Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710863

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Because physician practices contribute to national healthcare expenditures, initiatives aimed at educating physicians about high-value cost-conscious care (HVCCC) are important. Prior studies suggest that the training environment influences physician attitudes and behaviors towards HVCCC. OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between medical student experiences and HVCCC attitudes. DESIGN: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of a multi-institutional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students from nine US medical schools. APPROACH: A 44-item survey that included the Maastricht HVCCC Attitudes Questionnaire, a validated tool for assessing HVCCC attitudes, was administered electronically. Attitudinal domains of high-value care (HVC), cost incorporation (CI), and perceived drawbacks (PD) were compared using one-way ANOVA among students with a range of exposures. Open text responses inviting participants to reflect on their attitudes were analyzed using classical content analysis. KEY RESULTS: A total of 740 students completed the survey (response rate 15%). Students pursuing a "continuity-oriented" specialty held more favorable attitudes towards HVCCC than those pursuing "technique-oriented" specialties (HVC sub-score = 3.20 vs. 3.06; p = 0.005, CI sub-score = 2.83 vs. 2.74; p < 0.001). Qualitative analyses revealed personal, educational, and professional experiences shape students' HVCCC attitudes, with similar experiences interpreted differently leading to both more and less favorable attitudes. CONCLUSION: Students pursuing specialties with longitudinal patient contact may be more enthusiastic about practicing high-value care. Life experiences before and during medical school shape these attitudes, and complex interactions between these forces drive student perceptions of HVCCC.

2.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(4): 104284, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604101

RESUMEN

(1) Delays in initial treatment have been a frequently used metric for assessing disparities in medicine; however, there has been sparse literature on treatment delays in thyroid cancer. We therefore aimed to assess disparities by investigating the association between race/ethnicity, insurance type, and socioeconomic status and time to surgical treatment of thyroid cancer. (2) A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect demographic and clinical data from 443 surgical thyroid cancer patients at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2018-2019. We investigated the time between thyroid cancer diagnosis and surgery by race/ethnicity, insurance, and income groups. (3) Univariate analysis showed that race/ethnicity, insurance type, and SES alone were not statistically significant predictors of earlier time to treatment (p = 0.766, 0.339, 0.435, respectively). On multivariable linear regression, time between diagnosis and surgical treatment was not significantly different for racial minorities compared to non-Hispanic White patients, patients with Medicare/Medicaid compared to private insurance, and patients with lowest income quartile (<$54,585) compared to those with the highest (≥$116,560). (4) Present study showed no significant delays in treatment for different racial/ethnic, insurance, and income groups.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Adulto , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Clase Social , Medicare , Tiroidectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Renta
3.
Head Neck ; 46(5): 1224-1233, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38414175

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for oral cavity defects have been given nothing by mouth for 6-14 days post-operatively due to concern for orocutaneous fistula development. METHODS: Multiple databases were screened for studies assessing the rate of orocutaneous fistula formation in early (≤5 days) versus late (>5 days) feeding groups following oral cavity free flap reconstruction. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses were used. RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial, one prospective cohort, and three retrospective cohort studies were included. The early feeding group displayed no significant increase in orocutaneous fistula formation (RD = -0.02, p = 0.06) or free flap failure (RD = -0.01, p = 0.39), with a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference [days] = -2.43, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While further prospective trials are necessary, initiation of oral intake before post-operative day 5 may be appropriate in properly selected patients following oral reconstruction.

4.
J Community Health ; 48(6): 913-918, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405614

RESUMEN

Our institution's student-run free clinic has been able to offer medication at no out-of-pocket cost to all patients since it opened in 2004. We have employed two strategies to manage prescription drug costs while simultaneously increasing medication coverage: (1) using Patient Drug Assistance Programs (PDAPs) and (2) developing an institutional-level partnership with pharmaceutical charities for medication subsidization. In this study, we aimed to analyze the financial impact of these measures on the clinic.A query of clinic data over the past 5 years identified 299 active PDAPs, corresponding to 299 fully-subsidized prescriptions. In 2017, there were 35 active PDAPs, increasing to 52 (2018), 62 (2019), and 82 (2020) before a decline to 68 PDAPs in 2021. The company affiliated with the most PDAPs varied annually: GlaxoSmithKline (2017), Lilly (2018, 2019, 2020), and both GlaxoSmithKline and Lilly (2021). The most frequent medications were sitagliptin (2017), insulin (2018, 2019), albuterol (2017, 2018), and dulaglutide (2020, 2021).In addition, data extracted from the private company subsidization program was analyzed for the year 2021. Program membership was $10,000 for institution-wide medication subsidization for all uninsured patients in the hospital system. In total, the clinic was able to acquire 220 medications with a 96% subsidy, corresponding to a direct clinic cost of $2,101.28. Comparatively, the market value of these medications was $52,401.51.Utilization of free drug acquisition programs and partnerships with pharmaceutical charities allowed for an increase in cost-savings and medications provided. Although the process for applying for medication assistance programs is complex, these programs serve as powerful tools for providing medications that may otherwise be unavailable due to cost. Other clinics and healthcare settings with uninsured patients should consider these programs as a means to ease medication cost burden.


Asunto(s)
Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes , Humanos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Costos de los Medicamentos , Pacientes no Asegurados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA