Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Respir Med ; 11(11): 991-1002, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37453445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with a high mortality rate and longer mechanical ventilation. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ventilation with ultra-low tidal volume (ULTV) compared with low tidal volume (LTV) in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. METHODS: This study was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised trial conducted in ten intensive care units in France. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, received invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 (confirmed by RT-PCR), had ARDS according to the Berlin definition, a partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ratio of 150 mm Hg or less, a tidal volume (VT) of 6·0 mL/kg predicted bodyweight or less, and received continuous intravenous sedation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using randomisation blocks to receive ULTV (intervention group) aiming for VT of 4·0 mL/kg predicted bodyweight or LTV (control group) aiming for VT 6·0 mL/kg predicted bodyweight. Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was a ranked composite score based on all-cause mortality at day 90 as the first criterion and ventilator-free days among patients alive at day 60 as the second criterion. Effect size was computed with the unmatched win ratio, on the basis of pairwise prioritised comparison of primary outcome components between every patient in the ULTV group and every patient in the LTV group. The unmatched win ratio was calculated as the ratio of the number of pairs with more favourable outcome in the ULTV group over the number of pairs with less favourable outcome in the ULTV group. Primary analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who were randomly assigned and not lost to follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04349618. FINDINGS: Between April 15, 2020, and April 13, 2021, 220 patients were included and five (2%) were excluded. 215 patients were randomly assigned (106 [49%] to the ULTV group and 109 [51%] to the LTV group). 58 (27%) patients were female and 157 (73%) were male. The median age was 68 years (IQR 60-74). 214 patients completed follow-up (one lost to follow-up in the ULTV group) and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significantly different between groups (unmatched win ratio in the ULTV group 0·85 [95% CI 0·60 to 1·19]; p=0·38). 46 (44%) of 105 patients in the ULTV group and 43 (39%) of 109 in the LTV group died by day 90 (absolute difference 4% [-9 to 18]; p=0·52). The rate of severe respiratory acidosis in the first 28 days was higher in the ULTV group than in the LTV group (35 [33%] vs 14 [13%]; absolute difference 20% [95% CI 9 to 31]; p=0·0004). INTERPRETATION: In patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19-related ARDS, there was no significant difference with ULTV compared with LTV in the composite score based on mortality and ventilator-free days among patients alive at day 60. These findings do not support the systematic use of ULTV in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. FUNDING: French Ministry of Solidarity and Health and Hospices Civils de Lyon.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Pulmón , Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Respir Care ; 68(6): 760-766, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37225654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is the final step of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. An SBT is aimed at predicting work of breathing (WOB) after extubation and, most importantly, a patient's eligibility for extubation. The optimal SBT modality remains debated. A high-flow oxygen (HFO) has been tested during SBT in clinical study only, which is why no definite conclusion can be drawn on its physiologic effects on the endotracheal tube. Our objective was to assess, on a bench, inspiratory tidal volume (VT), total PEEP, and WOB across 3 different SBT modalities: T-piece, 40 L/min HFO, and 60 L/min HFO. METHODS: A test lung model was set with 3 conditions of resistance and linear compliance, 3 inspiratory efforts (low, normal, and high), each at 2 breathing frequencies (low and high for 20 and 30 breaths/min, respectively). Pairwise comparisons and a quasi-Poisson generalized linear model that compared SBT modalities were performed. RESULTS: Inspiratory VT, total PEEP, and WOB differed from one SBT modality to another. Inspiratory VT remained higher with the T-piece than in the HFO independent of the mechanical condition, effort intensity, and breathing frequency (P < .001 in each comparison). WOB adjusted by the inspiratory VT was significantly lower during SBT performed with an HFO than when performed with the T-piece (P < .001 in each comparison). The total PEEP was significantly higher in the HFO at 60 L/min than in the other modalities (P < .001). The end points were significantly influenced by breathing frequency, effort intensity, and mechanical condition. CONCLUSIONS: With the same effort intensity and breathing frequency, inspiratory VT was higher in the T-piece than in the other modalities. Compared with the T-piece, WOB was significantly lower in the HFO condition and higher flow was a benefit. Based on the results of the present study, the HFO as an SBT modality would seem to require clinical testing.


Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Oxígeno , Cooperación del Paciente
3.
Crit Care Med ; 51(6): 753-764, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36790209

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe changes in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) by ICUs and patient outcomes. DESIGN: We extracted data from the OutcomeRea database concerning patients admitted for AECOPD between 1997 and 2018. We analyzed trends in the use of ventilatory support, corticosteroid therapy, antibiotic therapy, and patient survival. SETTING: ICUs at 32 French sites. PATIENTS: One thousand eight hundred sixteen patients in the database had a diagnosis of AECOPD. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Over time, there was a reduction in the prescription of corticosteroids and antibiotics. In a time-series analysis, these changes in practice were not linked with ICU mortality. The proportion of patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) also gradually declined (from 51% between 1997 and 2002 to 35% between 2013 and 2018) with an association between decrease in IMV use and reduction in ICU mortality in a time series analysis. Rates of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure decreased with an increase in NIV use to support weaning from IMV. There was a reduction in the median ICU length of stay (from 8 d in 1997-2002 to 4 d in 2013-2018) and in the median total duration of hospitalization (from 23 d in 1997-2002 to 14 d in 2013-2018). We observed an improvement in prognosis, with decreases in overall hospital mortality (from 24% between 1997 and 2002 to 15% between 2013 and 2018), ICU mortality (from 14% between 1997 and 2002 to 10% between 2013 and 2018), and 90-day mortality (from 41% between 1997 and 2002 to 22% between 2013 and 2018). CONCLUSIONS: The length of stay and mortality of patients with AECOPD admitted to ICUs has decreased over the last 20 years, with a wider use of NIV and a reduction in antibiotic and corticosteroid prescriptions.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación no Invasiva , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Respiración Artificial , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
5.
Trials ; 22(1): 692, 2021 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34635128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication of COVID-19 pneumonia, with a mortality rate amounting to 34-50% in moderate and severe ARDS, and is associated with prolonged duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Such as in non-COVID ARDS, harmful mechanical ventilation settings might be associated with worse outcomes. Reducing the tidal volume down to 4 mL kg-1 of predicted body weight (PBW) to provide ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTV) is an appealing technique to minimize ventilator-inducted lung injury. Furthermore, in the context of a worldwide pandemic, it does not require any additional material and consumables and may be applied in low- to middle-income countries. We hypothesized that ULTV without extracorporeal circulation is a credible option to reduce COVID-19-related ARDS mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: The VT4COVID study is a randomized, multi-centric prospective open-labeled, controlled superiority trial. Adult patients admitted in the intensive care unit with COVID-19-related mild to severe ARDS defined by a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 150 mmHg under invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 48 h, and consent to participate to the study will be eligible. Patients will be randomized into two balanced parallels groups, at a 1:1 ratio. The control group will be ventilated with protective ventilation settings (tidal volume 6 mL kg-1 PBW), and the intervention group will be ventilated with ULTV (tidal volume 4 mL kg-1 PBW). The primary outcome is a composite score based on 90-day all-cause mortality as a prioritized criterion and the number of ventilator-free days at day 60 after inclusion. The randomization list will be stratified by site of recruitment and generated using random blocks of sizes 4 and 6. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this manuscript is to provide primary publication of study protocol to prevent selective reporting of outcomes, data-driven analysis, and to increase transparency. Enrollment of patients in the study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04349618 . Registered on April 16, 2020.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Adulto , Circulación Extracorporea , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Clin Med ; 10(11)2021 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34071778

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To address the issue of ventilator shortages, our group (eSpiro Network) developed a freely replicable, open-source hardware ventilator. DESIGN: We performed a bench study. SETTING: Dedicated research room as part of an ICU affiliated to a university hospital. SUBJECTS: We set the lung model with three conditions of resistance and linear compliance for mimicking different respiratory mechanics of representative intensive care unit (ICU) patients. INTERVENTIONS: The performance of the device was tested using the ASL5000 lung model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven conditions were tested. All the measurements fell within the ±10% limits for the tidal volume (VT). The volume error was influenced by the mechanical condition (p = 5.9 × 10-15) and the PEEP level (P = 1.1 × 10-12) but the clinical significance of this finding is likely meaningless (maximum -34 mL in the error). The PEEP error was not influenced by the mechanical condition (p = 0.25). Our experimental results demonstrate that the eSpiro ventilator is reliable to deliver VT and PEEP accurately in various respiratory mechanics conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We report a low-cost, easy-to-build ventilator, which is reliable to deliver VT and PEEP in passive invasive mechanical ventilation.

7.
Transpl Immunol ; 56: 101207, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31071442

RESUMEN

Conversion to belatacept immunosuppression is a therapeutic option for renal-transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) toxicity, but it associates with high risk of acute rejection. Gradual conversion and serial immune monitoring with urinary chemokine CXCL9 may allow increasing safety of this maneuver. We converted kidney transplant recipients with signs of toxicity to CNI or other immunosuppressive drugs to belatacept over a 2-month period. We monitored renal function, metabolic profile, and circulating lymphocyte subsets. We also quantified urinary CXCL9 over a 12-month follow-up period. Between September 2016 and March 2017, 35 patients were successfully switched to belatacept immunosuppression at 3.3 (1.3-7.2) years after transplant. Two patients had a reversible rise in serum creatinine, associated with acute rejection in one case. Urinary CXCL9 increased before serum creatinine. After conversion, blood pressure and HbA1c significantly declined while eGFR and proteinuria remained stable. The percentage of circulating effector T cells and memory B cells significantly declined. Conversion from CNI to belatacept, in this setting, was feasible and safe, provided it was performed over a 2-month time-period. Monitoring urinary CXCL9 may further increase safety through earlier identification of patients at risk for acute rejection. The procedure associates with improved blood pressure, metabolic profile, and reduced circulating effector T and B cells.


Asunto(s)
Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/orina , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Quimiocina CXCL9/orina , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Memoria Inmunológica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes
8.
Front Immunol ; 9: 275, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29515582

RESUMEN

Antibody-mediated rejection is currently the leading cause of transplant failure. Prevailing dogma predicts that B cells differentiate into anti-donor-specific antibody (DSA)-producing plasma cells only with the help of CD4+ T cells. Yet, previous studies have shown that dependence on helper T cells decreases when high amounts of protein antigen are recruited to the spleen, two conditions potentially met by organ transplantation. This could explain why a significant proportion of transplant recipients develop DSA despite therapeutic immunosuppression. Using murine models, we confirmed that heart transplantation, but not skin grafting, is associated with accumulation of a high quantity of alloantigens in recipients' spleen. Nevertheless, neither naive nor memory DSA responses could be observed after transplantation of an allogeneic heart into recipients genetically deficient for CD4+ T cells. These findings suggest that DSA generation rather result from insufficient blockade of the helper function of CD4+ T cells by therapeutic immunosuppression. To test this second theory, different subsets of circulating T cells: CD8+, CD4+, and T follicular helper [CD4+CXCDR5+, T follicular helper cells (Tfh)], were analyzed in 9 healthy controls and 22 renal recipients. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that triple maintenance immunosuppression (CNI + MMF + steroids) efficiently blocked activation-induced upregulation of CD25 on CD8+, but not on CD4+ T cells. Although the level of expression of CD40L and ICOS was lower on activated Tfh of immunosuppressed patients, the percentage of CD40L-expressing Tfh was the same than control patients, as was Tfh production of IL21. Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) resulted in prolonged depletion of Tfh and reduction of CD4+ T cells number with depleting monoclonal antibody in murine model resulted in exponential decrease in DSA titers. Furthermore, induction with ATG also had long-term beneficial influence on Tfh function after immune reconstitution. We conclude that CD4+ T cell help is mandatory for naive and memory DSA responses, making Tfh cells attractive targets for improving the prevention of DSA generation and to prolong allograft survival. Waiting for innovative treatments to be translated into the clinical field ATG induction seems to currently offer the best clinical prospect to achieve this goal.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Piel , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Animales , Formación de Anticuerpos , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Citocinas/metabolismo , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto , Antígeno HLA-A2/genética , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase II/genética , Humanos , Memoria Inmunológica , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Isoantígenos/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Ratones Transgénicos , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA