Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Obes Surg ; 30(12): 5026-5032, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is often the preferred conversion procedure for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) poor responders. However, there is controversy whether it is better to convert in one or two stages. This study aims to compare the outcomes of one and two-stage conversions of LAGB to RYGB. METHODS: Retrospective review of a multicenter prospectively collected database. Data on conversion in one and two stages was compared. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-two patients underwent LAGB conversion to RYGB in seven specialized bariatric centers. Six hundred seventy-three (81%) were converted in one-stage. Patients in the two-stage group were more likely to have experienced technical complications, such as slippage or erosions (86% vs. 37%, p = 0.0001) and to have had a higher body mass index (BMI) (41.6 vs. 39.9 Kg/m2, p = 0.005). There were no differences in postoperative complications and mortality rates between the one-stage and two-stage groups (13.5% vs. 10.8%, and 0.7% vs. 0.0% respectively, p = ns). Mean final BMI and %total weight loss (%TWL) for the one-stage and the two-stage groups were 31.6 vs. 32.4 Kg/m2 (p = ns) and 30.4 vs. 26.8 (p = 0.017) after a mean follow-up of 33 months. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98%, 75%, and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage conversion of LAGB to RYGB is safe and effective. Two-stage conversion carries low morbidity and mortality in the case of band slippage, erosion, or higher BMI patients. These findings suggest the importance of patient selection when choosing the appropriate conversion approach.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Gastroplastia , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Surg Endosc ; 21(5): 758-60, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17235723

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an important facet of the preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery. Morbidly obese patients are at high risk for airway complications during this procedure, and an attractive alternative is transnasal EGD. This report describes a series of patients evaluated successfully using this technique. METHODS: All patients undergoing preoperative transnasal small-caliber EGD for morbid obesity surgery between September 2004 and June 2005 at a Veterans Affairs Hospital were included in the analysis. The variables assessed were the adequacy of the examination, patient tolerance, the need for sedation, and the ability to perform interventions. RESULTS: The study enrolled 25 patients (17 men and 8 women) with an average age of 55 years (range, 44-63 years) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 47 kg/m2 (range, 38-69 kg/m2). All the patients met the 1991 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference Criteria for bariatric surgery and were undergoing preoperative evaluation. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (82%), diabetes mellitus (80%), and obstructive sleep apnea (68%). All 25 patients had successful cannulation of the duodenum's second portion with excellent tolerance. There were no sedation requirements for 23 (92%) of the 25 patients. Significant pathology was found in 14 (56%) of the 25 patients, including hiatal hernia (28%), gastritis (16%), esophageal intestinal metaplasia (16%), esophagitis (12%), gastric polyps (8%), gastric ulcer (4%) and esophageal varices (4%). Biopsies were indicated for 12 patients and successful for all 12 (100%). CONCLUSION: Transnasal small-caliber EGD is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional EGD for the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. It requires minimal to no sedation in a population at high risk for complications in this setting. In addition, this technique is effective in identifying pathology that requires preoperative treatment and offers a complete examination with biopsy capabilities. This technique should be considered for all morbidly obese patients at high risk for airway compromise during EGD.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Endoscopios Gastrointestinales , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Cavidad Nasal , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Adulto , Duodenoscopía , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Esofagoscopía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Obes Surg ; 15(9): 1282-6, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16259888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is a widely performed bariatric operation. Preoperative factors that predict successful outcomes are currently being studied. The goal of this study was to determine if preoperative weight loss was associated with positive outcomes in patients undergoing LRYGBP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing LRYGBP at our institution between July 2002 (when a policy of preoperative weight loss was instituted) and August 2003. Outcome measures evaluated at 1 year postoperatively included percent excess weight loss (EWL) and correction of co-morbidities. Statistical analysis was performed by multiple linear regression. P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The study included 90 subjects. Initial BMI ranged from 35.4 to 63.1 (mean 48.1). Preoperative weight loss ranged from 0 to 23.8% (mean 7.25). At 12 months, postoperative EWL ranged from 40.4% to 110.9 % (mean 74.4%). Preoperative loss of 1% of initial weight correlated with an increase of 1.8% of postoperative EWL at 1 year. In addition, initial BMI correlated negatively with EWL, so that an increase of 1 unit of BMI correlated with a decrease of 1.34% of EWL. Finally, preoperative weight loss of >5% correlated significantly with shorter operative times by 36 minutes. Preoperative weight loss did not correlate with postoperative complications or correction of co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative weight loss resulted in higher postoperative weight loss at 1 year and in shorter operative times with LRYGBP. No differences in correction of co-morbidities or complication rates were found with preoperative weight loss in this study. Preoperative weight loss should be encouraged in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias
4.
Minerva Chir ; 59(5): 447-59, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15494672

RESUMEN

Laparoscopic antireflux surgical procedures were introduced into clinical practice a little more than a decade ago. Today, they constitute a well-established treatment modality for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. With the introduction of laparoscopy, there has been a significant increase in the number of antireflux procedures performed annually in the United States. This most likely indicates more willingness by patients and referring physicians to consider the less invasive approach, rather than a change in the indications of surgical therapy. The main indications for surgical treatment continue to be relapse on medical therapy, intolerance of medications or the patient's choice of not taking medications chronically. A key to successful outcome following antireflux surgical procedures is careful patient selection and work-up. The use of endoscopy, contrast studies, esophageal manometry and 24-h pH studies is of paramount importance. Typical of many laparoscopic operations, antireflux procedures evolved with time and underwent several technical refinements. There continues to be considerable debate on some of the technical aspects of these procedures and on the long-term difference in outcome between partial and complete fundoplication. The superiority of the laparoscopic approach over the open approach has been established, with short-term advantages observed. Long-term outcome between the open and laparoscopic approaches appears to be equivalent. Failures of surgical therapy can be broadly divided into 2 groups: 1) improper patient selection and work-up and 2) technical failures. Redo laparoscopic antireflux operations are technically challenging but feasible in experienced hands.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Manometría , Selección de Paciente , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Surg Endosc ; 18(4): 676-80, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15026932

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Open repair of parastomal hernias is associated with high rates of morbidity and recurrence. Laparoscopic repair with mesh has been described, and good results have been reported in small case series with short-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to review our institution's experience with the laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias. METHODS: Nine patients with symptomatic parastomal hernias (five ileal conduits, two ileostomies, and two sigmoid colostomies) underwent laparoscopic repair with mesh between April 1998 and September 2001. Demographics, operative details, postoperative complications, and hernia recurrences were recorded retroprospectively. RESULTS: All of the patients were men; their average age was 66 years (range, 53-77). A single piece of Gore-Tex Dual Mesh with a slit to accommodate the stoma was used in seven of nine repairs; in the other two patients, two pieces of mesh were used. Concurrent incisional hernias were repaired in three of nine patients (33.3%). The average operating time was 243 min (range, 136-360). The average postoperative length of stay was 4.7 days (range, 2-7). Immediate postoperative complications occurred in three patients (33.3%) (one ileus, one urinary retention, and one ulnar neuropathy). Recurrences developed in four patients (44.4%), and in one patient (11.1%) the stoma prolapsed; all of these failures occurred within 6 months of the operation. One patient died 10 months postoperatively, without evidence of hernia recurrence. Three patients are without evidence of recurrence after 18, 21, and 33 months (average, 24) of follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this series, laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia failed in 56% of patients, all within 6 months of the operation. Although the laparoscopic approach has potential advantages compared to the conventional open methods, the initial results are disappointing. Advances in the technique may improve the early results, and further prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this approach.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Anciano , Colostomía , Femenino , Humanos , Ileostomía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Derivación Urinaria
6.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 11(6): 361-6, 2001 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11814126

RESUMEN

The technique of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has evolved during the past decade to become an effective and safe alternative for inguinal herniorrhaphy. In experienced hands, the procedure can be performed with low morbidity and with recurrence rates comparable to those following open repair using mesh. Several studies have shown a significant advantage for the laparoscopic approach, with less postoperative analgesic requirement and earlier return to work. Its limitations continue to be higher cost and complexity and the requirement for general anesthesia. The results and cost-effectiveness are maximized when applied to properly chosen patients by surgeons experienced in the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 4(2): 143-9, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10675237

RESUMEN

Laparoscopic fundoplication controls heartburn and regurgitation, but the effects on the respiratory symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are unclear. Confusion stems from difficulty preoperatively in determining whether cough or wheezing is actually caused by reflux when reflux is found on pH monitoring. To date, there is no proven way to pinpoint a cause-and-effect relationship. The goals of this study were to assess the following: (1) the value of pH monitoring in establishing a correlation between respiratory symptoms and reflux; (2) the predictive value of pH monitoring on the results of surgical treatment; and (3) the outcome of laparoscopic fundoplication on GERD-induced respiratory symptoms. Between October 1992 and October 1998, a total of 340 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD. From the clinical findings alone, respiratory symptoms were thought possibly to be caused by GERD in 39 patients (11%). These 39 patients had been symptomatic for an average of 134 months. They were all taking H2-blocking agents (21%) or proton pump inhibitors (79%). Seven patients (18%) were also being treated with bronchodilators, alone (3 patients) or in combination with prednisone (4 patients). Median length of postoperative follow-up was 28 months. In 23 patients (59%) a temporal correlation was found during 24-hour pH monitoring between respiratory symptoms and episodes of reflux. Postoperatively heartburn resolved in 91% of patients, regurgitation in 90% of patients, wheezing in 64% of patients, and cough in 74% of patients. Cough resolved in 19 (83%) of 23 patients in whom a correlation between cough and reflux was found during pH monitoring, but in only 8 (57%) of 14 of patients when this correlation was absent. Cough persisted postoperatively in the two patients who did not cough during the study. These data show that pH monitoring helped to establish a correlation between respiratory symptoms and reflux, and it helped to identify the patients most likely to benefit from antireflux surgery. Following laparoscopic surgery, respiratory symptoms resolved in 83% of patients when a temporal correlation between cough and reflux was found on pH monitoring; heartburn and regurgitation resolved in 90%.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Enfermedades Respiratorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Tos/etiología , Tos/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Enfermedades Respiratorias/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Surg Endosc ; 13(9): 843-7, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10449836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been said that a Heller myotomy cannot improve dysphagia in achalasia when the esophagus is markedly dilated or sigmoid shaped. Those who hold this belief recommend esophagectomy as the primary treatment in such cases. This study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy combined with Dor fundoplication in 66 patients with and without esophageal dilatation, all of whom had achalasia. METHODS: On the basis of the maximal diameter of the esophageal lumen and the shape of the esophagus, the patients were placed into four groups: group A (esophageal diameter <4.0 cm; 26 patients), group B (diameter 4.0-6.0 cm; 21 patients), group C1 (diameter >6.0 cm and straight esophageal axis; 12 patients), and group C2 (diameter >6.0 cm and sigmoid-shaped esophagus; 7 patients). All patients underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. RESULTS: The duration of the operation and the length of hospital stay were similar among the four groups. Excellent or good results were obtained in 88% of group A, 100% of group B, 83% of group C1, and 100% of group C2. No patient in this consecutive series ultimately required an esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with achalasia who have esophageal dilation, a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (a) took no longer and was no more difficult, (b) was associated with no more postoperative complications, and (c) gave just as good relief of dysphagia. We conclude that esophageal dilation by itself should rarely serve as an indication for esophagectomy rather than myotomy as the initial surgical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Esófago/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dilatación Patológica , Acalasia del Esófago/complicaciones , Acalasia del Esófago/patología , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Fundoplicación , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias
10.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 8(3): 551-68, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9654568

RESUMEN

Accessing the stomach via a gastrostomy is the preferred method for providing enteral nutritional support when supplementation is required for more than three or four weeks. Since its introduction in the early 1980s, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy has become the most popular method for creating a gastrostomy. It is a quick and cost-effective method and has supplanted open gastrostomy for the establishment of a gastrocutaneous fistula to provide access to the stomach for numerous indications. It is associated, however, with serious and potentially lethal complications which must be completely understood by the endoscopist. In addition, patient selection and thorough attention to details are paramount to the performance of a safe percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Gastroscopía , Gastrostomía/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Nutrición Enteral/economía , Nutrición Enteral/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Fascitis Necrotizante/etiología , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Gastroscopía/efectos adversos , Gastroscopía/economía , Gastroscopía/métodos , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Gastrostomía/economía , Gastrostomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Apoyo Nutricional , Selección de Paciente , Peritonitis/etiología , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Radiología Intervencionista , Seguridad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA