years (80%), were obese (75%), and lived in rural settings (63%). At baseline, median peak VO2 (14.1 mL·kg-1·min-1) and KCCQ-OSS (63.7) were severely reduced. Exercise training improved peak VO2 (+0.8 mL·kg-1·min-1; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2; P<.001) and KCCQ-OSS (+5.5; 95% CI, 2.5 to 8.6; P<.001). Nitrite was well tolerated, but treatment with nitrite did not affect the change in peak VO2 with ET (nitrite effect, -0.13; 95% CI, -1.03 to 0.76; P=.77) or KCCQ-OSS (-1.2; 95% CI, -7.2 to 4.9; P=.71). This pattern was consistent across other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For patients with HFpEF, ET administered for 12 weeks in a predominantly rural setting improved exercise capacity and health status, but compared with placebo, treatment with inorganic nitrite did not enhance the benefit from ET. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02713126.

Clinical phenogroup diversity and multiplicity: Impact on mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: We aimed to clarify the extent to which cardiac and peripheral impairments to oxygen delivery and utilization contribute to exercise intolerance and risk for adverse events, and how this relates to diversity and multiplicity in pathophysiologic traits. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and non-cardiac dyspnoea (controls) underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing and clinical follow-up. Haemodynamics and oxygen transport responses were compared. HFpEF patients were then categorized a priori into previously-proposed, non-exclusive descriptive clinical trait phenogroups, including cardiometabolic, pulmonary vascular disease, left atrial myopathy, and vascular stiffening phenogroups based on clinical and haemodynamic profiles to contrast pathophysiology and clinical risk. Overall, patients with HFpEF (n = 643) had impaired cardiac output reserve with exercise (2.3 vs. 2.8 L/min, p = 0.025) and greater reliance on peripheral oxygen extraction augmentation (4.5 vs. 3.8 ml/dl, p < 0.001) compared to dyspnoeic controls (n = 219). Most (94%) patients with HFpEF met criteria for at least one clinical phenogroup, and 67% fulfilled criteria for multiple overlapping phenogroups. There was greater impairment in peripheral limitations in the cardiometabolic group and greater cardiac output limitations and higher pulmonary vascular resistance during exertion in the other phenogroups. Increasing trait multiplicity within a given patient was associated with worse exercise haemodynamics, poorer exercise capacity, lower cardiac output reserve, and greater risk for heart failure hospitalization or death (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.79 for 0-1 vs. ≥2 phenogroup traits present). CONCLUSIONS: Though cardiac output response to exercise is limited in patients with HFpEF compared to those with non-cardiac dyspnoea, the relative contributions of cardiac and peripheral limitations vary with differing numbers and types of clinical phenotypic traits present. Patients fulfilling criteria for greater multiplicity and diversity of HFpEF phenogroup traits have poorer exercise capacity, worsening haemodynamic perturbations, and greater risk for adverse outcome.

Obesity in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Time to Address the Elephant in the Room.

Obesity has been long recognized as a risk factor for the development of heart failure, but recent evidence suggests obesity is more typically associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as opposed to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Nevertheless, numerous studies have found that obesity modulates the presentation and progression of HFrEF and may contribute to the development of HFrEF in some patients. Although obesity has definite negative effects in HFrEF patients, the effects of intentional weight loss in HFrEF patients with obesity have been poorly studied.

Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The CAMEO-DAPA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors reduce risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the hemodynamic mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear. This study sought to determine whether treatment with dapagliflozin affects pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at rest and during exercise in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial testing the effects of 10 mg of dapagliflozin once daily in patients with HFpEF. Patients with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure, ejection fraction ≥50%, and elevated PCWP during exercise were recruited. Cardiac hemodynamics were measured at rest and during exercise using high-fidelity micromanometers at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment. The primary end point was a change from baseline in rest and peak exercise PCWPs that incorporated both measurements, and was compared using a mixed-model likelihood ratio test. Key secondary end points included body weight and directly measured blood and plasma volumes. Expired gas analysis was performed evaluate oxygen transport in tandem with arterial lactate sampling. RESULTS: Among 38 patients completing baseline assessments (median age 68 years; 66% women; 71% obese), 37 completed the trial. Treatment with dapagliflozin resulted in reduction in the primary end point of change in PCWP at rest and during exercise at 24 weeks relative to treatment with placebo (likelihood ratio test for overall changes in PCWP; P<0.001), with lower PCWP at rest (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -3.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.6 to -0.4]; P=0.029) and maximal exercise (ETD, -5.7 mm Hg [95% CI, -10.8 to -0.7]; P=0.027). Body weight was reduced with dapagliflozin (ETD, -3.5 kg [95% CI, -5.9 to -1.1]; P=0.006), as was plasma volume (ETD, -285 mL [95% CI, -510 to -60]; P=0.014), but there was no significant effect on red blood cell volume. There were no differences in oxygen consumption at 20-W or peak exercise, but dapagliflozin decreased arterial lactate at 20 W (-0.70 ± 0.77 versus 0.37 ± 1.29 mM; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, treatment with dapagliflozin reduces resting and exercise PCWP, along with the favorable effects on plasma volume and body weight. These findings provide new insight into the hemodynamic mechanisms of benefit with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in HFpEF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04730947.