RESUMEN
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) has a poor prognosis in general, with hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remaining the standard of care for cure. The hypomethylating agent, azacitidine, has been used as a bridging therapy to transplant. However, no patients have been treated with azacitidine without an HSCT post azacitidine. We report on an infant with JMML with somatic KRAS G12A mutation and monosomy 7 who achieved sustained remission following azacitidine monotherapy. He also developed an aberrant B-lymphoblast population which declined with similar kinetics as his JMML-associated abnormalities, suggesting that a B-lymphoblast population in JMML does not always progress to acute leukemia.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Azacitidina/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Células Precursoras de Linfocitos B/patología , Deleción Cromosómica , Cromosomas Humanos Par 7 , Humanos , Lactante , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Juvenil/patología , Masculino , Inducción de RemisiónAsunto(s)
Linaje de la Célula , Análisis Citogenético , Inmunofenotipificación , Linfocitos/metabolismo , Linfocitos/patología , Células Mieloides/metabolismo , Células Mieloides/patología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Antígenos de Superficie/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Translocación GenéticaRESUMEN
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive malignant small round cell tumor that arises in bone or soft tissue of adolescents and young adults. A characteristic molecular finding in ES is EWSR1 gene fusion with ETS (erythroblast transformation-specific) family genes including FLI1 (~90%) and ERG (>5%). Here we report our experience using integrated clinicopathologic, cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses of 32 pediatric patients with ES diagnosed in a single institution between 2005 and 2011. Diagnostic EWSR1 rearrangements were detected in 30 (93.8%) of 32 patients. Cytogenetics detected t(11;22) (n = 14) and t(21;22) (n = 1) in 15 (46.9%) patients. FISH detected EWSR1 rearrangements in 27 (96.4%) of 28 patients tested. RT-PCR was positive in 27 (84.4%) of 32 patients, including 24 EWSR1-FLI1 and 3 EWSR1-ERG. RT-PCR defined breakpoints and fusion partners in 7 cases with EWSR1 rearrangements detected by FISH. Sanger sequencing further delineated breakpoints in 21 (77.8%) of 27 RT-PCR positive cases. In summary, conventional cytogenetic analysis provided a global view but had a lower detection rate and longer turnaround time than other methods. FISH is a rapid method and theoretically can detect all EWSR1 rearrangements, but it cannot identify all partners and is not completely specific for ES. RT-PCR and sequencing are more sensitive and useful in identifying fusion partners and refining breakpoints; however, these methods can be compromised by poor RNA preservation and primer design. In conclusion, an integrated approach that uses all methods capable of detecting EWSR1 rearrangements has value in the workup of suspected cases of ES.