Effectiveness of Bio-K+ for the prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection: Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of administering probiotics to prevent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) among patients receiving therapeutic antibiotics. DESIGN: Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2019. SETTING: This study was conducted in 4 acute-care hospitals across an integrated health region. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients, aged ≥55 years. METHODS: Patients were given 2 probiotic capsules daily (Bio-K+, Laval, Quebec, Canada), containing 50 billion colony-forming units of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R, and L. rhamnosus CLR2. We measured hospital-acquired CDI (HA-CDI) and the number of positive C. difficile tests per 10,000 patient days as well as adherence to administration of Bio-K+ within 48 and 72 hours of antibiotic administration. Mixed-effects generalized linear models, adjusted for influenza admissions and facility characteristics, were used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes. RESULTS: Overall adherence of Bio-K+ administration ranged from 76.9% to 84.6% when stratified by facility and periods. Rates of adherence to administration within 48 and 72 hours of antibiotic treatment were 60.2% -71.4% and 66.7%-75.8%, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, there was no change in HA-CDI (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.23) or C. difficile positivity rate (IRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24). Discharged patients may not have received a complete course of Bio-K+. Our hospitals had a low baseline incidence of HA-CDI. Patients who did not receive Bio-K+ may have differential risks of acquiring CDI, introducing selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals considering probiotics as a primary prevention strategy should consider the baseline incidence of HA-CDI in their population and timing of probiotics relative to the start of antimicrobial administration.

Implementation strategies for hospital-based probiotic administration in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design for preventing hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients, especially among older adults. Probiotics have been evaluated to prevent hospital-acquired (HA) CDI in patients who are receiving systemic antibiotics, but the implementation of timely probiotic administration remains a challenge. We evaluated methods for effective probiotic implementation across a large health region as part of a study to assess the real-world effectiveness of a probiotic to prevent HA-CDI (Prevent CDI-55 +). METHODS: We used a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial across four acute-care adult hospitals (n = 2,490 beds) to implement the use of the probiotic Bio-K + ® (Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285®, L. casei LBC80R® and L. rhamnosus CLR2®; Laval, Quebec, Canada) in patients 55 years and older receiving systemic antimicrobials. The multifaceted probiotic implementation strategy included electronic clinical decision support, local site champions, and both health care provider and patient educational interventions. Focus groups were conducted during study implementation to identify ongoing barriers and facilitators to probiotic implementation, guiding needed adaptations of the implementation strategy. Focus groups were thematically analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. RESULTS: A total of 340 education sessions with over 1,800 key partners and participants occurred before and during implementation in each of the four hospitals. Site champions were identified for each included hospital, and both electronic clinical decision support and printed educational resources were available to health care providers and patients. A total of 15 individuals participated in 2 focus group and 7 interviews. Key barriers identified from the focus groups resulted in adaptation of the electronic clinical decision support and the addition of nursing education related to probiotic administration. As a result of modifying implementation strategies for identified behaviour change barriers, probiotic adherence rates were from 66.7 to 75.8% at 72 h of starting antibiotic therapy across the four participating acute care hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a barrier-targeted multifaceted approach, including electronic clinical decision support, education, focus groups to guide the adaptation of the implementation plan, and local site champions, resulted in a high probiotic adherence rate in the Prevent CDI-55 + study.

Impact of Clostridioides difficile length of treatment on rates of recurrence in patients on concurrent antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is principally health care-associated, with a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. The guidelines recommend CDI therapy for 10 days; however, it is often extended in practice when concurrent antibiotics are used. The impact of the extended duration of therapy remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of CDI recurrence in patients receiving standard duration of therapy (SDT) with those receiving extended duration of therapy (EDT) for the treatment of hospital-acquired CDI (HA-CDI) while receiving concurrent antibiotics. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted between October 2017 and 2019. Adult HA-CDI patients who received a minimum 10 days of CDI therapy and were on concurrent antibiotics were stratified into SDT and EDT groups. Rates of CDI recurrence (at 90 and 180 days) and incidence of new-onset vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria (SD-106, EDT-117). CDI recurrence rates at 90 and 180 days were not statistically significant between SDT and EDT groups (22% vs 26%, P = .40% and 26% vs 31%, P = .47). Although the incidence of VRE within the extended group was higher, it was not statistically significant (6% vs 9%, P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in rates of recurrence or new-onset VRE was observed between SDT and EDT in HA-CDI patients.

The Alberta Telestewardship Network: Building a platform to enable capacity building in antimicrobial stewardship-results of an initial pilot study.

Background: Resources to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AS) are limited, but a telestewardship platform can enable capacity building and scalability. The Alberta Telestewardship Network (ATeleNet) was designed to focus on outreach across the province of Alberta, Canada, and facilitate AS activities. Methods: Outreach occurred virtually between pharmacists and physicians in hospital and long-term care settings throughout Alberta via secure, enterprise video conferencing software on both desktop and mobile devices. We used a quantitative questionnaire adapted from the telehealth usability questionnaire to capture the health provider's experience during each session. The questionnaire consisted of 39 questions, and a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the degree of agreement and collate responses into a descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 33 pilot consultations were completed between July 6, 2020 and December 15, 2021. The majority (22, 85%) of respondents agreed that video conference-based virtual sessions are an acceptable means to provide health care and that they were able to express themselves effectively to other health care professionals (23, 88%). Respondents agreed the system was simple to use (23, 96%), and that they could become productive quickly using the system (23, 88%). Overall, 24 (92%) respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the virtual care platform. Conclusions: We implemented and evaluated a telehealth consultation and collaborative care service between AS providers at multiple centres. AHS has since prioritized similar workflows, including access to specialists in acute care, as part of their virtual health strategy. Evaluation results will be shared with provincial stakeholders for further strategic planning and deployment.

Historique: Les ressources pour améliorer la gérance antimicrobienne (GA) sont limitées, mais une plateforme de télégérance peut favoriser le renforcement des capacités et l'échelonnabilité. L'Alberta Telestewardship Network (réseau de télégérance de l'Alberta, ou ATeleNet) a été conçu pour mettre l'accent sur le rayonnement dans la province de l'Alberta, au Canada et pour faciliter les activités de GA. Méthodologie: Le rayonnement s'est produit virtuellement entre des pharmaciens et des médecins d'établissements hospitaliers et d'établissements de soins de longue durée de l'Alberta par logiciel de visioconférence sécurisé sur des ordinateurs de bureau et des appareils mobiles. Les chercheurs ont utilisé un questionnaire quantitatif adapté du questionnaire sur la convivialité de la télésanté pour saisir l'expérience du dispensateur de soins lors de chaque séance. Le questionnaire était composé de 39 questions, et une échelle de Likert de cinq points a permis d'évaluer le degré d'entente et de recueillir les réponses dans une analyse descriptive. Résultats: Au total, les chercheurs ont effectué 33 consultations pilotes entre le 6 juillet 2020 et le 15 décembre 2021. La majorité des répondants (n = 22, 85 %) ont convenu que les séances en visioconférence représentaient un moyen acceptable de fournir des soins de santé et leur permettaient de s'exprimer avec efficacité auprès des autres professionnels de la santé (n = 23, 88 %). Les répondants ont indiqué que le système était facile à utiliser (n = 23, 96 %), et qu'ils pouvaient vite devenir productifs (n = 23, 88 %). Dans l'ensemble, 24 répondants (92 %) étaient satisfaits ou très satisfaits de la plateforme de soins virtuels. Conclusions: Les chercheurs ont lancé et évalué une consultation en télésanté et un service de soins coopératifs entre fournisseurs de GA de multiples centres. Depuis, les Services de santé de l'Alberta ont priorisé des processus de travail semblables dans leur stratégie de santé virtuelle, y compris pour l'accès à des spécialistes en soins aigus. Les résultats de l'évaluation seront transmis à des intervenants provinciaux en vue d'une planification et d'un déploiement stratégiques.

Use of an electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for surveillance of medication omissions: results of a one year study of antimicrobials in the inpatient setting.

INTRODUCTION: Medication administration omissions (MAO) are usually considered medication errors but not all MAO are clinically relevant. We determined the frequency of clinically relevant MAO of antimicrobial drugs in adult hospitals in Calgary, Alberta, Canada based on electronic medication administration record (eMAR). METHODS: We examined 2011 data from eMAR records on medical wards and developed a reproducible assessment scheme to categorize and determine clinical relevance of MAO. We applied this scheme to records from 2012 in a retrospective cohort study to quantify clinically relevant MAO. Significant predictors of clinically relevant MAO were identified. RESULTS: A total of 294,718 dose records were assessed of which 10,282 (3.49%) were for doses not administered. Among these 4903 (1.66% of total); 47.68% of MAO were considered clinically relevant. Significant positive predictors of clinically relevant MAO included inhaled (OR 4.90, 95% CI 3.54-6.94) and liquid oral (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18-1.47) route of medication compared to solid oral and irregular dose schedules. Evening nursing shift compared to night shift (OR 0.77 95% CI 0.70-0.85) and parenteral (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.46-0.54) were negative predictors, The commonest reasons for relevant MAO were patient preference, unspecified reason, administration access issues, drug not available or patient condition. CONCLUSION: Assessment of MAO by review of computer records provides a greater scope and sample size than directly observed medication administration assessments without "observer" effect. We found that MAO of antimicrobials in inpatients were uncommon but were seen more frequently with orally administered antimicrobials which may have significance to antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Assessment of antimicrobial utilization metrics: days of therapy versus defined daily doses and pharmacy dispensing records versus nursing administration data.

OBJECTIVE: To compare antimicrobial utilization data derived from pharmacy dispensing records and nursing administration record data by 2 commonly used units of measure. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND METHODS: Data from nursing administration records and pharmacy dispensing records were obtained for 32 medical wards. From nursing and pharmacy data, defined daily doses (DDD) were calculated, and from the nursing data, days of therapy were derived. Direct comparison of total antimicrobial use was performed by graphical analysis and linear regression. Slope of trend line was used to quantify the difference between pairs of measures. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to determine constant and proportional bias. At the level of individual agents, difference between pairs of measures was calculated and presented graphically and the average (95% CI) for the difference between measures was determined. RESULTS: Nursing administration record-derived DDD were on average 23% lower than corresponding rates of pharmacy dispensing record-derived DDD. The difference between rates of utilization by days of therapy vs DDD from the same source (nursing) was relatively small. Results from analysis of different individual agents were highly variable with wide 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, we found clinically relevant differences in antimicrobial utilization associated with data from different sources. This outweighed the importance of the metric (DDD or days of therapy). However, measurement of use of individual agents was highly variable and sensitive to both metric unit and data sources.

Utilization of colistin for treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Colistin is uncommonly used in clinical practice; however, the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms has rekindled interest in this potentially toxic therapeutic option. The present study describes the authors' experience with colistin in the management of patients who were infected with metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa within the Calgary Health Region (Calgary, Alberta). METHOD: Adult patients who received colistimethate sodium (colistin) between January 2000 and December 2005 were identified via pharmacy records, and their charts were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Patient demographics, clinical course and relevant laboratory data were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-eight courses of colistin were received by 22 patients. The majority of these treatments were directed at MBL-producing Pseudomonas. One-half of the patients received nebulized colistin. Intravenous (IV) colistin was administered to 12 patients for a mean +/- SD of 14.7+/-13.8 days (range 3.7 to 46 days). The highest IV dose used was 125 mg every 6 h or 6 mg/kg/day. Eight of 12 patients (67%) treated with IV colistin responded either fully or partially. Two patients received IV colistin as outpatients. Adverse effects considered to be due to colistin included drug fever, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Five of nine patients (56%) who had complete data available for evaluation had at least a doubling of creatinine levels from baseline. CONCLUSION: Patients in the present study received both IV and nebulized colistin for multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa. The use of IV colistin was associated with a favourable response, but mild nephrotoxicity occurred in two-third of patients. It was concluded that colistin may be a useful drug when choices are limited.

Adequacy of empirical antifungal therapy and effect on outcome among patients with invasive Candida species infections.

OBJECTIVES: Although inadequate antimicrobial therapy has been demonstrated in multiple studies to increase the risk for death in bacterial infections, few data investigating the effect of antifungal therapy on outcome of serious fungal disease are available. We sought to assess the adequacy of empirical therapy and its effect on mortality in invasive Candida species infections. METHODS: Population-based surveillance of all patients with Candida spp. cultured from blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid was conducted. Adequacy of empirical therapy was assessed according to published guidelines. RESULTS: During a 5 year period, 207 patients had an invasive Candida spp. infection identified; in 199 cases (96%) adequate data were available for assessment of treatment and outcome at hospital discharge. One hundred and three (52%) cases were due to Candida albicans, 44 (22%) were due to Candida glabrata and the remainder were due to other species. Between the time of culture draw and reporting of a positive culture, only 64 (32%) patients were treated with empirical therapy; this was deemed adequate in 51 (26%). Patients who received adequate empirical therapy had a significant decrease in crude mortality [14/51 (27%) versus 68/148 (46%); risk ratio 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.37-0.96); P = 0.02]. After adjusting for age and the need for intensive care unit admission in logistic regression analysis, the use of adequate empirical therapy was independently associated with a reduced risk for death [odds ratio 0.46 (95% confidence interval 0.22-1.00); P = 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate empirical therapy is used in a minority of patients with invasive Candida spp. infections but is associated with improved survival.