RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Approximately 45% of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) patients harbor a BRAFV600E mutation and are eligible for target therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), nevertheless, few data advocate for this. Hence, we've conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness and safety of BRAFi/MEKi in BRAFV600E ATC patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for BRAFi/MEKi TT in BRAFV600E ATC patients. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Nine studies with 168 patients were included. Median follow-up ranged from 2.0 to 47.9 months. 75% of patients had stage IVc. In a pooled analysis, ORR was 68.15% (95% CI 55.31-80.99, I2 = 47%) and DCR was 85.39% (95% CI 78.10-92.68, I2 = 0), with a median DOR of 14.4 months (95% CI 4.6-14.4) and a median PFS of 6.7 months (95% CI 4.7-34.2). Moreover, 1-year OS rate was 64.97% (95% CI 48.76-81.17, I2 = 84%) and 2-years OS rate was 52.08% (95% CI 35.71-68.45, I2 = 79%). Subgroup analysis showed patients in the neoadjuvant setting had higher rates of 1 and 2-years OS and observational studies tended to report higher rates of ORR than clinical trials. No new or unexpected adverse events were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated BRAFi/MEKi have a decent activity for BRAFV600E ATC patients, especially in the neoadjuvant setting, with a tolerable safety profile. However, further clinical trials are warranted to investigate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mutación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clazosentan has been studied to treat cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials updates the current knowledge regarding the efficacy and safety of clazosentan compared with placebo after aSAH. METHODS: Databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials directly comparing the use of clazosentan and placebo for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aSAH. Additional eligibility criteria were the report of any of the outcomes of interest (vasospasm, morbidity, functional outcome, or mortality). The primary outcome was vasospasm-related delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The analyses were stratified by clazosentan dosage (low or high dose) and aneurysm treatment modality (clipping or coiling). The Cochrane RoB-2 tool was used for studies quality assessment. RESULTS: Six studies comprising 7 clinical trials were included, involving 2778 patients. Clazosentan decreased the risk of vasospasm-related DCI (risk ratio [RR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.81) and delayed ischemic neurological deficit (RR 0.63, 95% 0.50-0.80). Angiographic vasospasm (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.61) was also decreased. Functional outcomes (favorable Glasgow Outcome Scale, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.24) and death (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71-1.49) did not change. Meanwhile, adverse events were increased by clazosentan (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.35-1.76). CONCLUSION: Clazosentan decreased vasospasm-related DCI and angiographic vasospasm but did not improve functional outcomes or mortality. Adverse events were increased by clazosentan.