[Crisis consultations in child and adolescent psychiatry in Reims: Cross-sectional study of the population of accompanied minors]. / Dispositif de crise en psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent à Reims : étude transversale de la population des mineurs accompagnés.

INTRODUCTION: The crisis consultation unit (CCU) of the child psychiatry department of the Reims University Hospital was created to respond to an increasing demand for rapid interventions with minors. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to observe the characteristics of the population received in this facility and to explore the links between the data, to hypothesize about its specificities. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study of data collected during telephone assessments between June 2016 and January 2018. A univariate analysis was performed using EpiInfo© software and the pvalue.io© statistical interface using R statistical software. A total of 263 telephone contacts were counted. RESULTS: A greater activity of the service is found during the school period. The majority of minors did not have any psychiatric or psychological follow-up at the time of the call. Boys consulted earlier, preferably for externalized disorders. The youngest children are often referred to prevent symptoms following an acute stress. CONCLUSION: Our study allowed us to draw up a sociodemographic profile and to show certain trends observed within the CCU of the child psychiatry department of the Reims University Hospital, in particular the multiplicity of reasons for consultation. At a time when the health crisis is impacting the mental health of the entire population and increasing the time required for treatment, this type of system is particularly relevant to the possible reorganization of the care offered by the CMP. The CCU would make it possible to report the most urgent situations, which would then benefit from specific care (hospitalization, medication, specific consultations).

Pregnancy denial: a complex symptom with life context as a trigger? A prospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for a woman to experience pregnancy denial. DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION: A French multicentric prospective case-control study with 71 mother-infant dyads having experienced a pregnancy denial versus a control group of 71 dyads. METHODS: Data were collected in the week after delivery using an observational leaflet and two psychiatric scales (MINI and QSSP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding social, demographic, medical and psychiatric data. RESULTS: Not being in a stable relationship (odds ratio [OR] 17.18, 95% CI 3.37-87.60]; P < 0.0001), not having a high school diploma (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.38]; P < 0.0001) and having a psychiatric history (OR 6.33, 95% CI 1.62-24.76; P = 0.0002) were risk factors to experience pregnancy denial, whereas being older was a protective factor (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93; P = 0.0054) (logistic regression, Wald 95% CI). Other risk factors included late declarations of pregnancy history and past pregnancy denials (case n = 7, 9.7% versus 0% in controls; P = 0.01), past pregnancy denials in the family (case n = 13, 18% versus control n = 4, 5.6%; P = 0.03), and use of a contraceptive method (75% for cases versus 7% in control; P < 0.0001), primarily an oral contraceptive (75%). CONCLUSION: Family or personal history of pregnancy denial should be part of the systematic anamnesis during the first visit of a patient of child-bearing age. Further, our study points out that life context (young age, single status, socio-economic precarity, pill-based contraception) could be a trigger for pregnancy denial in certain women. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Life context can be a trigger for pregnancy denial.

Peri-insular hemispherotomy in children: a single institution experience.

The objective of this paper is to evaluate our experience in performing peri-insular hemispherotomy in refractory epileptic children. First, we address the history of hemispheric surgeries for epilepsy and then we compare our results to the medical literature in term of seizure control and complications. Between 1993 and 2007, 14 children who suffered from refractory hemispheric epilepsy underwent a peri-insular hemispherotomy. All children's charts were reviewed in a retrospective manner. Age at onset of epilepsy, imaging studies, cause of refractory epilepsy, electroencephalography findings, type of epileptic seizure, number of antiepileptic drugs (AED), preoperative neuropsychological evaluation and surgical outcome with regard to the children's seizure activity were analyzed. Nine boys and 5 girls were enrolled in this study. The mean age at onset of epilepsy was 16 months (range birth-5 years). All the children presented complex partiel seizures. Seizure frequency varied from 5 to 100 a day. The average delay prior to the hemispherotomy was 83 months (range 12-226 months). Mean age at the time of the surgery was 8.4 years (range 1.7-18 years). We performed 9 peri-insular hemispherotomies on the right side and 5 on the left. There were no reported surgical complications in this series. 10 children are seizure free (72%). Peri-insular hemispherotomy must be considered as a safe and very efficient therapeutic approach for children suffering from hemispheric refractory epilepsy. Peri-insular hemispherotomies are procedures where pathology and surgical technique interact narrowly. Acquired pathologies had better results than developmental ones.