Sexto reporte de eventos adversos con tratamientos biológicos en Argentina: Informe del registro BIOBADASAR / Sixth report of adverse events with biological treatments in Argentina: Report of the BIOBADASAR registry

Objetivo: Actualizar los resultados del registro BIOBADASAR sobre seguridad, duración y causas de interrupción del tratamiento luego de 8 años de seguimiento. Métodos: BIOBADASAR es un registro de seguridad de terapias biológicas establecido por la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología. Se presenta la descripción de BIOBADASAR 3.0, una cohorte compuesta por 53 centros de Argentina seguidos prospectivamente desde agosto de 2010 hasta enero de 2018. Resultados: Se registraron 4656 pacientes, 6234 tratamientos [3765 casos (terapia con biológicos) y 2469 controles (terapia no biológicos)]. Se interrumpió el tratamiento en el 44,6% en los casos vs. 27,9% en los controles. Causa principal de discontinuación fue por ineficacia (40% casos vs. 32% controles). Se presentaron 3154 eventos adversos (2230 en casos vs. 924 en controles), de los cuales el 13,6% fueron graves (9,8% en casos y 3,7% en controles). El evento adverso (EA) más frecuente en ambos grupos fueron las infecciones (43,56% en casos vs. 34,31% en los controles, RR: 3,42; IC 95%: 3,02-3,88), y de ellas las de vías aéreas superiores (14,5%). Las neoplasias se presentaron en 78 casos vs. 45 en controles (RR: 1,98; IC 95%: 1,37-2,86). Conclusiones: En este sexto reporte no se observan tendencias diferentes sobre seguridad, duración y causas de interrupción del tratamiento respecto a informes previos. Las infecciones fueron el principal EA y la ineficacia, seguido por EA y la pérdida de pacientes las principales causas de suspensión del tratamiento. El advenimiento de nuevos agentes biológicos y la necesidad de control en seguridad a largo plazo, fortalece el uso de este tipo de registro.

Objective: Update the results of the BIOBADASAR registry on safety, duration and causes of treatment interruption after 8 years of follow-up. Methods: BIOBADASAR is a safety record of biological therapies established by the Argentine Society of Rheumatology. The description of BIOBADASAR 3.0 is presented, a cohort of 53 centers in Argentina followed prospectively from August 2010 to January 2018. Results: 4656 patients were registered, 6234 treatments [3765 cases (therapy with biologicals) and 2469 controls (non-biological therapy)]. Treatment was interrupted in 44.6% in cases vs. 27.9% in controls. Main cause of discontinuation was due to inefficiency (40% cases vs. 32% controls). There were 3154 adverse events (2230 in cases vs. 924 in controls), of which 13.6% were tombs (9.8% in cases and 3.7% in controls). The most frequent adverse event (AE) in both groups were infections (43.56% in cases vs. 34.31% in controls, RR: 3.42, 95% CI: 3.02-3.88), and the upper airway pathways (14.5%). Neoplasms were published in 78 cases versus 45 controls (RR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.37-2.86). Conclusions: In this article, there are no different trends regarding safety, duration and causes of interruption of treatment compared to previous reports. Infections were the main causes of treatment discontinuation. The advent of new biological agents and the need for control over long-term security, strengthens the use of this type of registration.

Accesibilidad y adherencia a drogas biológicas en un servicio público de reumatología de la ciudad de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina / Accessibility and adherence to biological drugs in a public rheumatology service in the city of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina

Objetivo: Describir la situación de accesibilidad y adherencia a tratamientos con drogas biológicas en pacientes de un servicio público de reumatología. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal, observacional y retrospectivo que incluyó pacientes con gestión de DB. Variables: sociodemográficas, clínicas, tratamientos, tiempo desde el diagnóstico al acceso, adherencia (porcentaje de toma mensual y adecuada de la droga ≥75%); tiempo desde prescripción a administración; trámite administrativo realizado por entidad pública u obra social; certificado único de discapacidad (CUD). Resultados: Se incluyeron 57 pacientes, 86% mujeres, edad media 47,79 años (IC 95%: 44,46-51,12); educación media 8,42 años (IC 95%: 7,68-9,16); 82,5% nivel socioeconómico medio-bajo; 63,2% etnia mestiza; 19,3% cobertura privada. Patología más frecuente: artritis reumatoidea. Tiempo medio desde el diagnóstico a la DB: 104,25 meses (IC 95%: 82,61-125,89). Tiempo medio desde la prescripción a la aplicación: 6,4 meses (IC 95%: 5,62-7,18). Adherencia del 86,0%. 50% de los pacientes contaban con CUD. No hubo diferencias en el tiempo de espera desde prescripción a administración de DB, en relación a cobertura de salud (p=0,065) y nivel socioeconómico. Conclusión: Existe un largo tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad en relación a la accesibilidad a DB y tanto el acceso como la adherencia reflejan la vulnerabilidad de estos pacientes.

Objective: To describe the situation of accessibility and adhesion treatment of patients with biological drugs (BD) from a public rheumatology service. Methods: Cross-sectional, observational and retrospective study, which includes patients who have been treated with BD. Variables: sociodemographic; clinical and treatments; time from diagnosis to BD access, adherence (monthly intake percentage of the drug ≥75%); time from the prescription to the administration of the BD; paperwork by a public or private entity; disability certificate (DC). Results: A total of 57 patients were included, 86% women, mean age being 47.79 (95% CI: 44.46-51.12) and education years being 8.42 (95% CI: 7.68- 9.16). 82.5% belonged to a medium-low socioeconomic status and 63.2% were mestizos. 19.3% had private coverage. Rheumatoid Arthritis was the most frequent disease. The mean time from diagnosis to BD: 104.25 months (95% CI: 82.61-125.89). The mean time from prescription to application: 6.4 months (95% CI: 5.62-7.18). The adherence was 86.0% and 50.0 % of patients had DC. There were no differences in the waiting time from the prescription to BD administration, taking into account the health coverage (p = 0.065) and socioeconomic status. Conclusion: There is a long time of disease evolution in regarding the accessibility to BD. In addition, accessibility and adherence reflect the vulnerability of our patients.

Características de los tratamientos biológicos en enfermedades reumáticas en Argentina: quinto informe del registro BIOBADASAR / Features of rheumatic diseases biological treatments in Argentina: BIOBADASAR fifth report

Introducción: El proyecto BIOBADASAR (Registro argentino deeventos adversos con tratamientos biológicos en reumatología)comenzó en agosto de 2010, para recabar información a largo plazosobre los eventos adversos en tratamientos biológicos en pacientescon enfermedades reumáticas en la práctica clínica cotidiana enArgentina.Pacientes y método: Se registraron datos de cada paciente,tratamientos y acontecimientos adversos relevantes o importantes.Los pacientes debían tener enfermedad diagnosticada y tratadacon un agente biológico. Cada caso se comparó con un control:un paciente con tratamiento no biológico con característicasdemográficas similares. Se analizaron los datos con análisis de lavarianza, con test de t de Student, Mann Whitney, test chi2, o testexacto de Fisher. El análisis de supervivencia de los tratamientoshasta su discontinuación o interrupción se realizó con el método deKaplan-Meier y test log-rank...

Background: BIOBADASAR (Argentine Registry of Adverse Eventsin Biological Treatments in Rheumatology) was started in August2010 to obtain long-term information of patients with rheumatic diseases,treatments and adverse events in everyday clinical practice.Patients and methods: Data on patients’ demographics,treatments and adverse events were collected. Patients had a diagnosisof a rheumatic disease and were treated with biological agent.To compare information, a control group was included, consisting ofpatients treated with similar demographic characteristics but treatedwith a non-biological agent. Data were analysed with Anova,Student´s t, Mann Whitney, chi2, Fisher´s exact tests, as appropriate.Survival analysis of treatments was performed with Kaplan-Meiercurves and log-rank test...

Tercer reporte de eventos adversos con tratamientos biológicos en Argentina. Informe de registro biobadasar / Thrid report of adverse events with biologics in Argentina. Report from biobadasar registry

Introducción: BIOBADASAR (Registro Argentino de Eventos Adversos con Tratamientos Biológicos en Reumatología) comenzó en agosto de 2010. La importancia de este registro es mostrar datos locales que, probablemente, puedan diferir de otros registros. El objetivo es comunicar los resultados del tercer reporte de BIOBADASAR. Métodos: Todos los pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas que requirieron tratamiento con agentes biológicos y pacientes controles sin estos tratamientos fueron incluidos en la base de datos provenientes de 32 centros participando a lo largo de la Argentina. Tres áreas de datos son analizados: características de los pacientes, tratamientos y eventos adversos...

Introduction: BIOBADASAR (Argentine Registry of Adverse Events with Biological Treatments in Rheumatology) began in August 2010. The importance of this registry is to show local data that may probably differ from other registries. The objective is to communicate the results of the third BIOBADASAR report. Methods: All patients with rheumatic diseases who required treatment with biological agents and control patients without these treatments were included in the database from 32 participating centers throughout Argentina. Three areas of data are analyzed: patient characteristics, treatments and adverse events...

Familial osteoarthritis and Milwaukee shoulder associated with calcium pyrophosphate and apatite crystal deposition.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and define the phenotypes observed in a large Italo-Argentinean kindred with osteoarthritis, chondrocalcinosis, and Milwaukee shoulder (MS). METHODS: Seventy-five members were evaluated with a history, examination, and radiographs of shoulders, spine, hands, and knees. Superior subluxation of the glenohumeral joint was graded using shoulder radiographs and tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and 3 dimensional computed tomography was performed on selected members. In 31 family members peripheral blood DNA was utilized for genetic linkage analysis of several candidate gene loci previously linked to chondrocalcinosis phenotypes, as well as those implicated in the proper patterning of skeletal elements and cartilage differentiation. In addition, direct sequence analysis of type II collagen gene (COL2A1), the gene that codes for the major structural protein of cartilage, was undertaken in 3 affected and 3 unaffected members of the family. RESULTS: MS was seen in one member of the first generation and 6 members of the 2nd generation, while 8 members of the 3rd generation showed an incomplete form of MS. Isolated superior subluxation of the shoulder was seen in 16 other family members of the 3rd and 4th generations. Osteoarthritis of the spine and peripheral joints was seen in 31 affected members, while chondrocalcinosis was observed in 6 members of the first generation. Shoulder synovial fluid from 2 patients showed the presence of both apatite and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals. Direct analysis of the COL2A1 gene indicated no known disease determining mutations in affected members, thus excluding this gene as a candidate gene in this family. Genetic linkage to several candidate loci, including the chondrocalcinosis loci on chromosomes 5p and 8q, as well as loci for HOX A and C were also excluded. Linkage analyses of other loci for the HOX B and D genes and the PAX 1 and 9 genes were uninformative in this kindred. CONCLUSION: This kindred illustrates an unusual type of osteoarthritis with secondary intraarticular and periarticular calcification and MS in the most severely affected elderly members. A search for linkage to some potential candidate genes was either excluded or uninformative. Further linkage analysis to identify potential candidate genes is in progress.