Radiofrequency thermal ablation of small tumors in transplanted kidneys: an evolving nephron-sparing option.

Small tumors in transplanted kidneys are rarely detected during follow-up. With surgical treatment, it is sometimes challenging to preserve the graft and its function. Image-guided ablation techniques have been recently reported as effective in treating these tumors. Herein three cases of radiofrequency (RF) thermal ablation in transplanted kidneys are reviewed and compared with cases in the literature. There were no major complications seen, the mean change in serum creatinine level was no greater than 0.1 mg/dL, and complete ablation was sustained on imaging studies at 3, 18, and 62 months follow-up. RF ablation can be considered a safe, function-preserving, and effective evolving therapeutic option for small tumors in transplanted kidneys.

Percutaneous RF thermal ablation of renal tumors: is US guidance really less favorable than other imaging guidance techniques?

The purpose of this study was to compare our experience with ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) of renal tumors with results of CT-guided and MRI-guided series in the current literature. Of 90 consecutive renal tumors treated with RFA in 71 patients, 87 lesions were ablated under US guidance. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and safety. Results were then compared to published case series where CT and MRI guidances were used exclusively. In our series we had a major complication rate of 4.6%, whereas in CT- and MRI-based series it was 0-12% (mean, 2.2%) and 0-8.3% (mean, 4.1%), respectively. During follow-up (1-68 months; mean, 24 months) technical effectiveness was 89.7%, while it was between 89.5% and 96% in CT-guided series and between 91.7% and 100% in MRI-guided series. The size of successfully treated lesions (28 mm) was lower than that of partially-ablated lesions (36 mm; p = 0.004) and only central lesion location proved to be a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.009); in CT-guided series, positive prognostic factors were exophytic growth and size

Radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), the standard approach which has been used for many years to treat early non-surgical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which has become an interesting alternative. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized trial was carried out on 139 cirrhotic patients in Child-Pugh classes A/B with 1-3 nodes of HCC (diameter 15-30 mm), for a total of 177 lesions. Patients were randomized to receive RFA (n=70) or PEI (n=69). The primary end-point was complete response (CR) 1 year after the percutaneous ablation of all HCC nodes identified at baseline. Secondary end-points were: early (30-50 days) CR, complications, survival and costs. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 1-year CR was achieved in 46/70 (65.7%) and in 25/69 (36.2%) patients treated by RFA and PEI, respectively (p=0.0005). For lesions >20 mm in diameter, there was a larger CR rate in the RFA group (68.1% versus 26.3%). An early CR was obtained in 67/70 (95.7%) patients treated by RFA compared with 42/64 (65.6%) patients treated by PEI (p=0.0001). Complications occurred in 10 and 12 patients treated by RFA and PEI, respectively. The overall survival rate was not significantly different in the RFA versus PEI arm (adjusted hazard ratio=0.88, 95% CI: 0.50-1.53). There was an incremental health-care cost of 8286 euro for each additional patient successfully treated by RFA. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year CR rate after percutaneous treatment of early HCC was significantly better with RFA than with PEI but did not provide a clear survival advantage in cirrhotic patients.

Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: small size favorably predicts technique effectiveness and survival.

The objective of this study was to analyze long-term results of radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) for colorectal metastases (MTS), in order to evaluate predictors for adverse events, technique effectiveness, and survival. One hundred ninety-nine nonresectable MTS (0.5-8 cm; mean, 2.9 cm) in 122 patients underwent a total of 166 RFA sessions, percutaneously or during surgery. The technique was "simple" or "combined" with vascular occlusion. The mean follow-up time was 24.2 months. Complications, technique effectiveness, and survival rates were statistically analyzed. Adverse events occurred in 8.1% of lesions (major complication rate: 1.1%), 7.1% with simple and 16.7% with combined technique (p = 0.15). Early complete response was obtained in 151 lesions (81.2%), but 49 lesions (26.3%) recurred locally after a mean of 10.4 months. Sustained complete ablation was achieved in 66.7% of lesions < or = 3 cm versus 33.3% of lesions > 3 cm (p < 0.0001). Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91%, 54%, and 33%, respectively, from the diagnosis of MTS and 79%, 38%, and 22%, respectively, from RFA. Mean survival time from RFA was 31.5 months, 36.2 in patients with main MTS < or = 3 cm and 23.2 in those with at least one lesion > 3 cm (p = 0.006). We conclude that "simple" RFA is safe and successful for MTS < or = 3 cm, contributing to prolong survival when patients can be completely treated.