Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?

OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD). METHODS: This prospective population pharmacokinetic study was conducted in IHD patients prescribed cefazolin 2 g three times weekly. Plasma samples were collected at prespecified timepoints and assayed for total and unbound concentrations using validated LC. Pharmacokinetic modelling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics®. PTA in plasma suitable for MSSA (unbound trough concentrations of ≥2 mg/L for the final 24 h of a 72 h interval) were simulated for different dosing regimens. A PTA of ≥95% was deemed acceptable. RESULTS: A total of 260 cefazolin concentrations (130 total, 130 unbound) were collected from 16 patients (14 female) with a median age of 51 years. The median (IQR) pre-dialysis unbound cefazolin concentration for a 3 day dose interval trough was 17.7 (13.5-31.4) mg/L. The median (IQR) unbound fraction was 0.38 (0.32-0.46). The lowest pre-dialysis unbound concentration was 9.1 mg/L. A two-compartment model with a complex protein-binding component adequately described the data. The mean unbound cefazolin CL during IHD was 16.4 ±â€Š4.26 L/h, compared with 0.40 ±â€Š0.19 L/h when dialysis was off. Duration of time on haemodialysis (TOH) was the only covariate supported in the final model. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen was associated with a PTA of 99.7% on dosing simulations to maintain unbound concentrations of ≥2 mg/L with TOH of 6 months. The 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis was associated with a PTA of 95.4%. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis cefazolin regimen is supported for MSSA infections.

Antibiotic dose optimisation in the critically ill: targets, evidence and future strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the recent evidence for antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in enhancing patient outcomes in sepsis and septic shock. We also summarise the limitations of available data and describe future directions for research to support translation of antibiotic dose optimisation to the clinical setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Sepsis and septic shock are associated with poor outcomes and require antibiotic dose optimisation, mostly due to significantly altered pharmacokinetics. Many studies, including some randomised controlled trials have been conducted to measure the clinical outcome effects of antibiotic dose optimisation interventions including use of therapeutic drug monitoring. Current data support antibiotic dose optimisation for the critically ill. Further investigation is required to evolve more timely and robust precision antibiotic dose optimisation approaches, and to clearly quantify whether any clinical and health-economic benefits support expanded use of this treatment intervention. SUMMARY: Antibiotic dose optimisation appears to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock, however further research is required to quantify the level of benefit and develop a stronger knowledge of the role of new technologies to facilitate optimised dosing.

Unraveling the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring via machine learning for patients with sepsis.

Clinical studies investigating the benefits of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) among critically ill patients are hindered by small patient groups, variability between studies, patient heterogeneity, and inadequate use of TDM. Accordingly, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of TDM remain elusive. To address these challenges, we propose an innovative approach that leverages data-driven methods to unveil the concealed connections between therapy effectiveness and patient data, collected through a randomized controlled trial (DRKS00011159; 10th October 2016). Our findings reveal that machine learning algorithms can successfully identify informative features that distinguish between healthy and sick states. These hold promise as potential markers for disease classification and severity stratification, as well as offering a continuous and data-driven "multidimensional" Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The positive impact of TDM on patient recovery rates is demonstrated by unraveling the intricate connections between therapy effectiveness and clinically relevant data via machine learning.

Effect of Two Hydration Strategies on CapillarySodium Concentrations in Runners Participating in 170-km Trail Race: The 2015 UltraTrail du Mont-Blanc Experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of 2 hydration strategies on capillary sodium concentrations during Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc (UTMB) 2015. DESIGN: Prospective exposed/nonexposed cohort study. SETTING: Ultra-Trail du Mont Blanc 2015 (170 km). PARTICIPANTS: Thousand five hundred sixty-three registered runners of UTMB 2015 asked to predefine their hydration strategy as either "drinking to thirst" or any other mode ("not drinking to thirst"). INTERVENTION: One hundred "drinking to thirst" participants were randomly selected and paired (sex and age) with 96 "not drinking to thirst" participants. Participant weight and capillary sodium concentrations were measured before and after the race. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variations of capillary sodium concentrations and weight during the trail according to predefine hydration strategy as either "drinking to thirst" or "not drinking to thirst." Adverse events were recorded. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 196 participants, 88 (62 finishers) "drinking to thirst" and 87 (64 finishers) "nondrinking to thirst" participants were analyzed, respectively. There was no difference in the change in capillary sodium concentrations prerace to postrace between the groups (1.5 ± 4.4 vs 1.5 ± 4.7 mEq/L, P = 0.98). The change in participant weight was also not different (P = 0.3877). Hypernatremia or hyponatremia were reported in 19 of 88 (21.6%) and 24 of 87 (27.6%) in "drinking to thirst" and "non-drinking to thirst" participants, respectively (P = 0.20). The incidence of adverse events was not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study observed no impact of hydration strategy on the change in capillary sodium concentrations before and after UTMB 2015.

The impact of extracorporeal support on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Infections represent a major risk for critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients requiring extracorporeal life-saving support such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). Patient outcomes rely on achieving target antimicrobial concentrations. In critically ill adults on extracorporeal support, suboptimal antimicrobial concentrations have been shown to be common. Our objective was to systematically review antimicrobial pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill term neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and/or CRRT and compare them to similar cohorts of patients not receiving ECMO or CRRT. METHODS: Studies published between 1990 and 2022 were identified through systematic searches in PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Google Scholar and CINAHL. Studies were included which provided antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters (volume of distribution and clearance) in the neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and/or CRRT. Studies were excluded if no antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters were described or could be calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four pharmacokinetic studies were identified describing 737 patients, with neonatal patients recruited in 70% of the ECMO studies and <1% of the CRRT studies. Of all the studies, 50% were case reports or case series. The pharmacokinetics were altered for gentamicin, daptomycin, ceftolozane, micafungin, voriconazole, cefepime, fluconazole, piperacillin, and vancomycin, although considerable patient variability was described. CONCLUSION: Significant gaps remain in our understanding of the pharmacokinetic alterations in neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and CRRT support.

Propofol does not alter the protein binding and unbound concentration of lidocaine at clinically targeted plasma concentrations in vitro - A short communication.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous lidocaine is increasingly used as an analgesic adjunct during general anaesthesia. Lidocaine is highly protein-bound and changes to binding can alter drug efficacy or toxicity. We aimed to measure the effect of various propofol and lidocaine plasma concentration combinations on the protein binding and concentration of lidocaine in vitro. METHODS: Known targeted concentrations of propofol and lidocaine were added to drug-free human plasma in vitro. Samples were prepared and analysed in various clinically relevant concentration combinations; propofol at 0, 2, 4 and 6 µg/mL, and lidocaine at 1, 3 and 5 µg/mL. The total and unbound concentrations of lidocaine were measured by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and percentage protein binding was determined. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) and differences between groups analysed. RESULTS: The overall mean protein binding of lidocaine was 68.8% (SD 5.5, range 57.5-80.9%). Beta regression analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in lidocaine percentage binding across a range of propofol and lidocaine concentration combinations. CONCLUSION: Propofol did not alter the unbound and free pharmacologically active proportion of lidocaine at different clinically targeted concentrations of propofol and lidocaine in plasma in vitro. The percentage of plasma protein binding of lidocaine in this study was consistent with previously published results.

Is there evidence on the optimal duration of aminoglycoside therapy in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combination regimens used for the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in combination regimens is expected to be different from that of monotherapy regimens, and shorter durations could help minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence for the optimal duration of aminoglycosides in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINHAL databases were searched. Covidence software was used for article screening and management. Studies were included if they clearly reported the duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations used against Gram-negative bacteria. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023392709). RESULTS: A total of 45 ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combination courses from 32 articles were evaluated. The duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in combinations regimens ranged from 1 to 14 days, varying with the type of infection treated. In half (51.1%; (23/45) of the combinations, aminoglycosides were administered for a duration ranging from 6 to 9 days. In 26.7% (12/45) of the combinations, the duration of aminoglycoside therapy was ≤ 5 days. In the remaining 22.2% (10/45) of these combinations, the aminoglycosides were administered for a duration of ≥ 10 days. Aminoglycosides were administered for a longer duration of 7-14 days in 12 (75%) of the 16 combination courses that induced toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Long duration of aminoglycoside use is associated with increased risk of toxicity. However, there is a lack of evidence on defining an optimal duration of aminoglycoside therapy in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combination regimens that ensures clinical efficacy outcomes whilst minimizing toxicity outcomes.

A Systematic Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Novel Beta-Lactams and Beta-Lactam with Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for the Treatment of Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Novel beta-lactams show activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause severe lung infections. Understanding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of these agents may help optimise outcomes in the treatment of pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: To describe and appraise studies that report pulmonary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Scopus libraries were used for the literature search. Pulmonary population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on adult patients receiving cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Two independent authors screened, reviewed and extracted data from included articles. A reporting guideline for clinical pharmacokinetic studies (ClinPK statement) was used for bias assessment. Relevant outcomes were included, such as population pharmacokinetic parameters and probability of target attainment of dosing regimens. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included. There was heterogeneity in study methods and reporting of results, with diversity across studies in adhering to the ClinPK statement checklist. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most studied agent. Only two studies collected epithelial lining fluid samples from patients with pneumonia. All the other phase I studies enrolled healthy subjects. Significant population heterogeneity was evident among available population pharmacokinetic models. Probabilities of target attainment rates above 90% using current licensed dosing regiments were reported in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although lung pharmacokinetics was rarely described, this review observed high target attainment using plasma pharmacokinetic data for all novel beta-lactams. Future studies should describe lung pharmacokinetics in patient populations at risk of carbapenem-resistant pathogen infections.

Demographic, clinical and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in Central Australia.

We describe the demographics, clinical and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSI) in Central Australia. All ESBL-producing E. coli bloodstream isolates from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively identified. Demographic and clinical information was extracted by chart review. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for multi-locus sequence typing, antibiotic-resistance genes, and phylogenetic relationships. We identified 41 non-duplicate episodes of ESBL E. coli BSI. Median age was 55 years (IQR 47-63), 78% were female, 93% were Aboriginal, and half came from a remote community. Infections were predominantly urinary (68%, 28/41). In the 12 months prior, 70% (26/37) of identified patients had been hospitalised and 81% (30/37) prescribed antibiotics. Meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility was maintained in 100% and 95% of isolates, respectively. Co-resistance to non-ß-lactam antibiotics was 32% to gentamicin, 61% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 68% to ciprofloxacin. For sequenced isolates, 41% (16/35) were sequence type 131 (ST131). Mean acquired antibiotic-resistance genes for each isolate was 12.3 (SD 3.1). Four isolates carried an OXA-1 gene. Only non-ST131 isolates carried AmpC and acquired quinolone-resistance genes. There was some evidence of clustering of closely related strains, but no evidence of community or healthcare admission overlap. ESBL rates are rapidly rising in Central Australia, which is a conducive environment for antibiotic resistance development (e.g., overcrowding, socioeconomic disadvantages, high healthcare exposure and high antibiotic use). Future research is required to explore resistance-transmission dynamics in this unique setting.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers an alternative to inpatient (hospital bed-based) treatment of infections that require intravenous administration of antimicrobials. This meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence available from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of OPAT compared to inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Sciences databases for RCTs comparing outpatient versus inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. We included studies without restrictions on language or publication year. Eligibility was reviewed independently by two assessors, and data extraction was cross validated. We evaluated bias risk via the Cochrane tool and determined the evidence certainty using GRADE. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. The protocol of this review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023460389). RESULT: Thirteen RCTs, involving 1,310 participants were included. We found no difference in mortality (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.54, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.23 to 1.26; P = 0.93), treatment failure (RR 1.0, CI 0.59 to 1.72; P = 0.99), adverse reaction related to antimicrobials (RR 0.89, CI 0.69 to 1.15; P = 0.38), and administration device (RR 0.58, CI 0.17 to 1.98; P = 0.87) between outpatient and inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. The overall body of evidence had a low level of certainty. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests OPAT is a safe and effective alternative to inpatient treatment. Further RCTs are warranted for a thorough comparison of inpatient and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with a high level of certainty.

Can capillary microsampling facilitate a clinical pharmacokinetics study of cefazolin in critically ill children?

Aim: Pharmacokinetic studies in children are limited, in part due to challenges in blood sampling. We compare the use of capillary microsampling and conventional sampling techniques in pediatric patients to show results that can be used in the pharmacokinetic analysis of Cefazolin.Patients & Methods: Paired blood samples (n = 48) were collected from 12 patients (median age/weight 49 months/18 kg).Results: The United States Federal Drug Administration incurred sample reanalysis acceptance criteria was used and identified 79% of paired samples achieved a difference of less than 20% in magnitude with a capillary microsampling bias of -10% (SD 20%). With exclusion of PK outliers, this rose to 88%.Conclusion: Capillary microsampling is reliable, meets acceptance criteria and can be used in pharmacokinetic studies.ACTRN: 12618001469202.

What is this article about? This study assesses a novel method of blood sample collection (capillary microsampling) for the analysis of a common antibiotic, cefazolin. In this study, we compare the results from samples collected using this method to blood tests taken in the traditional way.Capillary microsampling collects a very small volume of blood (about a drop of blood or 0.05 ml) taken from a skin prick and collected in a capillary tube. Traditional blood sampling collects a larger volume of blood (typically from 1 to 3 ml) taken from an artery or a vein. In this study, the patients (10 male and 2 female) had a mean age of 49 months and a mean weight of 18 kg. The amount of cefazolin in the blood samples were analyzed using the same methodology and results compared with assess the variability and reliability of the capillary microsampling method.What were the results? The results showed that difference of the two sample types is within the accepted criteria of the United States Federal Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, meaning the results are reliable.What do the results of the study mean? Blood samples for cefazolin can be small and easily obtained from a skin prick as a capillary microsample and can give reliable results. This greatly aids the ability to study the metabolism of cefazolin in children, particularly those that are not able to give a large amount of blood.

Clinical guidance for unfractionated heparin dosing and monitoring in critically ill patients.

INTRODUCTION: Unfractionated heparin is a widely used anticoagulant in critically ill patients. It has a well-established safety profile and remains an attractive option for clinicians due to its short half-life and reversibility. Heparin has a unique pharmacokinetic profile, which contributes to significant inter-patient and intra-patient variability in effect. The variability in anticoagulant effect combined with heparin's short half-life mean close monitoring is required for clinical efficacy and preventing adverse effects. To optimize heparin use in critically ill patients, effective monitoring assays and dose adjustment strategies are needed. AREAS COVERED: This paper explores the use of heparin as an anticoagulant and optimal approaches to monitoring in critically ill patients. EXPERT OPINION: Conventional monitoring assays for heparin dosing have significant limitations. Emerging data appear to favor using anti-Xa assay monitoring for heparin anticoagulation, which many centers have successfully adopted as the standard. The anti-Xa assay appears have important benefits relative to the aPTT for heparin monitoring in critically ill patients, and should be considered for broader use.

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including ß-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Prolonged vs Intermittent Infusions of ß-Lactam Antibiotics in Adults With Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: There is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock. Objective: To determine whether prolonged ß-lactam antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions. Data Sources: The primary search was conducted with MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2, 2024. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing prolonged (continuous or extended) and intermittent infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A bayesian framework was used as the primary analysis approach and a frequentist framework as the secondary approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical cure. Results: From 18 eligible randomized clinical trials that included 9108 critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock (median age, 54 years; IQR, 48-57; 5961 men [65%]), 17 trials (9014 participants) contributed data to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio for all-cause 90-day mortality for prolonged infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics compared with intermittent infusions was 0.86 (95% credible interval, 0.72-0.98; I2 = 21.5%; high certainty), with a 99.1% posterior probability that prolonged infusions were associated with lower 90-day mortality. Prolonged infusion of ß-lactam antibiotics was associated with a reduced risk of intensive care unit mortality (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.70-0.97; high certainty) and an increase in clinical cure (risk ratio, 1.16; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.31; moderate certainty). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults in the intensive care unit who had sepsis or septic shock, the use of prolonged ß-lactam antibiotic infusions was associated with a reduced risk of 90-day mortality compared with intermittent infusions. The current evidence presents a high degree of certainty for clinicians to consider prolonged infusions as a standard of care in the management of sepsis and septic shock. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023399434.

Continuous vs Intermittent ß-Lactam Antibiotic Infusions in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The BLING III Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Whether ß-lactam antibiotics administered by continuous compared with intermittent infusion reduces the risk of death in patients with sepsis is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether continuous vs intermittent infusion of a ß-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) results in decreased all-cause mortality at 90 days in critically ill patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: An international, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in 104 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia, Belgium, France, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Recruitment occurred from March 26, 2018, to January 11, 2023, with follow-up completed on April 12, 2023. Participants were critically ill adults (≥18 years) treated with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for sepsis. Intervention: Eligible patients were randomized to receive an equivalent 24-hour dose of a ß-lactam antibiotic by either continuous (n = 3498) or intermittent (n = 3533) infusion for a clinician-determined duration of treatment or until ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure up to 14 days after randomization; new acquisition, colonization, or infection with a multiresistant organism or Clostridioides difficile infection up to 14 days after randomization; ICU mortality; and in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 7202 randomized participants, 7031 (mean [SD] age, 59 [16] years; 2423 women [35%]) met consent requirements for inclusion in the primary analysis (97.6%). Within 90 days, 864 of 3474 patients (24.9%) assigned to receive continuous infusion had died compared with 939 of 3507 (26.8%) assigned intermittent infusion (absolute difference, -1.9% [95% CI, -4.9% to 1.1%]; odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.01]; P = .08). Clinical cure was higher in the continuous vs intermittent infusion group (1930/3467 [55.7%] and 1744/3491 [50.0%], respectively; absolute difference, 5.7% [95% CI, 2.4% to 9.1%]). Other secondary outcomes were not statistically different. Conclusions and Relevance: The observed difference in 90-day mortality between continuous vs intermittent infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics did not meet statistical significance in the primary analysis. However, the confidence interval around the effect estimate includes the possibility of both no important effect and a clinically important benefit in the use of continuous infusions in this group of patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03213990.

COVID-19 Drug Treatments Are Prone to Sequestration in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuits: An Ex Vivo Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Study.

Drug treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) dramatically improve patient outcomes, and although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has significant use in these patients, it is unknown whether ECMO affects drug dosing. We used an ex vivo adult ECMO model to measure ECMO circuit effects on concentrations of specific COVID-19 drug treatments. Three identical ECMO circuits used in adult patients were set up. Circuits were primed with fresh human blood (temperature and pH maintained within normal limits). Three polystyrene jars with 75 ml fresh human blood were used as controls. Remdesivir, GS-441524, nafamostat, and tocilizumab were injected in the circuit and control jars at therapeutic concentrations. Samples were taken from circuit and control jars at predefined time points over 6 h and drug concentrations were measured using validated assays. Relative to baseline, mean (± standard deviation [SD]) study drug recoveries in both controls and circuits at 6 h were significantly lower for remdesivir (32.2% [±2.7] and 12.4% [±2.1], p < 0.001), nafamostat (21.4% [±5.0] and 0.0% [±0.0], p = 0.018). Reduced concentrations of COVID-19 drug treatments in ECMO circuits is a clinical concern. Remdesivir and nafamostat may need dose adjustments. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies are suggested to guide optimized COVID-19 drug treatment dosing during ECMO.

Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Dose Recommendations for Ciprofloxacin in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Obesity.

Recent studies have explored the influence of obesity and critical illness on ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics. However, variation across the subpopulation of individuals with obesity admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with varying renal function remains unexamined. This study aims to characterize ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in ICU patients with obesity and provide dose recommendations for this special population. Individual patient data of 34 ICU patients with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) from four studies evaluating ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in ICU patients were pooled and combined with data from a study involving 10 individuals with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. All samples were collected after intravenous administration. Non-linear mixed effects modeling and simulation were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and describe ciprofloxacin exposure in plasma. Model-based dose evaluations were performed using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of AUC/MIC >125. The data from patients with BMI ranging from 30.2 to 58.1 were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination and a proportional error model. The inclusion of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) as a covariate on clearance reduced inter-individual variability from 57.3% to 38.5% (P < .001). Neither body weight nor ICU admission significantly influenced clearance or volume of distribution. Renal function is a viable predictor for ciprofloxacin clearance in ICU patients with obesity, while critical illness and body weight do not significantly alter clearance. As such, body weight and critical illness do not need to be accounted for when dosing ciprofloxacin in ICU patients with obesity. Individuals with CKD-EPI >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 may require higher dosages for the treatment of pathogens with minimal inhibitory concentration ≥0.25 mg/L.

Factors Influencing Integration and Usability of Model-Informed Precision Dosing Software in the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients is challenging and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) software may be used to optimize dosing in these patients. However, few intensive care units (ICU) currently adopt MIPD software use. OBJECTIVES: To determine the usability of MIPD software perceived by ICU clinicians and identify implementation barriers and enablers of software in the ICU. METHODS: Clinicians (pharmacists and medical staff) who participated in a wider multicenter study using MIPD software were invited to participate in this mixed-method study. Participants scored the industry validated Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ, assessing software usability) and Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2, assessing factors impacting software acceptance) survey. Semistructured interviews were used to explore survey responses. The framework approach was used to identify factors influencing software usability and integration into the ICU from the survey and interview data. RESULTS: Seven of the eight eligible clinicians agreed to participate in the study. The PSSUQ usability scores ranked poorer than the reference norms (2.95 vs. 2.62). The TAM2 survey favorably ranked acceptance in all domains, except image. Qualitatively, key enablers to workflow integration included clear and accessible data entry, visual representation of recommendations, involvement of specialist clinicians, and local governance of software use. Barriers included rigid data entry systems and nonconformity of recommendations to local practices. CONCLUSION: Participants scored the MIPD software below the threshold that implies good usability. Factors such as availability of software support by specialist clinicians was important to participants while rigid data entry was found to be a deterrent.