Patient and Context Factors in the Adoption of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Importance: Although active surveillance for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) has been recommended for years, its adoption at the population level is often limited. Objective: To make active surveillance available for patients with LRPC using a research framework and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes between those who receive active surveillance vs radical treatments at diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, prospective cohort study was designed by a large multidisciplinary group of specialists and patients' representatives. The study was conducted within all 18 urology centers and 7 radiation oncology centers in the Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Regional Oncology Network in Northwest Italy (approximate population, 4.5 million). Participants included patients with a new diagnosis of LRPC from June 2015 to December 2021. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023. Exposure: At diagnosis, all patients were informed of the available treatment options by the urologist and received an information leaflet describing the benefits and risks of active surveillance compared with active treatments, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation treatment (RT). Patients choosing active surveillance were actively monitored with regular prostate-specific antigen testing, clinical examinations, and a rebiopsy at 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were proportion of patients choosing active surveillance or radical treatments, overall survival, and, for patients in active surveillance, treatment-free survival. Comparisons were analyzed with multivariable logistic or Cox models, considering centers as clusters. Results: A total of 852 male patients (median [IQR] age, 70 [64-74] years) were included, and 706 patients (82.9%) chose active surveillance, with an increasing trend over time; 109 patients (12.8%) chose RP, and 37 patients (4.3%) chose RT. Median (IQR) follow-up was 57 (41-76) months. Worse prostate cancer prognostic factors were negatively associated with choosing active surveillance (eg, stage T2a vs T1c: odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.93), while patients who were older (eg, age ≥75 vs <65 years: OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.98-9.22), had higher comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.85), underwent an independent revision of the first prostate biopsy (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.26-4.38) or underwent a multidisciplinary assessment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.38-5.11) were more likely to choose active surveillance vs active treatment. After adjustment, center at which a patient was treated continued to be an important factor in the choice of treatment (intraclass correlation coefficient, 18.6%). No differences were detected in overall survival between active treatment and active surveillance. Treatment-free survival in the active surveillance cohort was 59.0% (95% CI, 54.8%-62.9%) at 24 months, 54.5% (95% CI, 50.2%-58.6%) at 36 months, and 47.0% (95% CI, 42.2%-51.7%) at 48 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of patients with LRPC, a research framework at system level as well as favorable prognostic factors, a multidisciplinary approach, and an independent review of the first prostate biopsy at patient-level were positively associated with high uptake of active surveillance, a practice largely underused before this study.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint. RESULTS: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.

Is concomitant treatment with steroids and radiotherapy more favorable than sequential treatment in moderate-to-severe graves orbitopathy?

PURPOSE: Glucocorticoids (GCs) and external radiotherapy (RT) are used for treating moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO). We aimed to assess whether GCs and RT were more effective when administered concomitantly or sequentially. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes [assessed by Clinical Activity Score (CAS) and NOSPECS classification] in 73 patients treated with both i.v. GCs and RT. The patients were divided in two groups: In group A (53 patients), RT was delivered concomitantly with GCs, and in group B (20 patients) RT was administered subsequently to the end of methylprednisolone. RESULTS: At baseline, CAS (median 4.0) and the percentage of patients encompassing the various grades of the classes 2, 3 and 4 of the NOSPECS score were similar in both groups. Six months after RT, CAS decreased to 2 in both groups (p = 0.0003 vs baseline) as well as NOSPECS class 4 (p < 0.0001 vs baseline). NOSPECS class 2 improved more in group A than in group B (p = 0.016). The median cumulative dose of GCs was lower in group A than in group B (median 4.500 vs 6000 mg, p < 0.007); the overall length of therapy was shorter in group A than in group B (68 vs 106 days, p < 0,02). The most common acute adverse effect was transient conjunctivitis (five in group A and three in group B); seven patients (five in group A and two in group B, age between 60 and 66 years) developed cataract, requiring surgery in five cases. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of GC and RT showed a favorable effect in moderate-to-severe GO, thus suggesting that RT should be carried out early during steroid therapy, when clinical symptoms do not improve or deteriorate after the first i.v. administrations of GCs.

Low-dose radiotherapy for extranodal marginal zone B lymphoma of the lip: Case report and literature review.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) of the lip is extremely rare. It is usually indolent and in early stages a local approach is often indicated. We present a case report of a patient with extranodal NHL of the lip treated with chemotherapy and low-dose radiation treatment (RT). The patient was affected by B-cell NHL of the marginal zone, Stage IAE. After a few months of observation with progressive disease, the patient was submitted to two cycles of chemotherapy with no response. Therefore, he was treated with very low-dose RT consisting of two fractions of 2 Gy. Complete response was observed and after 1-year follow-up, persistent complete response was recorded. In cases of localized disease, especially in patients with comorbidities of poor performance status (PS), low-dose RT can be an appropriate approach with excellent outcomes in terms of effectiveness and low risk of toxicity.

Automatic genetic planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy: A large multi-centre validation for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The first clinical genetic autoplanning algorithm (Genetic Planning Solution, GPS) was validated in ten radiotherapy centres for prostate cancer VMAT by comparison with manual planning (Manual). METHODS: Although there were large differences among centres in planning protocol, GPS was tuned with the data of a single centre and then applied everywhere without any centre-specific fine-tuning. For each centre, ten Manual plans were compared with autoGPS plans, considering dosimetric plan parameters and the Clinical Blind Score (CBS) resulting from blind clinician plan comparisons. AutoGPS plans were used as is, i.e. there was no patient-specific fine-tuning. RESULTS: For nine centres, all ten plans were clinically acceptable. In the remaining centre, only one plan was acceptable. For the 91% acceptable plans, differences between Manual and AutoGPS in target coverage were negligible. OAR doses were significantly lower in AutoGPS plans (p < 0.05); rectum D15% and Dmean were reduced by 8.1% and 17.9%, bladder D25% and Dmean by 5.9% and 10.3%. According to clinicians, 69% of the acceptable AutoGPS plans were superior to the corresponding Manual plan. In case of preferred Manual plans (31%), perceived advantages compared to autoGPS were minor. QA measurements demonstrated that autoGPS plans were deliverable. A quick configuration adjustment in the centre with unacceptable plans rendered 100% of plans acceptable. CONCLUSION: A novel, clinically applied genetic autoplanning algorithm was validated in 10 centres for in total 100 prostate cancer patients. High quality plans could be generated at different centres without centre-specific algorithm tuning.

Lactobacillus brevis CD2 for Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Patients With Head and Neck Tumors: A Multicentric Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal mucositis occurs in virtually all patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiochemotherapy. The manipulation of the oral cavity microbiota represents an intriguing and challenging target. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients were enrolled to receive Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges or oral care regimen with sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3 or 4 oropharyngeal mucositis during radiotherapy treatment. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 oropharyngeal mucositis between the intervention and control groups (40.6% vs. 41.6% respectively, p=0.974). The incidence of pain, dysphagia, body weight loss and quality of life were not different between the experimental and standard arm. CONCLUSION: Our study was not able to demonstrate the efficacy of L. brevis CD2 lozenges in preventing radiation-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. Although modulating homeostasis of the salivary microbiota in the oral cavity seems attractive, it clearly needs further study.

Role of radiotherapy in improving activity of immune-modulating drugs in advanced renal cancer: Biological rationale and clinical evidences.

In the last few years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been extensively investigated in renal cell carcinoma and led to remarkable results. Radiation therapy may increase the activity of immune modulating agents through different mechanisms, priming the immune system, recruiting immune cells to the tumor environment, and altering the immunosuppressive effects of the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical studies reported increased loco-regional control when radiation is combined with immune-checkpoint blockade. Moreover, increased systemic disease control has been demonstrated when local radiation is combined with both anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Actually, several trials are ongoing testing the activity of radiation therapy in combination with different immune-modulating agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The aim of this paper is to focus on the biological rationale of adding radiation therapy to immune-modulating agents in renal cell carcinoma and to review the currently available clinical evidence about the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Variability of clinical target volume delineation for rectal cancer patients planned for neoadjuvant radiotherapy with the aid of the platform Anatom-e.

OBJECTIVE: Delineation of treatment volumes is a major source of uncertainties in radiotherapy (RT). This is also true for rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant RT, with a potential impact on treatment quality. We investigated the role of the digital platform Anatom-e (Anatom-e Information Sytems Ltd., Houston, Texas) in increasing the compliance to follow a specific treatment protocol in a multicentric setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two clinical cases of locally advanced rectal cancer were chosen. Participants were instructed to follow the 2009 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus atlas and asked to manually segment clinical target volumes (CTVs), for both patient 1 and 2, on day 1 with and without the use of Anatom-e. After one week (day 2), the same radiation oncologist contoured again, with and without Anatom-e, the same CT series. Intraobserver (Intra-OV) and interobserver (Inter-OV) variability were evaluated with the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean distance to agreement (MDA). RESULTS: For clinical case 1, no significant difference was found for Intra-OV and Inter-OV. For clinical case 2, no significant difference was found for Intra-OV but a statistically significant difference was found for Inter-OV in DSC when using or not the platform. Mean DCS was 0.65 (SD: ±0.64; range: 0.58-0.79) for day 1 vs reference volume without Anatom-e and 0.72 (SD: ±0.39; range: 0.67-0.77) (p = 0.03) with it. Mean MDA was lower with Anatom-e (3.61; SD: ±1.33; range: 2.85-4.78) than without (4.14; SD: ±2.97; range: 2.18-5.21), with no statistical significance (p = 0.21) The use of Anatom-e decreased the SD from 2.97 to 1.33. Mean HD was lower with Anatom-e (26.06; SD: ±2.05; range: 24.08-32.62), with no statistical significance (p = 0.14) compared to that without (31.39; SD: ±1.31; range: 26.14-48.72). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Anatom-e decreased the Inter-OV in the CTV delineation process for locally advanced rectal cancer with complex disease presentation planned for neoadjuvant RT. This system may be potentially helpful in increasing the compliance to follow shared guidelines and protocols.

Heterotopic ossifications: role of radiotherapy as prophylactic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is abnormal formation of lamellar bone in soft tissue; the most frequent causes are total hip arthroplasty and trauma. Severe cases can lead to ankilosis with important impact on quality of life. Surgery is the elective treatment, but, especially in high-risk patients, it is important to prevent the re-formation of HO and, in these cases, radiotherapy (RT) can play an important role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we retrospectively analyzed a mono-institutional casistic of 30 patients (31 sites) at high risk for HO development, treated with surgery and pre- or postoperative RT. The majority of patients received a single RT fraction of 7 Gy, median age was 62, with a prevalence of male and hip as most frequently involved site. Radiological studies and clinical examination were performed in all patients during the follow-up period to evaluate both treatment efficacy and acute or late toxicity. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 67 months, 23 patients had a complete response (CR) with excellent results in term of joint mobility. Two patients with CR showed a relapse of HO in the same site 19 and 12 months after treatment, respectively. Seven patients (22,6%) had a partial response (PR) to RT. One patient who reached CR had a history of previous irradiation in the same site 16 years before. No acute or late reactions have been reported. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm safety and efficacy of RT in preventing HO, especially in high-risk patients, preferring a single fraction of 7 Gy.

H2AX phosphorylation level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as an event-free survival predictor for bladder cancer.

Bladder cancer (BC) has a typical aetiology characterized by a multistep carcinogenesis due to environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and their interaction. Several lines of evidence suggest that DNA repair plays a role in the development and progression of BC. In particular, the study of individual susceptibility to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) may provide valuable information on BC risk, and help to identify those patients at high-risk of either recurrence or progression of the disease, possibly personalizing both surveillance and treatment. Among the different DSB markers, the most well characterized is phosphorylation of the histone H2AX (γ-H2AX). We assessed any potential role of γ-H2AX as a molecular biomarker in a case-control study (146 cases and 146 controls) to identify individuals with increased BC risk and at high-risk of disease recurrence or progression. We investigated γ-H2AX levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after their exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). We did not find any significant difference among cases and controls. However, we observed a significant association between γ-H2AX basal levels and risk of disease recurrence or progression. In particular, both BC patients as a whole and the subgroup of non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) with high basal H2AX phosphorylation levels had a decreased risk of recurrence or progression (for all BC HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.52-0.94, P = 0.02; for NMIBC HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.50-0.92, P = 0.01), suggesting a protective effect of basal DSB signaling. Our data suggest that γ-H2AX can be considered as a potential molecular biomarker to identify patients with a higher risk of BC recurrence. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with (chemo) radiation: report of an Italian survey.

PURPOSE: There is a limited number of therapies with a high level of recommendations for mucositis, while several strategies are currently employed with a limited evidence for efficacy. A national survey among Italian oncologists who treat head and neck cancer (HNC) was conducted in order to assess the most common preventive and therapeutic protocols (including nutritional support and pain control) for oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: From September to November 2012, a nationwide electronic survey with 21 focused items was proposed to chemotherapy and radiotherapy centers. RESULTS: We collected 111 answers. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale is employed by 55% of the physicians in assessing mucosal toxicity. The most relevant predictive factors for OM development are considered smoke, alcohol use, planned radiotherapy, and concurrent use of radiosensitizing chemotherapy. Prophylactic gastrostomy is adopted in <10% of the patients. Preventive antibiotics or antimycotics are prescribed by 46% of the responders (mainly local or systemic antimycotic drugs). Alkalinizing mouthwashes or coating agents are frequently adopted (70% of the cases). Among therapeutic interventions, systemic fluconazole is administered by 80% of the physicians. Pain is mainly treated by weak followed by strong opioids. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of preventive and therapeutic protocols for OM exists among the participating Italian centers, with some uniformity in respect to nutritional support, use of antimycotic and painkillers. There is an urgent need for well-conducted clinical trials aimed at assessing the best choices for OM prevention and treatment in HNC.

Volumetric and positional changes of planning target volumes and organs at risk using computed tomography imaging during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-neck cancer: an "old" adaptive radiation therapy approach.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess, in a department of radiation oncology not equipped with in-room imaging systems, volumetric and positional changes of planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), using consecutive off-board computed tomography (CT) imaging. Dosimetric aspects were not investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with H&N cancer underwent CT re-scanning at 3, 5, and 7 weeks. Positional changes of the PTVs and parotid glands as distances relative to the virtual isocentre were determined. The parotids glands (PGs) were re-delineated on each CT set and volume differences were computed. Anterior-posterior (AP) and latero-lateral (LL) displacements for the spinal cord at C1 and C6 level were calculated. Changes in patient body contours were evaluated by comparing the volumes within the external skin outline. RESULTS: Apart from two patients requiring re-planning due to substantial weight loss, our results evidenced no significant shifts of PTVs and PGs. PG volume decreased with a trend in volume reduction for the ipsilateral parotid. No significant shift of spinal cord at C1 and C6 level was detected, in either the AP or LL direction. The collected data demonstrated a trend in external skin contour volume loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results reflect the literature data and indicate that an off-line adaptive RT approach is appropriate in clinical practice.

Conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma represents a distinct entity as compared to other head and neck tumours. Radio-chemotherapy is the treatment of first choice in non-metastatic disease. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows the sparing of parotid glands, improving the toxicity profile. The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained with IMRT with those obtained with conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in terms of tumour control, survival, acute and late toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 52 patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the nasopharynx (stage I-IVB according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) treated with curative intent between January 2003 and August 2011: 26 patients were treated with 2D or 3D technique (arm A) and 26 with IMRT technique (arm B) with simultaneous integrated boost. Fifty patients (96 %) received chemotherapy. Local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicity were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 37.6 months (69 months in arm A and 23 months in arm B), 69 % of patients were alive and disease-free, 10 % were alive with disease and 21 % died of disease, with an OS of 81 % at 2 years and 79 % at 5 years, a LC rate of 88 % at 2 years and 78 % at 5 years, a LRC rate of 80 % at 2 years and 73 % at 5 years and a DFS of 74 % at 2 years and 65 % at 5 years, with no statistically significant differences between IMRT and 2DRT/3DCRT. In multivariate analysis, the TNM stage and the volume treated at high dose correlated with DFS. No factor was found to be related to OS. Chronic toxicity was not statistically different in the two study groups and in particular ≥ G2 xerostomia rates were 67 and 41 % in arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study confirm that IMRT associated with chemotherapy, even with moderately hypofractionated regimens, allows good disease control with better results in terms of late xerostomia, although without statistically significant differences compared to 2DRT and 3DCRT. The hypothesis of an impact of IMRT on survival has yet to be confirmed.

A case of primary mediastinal Ewing's sarcoma / primitive neuroectodermal tumor presenting with initial compression of superior vena cava.

Ewing's sarcomas and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors (ES/PNETs) are high grade malignant neoplasms. These malignancies are characterized by a chromosome 22 rearrangement, arise from bone or soft tissue, predominantly affect children and young adults, and are grouped in the Ewing family of tumors. Multimodality treatment programs are the treatment of choice. Primary localization of ES/PNET in the mediastinum is extremely rare. We describe a case of ES/PNET presenting as a mediastinal mass with tracheal compression and initial signs of superior vena cava in a 66-year-old woman.

Should radiotherapy after primary systemic therapy be administered with the same recommendations made for operable breast cancer patients who receive surgery as first treatment? A critical review.

Primary systemic therapy is not only used in patients with locally advanced inoperable non-metastatic breast cancer but also for operable stage II and III cancer aimed at breast conservation. The indications for local-regional radiotherapy for patients who receive primary systemic therapy are still evolving. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive discussion of how primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer patients could affect the indications of radiotherapy to optimize local-regional treatment. An overview of available literature data regarding neoadjuvant treatment and radiotherapy is analyzed and discussed. Considering the variability of data on this issue, an appropriate approach could still be to tailor treatment decision to the individual clinical case.

Swallowing dysfunction in head and neck cancer patients treated by radiotherapy: review and recommendations of the supportive task group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology.

PURPOSE: Dysphagia is a debilitating complication in head and neck cancer patients (HNCPs) that may cause a high mortality rate for aspiration pneumonia. The aims of this paper were to summarize the normal swallowing mechanism focusing on its anatomo-physiology, to review the relevant literature in order to identify the main causes of dysphagia in HNCPs and to develop recommendations to be adopted for radiation oncology patients. The chemotherapy and surgery considerations on this topic were reported in recommendations only when they were supposed to increase the adverse effects of radiotherapy on dysphagia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review of literature was focused on studies reporting dysphagia as a pre-treatment evaluation and as cancer and cancer therapy related side-effects, respectively. Relevant literature through the primary literature search and by articles identified in references was considered. The members of the group discussed the results and elaborated recommendations according to the Oxford CRBM levels of evidence and recommendations. The recommendations were revised by external Radiation Oncology, Ear Nose and Throat (ENT), Medical Oncology and Speech Language Pathology (SLP) experts. RESULTS: Recommendations on pre-treatment assessment and on patients submitted to radiotherapy were given. The effects of concurrent therapies (i.e. surgery or chemotherapy) were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: In HNCPs treatment, disease control has to be considered in tandem with functional impact on swallowing function. SLPs should be included in a multidisciplinary approach to head and neck cancer.

Radiotherapy alone or with concomitant daily low-dose carboplatin in locally advanced, unresectable head and neck cancer: definitive results of a phase III study with a follow-up period of up to ten years.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is the conventional treatment for locally advanced inoperable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the poor therapeutic results justify the development of radiochemotherapy combinations. In an attempt to improve local control and survival in patients with stage III and IV unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and based on the results of our previous dose escalation study, we undertook a prospective multicentric randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 1992 through December 1995, a total of 164 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone (arm I) or combined (arm II) with daily low-dose carboplatin. RESULTS: The 3, 5 and 10-year local-regional recurrence-free survival rates were better in arm II (21.7%, 15.1% and 15.1%, respectively) than in arm I (15%, 10.7% and 10.7%), but without statistical significance (P = 0.11). The 3, 5 and 10-year disease-free survival rates showed the same positive trend for arm II (16%, 6.8% and 6.8% vs. 9%, 5.5% and 5.5%, in arm I, respectively), again without statistical significance (P = 0.09). Instead, a statistical advantage was found in overall survival rates at 3, 5 and 10-years (28.9%, 9% and 5.5% in arm II and 11.1%, 6.9% and 6.9% in arm I, respectively) (P = 0.02). The 3, 5 and 10-year local-regional recurrence-free survival rates in stage IV disease were statistically better in arm II (21.5%, 15.9% and 15.9%) than in arm I (12.8%, 7.7% and 7.7%, respectively) (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results in both treatment arms of the trial appear less positive than most published series. However, our findings do not exclude that carboplatin may be beneficial, but the benefit in local control must be lower than the 15% assumed to dimension the trial.

Radiotherapy-induced taste impairment.

Changes in taste perception occur in a significant proportion of cancer patients. Among cancer patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) in head and neck area, the vast majority reports an altered taste sense during and after treatments. Taste impairment starts a few weeks after the beginning of irradiation, and almost all such patients experienced loss of taste acuity at a dose of 60 Gy. Some studies investigated the four basic taste intensities (sweet, salty, sour and bitter) and the umami taste, and several of these reports identified diminished threshold sensitivity for at least one taste quality. Six months to one year after RT, taste acuity recovers to its previous level in many patients, but some patients show incomplete or no recovery even several years later. Taste impairment has profound effects on patients' quality of life because is associated with weight loss through reduced appetite and altered patterns of food intake. Damage to the major salivary glands during head and neck RT leads to disturbance in taste acuity. With the implementation of new radiation techniques, such as conformal and intensity-modulated RT in head and neck irradiation, the late-radiation effects can probably be reduced, but the remaining sequelae are still bothersome to the patients.