Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39070061

RESUMEN

Background: Pseudo-orthostatic tremor is a hyperkinetic movement disorder usually associated with other neurological comorbidities, mainly Parkinson's disease. Case report: A 65-year-old male presented with unsteadiness and leg tremor while standing. Electrophysiological evaluation confirmed the presence of pseudo-orthostatic tremor. Blood test showed an undiagnosed Graves' disease. A complete remission of tremor was achieved with methimazole. Dopamine transporter scintigraphy showed a mild reduction of the striatal binding, bilaterally. Discussion: Graves' disease can be associated with pseudo-orthostatic tremor. Thyroid function should be assessed in patients complaining of unsteadiness. The causative role of hyperthyroidism in determining dopaminergic degeneration and uncovering subclinical parkinsonism warrants further investigations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Graves , Trastornos Parkinsonianos , Temblor , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad de Graves/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Graves/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Graves/fisiopatología , Temblor/fisiopatología , Temblor/etiología , Temblor/diagnóstico , Anciano , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/fisiopatología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/complicaciones , Antitiroideos/uso terapéutico , Metimazol/uso terapéutico
2.
Neurol Sci ; 44(8): 2635-2642, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37349527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction is a well-established manifestation of the post-COVID syndrome. Psychological vulnerability to stressors can modify disease trajectories, causing long-term risk for negative outcomes. Nonetheless, how premorbid risk factors and response to stressor affect neuropsychological changes is still incompletely understood. In this study, we explored the impact of psychosocial variables on cognitive functioning in a post-COVID sample. METHODS: All subjects were submitted to a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and an assessment of perceived loneliness, post-traumatic stress, and changes in anxiety and depression levels. A social vulnerability index was also calculated. The set of psycho-social variables was reduced to two Principal Component Analysis (PCA) components: distress and isolation. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of individuals showed cognitive impairments, with predominant memory and executive deficits. Post-traumatic stress disorder was clinically relevant in 44% of the sample. Social vulnerability scores of the sample were comparable to those of general population. The individual performance in learning and response initiation/suppression was directly related to distress component, encasing anxiety, stress, and depression measures. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that psychosocial assessment of post-COVID patients can detect fragile individuals at risk of cognitive impairments. Dedicated psychological support services may play a useful role in the prevention of post-COVID cognitive dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disfunción Cognitiva , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Cognición/fisiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicología
3.
Eur J Neurol ; 30(5): 1272-1280, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Core clinical manifestations of COVID-19 include influenza-like and respiratory symptoms. However, it is now evident that neurological involvement may occur during SARS-CoV-2 infection, covering an extensive spectrum of phenotypical manifestations. A major challenge arising from this pandemic is represented by detecting emerging neurological complications following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. To date, a few post-COVID-19-infected subjects diagnosed with Parkinson disease (PD) have been described, raising the possibility of a connection between the infection and neurodegenerative processes. Here, we describe a case series of six subjects who developed PD after COVID-19. METHODS: Patients were observed at Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care Mondino Foundation Hospital, Pavia (Italy), and San Paolo University Hospital of Milan (Italy) between March 2021 and June 2022. In all subjects, SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by means of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction from a nasopharyngeal swab. Subjects underwent an accurate neurological evaluation, and neuroimaging studies were performed. RESULTS: We describe six subjects who developed PD with an average time window after SARS-CoV-2 infection of 4-7 weeks. Apparently, no relationship with COVID-19 severity emerged, and no overt structural brain abnormalities were found. All subjects experienced unilateral resting tremor at onset and showed a satisfactory response to dopaminergic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection have been shown to shape the individual susceptibility to develop long-term consequences. We hypothesize that, in these subjects, COVID-19 has unmasked a latent neurodegenerative process. Characterization of the neuroinflammatory signatures in larger cohorts is warranted, which might provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of PD.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Pandemias
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(30): e29704, 2022 Jul 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35905215

RESUMEN

Single reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have been reported worldwide during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. While case reports are likely to be biased toward uncommon clinical presentations, systematic assessment of prospective series can highlight the true clinical features and spectrum. In this prospective, observational study, we included all consecutive patients who developed GBS. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection as antecedent, the time-gap between the infection and GBS onset had to be ≤30 days. The referral was a neurological University Research Hospital, in the Italian Region more severely involved by the pandemic, and hospitalizing both COVID+ and non-COVID neurological diseases. Clinical, laboratory, cerebrospinal fluid, and electromyographic features of GBS diagnosed between March 2020 and March 2021 were compared to a retrospective series of GBS diagnosed between February 2019 and February 2020 (control population). Nasopharyngeal swab was still positive at GBS onset in 50% of patients. Mild-to-moderate COVID-related pneumonia, as assessed by X-ray (6 patients) or X-ray plus computerized tomography (2 patients) co-occurred in 6 of 10 patients. GBS diagnosed during the pandemic period, including 10 COVID-GBS and 10 non-COVID-GBS, had higher disability on admission (P = .032) compared to the GBS diagnosed between February 2019 and 2020, possibly related to later hospital referral in the pandemic context. Compared to non-COVID-GBS (n = 10) prospectively diagnosed in the same period (March 2020-2021), post-COVID-GBS (n = 10) had a higher disability score on admission (P = .028), lower sum Medical Research Council score (P = .022) and lymphopenia (P = .025), while there were no differences in GBS subtype/variant, severity of peripheral involvement, prognosis and response to treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid search for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antiganglioside antibodies were negative in all COVID+ patients. Temporal clustering of cases, coinciding with the waves of the pandemic, and concomitant reduction of the incidence of COVID-negative GBSs may indicate a role for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the development of GBS, although the association may simply be related to a bystander effect of systemic inflammation; lack of prevalence of specific GBS subtypes in post-COVID-GBS also support this view. GBS features and prognosis are not substantially different compared to non-COVID-GBS.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Humanos , ARN Viral , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA