Quantitative analysis of proteome coverage and recovery rates for upstream fractionation methods in proteomics.

The proteome of any cell or even any subcellular fraction remains too complex for complete analysis by one dimension of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Hence, to achieve greater depth of coverage for a proteome of interest, most groups routinely subfractionate the sample prior to LC-MS/MS so that the material entering LC-MS/MS is less complex than the original sample. Protein and/or peptide fractionation methods that biochemists have used for decades, such as strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX), isoelectric focusing (IEF) and SDS-PAGE, are the most common prefractionation methods used currently. There has, as yet, been no comprehensive, controlled evaluation of the relative merits of the various methods, although some binary comparisons have been made. Here, we compare the most popular methods for fractionating samples at both the protein and peptide level, replicating all analyses to provide estimates of the variability in the analyses and controlling precisely for instrument time dedicated to each analysis, as well as directly measuring the recovery of protein or peptide from each fractionation procedure. For maximal proteome coverage, SDS-PAGE is very clearly the most effective method tested, with more than 90% of the entire data set found. When considering the amount of material recovered after each fractionation procedure, solution-based IEF and SCX performed similarly, with approximately 80% of the input being recovered.

Identification of cognate host targets and specific ubiquitylation sites on the Salmonella SPI-1 effector SopB/SigD.

Salmonella enterica is a bacterial pathogen responsible for enteritis and typhoid fever. Virulence is linked to two Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI-1 and SPI-2) on the bacterial chromosome, each of which encodes a type III secretion system. While both the SPI-1 and SPI-2 systems secrete an array of effectors into the host, relatively few host proteins have been identified as targets for their effects. Here we use stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify the host targets of the SPI-1 effector, SopB/SigD. The only host protein found to bind immunoprecipitated SopB was the small G-protein Cdc42. The interaction was confirmed by reciprocal immunoprecipitation, and Cdc42 also bound glutathione S-transferase-fused SopB and SopB delivered through infection by the bacteria, confirming the interaction by an orthogonal method and in a more physiological context. The region of SopB responsible for the interaction was mapped to residues 117-168, and SopB is ubiquitylated at both K19 and K541, likely as monoubiquitylation. SopB colocalizes with activated Cdc42 near the plasmalemma, but we found no evidence that SopB alone can alter Cdc42 activity. This approach is also widely applicable to identify binding partners to other bacterial effectors.

Proteomic analysis of the secretome of Leishmania donovani.

BACKGROUND: Leishmania and other intracellular pathogens have evolved strategies that support invasion and persistence within host target cells. In some cases the underlying mechanisms involve the export of virulence factors into the host cell cytosol. Previous work from our laboratory identified one such candidate leishmania effector, namely elongation factor-1alpha, to be present in conditioned medium of infectious leishmania as well as within macrophage cytosol after infection. To investigate secretion of potential effectors more broadly, we used quantitative mass spectrometry to analyze the protein content of conditioned medium collected from cultures of stationary-phase promastigotes of Leishmania donovani, an agent of visceral leishmaniasis. RESULTS: Analysis of leishmania conditioned medium resulted in the identification of 151 proteins apparently secreted by L. donovani. Ratios reflecting the relative amounts of each leishmania protein secreted, as compared to that remaining cell associated, revealed a hierarchy of protein secretion, with some proteins secreted to a greater extent than others. Comparison with an in silico approach defining proteins potentially exported along the classic eukaryotic secretion pathway suggested that few leishmania proteins are targeted for export using a classic eukaryotic amino-terminal secretion signal peptide. Unexpectedly, a large majority of known eukaryotic exosomal proteins was detected in leishmania conditioned medium, suggesting a vesicle-based secretion system. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows that protein secretion by L. donovani is a heterogeneous process that is unlikely to be determined by a classical amino-terminal secretion signal. As an alternative, L. donovani appears to use multiple nonclassical secretion pathways, including the release of exosome-like microvesicles.