Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Peri-Device Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) reduces the risk of thromboembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. Peri-device leak (PDL) after LAAC may affect the subsequent risk of thromboembolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PDL after LAAC. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies reporting outcomes of PDL after LAAC from inception through October 2022. The primary outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, and device-related thrombus. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. We used I2 statistics to assess statistical heterogeneity; I2 >50% considered significant heterogeneity. This study included 54,279 patients from 11 studies (6 observational, 2 nonrandomized controlled trials [non-RCTs] primary results, 2 RCT post hoc analyses, and 1 analysis combining 2 RCTs data). PDL was associated with a significant increase in the composite outcome of stroke, TIA, or SE (odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.52, p = 0.03, I2 = 43%) as compared with cases with no PDL. There were no significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, or device-related thrombus. In conclusion, PDL after LAAC is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (composite stroke, TIA, or SE) without impacting mortality.

ORGANIZING PNEUMONIA: AN UNUSUAL SEQUELA OF COVID-19 INFECTION.

Organizing pneumonia (OP) is a form of interstitial lung disease that develops in response to acute lung injury. SARS-CoV-2 causes a wide range of lung and extrapulmonary disease, but there are few data suggesting an association between COVID-19 and OP. We describe a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia who developed severe progressive OP with significant morbidity. LEARNING POINTS: COVID-19 pneumonia is one of the secondary causes of organizing pneumonia (OP).Early initiation of steroids in OP is associated with improvement in symptoms and prognosis.A prolonged course of steroids may be needed in COVID-induced OP.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of the left atrial appendage closure on left atrial function.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) appendage closure (LAAC) is effective in patients with atrial fibrillation who are not candidates for long-term anticoagulation. However, the impact of LAAC on LA function is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of LAAC on atrial function. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search strategy was designed to utilize PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google scholar for studies showing the effect of LAAC on the LA function from inception to November 20, 2021. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated from the means and standard deviations. RESULTS: Of 247 studies initially identified, 8 studies comprising 260 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a significant increase in LA emptying fraction following LAAC compared with preoperative function (SMD: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-1.01; p = .03; I2 = 75%). In contrast, there were no significant differences in LA volume (SMD: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.82-0.69; p = .86; I2 = 92%) peak atrial longitudinal strain (SMD: 0.50; 95% CI: -0.08-1.08; p = .09; I2 = 89%), peak atrial contraction strain (SMD: 0.38; 95% CI: -0.22-0.99; p = .21; I2 = 81%), strain during atrial contraction (SMD: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.61-0.13; p = .20; I2 = 0%), strain during ventricular systole (SMD: 0.47; 95% CI: -0.32-1.27; p = .24; I2 = 89%), strain during ventricular diastole (SMD: 0.09; 95% CI: -0.32-0.51; p = .66; I2 = 65%). CONCLUSION: LAAC is associated with improvement in the left atrial emptying fraction, but did not significantly influence other parameters.

The WATCHMAN device and post-implantation anticoagulation management. A review of key studies and the risk of device-related thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (Afib). Anticoagulation is the gold standard to prevent stroke and systemic embolization. However, many patients have a contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN device, which closes the left atrial appendage, is non-inferior to warfarin to prevent embolic events in clinical trials. Post-procedural anticoagulation is needed to avoid device-related thrombosis. The use of anticoagulants after WATCHMAN implantation in patients with high bleeding risks has been a source of debate. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the current evidence on anticoagulation following the implantation of the WATCHMAN device, focusing on patients who have an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. OBSERVATION: The WATCHMAN device is efficacious and safe in preventing stroke and systemic embolization. Warfarin and aspirin are given for 45 days after implantation. If TEE at 45 days shows minimal residual peri-device flow (≤ 5mm) and no device-related thrombus, warfarin is stopped. This is followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for six months, then aspirin indefinitely. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for six months followed by daily aspirin indefinitely may be feasible for patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC. DOACs are more convenient to use than warfarin, and limited evidence suggests that they are not inferior following implantation of the device. CONCLUSION: Following the WATCHMAN implantation, the most often utilized regimen is warfarin followed by antiplatelet treatment. In cases where there is a high risk of bleeding, antiplatelets alone may be sufficient. More research is needed to tailor the existing antithrombotic regimen to the needs of patients.