Dehydrated Amnion Chorion Membrane versus standard of care for diabetic foot ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) continue to challenge wound care practitioners. This prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of a dehydrated Amnion Chorion Membrane (dACM) (Organogenesis Inc., US) versus standard of care (SoC) alone in complex DFUs in a challenging patient population. METHOD: Subjects with a DFU extending into dermis, subcutaneous tissue, tendon, capsule, bone or joint were enrolled in a 12-week trial. They were allocated equally to two treatment groups: dACM (plus SoC); or SoC alone. The primary endpoint was frequency of wound closure determined by a Cox analysis that adjusted for duration and wound area. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine median time to complete wound closure (CWC). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 218 patients, and these were split equally between the two treatment groups with 109 patients in each. A Cox analysis showed that the estimated frequency of wound closure for the dACM plus SoC group was statistically superior to the SoC alone group at week 4 (12% versus 8%), week 6 (22% versus 11%), week 8 (31% versus 21%), week 10 (42% versus 27%) and week 12 (50% versus 35%), respectively (p=0.04). The computed hazard ratio (1.48 (confidence interval: 0.95, 2.29) showed a 48% greater probability of wound closure in favour of the dACM group. Median time to wound closure for dACM-treated ulcers was 84 days compared to 'not achieved' in the SoC-treated group (i.e., ≥50% of SoC-treated DFUs failed to heal by week 12; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: In an adequately powered DFU RCT, dACM increased the frequency, decreased the median time, and improved the probability of CWC when compared with SoC alone. dACM demonstrated beneficial effects in DFUs in a complex patient population. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: This study was funded by Organogenesis Inc., US. JC serves as a consultant and speaker for Organogenesis. RDD serves as a speaker for Organogenesis. OMA and MLS serve as consultants for Organogenesis. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Real-World Comparative Effectiveness Assessment Study of a Native Type I Collagen Matrix Plus Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Antimicrobial and a Cryopreserved Cadaveric Skin Allograft for Use in Diabetic Foot Ulcers - A Non-inferiority Analysis.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a native type I collagen matrix plus polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial (PCMP) and a cryopreserved cadaveric skin allograft (CCSA) for use in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: A real-world data study was conducted on 989 DFUs analyzed digitally. Of these, 325 and 664 DFUs were treated with PCMP and CCSA, respectively. Non-inferiority testing for equivalence of PCMP and CCSA was performed at a level of significance of P < .05. Results: Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for healing for PCMP and CCSA at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24 was 12% vs 10%, 27% vs 24%, 39 % vs 37%, and 60% vs. 64%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were shown; P = .95. The median time to healing was 18 and 17 weeks for PCMP and CCSA, respectively; P = .95. The probability of healing was statistically equivalent between PCMP and CCSA; hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% CI (0.85, 1.17). Non-inferiority statistical testing results showed P = .01. Conclusions: Using non-inferiority hypothesis testing at a level of significance of P <.05, we showed that PCMP was equivalent to CCSA; P = .01. PCMP vs CCSA demonstrated no statistically significant differences in median time, percentage, and probability of healing. Data from real-world data comparative effectiveness assessment studies can help guide clinicians to limit overuse of ineffective therapies and underuse of effective therapies.

Real-world data analysis of bilayered living cellular construct and fetal bovine collagen dressing treatment for pressure injuries: a comparative effectiveness study.

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC) versus a fetal bovine collagen dressing (FBCD) in pressure injuries (PRIs). Methods: A real-world data study was conducted on 1352 PRIs analyzed digitally. 1046 and 306 PRIs were treated with BLCC and FBCD, respectively. Results: Cox healing for BLCC (n = 1046) was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) at week 4 (13 vs 7%), 8 (29 vs 17%), 12 (42 vs 27%), 24 (64 vs 45%), and 36 (73 vs 56%). The probability of healing increased by 66%, (hazard ratio = 1.66 [95% CI (1.38, 2.00)]; p < 0.0001. Time to healing was 162 days for FBCD and 103 days for BLCC showing a 36% reduction in time to healing with BLCC; (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: BLCC significantly improved healing of PRIs versus FBCD.

Type I collagen matrix plus polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial for the treatment of cutaneous wounds.

Aim: Determine the effectiveness of purified native type I collagen matrix plus polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial (PCMP) on cutaneous wounds. Materials & methods: A prospective cohort study of 307 patients (67 venous leg ulcers, 62 diabetic foot ulcers, 45 pressure ulcers, 54 post-surgical wounds and 79 other wounds) was conducted. Results: Cox wound closure for PCMP was 73% at week 32. The median time to wound closure was 17 weeks (Kaplan-Meier). The incidence of PCMP-treated wounds showing >60% reductions in areas, depths and volumes were 81, 71 and 85%, respectively. Conclusion: PCMP demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits to patients with various types of cutaneous wounds. Clinical Trial registration number: NCT03286452.

A randomized controlled clinical trial of a hypothermically stored amniotic membrane for use in diabetic foot ulcers.

Aim: Determine the effectiveness of hypothermically stored amniotic membrane (HSAM) versus standard of care (SOC) in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 76 DFUs analyzed digitally. Results: Cox wound closure for HSAM (38 wounds) was significantly greater (p = 0.04) at weeks 12 (60 vs 38%), and 16 (63 vs 38%). The probability of wound closure increased by 75% (Hazard Ratio = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.16-2.70). HSAM showed >60% reductions in area (82 vs 58%; p = 0.02) and depth (65 vs 39%; p = 0.04) versus SOC. Conclusion: HSAM increased frequency and probability of wound closure in DFUs versus SOC.

Evaluation of Wound Closure Rates Using a Human Fibroblast-derived Dermal Substitute Versus a Fetal Bovine Collagen Dressing: A Retrospective Study.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with an increased risk for serious and costly outcomes such as osteomyelitis, amputation, and hospitalization. PURPOSE: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the proportion of patients healed and time to healing of DFUs treated with a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute (HFDS) or a fetal bovine collagen dressing (FBCD). METHODS: Data from patients with a DFU who received the first treatment in 2014 were extracted from the electronic record database of 93 wound care centers. Baseline demographics (eg, age, gender, body mass index, and number of wounds); wound location, size, and duration; and wound-specific information such as wound size and number of and interval between applications were obtained. Study criteria stipulated patients who received at least one treatment in 2014 with HFDS or FBCD on a DFU with location coded as foot, toe, heel, metatarsal head, toe web space, toe amputation site, or transmetatarsal amputation site; ulcer size ≥1 cm2 to <20 cm2; and ulcer area reduction ≤50% in the 28 days before the first treatment with HFDS or FBCD were eligible for inclusion. Wounds that received an alternate skin substitute treatment up to 28 days before or concurrent with the first HFDS or FBCD treatment or if patient data that lacked baseline or follow-up wound area measurement were excluded. Deidentified data were extracted directly into data files and transferred to a third-party data management and statistical group for analysis. The frequency of DFUs achieving wound closure (defined as area ≤0.25 cm2) by weeks 12 and 24 and median time to wound closure of wounds that healed were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were compared using 2-sample t tests for continuous variables and 2-tailed Fisher's exact tests for difference in proportions between treatments. Frequency of and median time to wound closure were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis. The frequency of wounds closed at 12 and 24 weeks, median time to wound closure, hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval, and P value were estimated from the Cox model. Statistical significance was defined as P <.05. RESULTS: Records showed 206 patients with 208 DFUs received treatment (108 HFDS, mean age 60.2 years, mean wound duration 8.8 months; 100 FBCD, mean age 65.2 years, mean wound duration 12.8 months) and were included. Mean number of treatment applications was 4.5 and 2.4 for HFDS and FBCD, respectively. After 12 and 24 weeks 44 (41%) and 69 (64%) of HFDS-treated wounds, respectively, and 21 (21%) and 43 (43%) of FBCD-treated wounds, respectively, were healed (at 12 weeks, P = .03; at 24 weeks, P = .03, log rank 2-tailed test, unadjusted). Median time to wound closure for HFDS and FBCD was 14.6 and 25 weeks, respectively (P = .03; log rank, 2-tailed test; Kaplan-Meier analysis). HFDS treatment significantly increased the probability of wound healing compared to FBCD treatment in the Cox proportional hazards analysis after adjusting for treatment terms, baseline wound area, baseline wound duration, baseline wound depth, wound location, and patient age at first treatment (HR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.06-2.97; P = .03). CONCLUSION: DFU wounds are more likely to heal when treated with HFDS than with FBCD as used by facilities in this database. Studies examining the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and patient-centered outcomes of these treatments is warranted. .

Comparative effectiveness of a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute and a viable cryopreserved placental membrane for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Objective: To compare a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute (HFDS) to a viable cryopreserved placental membrane (vCPM) for use in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: An electronic medical record database of 1622 refractory DFUs with areas 1-40 cm2 was analyzed. Results: Cox estimates of wound closure for HFDS (1444 wounds) were significantly greater (p = 0.0002) by weeks 12 (31 vs 21%), 24 (55 vs 39%) and 36 (68 vs 51%) compared with vCPM (178 wounds). HFDS reduced the median time to wound closure by 55% compared with vCPM, (20 vs 36 weeks, p = 0.0002). HFDS also increased the probability of wound closure by 60% (hazard ratio = 1.60 [95% confidence interval, (1.25, 2.06)], p = 0.0002). Conclusion: HFDS improved time and frequency of wound closure in DFUs versus vCPM.

Comparative effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct and an acellular fetal bovine collagen dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC) and an acellular fetal bovine collagen dressing (FBCD) for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Methods: Data from WoundExpert® (Net Health, PA, USA) was used to analyze 1021 refractory venous leg ulcers treated at 177 facilities. Results: Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that BLCC (893 wounds) was superior to FBCD (128 wounds), p = 0.01 for: wound closure by weeks 12 (31 vs 25%), 24 (55 vs 43%) and 36 (68 vs 53%); reduction in time to wound closure of 37%, (19 vs 30 weeks); and improvement in the probability of healing by 45%. Conclusion: BLC versus FBCD showed significant differences in both time to and frequency of healing suggesting that BLCC may provide significant cost savings compared with FBCD.

Comparative Effectiveness of a Bioengineered Living Cellular Construct and Cryopreserved Cadaveric Skin Allograft for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers in a Real-World Setting.

Objective: A variety of advanced biological therapies are available for the treatment of chronic wounds such as venous leg ulcers (VLUs), but real-world comparative effectiveness data that can help guide decisions around treatments are currently lacking. Approach: This analysis was designed to compare the effectiveness of a bioengineered living cellular construct (BLCC) to a cryopreserved cadaveric skin allograft (CCSA) for the treatment of VLUs. Treatment records were collected from a large wound care-specific electronic medical record database on 717 patients (799 VLUs) receiving treatment at 177 wound care centers. Ulcers ≥28 days duration, between ≥1 and < 40 cm2 that closed ≤40% within the 28 days before treatment were included. Results: Patient baseline demographics and wound characteristics were comparable between groups. The median time to wound closure was 52% faster with BLCC compared with CCSA (15 weeks vs. 31 weeks). In addition, the proportion of wounds healed were significantly higher for BLCC by 12 weeks (42% vs. 24%) and 24 weeks (65% vs. 41%) (p = 0.0002). Treatment with BLCC increased the probability of healing by 97% compared with CCSA (hazard ratio = 1.97 [95% confidence interval 1.39-2.79], p = 0.0002). Innovation: This is the first real-world comparative effectiveness analysis to evaluate BLCC and CCSA for the treatment of VLUs. Conclusion: Treatment with a bioengineered cellular technology significantly improved the incidence and speed of wound closure compared with a CCSA.

The Comparative Effectiveness of a Human Fibroblast Dermal Substitute versus a Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in a Real-world Setting.

BACKGROUND: Impaired wound healing is associated with serious complications in patients with diabetes. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) can lead to costly complications and an increased mortality rate. Standard treatments for DFUs often need to be augmented with adjunctive therapies designed to stimulate healing in recalcitrant wounds. OBJECTIVE: This analysis was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of a human broblast-derived dermal substitute (HFDS) and a dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft (dHACM) for the treatment of DFUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a wound care-specic electronic health record database, real-world outcomes from 122 patients with 122 DFUs receiving treatment in 2014 in 72 wound care facilities across the United States were evaluated. Key criteria for entry into the analysis included ulcer size ≥ 1 cm2 to < 25 cm2, ulcer duration ≤ 1 year, and ulcer area reduction ≤ 20% in the 14 days prior to the rst treatment. Key exclusion criteria included lack of follow-up visits and lack of baseline wound measurements. The frequency of wound closure by weeks 12 and 24, median time to wound closure, hazard ratio with 95% con dence interval, and P value were estimated from a Cox model with terms for treatment, baseline wound area, baseline wound duration, baseline wound depth, and wound location. RESULTS: The results show the incidence of wound closure for HFDS compared with dHACM was signicantly improved by weeks 12 (55% vs. 32%) and 24 (76% vs. 50%). The HFDS treatment signi cantly increased the probability of wound closure by 107%, with a median time to closure of 7.4 weeks (38%) less than that of dHACM treatment (P = .02).

Comparative effectiveness of a bioengineered living cellular construct vs. a dehydrated human amniotic membrane allograft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in a real world setting.

We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of a bioengineered living cellular construct (BLCC) and a dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft (dHACM) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Using a wound care-specific electronic medical record database, we assessed real-world outcomes in 218 patients with 226 DFUs receiving treatment in 2014 at 99 wound care centers. The analysis included DFUs ≥1 and <25 cm2 with duration <=1 year and area reduction ≤20% in 14 days prior to treatment (N=163, BLCC; N=63, dHACM). The average baseline areas and durations were 6.0 cm2 and 4.4 months for BLCC and 5.2 cm2 and 4.6 months for dHACM, respectively. Patients treated with dHACM had more applications compared to those treated with BLCC (median 3.0 vs. 2.0) (p=0.003). A Cox model adjusted for key covariates including area and duration found the median time to closure for BLCC was 13.3 weeks compared to 26 weeks for dHACM, and the proportion of wounds healed were significantly higher for BLCC by 12 weeks (48% vs. 28%) and 24 weeks (72% vs. 47%) (p=0.01). Treatment with a bioengineered living cellular technology increased the probability of healing by 97% compared with a dehydrated amniotic membrane (hazard ratio = 1.97 [95% confidence interval 1.17, 3.33], p=0.01).

Comparative effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct and a porcine collagen wound dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Using data from a national wound-specific electronic medical record (WoundExpert, Net Health, Pittsburgh, PA), we compared the effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC) and an acellular porcine small intestine submucosa collagen dressing (SIS) for the treatment of venous leg ulcer. Data from 1,489 patients with 1,801 refractory venous leg ulcers (as defined by failure to have >40% reduction in size in the 4 weeks prior to treatment) with surface areas between 1 and 150 cm(2) in size, treated between July 2009 and July 2012 at 158 wound care facilities across the US were analyzed. Patient baseline demographics and wound characteristics were comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier-derived estimates of wound closure for BLCC (1,451 wounds) was significantly greater (p = 0.01, log-rank test) by weeks 12 (31% vs. 26%), 24 (50% vs. 41%), and 36 (61% vs. 46%), respectively, compared with SIS (350 wounds). BLCC treatment reduced the median time to wound closure by 44%, achieving healing 19 weeks sooner (24 vs. 43 weeks, p = 0.01, log-rank test). Treatment with BLCC increased the probability of healing by 29% compared with porcine SIS dressing (hazard ratio = 1.29 [95% confidence interval 1.06, 1.56], p = 0.01).

Effect of fixed-dose combined isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine in elderly patients in the African-American heart failure trial.

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose combined isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (FDC I/H) significantly improved outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) receiving background neurohormonal therapy in the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT). In this analysis, we investigated treatment effects by age <65 or ≥65 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time-to-event curves were produced by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model. Baseline characteristics showed that patients ≥65 years old had less hypertensive and more ischemic HF, better quality of life (QoL) scores, higher plasma B-type natriuretic peptide and creatinine levels, and received less background neurohormonal therapy. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that FDC I/H improved mortality and event-free survival in elderly patients. The hazard ratios for mortality, first heart failure hospitalization, and event-free survival (both unadjusted and adjusted for baseline differences), were similar quantitatively and in direction of effect in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: In A-HeFT, FDC I/H improved outcomes in HF patients aged <65 or ≥65 years, despite significant baseline differences between these age groups. Patients aged ≥65 years, a group at greater mortality risk, had the greatest survival benefit from FDC I/H.

Dysfunctional corin i555(p568) allele is associated with impaired brain natriuretic peptide processing and adverse outcomes in blacks with systolic heart failure: results from the Genetic Risk Assessment in Heart Failure substudy.

BACKGROUND: Corin, a transmembrane serine protease expressed in cardiomyocytes, cleaves pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) into biologically active peptide hormones. The minor corin I555(P568) allele, defined by the T555I and Q568P mutations, is common in persons of African ancestry and associated with increased risk for hypertension and cardiac concentric hypertrophy. The corin gene product containing the T555I and Q568P mutations has significantly reduced natriuretic peptide processing capacity. We hypothesized that the corin I555(P568) allele would be associated with adverse outcomes and impaired BNP processing in blacks with systolic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective study of 354 subjects in the African American Heart Failure Trial Genetic Risk Assessment in Heart Failure substudy. In the corin variant group (n=50) compared with corin nonvariant group (n=300), BNP-32 (amino acids 77 to 108) was lower (190 pg/mL versus 340 pg/mL, P=0.007), but the ratio of unprocessed BNP(1 to 108)/processed BNP-32 was significantly higher (P=0.05). Stratified analyses were conducted because of evidence of significant interaction between the corin I555(P568) allele and treatment assignment. In the placebo arm, multivariable analysis demonstrated that the corin I555(P568) allele was associated with increased risk for death or heart failure hospitalization (relative risk 3.49; 95% CI, 1.45 to 8.39; P=0.005); however, in the treatment arm (fixed-dose combination isosorbide-dinitrate/hydralazine), the corin I555(P568) allele was not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a pharmacogenomic interaction in blacks with systolic heart failure. The corin I555(P568) allele is associated with an increased risk for death or heart failure hospitalization in patients receiving standard neurohormonal blockade, but the addition of fixed-dose combination isosorbide-dinitrate/hydralazine ameliorates this risk. A plausible mechanism for this pharmacogenomic interaction is the impaired processing of BNP in carriers of the corin I555(P568) allele as compared with noncarriers.

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) polymorphisms in African Americans with heart failure: results from the A-HeFT trial.

BACKGROUND: Genetic heterogeneity at the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) locus influences heart failure outcomes. The prevalence of NOS3 variants differs in black and white cohorts, but the impact of these differences is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects (n = 352) in the Genetic Risk Assessment of Heart Failure (GRAHF) substudy of the African-American Heart Failure Trial were genotyped for NOS3 polymorphisms: -786 T/C promoter, intron 4a/4b, and Glu298Asp and allele frequencies and compared with a white heart failure cohort. The effect of treatment with fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrates and hydralazine (FDC I/H) on event-free survival and composite score (CS) of survival, hospitalization, and quality of life (QoL) was analyzed within genotype subsets. In GRAHF, NOS3 genotype frequencies differed from the white cohort (P < .001). The -786 T allele was associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = .01), whereas the intron 4a allele was linked to lower diastolic blood pressure and higher LVEF (P = .03). Only the Glu298Asp polymorphism influenced treatment outcome; therapy with FDC I/H improved CS (P = .046) and QoL (P = .03) in the Glu298Glu subset only. CONCLUSIONS: In black subjects with heart failure, NOS3 genotype influences blood pressure and left ventricular remodeling. The impact of genetic heterogeneity on treatment with FDC I/H requires further study.

Exploring the potential synergistic action of spironolactone on nitric oxide-enhancing therapy: insights from the African-American Heart Failure Trial.

BACKGROUND: To investigate if treatment with an aldosterone antagonist affects the outcomes of treatment by fixed dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (FDC I/H) or placebo in black heart failure (HF) patients treated with contemporary HF medications. In the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT), FDC I/H was effective in reducing mortality and improving event-free survival. The beneficial effects of aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone [SP]), however have not been adequately assessed in black patients with or without the use of FDC I/H. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was performed in A-HeFT data base (n = 1050) to determine the effect of using SP (39% of patients) on outcomes. Baseline comparisons were done by 2-sample t-test or Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for comparing between and within groups for outcomes. SP had no effect on mortality, event-free survival, or first HF hospitalization in the overall A-HeFT population. However, SP decreased mortality risk in the FDC I/H group by 59% (P = .03), and a favorable trend was noted on event-free survival and first HF hospitalization. In contrast, the use of SP was not associated with a decrease in mortality or HF hospitalizations in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in black patients with systolic heart failure on standard therapy of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor antagonists, the beneficial effects of aldosterone antagonists require a background therapy of FDC I/H.

Effects of ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers in patients treated with the fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine in the African-American Heart Failure Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the A-HeFT (African-American Heart Failure Trial), treatment of African-American patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure (HF) with fixed-dose combination (FDC) of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (I/H) reduced mortality and morbidity and improved patient reported functional status compared with standard therapy alone. OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefit of FDC I/H in subgroups based on baseline drug therapy and to investigate whether ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers) [ARBs] or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) provided additional benefit in FDC I/H-treated African-American patients with HF. STUDY DESIGN: The A-HeFT was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling 1050 patients stabilized on optimal HF therapies and with NYHA class III/IV HF with systolic dysfunction conducted during the years 2001-4 with up to 18 months follow-up. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, first HF hospitalization, and improvement of quality of life at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included mortality, hospitalizations, and change in quality of life. Prospective Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for differences between FDC I/H and placebo groups and retrospective analyses were conducted within FDC I/H-treated and placebo groups. RESULTS: Subgroup analysis for mortality, event-free survival (death or first HF hospitalization), and HF hospitalization showed that FDC I/H, compared with placebo, was effective with or without ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers or other standard medications with all-point estimates favoring the FDC I/H group. Within the placebo-treated group, beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs were efficacious in improving survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; p<0.0001 for [beta]-blocker use and HR 0.39; p=0.01 for ACE inhibitor and/or ARB use). However, within the FDC I/H-treated group, use of beta-blockers, but not ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs, provided additional significant benefit for survival (HR 0.44; p=0.029 and HR 0.60; p=0.34, respectively), event-free survival (HR 0.62; p=0.034 and HR 0.72; p=0.29, respectively) and the composite score of death, HF hospitalization and change in quality of life (p=0.016 and p=0.13, respectively). CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis of baseline medication use in the A-HeFT, FDC I/H was superior to placebo with or without beta-blockers or ACE inhibitor. However, beta-blockers but not ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs provided additional significant benefit in African-Americans with HF treated with FDC I/H. These analyses are hypotheses generating and their confirmation in clinical trials needs to be considered.

Lack of bioequivalence between different formulations of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine and the fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine: the V-HeFT paradox.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the apparent discrepancy between the efficacy of the combination of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and hydralazine demonstrated in the first V-HeFT trial (V-HeFT I) and that in V-HeFT II could be explained by pharmacokinetic differences in the study drug formulations, and to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of the fixed-dose combination of ISDN/hydralazine (FDC ISDN/HYD; BiDil) formulation used in A-HeFT with that of the V-HeFT study drug formulations. STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A bioequivalence study was performed (n = 18-19 per group) comparing the ISDN and hydralazine formulations used in V-HeFT I, V-HeFT II and A-HeFT in healthy volunteer men and women aged 18-40 years. In phase A of the study, subjects received a reference solution of hydralazine hydrochloride/ISDN (37.5mg/10mg) orally. Slow acetylators were identified and randomised into three groups in phase B to receive a single oral dose of identical amounts of hydralazine hydrochloride/ISDN (37.5mg/10mg) from either (i) a hydralazine capsule plus an ISDN tablet (the V-HeFT I formulation); (ii) a hydralazine tablet plus an ISDN tablet (the V-HeFT II formulation); or (iii) FDC ISDN/HYD (the A-HeFT formulation). Blood/plasma concentrations of hydralazine and ISDN were determined from the blood samples taken between 0 and 36 hours. RESULTS: In phase B, the maximum observed concentrations (C(max)) were 65.9 +/- 53.9, 28.2 +/- 15.8 and 51.5 +/- 54.3 ng/mL of unchanged hydralazine, and 23.1 +/- 12.3, 21.7 +/- 13.4 and 26.7 +/- 18.7 ng/mL of ISDN for the V-HeFT I, V-HeFT II and A-HeFT formulations, respectively. The area under the blood/plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values were 32.6 +/- 13.4, 23.3 +/- 15.1 and 32.6 +/- 18.5 ng x h/mL of hydralazine, and 24.4 +/- 9.0, 24.8 +/- 8.0 and 23.5 +/- 6.3 ng x h/mL of ISDN for the V-HeFT I, V-HeFT II and A-HeFT formulations, respectively. For comparison of bioequivalence, the C(max) and AUC were normalised to 65kg bodyweight, and point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of the C(max) ratios, AUC ratios and ratios of the AUC in phase B normalised for clearance by the AUC in phase A (AUCR) were calculated. The three formulations were not bioequivalent based on the C(max) and AUC comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The blood concentrations of hydralazine obtained with the tablet formulation tested in V-HeFT II were markedly lower than those obtained with the capsule formulation tested in V-HeFT I or the FDC ISDN/HYD single tablet used in A-HeFT. The apparently modest effect on survival observed in V-HeFT II could be explained in part by the poor hydralazine bioavailability of the tablet preparation used in this trial. ISDN exposures were similar in the two trials. The ISDN-hydralazine formulation used in V-HeFT II was not bioequivalent to the formulation used in V-HeFT I or to the FDC ISDN/HYD that had demonstrated a significant survival benefit in A-HeFT.

Evidence for the continued safety and tolerability of fixed-dose isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine in patients with chronic heart failure (the extension to African-American Heart Failure Trial).

The benefits of fixed-dose combination isosorbide dinitrate plus hydralazine (ID/H) in African-Americans with heart failure (HF) were established by the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT), which was terminated early because of a significant survival benefit of ID/H. The Extension to A-HeFT trial (X-A-HeFT), designed to make ID/H available for ethical reasons after A-HeFT termination, afforded an opportunity to further observe responsiveness and compliance with ID/H. In total 198 patients completing the A-HeFT took ID/H for an additional 209 +/- 116 days. Their age (57 +/- 13 years), cause and duration of HF, and HF medications were not different from all A-HeFT patients. New York Heart Association class at X-A-HeFT baseline was > or =III in 51% of patients versus 100% of all patients at A-HeFT baseline, remained unchanged in most patients, improved in 24%, and worsened in only 9% during X-A-HeFT. The average number of ID/H tablets taken during X-A-HeFT was 3.7 +/- 1.8 per day with compliance averaging 87 +/- 25%. The most common adverse events, headache (34%) and dizziness (16%), were less than in patients taking ID/H in A-HeFT, with only 6% discontinuations for adverse events. The 6% annualized mortality rate in X-A-HeFT was the same as for ID/H in A-HeFT. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics or outcomes in X-A-HeFT patients analyzed according to their A-HeFT randomization. In conclusion, these results confirm the good compliance, tolerability, and responsiveness, with low mortality and improved symptoms, during treatment with ID/H observed in A-HeFT.

Isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in a fixed-dose combination produces further regression of left ventricular remodeling in a well-treated black population with heart failure: results from A-HeFT.

BACKGROUND: Isosorbide dinitrate combined with hydralazine therapy compared with placebo in patients with heart failure resulted in a sustained increase in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) indicative of regression of LV remodeling in the first Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT-I) in patients receiving only digoxin and diuretic. In the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) a fixed-dose combination resulted in a 43% reduction in mortality in 1050 black patients with heart failure already treated with recommended neurohormonal inhibiting drugs. Whether the fixed-dose combination produces a further regression of LV remodeling when added to renin-angiotensin and sympathetic inhibitors has not been documented. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiograms at baseline and 6 months after randomization to placebo or a fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (FDC I/H) were analyzed in 678 A-HeFT participants in a core laboratory. LVEF rose by 2.8 EF units in the FDC I/H group versus 0.8% in the control group (P < .01), LV mass index fell by 7.4 g/m2 in the FDC I/H group versus an increase of 1.4 g/m2 in the placebo group (P < .05), LV diastolic transverse diameter fell by 2.2 mm in FDC I/H and was unchanged in placebo (P < .01), and the LV systolic and diastolic sphericity indices improved in the FDC I/H group but remained unchanged in the placebo group. The mean plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) also measured in a core laboratory fell in the FDC I/H group by 39 pg/mL compared with 8 pg/mL in the placebo group (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose combination of I/H produces regression of LV remodeling when added to background therapy with renin-angiotensin and sympathetic inhibitors in black patients with heart failure. This remodeling benefit may explain at least in part the mortality reduction in A-HeFT.