COX-2 expression and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and celecoxib: a quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of RTOG C0128.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to measure expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and CD34 in pretreatment tumor biopsies from patients on the RTOG C0128 phase II study, and to correlate expression of these biomarkers, using quantitative immunohistochemistry, with clinical outcome parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment biopsies were placed into tissue microarrays. COX-2 and CD34 expression were measured using automated quantitative immunohistochemistry (AQUA®). Cox regression models and Fisher's exact test were used to explore associations between expression of the biomarkers and clinical end points. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were accrued between 2001 and 2004; 78 were eligible and analyzable. Pathology specimen submission was optional; COX-2 expression was determined for 37 (47%) of patients, and CD34 scoring was determined for 34 (44%) of patients. Median follow-up was 44.5 months. In tumors where COX-2 data were available, 6 (16%) of 37 patients had local-regional failure; 4 of these patients had tumors with COX-2 scores below the AQUA® score median (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-2.16; P = 0.28). Of the 8 patients with disease-free survival failures, 5 had tumors with COX-2 levels below the median (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-2.04; P = 0.32). The 4 patients who died all had COX-2 levels below the median value. COX-2 levels below the median were associated with worse 2-year survival (Fisher's P = 0.046). There was no statistically significant association between CD34 status and clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Low COX-2 expression measured by AQUA® was associated with worse overall survival in this subset of patients available for analysis from RTOG C0128. Application of AQUA® technology, in a larger study, will be required to definitively evaluate the association COX-2 with clinical outcome in cervical cancer.

Utility of megavoltage fan-beam CT for treatment planning in a head-and-neck cancer patient with extensive dental fillings undergoing helical tomotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the potential utility of megavoltage fan-beam computed tomography (MV-FBCT) for treatment planning in a patient undergoing helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the presence of extensive dental artifact. A 28-year-old female with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma presented for radiation therapy. Due to the extensiveness of the dental artifact present in the oral cavity kV-CT scan acquired at simulation, which made treatment planning impossible on tomotherapy planning system, MV-FBCT imaging was obtained using the HI-ART tomotherapy treatment machine, with the patient in the treatment position, and this information was registered with her original kV-CT scan for the purposes of structure delineation, dose calculation, and treatment planning. To validate the feasibility of the MV-FBCT-generated treatment plan, an electron density CT phantom (model 465, Gammex Inc., Middleton, WI) was scanned using MV-FBCT to obtain CT number to density table. Additionally, both a "cheese" phantom (which came with the tomotherapy treatment machine) with 2 inserted ion chambers and a generic phantom called Quasar phantom (Modus Medical Devices Inc., London, ON, Canada) with one inserted chamber were used to confirm dosimetric accuracy. The MV-FBCT could be used to clearly visualize anatomy in the region of the dental artifact and provide sufficient soft-tissue contrast to assist in the delineation of normal tissue structures and fat planes. With the elimination of the dental artifact, the MV-FBCT images allowed more accurate dose calculation by the tomotherapy system. It was confirmed that the phantom material density was determined correctly by the tomotherapy MV-FBCT number to density table. The ion chamber measurements agreed with the calculations from the MV-FBCT generated phantom plan within 2%. MV-FBCT may be useful in radiation treatment planning for nasopharyngeal cancer patients in the setting of extensive dental artifacts.

The role of adjuvant radiation in uterine sarcomas.

PURPOSE: To determine clinical and pathological factors significant for overall survival (OS) and local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) in uterine sarcoma as they relate to adjuvant radiotherapy (AR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of 3,650 patients with uterine sarcoma was conducted using the National Oncology Database, a proprietary database of aggregated tumor registries owned by Impac Medical Systems (Sunnyvale, CA). Adjuvant radiotherapy was defined as postoperative external beam radiation to the pelvis, with or without brachytherapy. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis (MVA) using the Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, with significant differences (p < 0.05) determined using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 59 months, with a 5-year OS of 37%. Significant prognostic factors for OS were stage, race/ethnicity, grade, age, histology, lymph node status, and surgical treatment (p < 0.01 for all factors). Use of AR was not predictive for OS. For nonmetastatic cancer patients receiving definitive surgery (n = 2,206), the 5-year LRFFS was 87%. In this group, stage, grade, histology, and AR were prognostic for LRFFS (p < 0.05), with AR associated with improved outcome compared with surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.4, p < 0.001). Patients with carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, poorly differentiated tumors, and negative lymph nodes had reduced local-regional failure (LRF) with AR (log-rank, p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: In the largest retrospective analysis of uterine sarcoma published thus far, AR conferred a 53% reduction in the risk of LRF at 5 years. Use of AR may have broader indications than what are currently accepted in clinical practice.

The impact of concurrent granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective phase III study by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9901.

PURPOSE: Based on early clinical evidence of potential mucosal protection by granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to test the efficacy and safety of GM-CSF in reducing the severity and duration of mucosal injury and pain (mucositis) associated with curative radiotherapy (RT) in head-and-neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients included those with head-and-neck cancer with radiation ports encompassing >50% of oral cavity and/or oropharynx. Standard RT ports were used to cover the primary tumor and regional lymphatics at risk in standard fractionation to 60-70 Gy. Concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy was allowed. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous injection of GM-CSF 250 microg/m2 or placebo 3 times a week. Mucosal reaction was assessed during the course of RT using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and the protocol-specific scoring system. RESULTS: Between October 2000 and September 2002, 130 patients from 36 institutions were accrued. Nine patients (7%) were excluded from the analysis, 3 as a result of drug unavailability. More than 80% of the patients participated in the quality-of-life endpoint of this study. The GM-CSF did not cause any increase in toxicity compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in the average mean mucositis score in the GM-CSF and placebo arms by a t test (p = 0.4006). CONCLUSION: This placebo-controlled, randomized study demonstrated no significant effect of GM-CSF given concurrently compared with placebo in reducing the severity or duration of RT-induced mucositis in patients undergoing definitive RT for head-and-neck cancer.

Secondary supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor following irradiation in a patient with low-grade astrocytoma.

We report a case of a supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) that occurred 12 years after cranial irradiation for a grade II astrocytoma. Neuroimaging was unable to distinguish between a recurrence of the original neoplasm and the development of a new, distinct entity. Pathologic review assisted by immunohistochemical staining, however, revealed a high-grade PNET. Although rare, PNET needs to be included in the differential diagnoses for previously irradiated patients, who develop recurrent brain tumors in the presence of uncharacteristic imaging features.

Toxicity and outcome results of RTOG 9311: a phase I-II dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the acute and late morbidities from a multiinstitutional three-dimensional radiotherapy dose-escalation study for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled in a Phase I-II three-dimensional radiotherapy dose-escalation trial. Of the 179 patients, 177 were eligible. The use of concurrent chemotherapy was not allowed. Twenty-five patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified at escalating radiation dose levels depending on the percentage of the total lung volume that received >20 Gy with the treatment plan (V(20)). Patients with a V(20) <25% (Group 1) received 70.9 Gy in 33 fractions, 77.4 Gy in 36 fractions, 83.8 Gy in 39 fractions, and 90.3 Gy in 42 fractions, successively. Patients with a V(20) of 25-36% (Group 2) received doses of 70.9 Gy and 77.4 Gy, successively. The treatment arm for patients with a V(20) > or =37% (Group 3) closed early secondary to poor accrual (2 patients) and the perception of excessive risk for the development of pneumonitis. Toxicities occurring or persisting beyond 90 days after the start of radiotherapy were scored as late toxicities. The estimated toxicity rates were calculated on the basis of the cumulative incidence method. RESULTS: The following acute Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed for Group 1: 70.9 Gy (1 case of weight loss), 77.4 Gy (nausea and hematologic toxicity in 1 case each), 83.8 Gy (1 case of hematologic toxicity), and 90.3 Gy (3 cases of lung toxicity). The following acute Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed for Group 2: none at 70.9 Gy and 2 cases of lung toxicity at 77.4 Gy. No patients developed acute Grade 3 or worse esophageal toxicity. The estimated rate of Grade 3 or worse late lung toxicity at 18 months was 7%, 16%, 0%, and 13% for Group 1 patients receiving 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, or 90.3 Gy, respectively. Group 2 patients had an estimated late lung toxicity rate of 15% at 18 months for both 70.9 and 77.4 Gy. The prognostic factors for late pneumonitis in multivariate analysis were the mean lung dose and V(20). The estimated rate of late Grade 3 or worse esophageal toxicity at 18 months was 8%, 0%, 4%, and 6%, for Group 1 patients receiving 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, 90.3 Gy, respectively, and 0% and 5%, respectively, for Group 2 patients receiving 70.9 and 77.4 Gy. The dyspnea index scoring at baseline and after therapy for functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort revealed no change in 63%, functional pulmonary loss in 23%, and pulmonary improvement in 14% of patients. The observed locoregional control and overall survival rates were each similar among the study arms within each dose level of Groups 1 and 2. Locoregional control was achieved in 50-78% of patients. Thirty-one patients developed regional nodal failure. The location of nodal failure in relationship to the RT volume was documented in 28 of these 31 patients. Twelve patients had isolated elective nodal failures. Fourteen patients had regional failure in irradiated nodal volumes. Two patients had both elective nodal and irradiated nodal failure. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose was safely escalated using three-dimensional conformal techniques to 83.8 Gy for patients with V(20) values of <25% (Group 1) and to 77.4 Gy for patients with V(20) values between 25% and 36% (Group 2), using fraction sizes of 2.15 Gy. The 90.3-Gy dose level was too toxic, resulting in dose-related deaths in 2 patients. Elective nodal failure occurred in <10% of patients.

Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer with RTOG 9406 dose level IV.

PURPOSE: This is the first report of the toxicity outcomes using dose level IV (74 Gy) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 9406 for Stage T1-T2 prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 262 patients were entered in this cooperative group, Phase I-II, dose-escalation trial of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma treated to a dose of 74 Gy (Level IV); 256 patients were analyzable for toxicity. A minimal dose of 2 Gy/fraction was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). Patients were stratified according to the risk of seminal vesicle invasion on the basis of the Gleason score and presenting prostate-specific antigen level. Group 1 patients had clinical Stage T1-T2 tumors with a seminal vesicle invasion risk of <15%. Group 2 patients had clinical Stage T1-T2 tumors with a seminal vesicle invasion risk of >/=15%. Patients in Group 1 were prescribed 74 Gy to a prostate PTV. Patients in Group 2 were prescribed 54 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles (PTV1) followed by a boost to the prostate only (PTV2) to 74 Gy. PTV margins between 5 and 10 mm were required. Elective pelvic radiotherapy was not used. The frequency of late effects of Grade 3 or greater was compared with that for a similar group of patients treated in RTOG studies 7506 and 7706, with length of follow-up adjustments made for the interval from therapy completion. A second comparison was made with 206 patients treated to dose level II (73.8 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) to see whether the fraction size affected toxicity. RESULTS: The average months at risk for late Grade 3+ toxicity after therapy completion were 28.9 and 23.9 months for Group 1 and 2, respectively. Acute toxicity at dose level IV (74 Gy) was remarkably low, with Grade 3 acute effects reported in only 1% of Group 1 and 3% of Group 2 patients. No Grade 4 or 5 acute toxicities were reported. Late toxicity continued to be low compared with RTOG historical controls. One patient in Group 1 and 4 patients in Group 2 experienced Grade 3 bladder toxicity. Two patients in Group 2 experienced Grade 3 bowel toxicity. No Grade 4 or 5 late effects were reported. The rate of late Grade 2 toxicity (any type) was 23% and 16% in Group 1 and 2, respectively. The observed rate of Grade 3 or greater late effects for Group 1 (1 case) was significantly lower (p <0.0001) than the 18.5 cases that would have been expected from the historical control data. The observed rate for Group 2 (6 cases) was also significantly lower (p = 0.0009) than the 21.3 cases expected. No statistically significant difference was noted in the rate of acute or late toxicity in patients who were treated to 73.8 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction or 74 Gy at 2.0 Gy/fraction. Patients treated with the larger 2.0-Gy fractions tended to have more Grade 3 or greater toxicity than patients treated with 1.8-Gy fractions (2% vs. 1%, p = 0.09). The results after the longer follow-up with dose level II suggest these differences may increase with additional follow-up. CONCLUSION: Tolerance to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with 74 Gy in 2-Gy fractions remains better than expected compared with historical controls. The magnitude of any effect from fraction size requires additional follow-up.

Increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis in patients with cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy, radiation, and erythropoietin.

BACKGROUND: Because studies have suggested that anemia has an adverse effect on outcome for patients with cervical carcinoma who are treated with radiation, recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) has been used increasingly to maintain hemoglobin levels in these patients. Erythropoietin may increase the risk of thrombosis. The authors performed a retrospective analysis to determine whether there was an increased rate of symptomatic venous thrombosis associated with the use of rHuEpo in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix and vagina. METHODS: A retrospective, case-control study was performed on consecutive patients with localized carcinoma of the uterine cervix or vagina who were treated with chemotherapy and radiation (chemoradiotherapy). The primary outcome was symptomatic venous thrombosis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven patients were reviewed. When they were divided into women who received rHuEpo (n = 75 patients) and women who did not receive rHuEpo (n = 72 patients), there were no significant differences in age, height, weight, disease stage, or body mass index. Fewer patients in the rHuEpo group required transfusions. In the rHuEpo group, 17 of 75 patients had either an upper extremity thrombosis (n = 12 patients) or a lower extremity thrombosis (n = 7 patients): 2 patients had both, and 2 patients had more than 1 event. Two of 72 patients who did not receive rHuEpo had symptomatic thrombosis. Patients who received rHuEpo had an odds ratio (OR) of developing thrombosis of 10.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.3-46.2). Multiple logistic regression revealed that only the use of rHuEpo was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (OR, 15.3; 95% CI, 3.1-76.7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical carcinoma who received chemoradiotherapy and rHuEpo had an increased risk of symptomatic venous thrombosis.

Interim report of toxicity from 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406, level III (79.2 Gy).

PURPOSE: A prospective Phase I dose escalation study was conducted to determine the maximally tolerated radiation dose in men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostate cancer. This is a preliminary report of toxicity at Level III (79.2 Gy) on 3D Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 26, 1996 and October 1, 1998, 173 patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer (T1 and T2) were accrued to a Level III dose of 79.2 Gy. One hundred sixty-nine patients were available for analysis of toxicity. Patients were registered to two groups according to the risk of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) on the basis of presenting PSA and Gleason score. Group 1 patients had a calculated risk of SVI <15%, and Group 2 patients had a risk of SVI > or = 15%. For Group 1 patients, the planning target volume (PTV) margins were 5-10 mm around the prostate only. For Group 2 patients, the same margins were applied to the prostate and seminal vesicles (PTV(1)) for the initial 55.8 Gy; then treatment volume was reduced to the prostate only (PTV(2)). To reduce the rectal dose on dose Level III, the minimum PTV dose was limited to 73.8 Gy, whereas the minimum gross target volume dose was 79.2 Gy, both in 44 fractions. The incidence of > or = 3 Grade late effects was compared to that in a similar group of patients treated on RTOG 7506 and 7706 studies. RESULTS: Acute tolerance to 79.2 Gy was excellent with no patients experiencing > or = Grade 3 acute toxicity. The acute toxicity rate was comparable to that reported for previous lower dose levels. With the median follow-up of 3.3 years (range: 0.4-4.4 years), a total of 4 patients (2.4%) experienced Grade 3 late toxicity, three cases of which were related to the bladder, and one related to the rectum. There were no Grade 4 or 5 late complications noted during the period of observation. These results are also comparable to those reported at dose Levels I and II. The expected incidence of > or = 3 Grade 3 late toxicity was calculated using historical data from two previous RTOG prostate cancer trials, 7506 and 7706. The calculated risk accounted for the difference in follow-up duration between patients in this study and the historical experience. The observed rate of > or = Grade 3 late effects for Group 1 (two cases) is significantly lower (p = 0.0002) than the 17.6 cases that would have been expected from the historical control. The observed rate for Group 2 (two cases) was also significantly lower (p = 0.0037) than the 12.1 cases expected. CONCLUSION: Based on excellent tolerance of 3D-CRT for stages T1 and T2 prostate cancer, further biological dose escalation has been pursued to Levels IV and V, 74 Gy and 78 Gy, respectively, at 2 Gy per day, in an attempt to reduce the total treatment duration. This trial has closed. A Phase III comparative RTOG trial is being developed to determine whether high-dose 3D-CRT improves efficacy.

Radiotherapy for breast cancer: today and tomorrow.

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and radiation has allowed many women to preserve their breasts and avoid disfiguring surgery. Lumpectomy and breast irradiation is a standard therapy for early breast cancer patients who desire breast conservation. However, the overall rate of mastectomy exceeds that of BCT in the United States. There have been significant advances in patient awareness of the options available for local management of early breast cancer and changes in the attitudes of physicians, including surgeons, allowing a gradual rise in the rate of BCT in the last two decades. Now, investigations are designed to define subgroups of patients with early breast cancer in whom radiation can be safely omitted. In locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has allowed some women to have BCT after initial cytoreduction. This approach results in excellent local control when patients are carefully selected for BCT. There is renewed interest in postmastectomy radiation for early breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. In this intermediate risk group for locoregional recurrence, the addition of chest wall and regional lymphatic irradiation to adjuvant systemic therapy has potential for significant improvement in ultimate survival. This concept is novel in breast cancer, a disease that was believed to be systemic at inception and in which only systemic control was thought to impact survival. In this era of effective adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer, local control measures have become more important as local control has real potential for impacting survival.