Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 26(1): 44, 2024 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331930

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Machine learning models can support an individualized approach in the choice of bDMARDs. We developed prediction models for 5 different bDMARDs using machine learning methods based on patient data derived from the Austrian Biologics Registry (BioReg). METHODS: Data from 1397 patients and 19 variables with at least 100 treat-to-target (t2t) courses per drug were derived from the BioReg biologics registry. Different machine learning algorithms were trained to predict the risk of ineffectiveness for each bDMARD within the first 26 weeks. Cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization were applied to generate the best models. Model quality was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Using explainable AI (XAI), risk-reducing and risk-increasing factors were extracted. RESULTS: The best models per drug achieved an AUROC score of the following: abatacept, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.78); adalimumab, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74); certolizumab, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89); etanercept, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.87); tocilizumab, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77). The most risk-increasing variables were visual analytic scores (VAS) for abatacept and etanercept and co-therapy with glucocorticoids for adalimumab. Dosage was the most important variable for certolizumab and associated with a lower risk of non-response. Some variables, such as gender and rheumatoid factor (RF), showed opposite impacts depending on the bDMARD. CONCLUSION: Ineffectiveness of biological drugs could be predicted with promising accuracy. Interestingly, individual parameters were found to be associated with drug responses in different directions, indicating highly complex interactions. Machine learning can be of help in the decision-process by disentangling these relations.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Austria , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Certolizumab Pegol/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Inteligencia Artificial
2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 881943, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35721062

RESUMEN

Objective: To analyze real-world evidence on work productivity and daily activity impairment (WPAI) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated with golimumab in Austria. Methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study conducted in RA, PsA and axSpA patients initiating golimumab between April 2016 and May 2020 in 40 centers in Austria. WPAI, HRQoL (RAQoL, ankylosing spondylitis (AS)QoL and PsAQoL) questionnaires and disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index, CDAI, in RA and PsA; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI, in axSpA) were assessed at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24. Association between WPAI and disease activity was tested using linear regression. Results: We enrolled 233 patients (RA, n = 95; axSpA, n = 69; PsA, n = 69), 110 patients were followed up to month 24. Mean age was 50.2 ± 14.2 years; 64% were female. Disease activity decreased from baseline to month 24 (RA: CDAI -24.3 ± 13.5; axSpA: BASDAI -4.4 ± 2.1, and PsA: CDAI -21.7 ± 8.5, p < 0.0001, each). Total work productivity impairment (TWPI), activity impairment and presenteeism subscores continuously decreased throughout month 24 in all indications: RA (-58.3 ± 23%, -62.6 ± 23.8% and -61.7 ± 23.3%, respectively as compared to baseline; p < 0.0001, each), axSpA (-34.4 ± 38.3%, p = 0.0117; -60.9 ± 25.9%, and -43.8 ± 26.6%, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001 both) and PsA (-35.8 ± 43.7%, p = 0.0186; -52.3 ± 25.4%, p < 0.0001; and -43.3 ± 33.5%, p = 0.0007, respectively). Absenteeism scores decreased only in RA patients (-9.2 ± 24.9%, p = 0.0234). HRQoL improved between baseline and month 24 (RAQoL: -12.6 ± 7.5; ASQoL: -8.0 ± 4.3; PsAQoL; -8.3 ± 6.4, p < 0.0001, each). TWPI, presenteeism and activity impairment strongly associated with disease activity throughout the study. Conclusions: This real-world study confirms the benefit of golimumab on work productivity/daily activity impairment in Austrian RA, PsA, and axSpA patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA