RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart transplant recipients develop cancer at two-times the rate compared to the general population. However, the incidence and mortality rates and the adjusted association between cancer and mortality remains unclear. METHODS: We estimated the incidence and mortality rates and the adjusted association between developing cancer (any, skin, hematologic, and solid tumor subtypes) and the all-cause mortality rates among adult heart transplant recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from October 1, 1987, until June 28, 2020. RESULTS: Among 51,597 adult heart transplant recipients, 13,191 (25.6%) were diagnosed with de novo malignancy throughout the follow-up period. The cumulative incidence cancer at years 1, 5, 10, and 20 was 3%, 16.4%, 32.8%, and 56.6%, respectively. Among those with cancer, the cumulative mortality was 17.5%, 42.3%, 65%, and 91% at years 1, 5, 10, and 20, respectively. The incidence rate of any de novo malignancy was 38.7 cases per 1000 person-years and the mortality rate (for those with cancer) was 115.2 cases per 1000 person-years. Compared to those without cancer, those with cancer had a higher adjusted mortality association [HR: 2.14 (2.07, 2.21)]. The strongest associations were estimated for pancreatic [10.63 (8.34, 13.54)], leukemia [8.06 (4.33, 15.00)], and esophagus [6.94 (5.43, 8.87)] malignancies. The association between de novo malignancies and mortality was higher in the earlier years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to not developing cancer, those with de novo malignancy have a 2-fold higher mortality rate, on average. The strength of the association varies by cancer subtype and by follow-up time.
RESUMEN
Black heart transplant recipients have a higher mortality rate than white recipients 6-12 months after transplant. Whether there are racial disparities in post-transplant stroke incidence and all-cause mortality following post-transplant stroke among cardiac transplant recipients is unknown. Using a nationwide transplant registry, we assessed the association between race and incident post-transplant stroke using logistic regression and the association between race and mortality among adults who survived a post-transplant stroke using Cox proportional hazards regression. We found no evidence of an association between race and the odds of post-transplant stroke (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.83-1.20). The median survival time of those with a post-transplant stroke in this cohort was 4.1 years (95% CI: 3.0, 5.4). There were 726 deaths among the 1139 patients with post-transplant stroke, including 127 deaths among 203 Black patients and 599 deaths among 936 white patients. Among post-transplant stroke survivors, Black transplant recipients experienced a 23% higher rate of mortality compared to white recipients (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00-1.52). This disparity is strongest in the period beyond the first 6 months and appears to be mediated by differences in the post-transplant setting of care between Black and white patients. The racial disparity in mortality outcomes was not evident in the past decade. The improved survival of Black patients in the recent decade may reflect overall protocol improvements for heart transplant recipients irrespective of race, such as advancements in surgical techniques and immediate postoperative care as well as increased awareness about reducing racial disparities.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Humanos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Negro o AfroamericanoRESUMEN
Background In the general population, Black children have a higher incidence of stroke and all-cause mortality after stroke than White children. Beginning 6 months following cardiac transplantation, Black children have higher mortality than White children. However, whether there are racial and ethnic disparities in incidence and all-cause mortality following perioperative stroke among pediatric cardiac transplant recipients is unknown. Methods and Results Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we studied children who underwent their first heart transplant in the United States between January 1994 and September 2019. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed the association between race and ethnicity and perioperative stroke. We used multivariable piecewise Cox regression to examine the association between race and ethnicity and mortality among survivors of perioperative stroke. Among 8224 children who had a first cardiac transplant, 255 (3%) had a perioperative stroke. Black children had 32% lower odds of perioperative stroke compared with White children (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.46-0.996]). Following perioperative stroke, mortality rates were similar for Black and White children in the first 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.44-2.26]). However, Black children had a higher mortality rate than White children beyond 6 months (adjusted HR, 3.36 [95% CI, 1.22-9.22]). Conclusions Among pediatric cardiac transplant recipients, Black children have a lower incidence of perioperative stroke than White children. Among survivors of perioperative stroke, mortality is initially similar by race and ethnicity, but beyond 6 months, Black children have over a 3-fold higher mortality rate than White children. Identifying and intervening on potential differences in care is essential to addressing these disparities.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Niño , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Pronóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Black heart transplant recipients are more likely to receive induction immunosuppression compared to other races because of higher rates of acute rejection, graft failure, and mortality. However, it is not known whether contemporary induction immunosuppression improves their post-transplant outcomes. To evaluate whether Black patients who were prescribed induction immunosuppression therapy have lower all-cause mortality or graft-failure rates compared to those who were not, we studied Black U.S. adult heart transplant recipients in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database (2008-2018). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to compare the hazards of all-cause mortality or graft failure as a composite, for patients who were prescribed induction immunosuppression and those who were not. Among 5160 recipients, 2787 (54.0%) were prescribed induction immunosuppression and 2373 (46.0%) were not. There was no evidence of survival differences according to induction immunosuppression for the composite of all-cause mortality or graft failure (aHR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.32), mortality (aHR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.97-1.34), graft failure (aHR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.82-1.34) and acute rejection (aHR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.12). Given the side effects of treatment, future guidelines should reconsider the recommendation for induction immunosuppression among Black patients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal method of coronary revascularization for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is controversial in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing DES-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for LMCAD in DM patients and tested for effect measure modification (EMM) by diabetes for adverse events. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing CABG to DES-based PCI including DM patients with LMCAD published up to March 1, 2021. We completed separate random-effects meta-analyses for four RCTs (4356 patients, mean follow-up of 4.9 years) and six observational studies (9360 patients, mean follow-up of 5.2 years). RESULTS: In RCTs among DM patients, DES-based PCI, compared to CABG, was associated with a 30% increased relative risk (RR) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.56, I2 = 0%), while among non-DM patients, there was a 25% increased relative risk (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.44, I2 = 0%) for the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned revascularization (MACCE). There was no evidence of EMM (p-value for interaction = 0.70). The mean weighted SYNTAX score was 25.7. In observational studies, there was no difference between DES-based PCI and CABG for all-cause mortality in patients with DM (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.40, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: CABG was superior to PCI for LMCAD in RCTs in DM patients for MACCE. Heart teams may consider DM as one of the many components in the clinical decision-making process, but may not want to consider DM as a primary deciding factor between DES-based PCI and CABG for LMCAD with low to intermediate anatomical complexity in the other coronary arteries. STUDY REGISTRATION: CRD42021246931 (PROSPERO).
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is little data on the impact of chronic thrombocytopenia (CTP) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve repair (TAVR). Most studies are from single centers and mostly focused on postprocedure thrombocytopenia. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report on the impact of CTP (>1 year) on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after TAVR. METHODS: From the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2012 and 2015, we identified patients with CTP who underwent TAVR. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort was created to examine in-hospital outcomes in patients with and without CTP. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included postprocedure complications, length of stay, total cost, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: A matched pair of 4,300 patients with and without CTP were identified. Patients with CTP had higher in-hospital mortality as compared to no CTP patients (6.0 vs. 3.3%, p-value .007), increased postprocedure hemorrhage, platelet and blood transfusion, vascular complications, postop sepsis, and acute kidney injury. With regards to resource utilization, CTP patients had a longer length of stay, higher total cost and were more likely to be discharged to a facility (34.1 vs. 27.6%) other than home (All, p-value <.001). Subanalysis, however, revealed this difference in resource utilization was seen when patients developed postprocedure complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated higher risk of in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with baseline CTP undergoing TAVR. Further studies are required to investigate ways to improve the management of these patients.