Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 19(6): 608-613, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29874152

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are infectious, despite the standard use of cefazolin and metronidazole prophylaxis. Pre-operative biliary drainage (PBD) is a well-known risk factor for infectious complications. The objective was to identify the pathogens in intra-operative bile cultures in patients undergoing PD-with and without PBD-to determine the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent PD between 2009 and 2016 were identified retrospectively in three major teaching hospitals in The Netherlands. Organisms isolated from intra-operative bile cultures were studied. If pathogen coverage by standard prophylaxis was incomplete, the most appropriate alternative regimen was determined. RESULTS: Of this large cohort of 352 patients, 56% underwent PBD and 44% did not. Positive bile cultures were found in 87.9% in the PBD group, compared with 31.8% in the non-PBD group. The micro-organisms isolated most commonly were Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Klebsiella species. Cefazolin and metronidazole were appropriate in only 71% of patients. Adding gentamicin would provide complete coverage in 99% of PBD and 100% of non-PBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that PBD prior to PD leads to microbial colonization and antibiotic resistance. To potentially prevent infectious complications, gentamicin may be added to the standard antimicrobial prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Anciano , Bilis/microbiología , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Enterococcus , Femenino , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Klebsiella , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Streptococcus , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
HPB (Oxford) ; 20(8): 759-767, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the mandatory nationwide Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, rates of major complications and Failure to Rescue (FTR) after pancreatoduodenectomy between low- and high-mortality hospitals are compared, and independent predictors for FTR investigated. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in 2014 and 2015 in The Netherlands were included. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on mortality rates. The rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) and death after a major complication (FTR) were compared between these quartiles. Independent predictors for FTR were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 1.342 patients, 391 (29%) developed a major complication and in-hospital mortality was 4.2%. FTR occurred in 56 (14.3%) patients. Mortality was 0.9% in the first hospital quartile (4 hospitals, 327 patients) and 8.1% in the fourth quartile (5 hospitals, 310 patients). The rate of major complications increased by 40% (25.7% vs 35.2%) between the first and fourth hospital quartile, whereas the FTR rate increased by 560% (3.6% vs 22.9%). Independent predictors of FTR were male sex (OR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.2-3.9), age >75 years (OR = 4.3, 1.8-10.2), BMI ≥30 (OR = 2.9, 1.3-6.6), histopathological diagnosis of periampullary cancer (OR = 2.0, 1.1-3.7), and hospital volume <30 (OR = 3.9, 1.6-9.6). CONCLUSIONS: Variations in mortality between hospitals after pancreatoduodenectomy were explained mainly by differences in FTR, rather than the incidence of major complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Fracaso de Rescate en Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Anciano , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(10): 919-926, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Auditing is an important tool to identify practice variation and 'best practices'. The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit is mandatory in all 18 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Performance indicators and case-mix factors were identified by a PubMed search for randomized controlled trials (RCT's) and large series in pancreatic surgery. In addition, data dictionaries of two national audits, three institutional databases, and the Dutch national cancer registry were evaluated. Morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed of all pancreatic resections registered during the first two audit years. Case ascertainment was cross-checked with the Dutch healthcare inspectorate and key-variables validated in all centers. RESULTS: Sixteen RCT's and three large series were found. Sixteen indicators and 20 case-mix factors were included in the audit. During 2014-2015, 1785 pancreatic resections were registered including 1345 pancreatoduodenectomies. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. Following pancreatoduodenectomy, mortality was 4.1%, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III morbidity was 29.9%, median (IQR) length of stay 12 (9-18) days, and readmission rate 16.0%. In total 97.2% of >40,000 variables validated were consistent with the medical charts. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, with high quality data, reports good outcomes of pancreatic surgery on a national level.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Pancreatectomía/normas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/mortalidad , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/normas , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sistema de Registros , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA