Utility of serial troponin testing for emergency department patients with syncope.

BACKGROUND: For emergency department (ED) patients with syncope, cardiac troponin can identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and prognosticate for 30-day serious adverse events. However, it is unclear if serial testing improves diagnostic yield and prognostication. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from two prospective studies conducted to develop the Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Adults (age ≥ 16 years) with syncope were enrolled, and patient characteristics, vital signs, physician diagnostic impression, electrocardiogram and troponin results, and adjudicated 30-day serious adverse event were collected. The primary outcome was the detection of a serious adverse event within 30 days of ED disposition. The secondary outcome was comparison of ED length of stay among patients with single versus serial troponin measurements. RESULTS: 4996 patients [mean age 64.5 (SD 18.8) years, 52.2% male] were included: 4397 (89.8%) with single troponin [232 (5.3%) with serious adverse event in the ED and 203 (4.6%) after ED disposition]; 499 (10.2%) patients with > 1 troponin measurement [39 (7.8%) with serious adverse event in ED and 60 (12.0%) after ED disposition]. Among those with serial measurements, 10 patients (2.0%) had a rise from below to above the 99th percentile threshold, of whom 4 patients (0.8%) suffered serious adverse event: two with arrhythmias diagnosed on electrocardiogram, one with ACS and one suffered respiratory failure. Nine patients (1.8%) had Canadian Syncope Risk Score risk reclassification based on serial measurement, and none suffered 30-day serious adverse event. Median ED length of stay was significantly longer for patients with serial testing (5.6 vs. 3.8 h, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial troponin measurement was sufficient for serious adverse event detection and in-ED risk stratification. Serial troponin testing does not improve the diagnostic yield or prognostication and should be reserved for patients with ongoing symptoms or electrocardiogram findings suggestive of cardiac ischemia.

ABSTRAIT: CONTEXTE: Pour les patients du service des urgences (DE) atteints de syncope, la troponine cardiaque peut identifier le syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) et le pronostic pour les événements indésirables graves de 30 jours. Cependant, il n'est pas clair si les tests en série améliorent le rendement diagnostique et le pronostic. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une analyse secondaire des données de deux études prospectives menées pour élaborer le Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Des adultes (âgés de 16 ans) atteints de syncope ont été recrutés, et les caractéristiques du patient, les signes vitaux, l'empreinte diagnostique du médecin, les résultats de l'électrocardiogramme et de la troponine, ainsi que les événements indésirables graves évalués à 30 jours ont été recueillis. Le critère de jugement principal était la détection d'un événement indésirable grave dans les 30 jours suivant la décision de l'urgence. Le critère de jugement secondaire était la comparaison de la durée de séjour à l'urgence chez les patients ayant une seule mesure de troponine par rapport à la mesure en série. RéSULTATS: 4 996 patients [âge moyen 64,5 (ET 18,8) ans, 52,2 % d'hommes] ont été inclus : 4 397 (89,8 %) avec une seule troponine [232 (5,3 %) avec un événement indésirable grave à l'urgence et 203 (4,6 %) après l'urgence]; 499 (10,2 %) patients avec > 1 mesure de la troponine [39 (7,8 %) avec événement indésirable grave à l'urgence et 60 (12,0 %) après la décision à l'urgence]. Parmi les patients ayant fait l'objet de mesures en série, 10 (2,0 %) présentaient une augmentation du seuil inférieur à supérieur au seuil du 99e percentile, dont 4 (0,8 %) ont subi un événement indésirable grave : deux avec arythmies diagnostiquées par électrocardiogramme, un avec SCA et un avec insuffisance respiratoire. Neuf patients (1,8 %) ont présenté une reclassification du risque selon le score canadien de risque de syncope en fonction de la mesure en série, et aucun n'a subi d'événement indésirable grave de 30 jours. La durée médiane de séjour aux urgences était significativement plus longue pour les patients ayant subi des tests en série (5,6 vs. 3,8 heures, p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: La mesure initiale de la troponine était suffisante pour la détection des effets indésirables graves et la stratification des risques aux urgences. Les tests de troponine en série n'améliorent pas le rendement diagnostique ou le pronostic et doivent être réservés aux patients présentant des symptômes continus ou des résultats d'électrocardiogramme suggérant une ischémie cardiaque.

The HEARTRISK6 Scale: Predicting Short-Term Serious Outcomes in Emergency Department Acute Heart Failure Patients.

Background: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation that may have poor outcomes but often does not require hospital admission. There is little evidence to guide dispositional decisions. Objectives: The authors sought to create a risk score for predicting short-term serious outcomes (SSO) in patients with AHF. Methods: We pooled data from 3 prospective cohorts: 2 published studies and 1 new cohort. The 3 cohorts prospectively enrolled patients who required treatment for AHF at 10 tertiary care hospital EDs. The primary outcome was SSO, defined as death <30 days, intubation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), myocardial infarction, or relapse to ED <14 days. The logistic regression model evaluated 13 predictors, used an AIC-based step-down procedure, and bootstrapped internal validation. Results: Of the 2,246 patients in the 3 cohorts (N = 559; 1,100; 587), the mean age was 77.4 years, 54.5% were male, 3.1% received intravenous nitroglycerin, 5.2% received ED NIV, and 48.6% were admitted to the hospital. There were 281 (12.5%) SSOs including 70 deaths (3.1%) with many in discharged patients. The final HEARTRISK6 Scale included 6 variables: valvular heart disease, tachycardia, need for NIV, creatinine, troponin, and failed reassessment (walk test). Choosing HEARTRISK6 total-point admission thresholds of ≥1 or ≥2 would yield, respectively, sensitivities of 88.3% (95% CI: 83.9%-91.8%) and 71.5% (95% CI: 65.9%-76.7%) and specificities of 24.7% (95% CI: 22.8%-26.7%) and 50.1% (95% CI: 47.9%-52.4%) for SSO. Conclusions: Using 3 large prospectively collected datasets, we created a concise and sensitive risk scale for patients with AHF in the ED. Implementation of the HEARTRISK6 scale could lead to safer and more efficient disposition decisions.

The development and validation of a conceptual definition of avoidable transitions from long-term care to the emergency department: A mixed methods study.

Background/Objectives: Transitions to and from Emergency Departments (EDs) can be detrimental to long-term care (LTC) residents and burden the healthcare system. While reducing avoidable transfers is imperative, various terms are used interchangeably including inappropriate, preventable, or unnecessary transitions. Our study objectives were to develop a conceptual definition of avoidable LTC-ED transitions and to verify the level of stakeholder agreement with this definition. Methods: The EXamining Aged Care Transitions study adopted an exploratory sequential mixed-method design. The study was conducted in 2015-2016 in 16 LTC facilities, 1 ED, and 1 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in a major urban center in western Canada. Phase 1 included 80 participants, (healthcare aides, licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, LTC managers, family members of residents, and EMS staff). We conducted semistructured interviews (n = 25) and focus groups (n = 19). In Phase 2, 327 ED staff, EMS staff, LTC staff, and medical directors responded to a survey based on the qualitative findings. Results: Avoidable transitions were attributed to limited resources in LTC, insufficient preventive care, and resident or family wishes. The definition generated was: A transition of an LTC resident to the ED is considered avoidable if: (a) Diagnostic testing, medical assessment, and treatment can be accessed in a timely manner by other means; (b) the reasons for a transfer are unclear and the transition would increase the disorientation, pain, or discomfort of a resident, outweighing a clear benefit of a transfer; and (c) the transition is against the wishes expressed by the resident over time, including through informal and undocumented conversations. There was a high level of agreement with the definition across the four participant groups. Conclusions and Implications: To effectively reduce LTC resident avoidable transitions, stakeholders must share a common definition. Our conceptual definition may significantly contribute to improved care for LTC residents.

The Impact of an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Using Conventional Troponin I for Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.

Background: This study strove to assess the impact of the implementation of an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP), using shortened serial-testing intervals and a conventional troponin I (c-TnI) test, on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting to a Canadian ED with a primary complaint of cardiac chest pain between January 14, 2017 and January 15, 2019. For non-high-risk patients, the troponin delta timing decreased from 6 hours to 3 hours, and a different conventional troponin I level cut-point was implemented on January 15, 2018. The primary outcome was ED LOS. Secondary outcomes included disposition status, consultation proportions, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days. Results: A total of 3133 patient interactions were included. Although the overall decrease in median ED LOS was not significant (P = 0.074), a significant reduction occurred in ED LOS (-33 minutes; 95% confidence interval: -53.6 to -12.4 minutes) among patients who were discharged in the post-ADP group. Consultations were unchanged between groups (36.1% before vs 33.8% after; P = 0.17). The major adverse cardiac events outcomes were unchanged across cohorts (15.9% vs 15.3%; P = 0.62). Conclusions: The implementation of an ADP, with a conventional troponin I test, for cardiac chest pain in a Canadian ED was not associated with a significant reduction of LOS for all patients; however, a significant reduction occurred for patients who were discharged, and the strategy appears safe.

Contexte: Cette étude visait à évaluer les répercussions de la mise en œuvre d'un protocole de diagnostic accéléré avec intervalles plus courts entre les épreuves séquentielles et dosage classique de la troponine I sur la durée du séjour à l'urgence. Méthodologie: Cette étude de cohortes rétrospective a été menée chez des adultes (âgés de 18 ans ou plus) qui se sont présentés à l'urgence d'un hôpital canadien principalement pour une douleur thoracique cardiaque entre le 14 janvier 2017 et le 15 janvier 2019. Chez les patients qui n'étaient pas exposés à un risque élevé, l'intervalle de dosage de la troponine (delta) est passé de 6 heures à 3 heures, et une nouvelle valeur seuil a été utilisée pour le dosage classique de la troponine I à compter du 15 janvier 2018. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la durée du séjour à l'urgence. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient le statut au moment de la sortie, les proportions de consultation et les événements cardiovasculaires indésirables majeurs dans les 30 jours. Résultats: Au total, 3 133 interactions avec des patients ont été incluses. Bien que la diminution globale de la durée médiane du séjour à l'urgence n'ait pas été significative (p = 0,074), une réduction significative du séjour à l'urgence (-33 minutes; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : -53,6 à -12,4 minutes) a été observée chez les patients ayant reçu leur congé appartenant au groupe dans lequel le protocole de diagnostic accéléré a été mis en œuvre. Les consultations étaient inchangées entre les groupes (36,1 % avant vs 33,8 % après; p = 0,17). Les résultats relatifs aux événements cardiovasculaires indésirables majeurs sont demeurés inchangés dans les cohortes (15,9 % vs 15,3 %; p = 0,62). Conclusions: La mise en œuvre d'un protocole de diagnostic accéléré, avec un dosage classique de la troponine I, en cas de douleur thoracique d'origine cardiaque, à l'urgence d'un établissement canadien ne s'est pas traduite par une réduction significative du séjour à l'urgence chez tous les patients. Une réduction significative a néanmoins été observée chez les patients qui ont reçu leur congé, et la stratégie s'est avérée sûre.

The effectiveness of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with migraine presenting to emergency settings: A systematic review and network analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with acute migraine. BACKGROUND: Parenteral agents have been shown to be effective in treating acute migraine pain; however, the comparative effectiveness of different approaches is unclear. METHODS: Nine electronic databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify randomized clinical trials assessing parenteral agents to treat acute migraine pain in emergency settings. Two independent reviewers completed study screening, data extraction, and Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment, with differences being resolved by adjudication. The protocol of the review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42018100096). RESULTS: A total of 97 unique studies were included, with most studies reporting a high or unclear risk of bias. Monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, successfully reduced pain scores prior to discharge. They also increased the proportion of patients reporting pain relief and being pain free. Across the pain outcomes assessed, combination therapy was one of the higher ranked approaches and provided robust improvements in pain outcomes, including lowering pain scores (mean difference -3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.64 to -2.08) and increasing the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (risk ratio [RR] 2.83, 95% CI 1.74-4.61). Neuroleptics and metoclopramide also ranked high in terms of the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (neuroleptics RR 2.76, 95% CI 2.12-3.60; metoclopramide RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.90-3.49) and being pain free before emergency department discharge (neuroleptics RR 4.8, 95% CI 3.61-6.49; metoclopramide RR 4.1, 95% CI 3.02-5.44). Most parenteral agents were associated with increased adverse events, particularly combination therapy and neuroleptics. CONCLUSIONS: Various parenteral agents were found to provide effective pain relief. Considering the consistent improvements across various outcomes, combination therapy, as well as monotherapy of either metoclopramide or neuroleptics are recommended as first-line options for managing acute migraine pain. There are risks of adverse events, especially akathisia, following treatment with these agents. We recommend that a shared decision-making model be considered to effectively identify the best treatment option based on the patient's needs.

Physician Management and CT Ordering in the Emergency Department for Primary Headaches.

OBJECTIVE: Management of primary headache (PHA) varies across emergency departments (ED), yet there is widespread agreement that computed tomography (CT) scans are overused. This study assessed emergency physicians' (EPs) PHA management and their attitudes towards head CT ordering. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken with EPs from one Canadian center. Drivers of physicians' perceptions regarding the appropriateness of CT ordering for patients with PHA were explored. RESULTS: A total of 73 EPs (70% males; 48% with <10 years of practice) participated in the study. Most EPs (88%) did not order investigations for moderate-severe primary headaches; however, CT was the common investigation (47%) for headaches that did not improve. Computed tomography ordering was frequently motivated by the need for specialist consultation (64%) or admission (64%). A small proportion (27%) believed patients usually/frequently expected a scan. Nearly half of EPs (48%) identified patient imaging expectations/requests as a barrier to reducing CT ordering. Emergency physicians with CCFP (EM) certification were less likely to perceive CT ordering for patients with PHA as appropriate. Conversely, those who identified the possibility of missing a condition as a major barrier to limiting their CT use were more likely to perceive CT ordering for patients with PHA as appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians reported consistency and evidence-based medical management. They highlighted the complexities of limiting CT ordering and both their level of training and their perceived barriers for limiting CT ordering seem to be influencing their attitudes. Further studies could elucidate these and other factors influencing their practice.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Thoracic Imaging Referral Guideline.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Thoracic Expert Panel consists of radiologists, respirologists, emergency and family physicians, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 24 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 30 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 48 recommendation statements across the 24 scenarios. This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for screening/asymptomatic individuals, non-specific chest pain, hospital admission for non-thoracic conditions, long-term care admission, routine pre-operative imaging, post-interventional chest procedure, upper respiratory tract infection, acute exacerbation of asthma, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, suspect pneumonia, pneumonia follow-up, immunosuppressed patient with respiratory symptoms/febrile neutropenia, chronic cough, suspected pneumothorax (non-traumatic), clinically suspected pleural effusion, hemoptysis, chronic dyspnea of non-cardiovascular origin, suspected interstitial lung disease, incidental lung nodule, suspected mediastinal lesion, suspected mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and elevated diaphragm on chest radiograph.

Effect of a High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Associated Diagnostic Protocol on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the introduction of a high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) assay and its associated accelerated protocol on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) for patients presenting with chest pain, compared to an accelerated diagnostic protocol using conventional troponin (TnI) testing. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults with a primary presenting complaint of chest pain of cardiac origin and a Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale score of 2 or 3, between November 8, 2019 and November 9, 2021, to a tertiary-care urban Canadian ED. The primary outcome was ED LOS. Secondary outcomes included consultation proportions and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days of the index ED visit. Results: A total of 2640 patients presenting with chest pain were included, with 1333 in the TnI group and 1307 in the hs-TnI group. Median ED LOS decreased significantly, from 392 minutes for the TnI group, and 371 minutes for the hs-TnI group (median difference = 21 minutes; 95% confidence interval: 5.3, 36.7). The numbers of consultations and admissions were not statistically different between study periods. The major adverse cardiac events outcomes did not change following the implementation of the hs-TnI test (13.6% vs 13.1%; P = 0.71). Conclusions: The implementation of an accelerated chest pain protocol using an hs-TnI assay in a tertiary-care Canadian ED was associated with a modest reduction of LOS for all patients, and a substantial reduction of LOS for patients undergoing serial troponin testing. This strategy was safe, with no increase in adverse outcomes.

Contexte: Cette étude visait à évaluer l'introduction du dosage de la troponine I de haute sensibilité (hs-TnI) et le protocole accéléré qui lui est associé sur la durée des séjours aux urgences dans le cas des patients qui consultent pour une douleur thoracique, comparativement à un protocole diagnostique accéléré faisant appel à un test de troponine classique (TnI). Méthodologie: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective portant sur tous les adultes qui se sont présentés aux urgences d'un établissement urbain de soins tertiaires canadien entre le 8 novembre 2019 et le 9 novembre 2021 principalement pour une douleur thoracique d'origine cardiaque et dont le score était de 2 ou 3 à l'Échelle canadienne de triage et de gravité (ETG). Le principal critère d'évaluation était la durée du séjour au service des urgences. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la fréquence des consultations et les événements cardiaques indésirables majeurs dans les 30 jours ayant suivi la visite de référence aux urgences. Résultats: Au total, 2640 patients qui s'étaient présentés aux urgences pour une douleur thoracique ont été inclus, 1333 se trouvant dans le groupe TnI et 1307 dans le groupe hs-TnI. La durée médiane du séjour aux urgences a diminué considérablement, passant de 392 minutes dans le groupe TnI à 371 minutes dans le groupe hs-TnI (différence médiane de 21 minutes; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 5,3-36,7). Les consultations et les admissions n'ont pas affiché de différence statistique entre les périodes de l'étude. Les événements cardiaques indésirables majeurs n'ont pas varié après l'introduction du dosage de la hs-TnI (13,6 % vs 13,1 %; p = 0,71). Conclusions: L'adoption d'un protocole accéléré pour la douleur thoracique à l'aide du dosage de la hs-TnI au service des urgences d'un établissement de soins tertiaires canadien a été associée à une légère réduction de la durée du séjour pour l'ensemble des patients et à une réduction substantielle de cette durée pour les patients soumis à des analyses de la troponine en série. De plus, cette stratégie était sûre sans hausse des événements indésirables.