Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 196
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39259920

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Examine electronic health record (EHR) use and factors contributing to documentation burden in acute and critical care nurses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used guided by Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Key EHR components included, Flowsheets, Medication Administration Records (MAR), Care Plan, Notes, and Navigators. We first identified 5 units with the highest documentation burden in 1 university hospital through EHR log file analyses. Four nurses per unit were recruited and engaged in interviews and surveys designed to examine their perceptions of ease of use and usefulness of the 5 EHR components. A combination of inductive/deductive coding was used for qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: Nurses acknowledged the importance of documentation for patient care, yet perceived the required documentation as burdensome with levels varying across the 5 components. Factors contributing to burden included non-EHR issues (patient-to-nurse staffing ratios; patient acuity; suboptimal time management) and EHR usability issues related to design/features. Flowsheets, Care Plan, and Navigators were found to be below acceptable usability and contributed to more burden compared to MAR and Notes. The most troublesome EHR usability issues were data redundancy, poor workflow navigation, and cumbersome data entry based on unit type. DISCUSSION: Overall, we used quantitative and qualitative data to highlight challenges with current nursing documentation features in the EHR that contribute to documentation burden. Differences in perceived usability across the EHR documentation components were driven by multiple factors, such as non-alignment with workflows and amount of duplication of prior data entries. Nurses offered several recommendations for improving the EHR, including minimizing redundant or excessive data entry requirements, providing visual cues (eg, clear error messages, highlighting areas where missing or incorrect information are), and integrating decision support. CONCLUSION: Our study generated evidence for nurse EHR use and specific documentation usability issues contributing to burden. Findings can inform the development of solutions for enhancing multi-component EHR usability that accommodates the unique workflow of nurses. Documentation strategies designed to improve nurse working conditions should include non-EHR factors as they also contribute to documentation burden.

2.
Alzheimers Res Ther ; 16(1): 206, 2024 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294787

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous research on the risk of dementia associated with education attainment, smoking status, and alcohol use disorder (AUD) has yielded inconsistent results, indicating potential heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) of these factors on dementia risk. Thus, this study aimed to identify the important variables that may contribute to HTEs of these factors in older adults. METHODS: Using 2005-2021 data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), we included older adults (≥ 65 years) with normal cognition at the first visit. The exposure of interest included college education or above, current smoking, and AUD and the outcome was all-cause dementia. We applied doubly robust learning to estimate risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between exposed and unexposed groups in the overall cohort and subgroups identified through a decision tree model. RESULTS: Of 10,062 participants included, 929 developed all-cause dementia over a median 4.4-year follow-up. College education or above was associated with a lower risk of all-cause dementia in the overall population (RD, -1.5%; 95%CI, -2.8 to -0.3), especially among the subpopulations without hypertension, regardless of the APOE4 status. Current smoking was not related to increased dementia risk overall (2.8%; -1.5 to 7.2) but was significantly associated with increased dementia risk among men with (21.1%, 3.1 to 39.1) and without (8.4%, 0.9 to 15.8) cerebrovascular disease. AUD was not related to increased dementia risk overall (2.0%; -7.7 to 11.7) but was significantly associated with increased dementia risk among men with neuropsychiatric disorders (31.5%; 7.4 to 55.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our studies identified important factors contributing to HTEs of education, smoking, and AUD on risk of all-cause dementia, suggesting an individualized approach is needed to address dementia disparities.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Demencia , Escolaridad , Fumar , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Demencia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años
3.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 116(4): 328-337, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107147

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the third-leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. African Americans (AAs) with PDAC have worse survival in comparison to other racial groups. The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant stress to the healthcare system. We aim to evaluate the pandemic's impact on already known disparities in newly diagnosed patients with PDAC in Florida. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with PDAC in the OneFlorida+ Data Trust based upon date of diagnosis: Pre-pandemic (01/01/2017- 09/30/2019), Transition (10/01/2019-02/28/2020), and Pandemic (03/1/2020-10/31/2020). Primary endpoints are time to treatment initiation and rate of surgery and secondary endpoint is survival time. Disparities due to age, sex, race, and income were also evaluated. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test when necessary, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test were performed to compare the differences between the comparative groups for categorical, quantitative, and survival outcomes, respectively. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of cofactors. RESULTS: 934 patients with a median age of 67 years were included. There were 47.8% females and 52.2% males; 19.4% AA, 70.2% Caucasian, 10.4% Other race; median income was $53,551. While we observed a significant reduction in the diagnosis rate of new PDAC cases during the pandemic, there were no significant differences in demographic distributions among the three cohorts. Time to treatment did not significantly change from the pre-pandemic to the pandemic, and no difference was observed across all demographics. Rate of surgery increased significantly from the pre-pandemic (35.8%) to the pandemic (55.6%). AAs in the pre-pandemic cohort had a significantly lower rate of surgery of 25.0% compared to 41.7% in Caucasians. AAs, patients ≥ 67 years, and income < $53,000 had significantly higher hazards to death and shorter median survival time (mST). CONCLUSIONS: While no differences in time to initial treatment are observed among the newly diagnosed PDAC patients, there remain significant disparities in the rate of surgery and overall survival. Observing a significant reduction in diagnosis rate and analyzing disparities can provide insight into the effect of a resource-restricting pandemic for patients with newly diagnosed PDAC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/etnología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Florida/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etnología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 2024 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39174493

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth have higher rates of nicotine vaping than other youth in the United States. While social media can be effective in reaching youth and discouraging vaping, informed cultural tailoring is necessary to ensure effective messaging to SGM youth. This study aimed to understand SGM youth perspectives on anti-vaping social media messages and tailoring approaches. METHODS: In-depth, qualitative videoconference interviews were conducted from February to July 2022 with 34 SGM youth recruited in the United States via social media ads. The interview guide addressed participants' beliefs about vaping, the context of vaping, perspectives on tailoring messages, and responses to examples of social media anti-vaping messages. Coding and thematic analysis followed a team-based approach. RESULTS: SGM youth perspectives fell into four categories - representation and diversity, facts and evidence, empowering messages, and source credibility. Participants stressed the importance of accurate, genuine representation of SGM youth in messages, but also noted that more overt representation may be seen as tokenizing. Participants recommended partnering with known LGBTQ+ influencers who can promote or share anti-vaping messages on social media platforms. They also recommended using culturally tailored language, including statistics specific to SGM youth, and invoking themes of empowerment to improve the relevance, reach, and effectiveness of anti-vaping campaigns. CONCLUSIONS: Findings can inform future efforts to develop anti-vaping messages for SGM youth with effective reach through social media. Nuanced perspectives on SGM representation in messages suggest a careful approach to tailoring. Concerns around inauthenticity may be minimized by ensuring SGM youth are included in message development and dissemination. IMPLICATIONS: This study describes the importance of being attentive to the tailoring preferences among the current generation of sexual and gender minority youth. Findings will inform social media-based messaging strategies that discourage nicotine vaping tailored for SGM youth in health campaign material design and evaluation, ensuring that tailored messages are designed in ways that avoid unintended consequences. The study also describes methods for effectively engaging SGM youth in research to improve the relevance of health education materials for this population and increase reach, which in turn can lead to reduction in vaping practices among SGM youth.

5.
Alzheimers Dement ; 20(8): 5528-5539, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958394

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exhibit potential benefits in reducing dementia risk, yet the optimal beneficiary subgroups remain uncertain. METHODS: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating either SGLT2 inhibitor or sulfonylurea were identified from OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network (2016-2022). A doubly robust learning was deployed to estimate risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all-cause dementia. RESULTS: Among 35,458 individuals with T2D, 1.8% in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 4.7% in the sulfonylurea group developed all-cause dementia over a 3.2-year follow-up, yielding a lower risk for SGLT2 inhibitors (RD, -2.5%; 95% CI, -3.0% to -2.1%). Hispanic ethnicity and chronic kidney disease were identified as the two important variables to define four subgroups in which RD ranged from -4.3% (-5.5 to -3.2) to -0.9% (-1.9 to 0.2). DISCUSSION: Compared to sulfonylureas, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause dementia, but the association varied among different subgroups. HIGHLIGHTS: New users of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause dementia as compared to those of sulfonylureas. The association varied among different subgroups defined by Hispanic ethnicity and chronic kidney disease. A significantly lower risk of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia was observed among new users of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to those of sulfonylureas.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Demencia/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Heterogeneidad del Efecto del Tratamiento
6.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 37(9): 1515-1523, 2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39001862

RESUMEN

4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (commonly known as NNK) is one of the most prevalent and potent pulmonary carcinogens in tobacco products that increases the human lung cancer risk. Kava has the potential to reduce NNK and tobacco smoke-induced lung cancer risk by enhancing urinary excretion of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL, the major metabolite of NNK) and thus reducing NNK-induced DNA damage. In this study, we quantified N-glucuronidated NNAL (NNAL-N-gluc), O-glucuronidated NNAL (NNAL-O-gluc), and free NNAL in the urine samples collected before and after 1-week kava dietary supplementation. The results showed that kava increased both NNAL-N-glucuronidation and O-glucuronidation. Since NNAL-N-glucuronidation is dominantly catalyzed by UGT2B10, its representative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed among the clinical trial participants. Individuals with any of the four analyzed SNPs appear to have a reduced basal capacity in NNAL-N-glucuronidation. Among these individuals, kava also resulted in a smaller extent of increases in NNAL-N-glucuronidation, suggesting that participants with those UGT2B10 SNPs may not benefit as much from kava with respect to enhancing NNAL-N-glucuronidation. In summary, our results provide further evidence that kava enhances NNAL urinary detoxification via an increase in both N-glucuronidation and O-glucuronidation. UGT2B10 genetic status has not only the potential to predict the basal capacity of the participants in NNAL-N-glucuronidation but also potentially the extent of kava benefits.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos , Suplementos Dietéticos , Glucurónidos , Kava , Nitrosaminas , Humanos , Kava/química , Nitrosaminas/orina , Nitrosaminas/metabolismo , Carcinógenos/metabolismo , Glucurónidos/orina , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piridinas/orina , Piridinas/química , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Fumar/orina , Fumadores , Glucuronosiltransferasa/metabolismo , Glucuronosiltransferasa/genética , Adulto , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple
7.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 315: 777-778, 2024 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39049425

RESUMEN

Nurses who provide the majority of hands-on care for hospitalized patients are disproportionately affected by the current state of electronic health records (EHRs), and little is known about their lived perception of EHR use. Using a mixed-methods research design, we conducted an in-depth analysis and synthesis of data from EHR usage log files, interviews, and surveys and assessed factors contributing to the nurse documentation burden in acute and critical at a large academic medical center. There remain substantial spaces where we can develop viable solutions for enhancing the usability of multi-component EHR systems.


Asunto(s)
Documentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Registros de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Humanos , Carga de Trabajo , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cuidados Críticos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos , Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938265

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, a growing number of studies have documented more severe COVID-19 symptoms and worse outcomes among smokers compared to non-smokers. The aim of this research is to understand the views, risk perceptions, and behaviors of Lebanese adult smokers during the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted 18 qualitative online structured interviews with adults who smoke cigarettes and waterpipe tobacco residing in Lebanon from November 2020 through April 2021. Participants were recruited predominantly via paid social media ads. Interviews were audio-recorded using Zoom software then transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The findings showed three main themes: changes to smoking behaviors, concerns over the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19, and using coping methods to protect smokers from COVID-19. Although there was an increased risk perception of COVID-19 in relation to smoking, most participants reported an increase in smoking. Instead of being encouraged to quit, participants developed coping strategies against COVID-19 while smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking behavior did not seem to decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic. To support cessation initiatives and raise awareness, effective health messaging aimed at smokers is pivotal. Smoking cessation programs need to be better equipped at supporting people who smoke in finding healthier coping mechanisms during a pandemic. Moreover, policies to regulate the propagation of misinformation are required to prevent the development of a false sense of safety and protection from COVID-19.

10.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 17(5): 197-199, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693901

RESUMEN

Increasingly, research demonstrates economic benefits of tobacco cessation in cancer care, as seen in a new study by Kypriotakis and colleagues of the MD Anderson cessation program, demonstrating median health care cost savings of $1,095 per patient over 3 months. While the cost-effectiveness of tobacco cessation programs from a hospital perspective is important, implementation decisions in a predominantly fee-for-service system, such as in the United States, too often insufficiently value this outcome. Economic barriers, stakeholder disincentives, and payment models all impact program implementation. Combining economic evaluation with implementation research, including assessment of return-on-investment, may enhance sustainability and inform decision-making in cancer care settings. See related article by Kypriotakis et al., p. 217.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias , Cese del Uso de Tabaco , Humanos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/economía , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Estados Unidos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 129, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this review is to synthesise the effect of strategies aiming to sustain the implementation of evidenced-based interventions (EBIs) targeting key health behaviours associated with chronic disease (i.e. physical inactivity, poor diet, harmful alcohol use, and tobacco smoking) in clinical and community settings. The field of implementation science is bereft of an evidence base of effective sustainment strategies, and as such, this review will provide important evidence to advance the field of sustainability research. METHODS: This systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Methods will follow Cochrane gold-standard review methodology. The search will be undertaken across multiple databases, adapting filters previously developed by the research team, data screening and extraction will be performed in duplicate, strategies will be coded using an adapted sustainability-explicit taxonomy, and evidence will be synthesised using appropriate methods (i.e. meta-analytic following Cochrane or non-meta-analytic following SWiM guidelines). We will include any randomised controlled study that targets any staff or volunteers delivering interventions in clinical or community settings. Studies which report on any objective or subjective measure of the sustainment of a health prevention policy, practice, or programme within any of the eligible settings will be included. Article screening, data extraction, risk of bias, and quality assessment will be performed independently by two review authors. Risk of bias will be assessed using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). A random-effect meta-analysis will be conducted to estimate the pooled effect of sustainment strategies separately by setting (i.e. clinical and community). Sub-group analyses will be undertaken to explore possible causes of statistical heterogeneity and may include the following: time period, single or multi-strategy, type of setting, and type of intervention. Differences between sub-groups will be statistically compared. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This will be the first systematic review to determine the effect of strategies designed to support sustainment on sustaining the implementation of EBIs in clinical and community settings. The findings of this review will directly inform the design of future sustainability-focused implementation trials. Further, these findings will inform the development of a sustainability practice guide for public health practitioners. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022352333.


Asunto(s)
Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Proyectos de Investigación
12.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1384667, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595920

RESUMEN

Background: The implementation of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing may contribute to health disparities if access to testing is inequitable, as medically underserved patients are prescribed higher rates of drugs with PGx guidelines and often experience the benefits of emerging health technologies last. Limited research has evaluated potential implementation of PGx testing in populations who are medically underserved and none have evaluated their preferences regarding PGx test characteristics and cost. Our study endeavored to assess the willingness to pay for PGx testing and key PGx test preferences in a nationwide cohort of medically underserved respondents. Methods: A survey was developed to assess willingness to pay and preferences for PGx testing through a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Five attributes of PGx tests were included in the DCE: doctor recommendation, wait time, number of actionable results, benefit of the test (avoid a side effect or address a health problem), and out-of-pocket cost. A convenience sample of U.S. adults with an average yearly household income of $42,000 or less was collected utilizing an online survey fielded by Qualtrics Research Services (Provo, UT). For the DCE analysis, conditional logit and mixed-logit regression models were utilized to determine relative utility of attributes and levels, conditional relative importance for each attribute, and marginal willingness to pay. Results: Respondents completed the survey with an 83.1% response completion rate. Following quality control procedures, 1,060 respondents were included in the final nationwide cohort. Approximately, 82% of respondents were willing to pay less than $100 for PGx testing, and a strong price ceiling was identified at $200. Out-of-pocket cost was the attribute identified as having the greatest relative importance on choice, while wait time had the lowest importance. Greater utility was observed if the PGx test was doctor recommended, had a higher number of actionable results, and resolved major or minor health problems compared with avoiding side effects. Conclusion: This first-of-its-kind study provides important insights into the willingness to pay for PGx testing and PGx test preferences of a large medically underserved population. Applying these findings can potentially lead to improvements in the successful implementation of PGx testing in this population.

13.
Prev Med ; 183: 107954, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621422

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Banning flavors in tobacco and nicotine products may reduce youth initiation and prompt quit attempts but such bans may lead to illicit markets. We examined how likely current users would be to seek flavored products from illicit channels under various ban scenarios. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys of 2552 current users of menthol cigarettes or flavored cigars and 2347 users of flavored e-cigarettes were conducted between 2021 and 2022 in the United States. For each ban scenario, respondents reported if they would have intentions to seek the banned flavored products from any illicit channels and identified the specific illicit channel they would consider. Logistic regressions were used to estimate how the likelihood of having intentions to seek illicit channels was associated with demographics, ban scenarios, and status of tobacco use. RESULTS: Under various ban scenarios, 24-30% of people who smoked said they would seek illicit channels to obtain the banned products compared with 21-41% of dual users and 35-39% of users of flavored e-cigarettes. Online retailers were favored by people who smoked while users of flavored e-cigarettes favored local retailers. Heavy users were more likely to say they would try illicit channels. Under bans restricting more types of flavored tobacco products, users would be less likely to try illegal channels. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of users of flavored tobacco and nicotine products would not reject using illicit banned products. Tailored programs are needed to apply to the groups with a higher risk of seeking illicit channels for banned products.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Aromatizantes , Mentol , Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Adolescente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia
14.
J Clin Transl Endocrinol ; 35: 100331, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38444842

RESUMEN

Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes 99.7% of cervical cancer cases. Cervical cancer is preventable through early detection via HPV testing. However, the number of women screened for cervical cancer has not increased in the last several years. Lower screening rates among women living in high poverty and social vulnerability areas, Black women, and women with chronic co-morbidities (e.g., type 2 diabetes (T2D)) are associated with their higher cervical cancer mortality rates. When screened, Black women are more likely to be diagnosed at later stages and die from cervical cancer. HPV self-collection decreases barriers to cervical cancer screening and can help lessen disparities among underserved women. This study aimed to examine the acceptability of HPV self-collection among Black women with T2D living in socially vulnerable communities. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 Black women with T2D living in communities with high social vulnerability. The Health Belief Model informed the development of the interview guide to gather data on the acceptability of HPV self-collection. Results: Three main themes aligned with the Health Belief Model were identified: (1) HPV self-collection provides a comfortable alternative to in-clinic HPV testing (perceived benefits); (2) HPV self-collection would result in awareness of current HPV status (health motivation); and (3) Women were concerned about collecting their sample accurately (perceived barriers). Discussion/Conclusion: Black women with T2D living in communities with high social vulnerability identified multiple benefits of cervical cancer screening through HPV self-collection. Women are concerned about their ability to collect these samples correctly. Our findings call for future studies focusing on increasing self-efficacy and skills to collect HPV samples among Black women with chronic conditions like T2D who reside in underserved communities with high social vulnerability.

16.
Prev Med Rep ; 37: 102572, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186664

RESUMEN

Introduction: The prevalence of tobacco smoking in Lebanon is among the highest globally. This study aims to determine past attempts to quit smoking among adults and identify factors associated with intentions to quit. Methods: A nationally representative telephone survey was conducted between June and August 2022. Eligibility criteria included people aged >=18 years residing in Lebanon. The questionnaire was divided into three components: socio-demographic characteristics, cigarette and waterpipe tobacco use behaviours. Binary logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with intention to quit cigarette and waterpipe tobacco use. Results: A total of 2003 respondents were included in the study. The prevalence of any tobacco product use was 41%, the prevalence of current cigarette smoking was 41% and the prevalence of current waterpipe tobacco use was 20%. Approximately 24% of adults who smoke cigarettes and 26% of those who use waterpipe tobacco had previous quit attempts mainly due to health concerns. Intentions to quit smoking within the next 6 months were reported among 12% of survey respondents. Among adults who smoke, past quit attempts increased the likelihood of intentions to quit cigarette smoking by 5-fold (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 1.80-14.47, p = 0.002) and waterpipe tobacco use by 7-fold (OR: 6.98, 95% CI: 2.63-18.51, p = <0.001). Age and income were associated with intentions to quit cigarette but not waterpipe tobacco use. Conclusion: Intention to quit smoking was strongly associated with past quitting attempts. Understanding factors associated with intentions to quit can help inform the development of context specific smoking cessation interventions.

17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250221

RESUMEN

Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) rates in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) are the highest worldwide, particularly among young people. Although fiscal policies to curb tobacco use have been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), implementation has been suboptimal. The Eastern Mediterranean Consortium on the Economics of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking (ECON-WTS) was formed in response to this need to produce knowledge on the economics of WTS in the EMR and apply a comprehensive Knowledge translation (KT) framework. The KT framework comprised priority setting, evidence synthesis, knowledge translation, and knowledge uptake. In this article, we discuss the approaches followed in applying the KT framework to WTS control, providing examples and noting challenges and lessons learned where possible.

18.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 26(3): 298-306, 2024 Feb 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37647621

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Secondhand smoke (SHS) poses a significant health risk. However, individuals who do not smoke may be unaware of their exposure, thereby failing to take protective actions promptly. AIMS AND METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of underreported nicotine exposure in a nationally representative sample of US nonsmoking adults using data from the US National Health and Examination Survey. Individuals with underreported nicotine exposure were defined as those who reported no exposure to all tobacco products (traditional tobacco, nicotine replacements, and e-cigarettes) or SHS, yet had detectable levels of serum cotinine (>0.015 ng/mL). We fitted logistic regression models to determine sociodemographic and chronic condition factors associated with underreported nicotine exposure. RESULTS: Our analysis included 13 503 adults aged 18 years and older. Between 2013 and 2020, the prevalence of self-reported SHS exposure, serum cotinine-assessed nicotine exposure, and underreported nicotine exposure among US nonsmokers were 22.0%, 51.2%, and 34.6%, respectively. Remarkably, 67.6% with detectable serum cotinine reported no SHS exposure. Males, non-Hispanic blacks, individuals of other races (including Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Pacific Islanders), and those without cardiovascular diseases were more likely to underreport nicotine exposure than their counterparts. The median serum cotinine value was higher in respondents who reported SHS exposure (0.107 ng/mL) than in those who reported no exposure (0.035 ng/mL). We estimate that approximately 56 million US residents had underreported nicotine exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Over a third of US nonsmokers underreport their nicotine exposure, underlining the urgent need for comprehensive public awareness campaigns and interventions. Further research into sociodemographic determinants influencing this underreporting is needed. IMPLICATIONS: Understanding the extent of underreported nicotine exposure is crucial for developing effective public health strategies and interventions. It is imperative to bolster public consciousness about the risks associated with SHS. Additionally, surveillance tools should also incorporate measures of exposure to outdoor SHS and e-cigarette vapor to enhance the quality of data monitoring. Findings from this study can guide tobacco control initiatives and inform smoke-free air legislation.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Cotinina/análisis , Nicotina/análisis , Encuestas Nutricionales , Autoinforme , Prevalencia , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Productos de Tabaco
19.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(3): 393-403, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37794203

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Elevated costs of cancer treatment can result in economic and psychological "financial toxicity" distress. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a point-of-care intervention to connect adult patients with cancer-induced financial toxicity to telehealth-delivered financial counseling. METHODS: We conducted a three-armed parallel randomized pilot study, allocating newly referred patients with cancer and financial toxicity to individual, group accredited telehealth financial counseling, or usual care with educational material (1:1:1). We assessed the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, baseline and post-intervention COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), and Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) scores. RESULTS: Of 382 patients screened, 121 were eligible and enrolled. 58 (48%) completed the intervention (9 individual, 9 group counseling, 40 educational booklet). 29 completed follow-up surveys: 45% female, 17% African American, 79% white, 7% Hispanic, 55% 45-64 years old, 31% over 64, 34% lived in rural areas, 24% had cancer stage I, 21% II, 7% III, 31% IV. Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms, retention status, surveys completion. Mean (SD) COST was 12.4 (6.1) at baseline and 16.0 (8.4) post-intervention. Mean (SD) COST score differences were 6.3 (11.6) after individual counseling, 5.8 (8.5) after group counseling, and 2.5 (6.4) after usual care. Mean TUQ score among nine counseling participants was 5.5 (0.9) over 7.0. Non-parametric comparisons were not statistically meaningful. CONCLUSION: Recruitment and randomization were feasible, while study retention presented challenges. Nine participants reported good usability and satisfaction with telehealth counseling. Larger-scale trials focused on improving participation, retention, and impact of financial counseling among patients with cancer are justified.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estrés Financiero , Consejo , Neoplasias/terapia
20.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 28(2): 381-389, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763470

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital research and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) have grown in recent decades, yet there is still a paucity of prehospital implementation research. While recent studies have revealed EMS agency leadership perspectives on implementation, the important perspectives and opinions of frontline EMS clinicians regarding implementation have yet to be explored in a systematic approach. The objective of this study was to measure the preferences of EMS clinicians for the process of EBG implementation and whether current agency practices align with those preferences. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional survey of National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians registrants. Eligible participants were certified paramedics who were actively practicing EMS clinicians. The survey contained discrete choice experiments (DCEs) for three EBG implementation scenarios and questions about rank order preferences for various aspects of the implementation process. For the DCEs, we used multinomial logistic regression to analyze the implementation preference choices of EMS clinicians, and latent class analysis to classify respondents into groups by their preferences. RESULTS: A total of 183 respondents completed the survey. Respondents had a median age of 39 years, were 74.9% male, 89.6% White, and 93.4% of non-Hispanic ethnicity. For all three DCE scenarios, respondents were significantly more likely to choose options with hospital feedback and individual-level feedback from EMS agencies. Respondents were significantly less likely to choose options with email/online only education, no feedback from hospitals, and no EMS agency feedback to clinicians. In general, respondents' preferences favored classroom-based training over in-person simulation. For all DCE questions, most respondents (66.2%-77.1%) preferred their survey DCE choice to their agency's current implementation practices. In the rank order preferences, most participants selected "knowledge of the underlying evidence behind the change" as the most important component of the process of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of EMS clinicians' implementation preferences using DCEs, respondents preferred in-person education, feedback on hospital outcomes, and feedback on their individual performance. However, current practice at EMS agencies rarely matched those expressed EMS clinician preferences. Collectively, these results present opportunities for improving EMS implementation from the EMS clinician perspective.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hospitales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA