Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and suicidality: A replication study using reports to the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®).

INTRODUCTION: Reports of suicidality associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been reported to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We previously reported an increased reporting odds ratio (ROR) of some measures of suicidality with semaglutide and liraglutide using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Notwithstanding the increased ROR, causality between GLP-1 RAs exposure and any aspect of suicidality is not established. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis herein aims to extend a previous analysis of the FAERS by evaluating the ROR for suicidality reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase). We aimed to characterize the ROR of suicidality associated with GLP-1 RAs, as extrapolated from spontaneous reports. As per our previous report, the ROR was considered significant when the lower limit of the 95 % confidence (CI) was >1.0. RESULTS: We searched VigiBase reports from inception to January 2024. The RORs for suicidal ideation were significantly increased for semaglutide (5.82), liraglutide (4.03) and tirzepatide (2.25). For "depression/suicidal", the ROR was significantly increased for semaglutide (14.74) and liraglutide (5.86); and for suicidal behaviour, the ROR was significantly increased for semaglutide (6.52) and liraglutide (3.90). However, for suicide attempts, the ROR was significantly decreased for semaglutide (0.11), dulaglutide (0.075), exenatide (0.047) and liraglutide (0.15). For completed suicide, the ROR was also significantly decreased for semaglutide (0.01), dulaglutide (0.003), exenatide (0.002) and liraglutide (0.008). CONCLUSION: Unlike our previous report with FAERS, a mixed pattern of ROR emerged in the WHO VigiBase with respect to suicidality and exposure to select GLP-RAs. Causation between GLP-1 RA exposure and suicidality (either increased or decreased) cannot be ascertained from ROR data.

Efficacy of esketamine for perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum depression (PPD), now referred to as perinatal depression, is a prevalent and debilitating mood disorder that reduces health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychosocial functioning. Esketamine, which is efficacious in adults with treatment-resistant depression and individuals with depression and suicidality, is also analgesic in pain management during childbirth labour. Herein, we investigate the efficacy of prophylactic esketamine in reducing the incidence of PPD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid databases; inception to January 22, 2024) of randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of esketamine for PPD. We delimited our search to studies that prespecified the prevention of PPD with esketamine as the primary outcome. A meta-analysis was performed on PPD incidence rates using a random effects model. RESULTS: Our analysis consisted of seven studies that met our eligibility criteria. We found that esketamine was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of PPD diagnosis within one week of childbirth (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = [0.15, 0.60], p = 0.0047). We also observed that esketamine was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of PPD diagnosis between 4 to 6 weeks post-delivery (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = [0.18, 0.59], p = 0.0034). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that esketamine may have preventive antidepressant effects during the postpartum period. The aforementioned points have both mechanistic and clinically meaningful implications for the treatment of PPD.

Association between rumination, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in persons with depressive and other mood disorders and healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Suicidal ideation and behaviors are a leading cause of disability worldwide. Approximately 90 % of suicide completers have a diagnosable mood disorder. Extant literature reports rumination mediates functional impairment across mood disorders. Herein, we report the association between rumination and suicidality amongst persons with psychiatric disorders and healthy controls. METHODS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis included relevant articles retrieved from Web of Science, OVID and PubMed from inception to March 20, 2024. Random effects model was used to calculate the correlation between rumination, suicidal ideation and attempt. RESULTS: A total of 27 eligible studies were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Rumination (r = 0.25 [95 % CI: -0.03, 0.49]), reflection (r = 0.15 [-0.71, 0.83]) and brooding (r = 0.13 [-0.58, 0.73]) were nonsignificantly correlated with suicidal ideation in mood disorders. Suicide attempt history was significantly associated with greater odds of rumination in persons with depressive disorders (OR = 1.13 [0.42, 3.02]). In healthy controls, rumination (r = 0.30 [0.21, 0.38]), reflection (r = 0.23 [0.13, 0.32]) and brooding (r = 0.24 [0.12, 0.36]) were significantly correlated with suicidal ideation. Rumination also predicted lifetime history of suicide attempts in healthy controls (OR = 1.70 [1.16, 2.49]). LIMITATIONS: There were inadequate sample sizes of persons with different mood and psychiatric disorders which may have underpowered our ability to detect clinically meaningful associations. DISCUSSION: Our study reports a transdiagnostic association between measures of rumination and suicidality. Future research vistas should parse the neurobiological substrates subserving rumination and identify targeted therapies and their association with general cognition and treatment response.

Electroencephalography (EEG) spectral signatures of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and vortioxetine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Converging evidence suggests electroencephalography (EEG) methods may elucidate alterations in global structural and functional connectivity that underlie the pathophysiology of depressive disorders. Extant literature suggests SSRIs and SNRIs may broadly induce alterations to EEG-measured neural activity. Herein, this systematic review comprehensively evaluates changes to EEG spectral signatures associated with vortioxetine and each FDA-approved agent within the SSRI and SNRI class. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating changes to EEG spectral signatures associated with SSRI, SNRI, and/or vortioxetine treatment in persons with MDD. Database search occurred from database inception to May 3, 2024. RESULTS: Our search yielded 15 studies investigating overall spectral signature changes associated with SSRI- and/or SNRI-treatment. The existing literature presents with mixed findings. Notwithstanding, we did observe a pattern in which the SSRI and SNRI agents reproducibly affect EEG spectral signatures. We observed overlapping yet distinct spectral patterns for each agent within- and between-drug classes of SSRIs and SNRIs. Changes in resting/wake EEG were also observed. LIMITATIONS: The findings from our systematic review are mixed. Heterogeneity exists with sample size, composition, dosing of antidepressants, duration of antidepressant exposure, as well as the type of EEG devices used. DISCUSSIONS: Our findings provide support to the notion that although SSRIs, SNRIs and vortioxetine block reuptake of the serotonin transporter; they are different in their profile of pharmacology as evidenced by differential EEG signatures. EEG changes associated with SSRIs, SNRIs and vortioxetine are also highly replicated findings across mixed studies and populations.

Effects of ketamine on metabolic parameters in depressive disorders: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Persons with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), notably treatment-resistant depression (TRD), are differentially affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus and associated morbidity. Ketamine is highly efficacious in the treatment of adults living with MDD, notably TRD. Herein, we sought to determine the effect of ketamine on metabolic parameters in animal stress paradigms and human studies. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed, OVID, and Scopus databases for primary research articles from inception to May 5, 2024. Study screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers (S.W. and G.H.L.). Both preclinical and clinical studies were included in this review. RESULTS: Results from the preclinical studies indicate that in experimental diabetic conditions, ketamine does not disrupt glucose-insulin homeostasis. Within adults with MDD, ketamine is associated with GLUT3 transporter upregulation and differentially affects metabolomic signatures. In adults with TRD, ketamine induces increased brain glucose uptake in the prefrontal cortex. Available evidence suggests that ketamine does not adversely affect metabolic parameters. LIMITATIONS: There are a paucity of clinical studies evaluating the effects of ketamine on glucose-insulin homeostasis in adults with MDD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ketamine is not associated with significant and/or persistent disruptions in metabolic parameters. Available evidence indicates that ketamine does not adversely affect glucose-insulin homeostasis. These results underscore ketamine's efficacy and safety as an antidepressant treatment that is not associated with metabolic disturbances commonly reported with current augmentation therapies.

Association between cognitive functioning, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Treatable mental disorders, such as psychotic, major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BD), contribute to a substantial portion of suicide risk, often accompanied by neurocognitive deficits. We report the association between cognitive function and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts (SI/SA) in individuals with schizoaffective disorder, BD, and MDD. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Ovid and Scopus databases for primary studies published from inception to April 2024. Eligible articles that reported on the effect size of association between cognition and SI/SA were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were included for analysis. There was a negative association between executive functioning and SI/SA in schizoaffective disorder (SA: Corr = -0·78, 95 % CI [-1·00, 0·98]; SI: Corr = -0·06, 95 % CI [-0·85, 0·82]) and MDD (SA: Corr = -0·227, 95 % CI [-0·419, -0·017]; SI: Corr = -0·14, 95 % CI [-0·33, 0·06]). Results were mixed for BD, with a significant positive association between SA and global executive functioning (Corr = 0·08, 95 % CI [0·01, 0·15]) and negative association with emotion inhibition. Mixed results were observed for processing speed, attention, and learning and memory, transdiagnostically. LIMITATIONS: There is heterogeneity across sample compositions and cognitive measures. We did not have detailed information on individuals with respect to demographics and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a transdiagnostic association between measures of cognitive functions and aspects of suicidality. The interplay of cognitive disturbances, particularly in reward-based functioning, may underlie suicidality in individuals with mental disorders. Disturbances in impulse control, planning, and working memory may contribute to self-injurious behavior and suicide.

Engaging Mood Brain Circuits with Psilocybin (EMBRACE): a study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled and delayed-start, neuroimaging trial in depression.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide across domains of health and cognition, affecting overall quality of life. Approximately one third of individuals with depression do not fully respond to treatments (e.g., conventional antidepressants, psychotherapy) and alternative strategies are needed. Recent early phase trials suggest psilocybin may be a safe and efficacious intervention with rapid-acting antidepressant properties. Psilocybin is thought to exert therapeutic benefits by altering brain network connectivity and inducing neuroplastic changes that endure for weeks post-treatment. Although early clinical results are encouraging, psilocybin's acute neurobiological effects on neuroplasticity have not been fully investigated. We aim to examine for the first time how psilocybin acutely (intraday) and subacutely (weeks) alters functional brain networks implicated in depression. METHODS: Fifty participants diagnosed with MDD or persistent depressive disorder (PDD) will be recruited from a tertiary mood disorders clinic and undergo 1:1 randomization into either an experimental or control arm. Participants will be given either 25 mg psilocybin or 25 mg microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) placebo for the first treatment. Three weeks later, those in the control arm will transition to receiving 25 mg psilocybin. We will investigate whether treatments are associated with changes in arterial spin labelling and blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast neuroimaging assessments at acute and subacute timepoints. Primary outcomes include testing whether psilocybin demonstrates acute changes in (1) cerebral blood flow and (2) functional brain activity in networks associated with mood regulation and depression when compared to placebo, along with changes in MADRS score over time compared to placebo. Secondary outcomes include changes across complementary clinical psychiatric, cognitive, and functional scales from baseline to final follow-up. Serum peripheral neurotrophic and inflammatory biomarkers will be collected at baseline and follow-up to examine relationships with clinical response, and neuroimaging measures. DISCUSSION: This study will investigate the acute and additive subacute neuroplastic effects of psilocybin on brain networks affected by depression using advanced serial neuroimaging methods. Results will improve our understanding of psilocybin's antidepressant mechanisms versus placebo response and whether biological measures of brain function can provide early predictors of treatment response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06072898. Registered on 6 October 2023.

Impact of vortioxetine on depressive symptoms moderated by symptoms of anxiety in persons with post-COVID-19 condition: A secondary analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Recovery from a COVID-19 infection can lead to post-COVID-19 condition (PCC), which causes a multitude of debilitating symptoms that negatively affect an individual's health-related quality of life, including depressive and anxiety symptoms. We aim to examine the mediatory effects of anxiety on depressive symptoms in persons with PCC receiving vortioxetine. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating vortioxetine treatment on cognitive functioning in persons with PCC. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were measured by the 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Scale and the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR-16), respectively. RESULTS: Based on data of 147 participants, GAD-7 scores were significantly positively associated with QIDS-SR-16 scores (ß=0.038, 95 % CI [0.029,0.047], p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, a significant group (χ2=176.786, p < 0.001), time (χ2=8.914, p = 0.003), and treatment x time x GAD-7 score interaction (χ2=236.483, p < 0.001) effect was observed. Vortioxetine-treated participants had a significant difference in overall change in depressive symptoms (mean difference=-3.15, SEM=0.642, 95 % CI [-4.40,-1.89], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with depressive symptoms in persons with PCC. Antidepressant efficacy on ameliorating depressive symptoms is dependent on improving anxiety symptoms, underscoring significant implications in improving treatment efficacy and patient quality of life.

Preclinical and clinical efficacy of kappa opioid receptor antagonists for depression: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30 % of persons with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) inadequately respond to conventional antidepressants. Kappa opioid receptor (KOR) antagonists, aticaprant and navacaprant, are in development as treatments for MDD. Herein, we aim to comprehensively evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacology of aticaprant and navacaprant for MDD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of primary research investigating aticaprant and navacaprant on PubMed, OVID, and Scopus databases from inception to April 2024. Studies that reported on the pharmacological profile and/or safety and efficacy of aticaprant and navacaprant were included. RESULTS: Navacaprant monotherapy and aticaprant adjunctive therapy are in development for MDD. Navacaprant exhibits 300-fold selectivity for the KOR compared to the mu-opioid receptor, while aticaprant exhibits 30-fold selectivity. At clinically-relevant doses, navacaprant and aticaprant occupy 87-95 % and 73-94 % of KORs, respectively. Clinical trials of the foregoing agents (navacaprant as monotherapy and actiprant as adjunctive therapy) reported significant improvement in depressive symptoms and may clinically benefit measures of anhedonia. Both agents appear well-tolerated, with most adverse events mild and no known safety concerns. LIMITATIONS: Aticaprant and navacaprant treatment for MDD are in early stages of clinical trials and results from Phase 3 pivotal trials are not yet available. CONCLUSIONS: Kappa opioid receptor antagonists may serve as mechanistically-novel treatments for MDD and persons who inadequately respond to index conventional antidepressants. Anhedonia is debilitating and insufficiently treated with conventional antidepressants. Future research vistas should establish the efficacy and safety of KORAs in phase 3 studies in both acute and maintenance paradigms.

A replication study using the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) to evaluate whether an association between ketamine and esketamine and alcohol and substance misuse exists.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ketamine and esketamine are increasingly prescribed in the treatment of resistant mood disorders and persons at risk of suicide. Ketamine is a drug of misuse with increasing non-therapeutic use in the general population. Herein, our aim was to determine whether ketamine and/or esketamine are disproportionately associated with reports of substance and/or alcohol misuse. METHODS: Replicating a similar analysis recently conducted using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we identified cases of "alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder (SUD), substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse" in association with ketamine and esketamine reported to the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database (WHO VigiBase). We searched the database from inception to January 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) of each of the aforementioned parameters was calculated; acetaminophen was used as the control. The numerator of the equation represents the number of cases (n) and the denominator represents the total cases of psychiatric disorders (N). Significance was obtained when the lower limit of the 95 % confidence (CI) > 1.0. RESULTS: The RORs for ketamine was increased for most parameters (i.e., alcohol abuse (3.24), substance dependence (12.48), substance use disorder (170.44), substance abuse (2.94), drug dependence (2.88), drug use disorder (11.54) and drug abuse (2.85), respectively). With respect to esketamine, the RORs were observed to be different from ketamine insofar as we observed a reduction in the RORs for three parameters (i.e., substance abuse (0.41), drug dependence (0.083) and drug abuse (0.052), respectively). The IC025 values were significant for ketamine in cases of alcohol abuse (0.35), substance dependence (0.50), substance use disorder (2.77), substance abuse (0.83), drug dependence (0.97), drug use disorder (1.95) and drug abuse (0.94). Additionally, oxycontin showed significant IC025 values for substance use disorder (0.0014), substance abuse (0.042), and drug dependence (0.17). CONCLUSION: Esketamine was not associated with an increased ROR for any parameter of alcohol and/or substance use disorder. Mixed results were observed with ketamine with some RORs increased and others decreased. Estimating RORs using a pharmacovigilance database does not establish causation in the case of elevated RORs and cannot be assumed to be a therapeutic effect when lower RORs were observed.

The association between ketamine and esketamine and suicidality: reports to the Food And Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

INTRODUCTION: Replicated evidence indicates that ketamine and esketamine reduce measures of suicidality in persons with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). It remains uncertain whether individuals experience worsening of preexisting suicidality with either agent. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was searched from 1970 and 2019 to 30 September 2023 for reports of suicidal ideation, depression suicidal, suicidal behavior, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in association with ketamine and esketamine exposure, respectively. We present reporting odds ratios (ROR) significance was determined when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 1.0. Lithium was used as the control agent. RESULTS: Observed a higher ROR for suicidal ideation (ROR 7.58, 95% CI 6.34-9.07) and depression suicidal (ROR 14.19, 95% CI 1.80-112.07) with esketamine. Significantly lower RORs were observed for suicide attempt with ketamine (ROR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11-0.21) and esketamine (ROR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Mixed RORs across aspects of suicidality were observed with ketamine and esketamine. Limitations of the FAERS database prevent any determination of causal effects new onset suicidality to either agent. The lower RORs for suicide attempt with ketamine and esketamine is noted but cannot be interpreted as a direct therapeutic effect.

Protocols and practices in psilocybin assisted psychotherapy for depression: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) is a promising treatment option for depression, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) providing preliminary support for its safety and efficacy. However, there is a lack of consistency across existing treatment protocols and psychotherapeutic approaches. The objective of this review is to summarize and compare current psychotherapy methods of PAP in treating depression and distress in life-threatening illnesses. We sought to comprehensively summarize published psychotherapy protocols from clinical trials to provide insights for future practices. METHODS: A systematic search of four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL) for data relating to psychotherapy protocols was conducted by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: In total, our search identified 1869 articles; after removing duplicates, we screened 1107 articles. We included 70 articles in the full-text review and determined that 28 were eligible for the final review. All protocols include sessions before (preparatory) and after (integration) the psychedelic dosing session with supportive monitoring. However, there was substantial variability and inconsistencies in all other aspects of therapy protocols (e.g., duration and number of sessions, model of therapy). Additionally, significant limitations were identified in the frequent need for more clarity in the description of therapeutic approaches. CONCLUSION: In published clinical trials, PAP has consisted of preparation, supportive dosing, and integration sessions. Beyond this basic framework, significant heterogeneity and lack of clarity were identified in reported psychotherapy protocols, meaning a validated and universally agreed upon protocol for PAP currently does not exist. Future studies should more clearly define and report psychotherapeutic components to identify the safest and most efficacious approaches to PAP.

Comparing suicide completion rates in bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) has a high disease burden and the highest mortality risk in BD comes from suicide. Bipolar disorder type II (BD-II) has been described as a milder form of bipolar disorder; however, extant literature is inconsistent with this description and instead describe illness burden and notably suicidality comparable to persons with bipolar I disorder (BD-I). Towards quantifying the hazard of BD-II, herein we aim via systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rates of completed suicide in BD-I and BD-II. METHOD: We conducted a literature search on PubMed, OVID (Embase, Medline) and PsychINFO databases from inception to June 30th, 2023, according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles were selected based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis was performed, comparing the risk of completed suicide between individuals diagnosed with BD-I to BD-II. RESULTS: Four out of eight studies reported higher suicide completion rates in persons living with BD-II when compared to persons living with BD-I; however, two of the studies reported non-significance. Two studies reported significantly higher suicide completion rates for BD-I than BD-II. The pooled odds ratio of BD-II suicide rates to BD-I was 1.00 [95 % CI = 0.75, 1.34]. LIMITATIONS: The overarching limitation is the small number of studies and heterogeneity of studies that report on suicide completion in BD-I and BD-II. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the severity of BD-II, with a risk for suicide not dissimilar from BD-I. The greater propensity to depression, comorbidity and rapid-cycling course reported in BD-II are contributing factors to the significant mortality hazard in BD-II.

Association between fatigue and depressive symptoms in persons with post-COVID-19 condition: a post hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Post-COVID-19 Condition (PCC) is a prevalent, persistent and debilitating phenomenon occurring three or more months after resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. Fatigue and depressive symptoms are commonly reported in PCC. We aimed to further characterize PCC by assessing the relationship between fatigue and depressive symptom severity in adults with PCC. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted on data retrieved from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluating vortioxetine for cognitive deficits in persons with PCC. We sought to determine the relationship between baseline fatigue [i.e. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) total score] and baseline depressive symptom severity [i.e. 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR-16) total score] in adults with PCC. RESULTS: The statistical analysis included baseline data from 142 participants. After adjusting for age, sex, education, employment status, history of major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis, self-reported physical activity, history of documented acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and body mass index (BMI), baseline FSS was significantly correlated with baseline QIDS-SR-16 (ß = 0.825, p = .001). CONCLUSION: In our sample, baseline measures of fatigue and depressive symptoms are correlated in persons living with PCC. Individuals presenting with PCC and fatigue should be screened for the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. Guideline-concordant care should be prescribed for individuals experiencing clinically significant depressive symptoms. Fatigue and depressive symptom severity scores were not pre-specified as primary objectives of the study. Multiple confounding factors (i.e. disturbance in sleep, anthropometrics and cognitive impairment) were not collected nor adjusted for in the analysis herein. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Unrestricted Research Grant from H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05047952.

Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults: Réseau canadien pour les traitements de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (CANMAT) 2023 : Mise à jour des lignes directrices cliniques pour la prise en charge du trouble dépressif majeur chez les adultes.

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) last published clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder (MDD) in 2016. Owing to advances in the field, an update was needed to incorporate new evidence and provide new and revised recommendations for the assessment and management of MDD in adults. METHODS: CANMAT convened a guidelines editorial group comprised of academic clinicians and patient partners. A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since the 2016 guidelines. Recommendations were organized by lines of treatment, which were informed by CANMAT-defined levels of evidence and supplemented by clinical support (consisting of expert consensus on safety, tolerability, and feasibility). Drafts were revised based on review by patient partners, expert peer review, and a defined expert consensus process. RESULTS: The updated guidelines comprise eight primary topics, in a question-and-answer format, that map a patient care journey from assessment to selection of evidence-based treatments, prevention of recurrence, and strategies for inadequate response. The guidelines adopt a personalized care approach that emphasizes shared decision-making that reflects the values, preferences, and treatment history of the patient with MDD. Tables provide new and updated recommendations for psychological, pharmacological, lifestyle, complementary and alternative medicine, digital health, and neuromodulation treatments. Caveats and limitations of the evidence are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The CANMAT 2023 updated guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for the management of MDD, in a clinician-friendly format. These updated guidelines emphasize a collaborative, personalized, and systematic management approach that will help optimize outcomes for adults with MDD.

The association between ketamine and esketamine with alcohol and substance misuse: Reports to the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

INTRODUCTION: Ketamine and esketamine have been proven to be effective in treating adults with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Preliminary evidence indicates that, when combined with behavioral and psychological interventions, both agents may offer benefits for individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Notwithstanding, concerns have been raised as to whether either or both agents are associated with abuse and/or gateway activity. METHODS: Herein, we evaluate disproportionate reporting expressed as reporting odds ratios (ROR) for esketamine and ketamine. The outcomes of interest include alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, SUD, substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse as codified by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) within the FAERS. The IC025 values were significant for ketamine in cases of alcohol abuse (0.28), substance dependence (1.88), substance use disorder (0.996), substance abuse (0.61), drug dependence (0.56), drug use disorder (1.17) and drug abuse (1.22). Additionally, oxycontin showed significant IC025 values for substance dependence (0.067), substance use disorder (0.094), substance abuse (0.035), and drug dependence (0.27). RESULTS: We observed significant increases in the reporting odds ratios (RORs) for ketamine with respect to various outcomes: alcohol abuse (ROR 2.84, 95 % CI 1.53-5.28; p = 0.0010), substance dependence (ROR 18.72, 95 % CI 8.49-41.30; p ≤ 0.0001), SUD (ROR 11.40, 95 % CI 4.24-30.65; p ≤ 0.0001), substance abuse (ROR 2.29, 95 % CI 1.73-3.04; p ≤ 0.0001), drug dependence (ROR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.64-2.42; p ≤ 0.0001), drug use disorder (ROR 4.50, 2.94-6.88; p ≤ 0.0001) and drug abuse (ROR 3.72, 3.36-4.12; p ≤ 0.0001). For esketamine, we observed that the ROR was significantly reduced for substance abuse (ROR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.22-0.63; p = 0.0003), drug dependence (ROR 0.13, 95 % CI 0.076-0.23; p ≤ 0.0001) and drug abuse (ROR 0.048, 95 % CI 0.030-0.078; p ≤ 0.0001). To our knowledge, this is the first report of spontaneous adverse events related to these outcomes of interest in the FAERS. CONCLUSION: Mixed RORs were observed across aspects of SUD and AUD for both ketamine and esketamine. Due to limitations in the FAERS, establishing causal links between new onset alcohol and substance misuse with either agent remains inconclusive. Possible beneficial effects on measures of SUD and AUD were observed. It is currently unclear, but possible, whether both agents have differential ameliorative effects across dimensions of SUD and AUD, which is a focus of ongoing research.

Association between dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) and suicidality: reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: Package inserts for the FDA-approved dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant, lemborexant and daridorexant state that suicide risk should be monitored. It remains unknown whether suicidality is attributed to DORAs. We aim to evaluate suicidality associated with DORAs reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was determined with trazodone as the control. Significant disproportionate reporting was determined when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) did not encompass 1.0. We used information components (ICs) to calculate the lower limit of the 95% CI (IC025). IC was significantly increased when the IC025 ≥0. RESULTS: Suvorexant (0.025 ROR), lemborexant (0.019 ROR) and daridorexant (0.002 ROR) were significantly associated with lower odds of reported completed suicides compared to trazodone (p < 0.05). There was no significantly increased RORs for the DORAs regarding suicidal ideation, depression suicidal, suicidal behavior and suicide attempts. Nonsignificant associations between all parameters of suicidality were observed for each DORA using IC025. CONCLUSION: We did not find a significant association between any parameter of suicidality captured in the FAERS for each DORA. All persons treated for insomnia pharmacologically/non-pharmacologically should be evaluated for emergence/worsening of any suicidality aspect.