Using Microeconomic Spending Traits to Inform Trends in Utilization of Cosmetic Procedures by Race and Ethnicity.

Background: Cosmetic plastic surgery in the United States is underutilized by African American and Hispanic populations compared with their White and Asian counterparts. This study evaluated whether microeconomic spending traits as a representation of financial stability can inform trends in cosmetic procedure volumes by racial group. Methods: Annual volumes for the top five cosmetic surgical and cosmetic minimally invasive procedures by racial/ethnic group from 2012 to 2020 were collected from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' annual reports. Factor analysis was used to calculate inflexible and flexible consumer spending by racial/ethnic groupings from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics' consumer expenditure data. All four factors were calculated across US Bureau of Labor Statistics-defined racial/ethnic groupings and standardized so they could be interpreted relative to each other. Results: Compared with the other groupings, the White/Asian/other grouping spent significantly more on average for inflexible consumer spending (P = 0.0097), flexible consumer spending (P < 0.0001), cosmetic surgical procedures (P < 0.0001), and cosmetic minimally invasive procedures (P = 0.0006). In contrast, African American people spent significantly less on average for all four factors (all P < 0.01). For Hispanic people, values were significantly less on average for flexible consumer spending (P = 0.0023), cosmetic surgical procedures (P < 0.0001), and cosmetic minimally invasive procedures (P = 0.0002). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that inflexible and flexible consumer spending follow trends in utilization of cosmetic surgical and minimally invasive procedures by racial/ethnic groups. These microeconomic spending inequities may help further contextualize the racial/ethnic variation in access to cosmetic surgery.

The Impact of a Centralized Plastic Surgery Research Infrastructure on Scholarly Productivity and Output.

Although research and innovation is a key within the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, the impact of team structure, interpersonal dynamics, and/or standardized infrastructure on scholarly output has been infrequently studied. In this work, we present the formation and implementation of a novel plastic surgery research program that aims to unite previously disparate clinical and translational research efforts at our institution to facilitate critical inquiry. From July 2022 to June 2023, our department launched a pilot research program based on three pillars: (1) formalization of a research curriculum (monthly research meetings for agenda setting and discussion for project honing, formal research leadership for meeting facilitation and workflow regulation), (2) development of a centralized database to compile ongoing research (Google Drive repository to house all ongoing research documents, facilitate real-time editing, and provide resources/templates for assisting in the research process), and (3) bolstering of a core research identity built on mentorship and collaboration (more frequent interactions to shift previously siloed faculty-student mentorship into a robust milieu of intercollaboration). During the first year, we saw an increased number of publications and presentations, as well as robust participation and contribution from faculty, residents, and medical students. Future directions will focus on addressing resource limitation, such as project idea availability and funding, to sustain the success and growth of this novel research infrastructure.

The Effect of Upper Extremity Slings (UESs) on Balance in Young Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Upper extremity slings (UESs) are frequently provided for patients with a hand or forearm injury. However, their effect on balance has not been well explored. We sought to characterize the effect of a UES on balance in young adults. METHODS: Healthy young adult participants with no injuries acting as a proxy for the general young adult patient population using UESs balanced on a BioDex Balance System platform: once while wearing a UES and once without wearing it, to serve as their own control. Participant weight, height, gender, hand dominance, overall stability index, anterior/posterior stability index, and medial/lateral stability index were recorded. Comparisons were analyzed with paired t-tests and linear regression analysis.  Results: No significant difference in the three stability index scores were found between UES and no UES usage. Height and weight were found to have positive significant relationships with the overall stability index during UES usage.  Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing balance discrepancies between the sling and nonsling usage in a broader patient population and suggests that height and weight may impact balance negatively during UES use.

Ongoing Challenges With Price Transparency in Hospital Charges for Hand Procedures.

In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued a historic rule on price transparency that aimed to better inform Americans about their health care costs by requiring hospitals to publicly provide pricing information on their items and services. In this review article, we describe the current gaps in transparency that persist after the implementation of the rule, from incomplete pricing files to noncompliance despite the issuance of monetary penalties by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Price transparency is vital for hand and upper extremity procedures, given their cost variation and patient desire for more financial discussions with their physicians regarding these procedures. Further improvements and interventions by various stakeholders are necessary to improve the current state of hospital price transparency and cost information for these patients and for anyone who seeks to make informed health care decisions. Policymakers should enforce stronger financial interventions and penalties and promote the use of bundled payments to facilitate better compliance by hospitals through a more expanded and accessible display of health care service costs. To help increase health care financial literacy among consumers, hand surgeons and hospital staff should engage in more dialog regarding health care prices and financial considerations with their patients.

An analysis of community-level socioeconomic status effects on pricing transparency and variability of hand surgery procedures.

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Price Transparency final rule requires hospitals to publish pricing information about provided items and services via two methods: a comprehensive machine-readable file (MRF), and a display tool of selected shoppable services. Using MRFs on hospital websites, we examined trends in pricing transparency and variation in association with community-level socioeconomic factors for three common hand surgery procedures among AAMC-affiliated hospitals. METHODS: Available discount cash prices and payer-specific negotiated prices for CPT codes 64721, 26615, and 25111 were recorded. Multivariate analysis was used to stratify hospitals into two groups based on their area's median household income, percent uninsured, and GPCI practice expense scores. Generalized linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate price variability against community-level financial characteristics of the patient population. RESULTS: Of hospitals that met selection criteria, a majority did not display discount cash prices and payer-specific negotiated prices for the three procedures. Hospitals in lower-income and higher percentage uninsured areas tended to charge a higher average payer-specific negotiated price for CPT code 25111. They also tended to have greater variation in payer-specific negotiated prices than hospitals found in higher-income and lower percentage uninsured areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that considerable pricing variation and incomplete transparency exists for CPT codes 64721, 26615, and 25111 among AAMC-affiliated hospitals. Patients in lower-income and higher-percentage uninsured areas are more exposed to a higher variability and average of negotiated prices than those in higher-income areas, which may translate to higher out-of-pocket costs for those with higher coinsurance and less socioeconomic prowess.

An Analysis of Information Sources of YouTube Videos Pertaining to Tattoo Removal: Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: The American Academy of Dermatology and the Food and Drug Administration recommend consultation with a dermatologist prior to undergoing laser tattoo removal. However, non-health care professionals offer tattoo removal. Understanding the information available on the internet for patients regarding tattoo removal is important given that individuals are increasingly consulting digital sources to make decisions regarding skin care. Prior research has identified that YouTube contains misinformation on dermatologic health. Objective: Here, we present a cross-sectional study that determined the sources of information in YouTube videos that discuss tattoo removal and described the content presented to viewers. Methods: Using the query "tattoo removal," we reviewed English-language YouTube videos that explicitly discussed tattoo removal. The following data were recorded: profession of the presenter, tattoo removal method discussed, whether an explicit recommendation to see a dermatologist or physician was present in the video, and number of views. Results: We analyzed 162 YouTube videos. We found that the majority were presented by non-health care professionals (n=125, 77%), with only 4 (3.7%) records of this subset recommending viewers to seek consultation from a dermatologist to ensure safe and adequate tattoo removal. Conclusions: Based on our findings, we recommend that dermatologists and other health care professionals provide high-quality, evidence-based information to viewers on tattoo removal and encourage dermatology societies to share via their social media platforms information about the importance of consulting a dermatologist for tattoo removal.