A deep learning model for generating [18F]FDG PET Images from early-phase [18F]Florbetapir and [18F]Flutemetamol PET images.

INTRODUCTION: Amyloid-ß (Aß) plaques is a significant hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), detectable via amyloid-PET imaging. The Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET scan tracks cerebral glucose metabolism, correlated with synaptic dysfunction and disease progression and is complementary for AD diagnosis. Dual-scan acquisitions of amyloid PET allows the possibility to use early-phase amyloid-PET as a biomarker for neurodegeneration, proven to have a good correlation to [18F]FDG PET. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of synthesizing the later from the former through deep learning (DL), aiming at reducing the number of PET scans, radiation dose, and discomfort to patients. METHODS: A total of 166 subjects including cognitively unimpaired individuals (N = 72), subjects with mild cognitive impairment (N = 73) and dementia (N = 21) were included in this study. All underwent T1-weighted MRI, dual-phase amyloid PET scans using either Fluorine-18 Florbetapir ([18F]FBP) or Fluorine-18 Flutemetamol ([18F]FMM), and an [18F]FDG PET scan. Two transformer-based DL models called SwinUNETR were trained separately to synthesize the [18F]FDG from early phase [18F]FBP and [18F]FMM (eFBP/eFMM). A clinical similarity score (1: no similarity to 3: similar) was assessed to compare the imaging information obtained by synthesized [18F]FDG as well as eFBP/eFMM to actual [18F]FDG. Quantitative evaluations include region wise correlation and single-subject voxel-wise analyses in comparison with a reference [18F]FDG PET healthy control database. Dice coefficients were calculated to quantify the whole-brain spatial overlap between hypometabolic ([18F]FDG PET) and hypoperfused (eFBP/eFMM) binary maps at the single-subject level as well as between [18F]FDG PET and synthetic [18F]FDG PET hypometabolic binary maps. RESULTS: The clinical evaluation showed that, in comparison to eFBP/eFMM (average of clinical similarity score (CSS) = 1.53), the synthetic [18F]FDG images are quite similar to the actual [18F]FDG images (average of CSS = 2.7) in terms of preserving clinically relevant uptake patterns. The single-subject voxel-wise analyses showed that at the group level, the Dice scores improved by around 13% and 5% when using the DL approach for eFBP and eFMM, respectively. The correlation analysis results indicated a relatively strong correlation between eFBP/eFMM and [18F]FDG (eFBP: slope = 0.77, R2 = 0.61, P-value < 0.0001); eFMM: slope = 0.77, R2 = 0.61, P-value < 0.0001). This correlation improved for synthetic [18F]FDG (synthetic [18F]FDG generated from eFBP (slope = 1.00, R2 = 0.68, P-value < 0.0001), eFMM (slope = 0.93, R2 = 0.72, P-value < 0.0001)). CONCLUSION: We proposed a DL model for generating the [18F]FDG from eFBP/eFMM PET images. This method may be used as an alternative for multiple radiotracer scanning in research and clinical settings allowing to adopt the currently validated [18F]FDG PET normal reference databases for data analysis.

Fully automated explainable abdominal CT contrast media phase classification using organ segmentation and machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) provides much more information compared to non-enhanced CT images, especially for the differentiation of malignancies, such as liver carcinomas. Contrast media injection phase information is usually missing on public datasets and not standardized in the clinic even in the same region and language. This is a barrier to effective use of available CECT images in clinical research. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to detect contrast media injection phase from CT images by means of organ segmentation and machine learning algorithms. METHODS: A total number of 2509 CT images split into four subsets of non-contrast (class #0), arterial (class #1), venous (class #2), and delayed (class #3) after contrast media injection were collected from two CT scanners. Seven organs including the liver, spleen, heart, kidneys, lungs, urinary bladder, and aorta along with body contour masks were generated by pre-trained deep learning algorithms. Subsequently, five first-order statistical features including average, standard deviation, 10, 50, and 90 percentiles extracted from the above-mentioned masks were fed to machine learning models after feature selection and reduction to classify the CT images in one of four above mentioned classes. A 10-fold data split strategy was followed. The performance of our methodology was evaluated in terms of classification accuracy metrics. RESULTS: The best performance was achieved by Boruta feature selection and RF model with average area under the curve of more than 0.999 and accuracy of 0.9936 averaged over four classes and 10 folds. Boruta feature selection selected all predictor features. The lowest classification was observed for class #2 (0.9888), which is already an excellent result. In the 10-fold strategy, only 33 cases from 2509 cases (∼1.4%) were misclassified. The performance over all folds was consistent. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a fast, accurate, reliable, and explainable methodology to classify contrast media phases which may be useful in data curation and annotation in big online datasets or local datasets with non-standard or no series description. Our model containing two steps of deep learning and machine learning may help to exploit available datasets more effectively.

Deep learning-based partial volume correction in standard and low-dose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging.

Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging encounters the obstacle of partial volume effects, arising from its limited intrinsic resolution, giving rise to (I) considerable bias, particularly for structures comparable in size to the point spread function (PSF) of the system; and (II) blurred image edges and blending of textures along the borders. We set out to build a deep learning-based framework for predicting partial volume corrected full-dose (FD + PVC) images from either standard or low-dose (LD) PET images without requiring any anatomical data in order to provide a joint solution for partial volume correction and de-noise LD PET images. Methods: We trained a modified encoder-decoder U-Net network with standard of care or LD PET images as the input and FD + PVC images by six different PVC methods as the target. These six PVC approaches include geometric transfer matrix (GTM), multi-target correction (MTC), region-based voxel-wise correction (RBV), iterative Yang (IY), reblurred Van-Cittert (RVC), and Richardson-Lucy (RL). The proposed models were evaluated using standard criteria, such as peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), root mean squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), relative bias, and absolute relative bias. Results: Different levels of error were observed for these partial volume correction methods, which were relatively smaller for GTM with a SSIM of 0.63 for LD and 0.29 for FD, IY with an SSIM of 0.63 for LD and 0.67 for FD, RBV with an SSIM of 0.57 for LD and 0.65 for FD, and RVC with an SSIM of 0.89 for LD and 0.94 for FD PVC approaches. However, large quantitative errors were observed for multi-target MTC with an RMSE of 2.71 for LD and 2.45 for FD and RL with an RMSE of 5 for LD and 3.27 for FD PVC approaches. Conclusions: We found that the proposed framework could effectively perform joint de-noising and partial volume correction for PET images with LD and FD input PET data (LD vs. FD). When no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images are available, the developed deep learning models could be used for partial volume correction on LD or standard PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans as an image quality enhancement technique.

Attention-based deep neural network for partial volume correction in brain 18F-FDG PET imaging.

PURPOSE: This work set out to propose an attention-based deep neural network to predict partial volume corrected images from PET data not utilizing anatomical information. METHODS: An attention-based convolutional neural network (ATB-Net) is developed to predict PVE-corrected images in brain PET imaging by concentrating on anatomical areas of the brain. The performance of the deep neural network for performing PVC without using anatomical images was evaluated for two PVC methods, including iterative Yang (IY) and reblurred Van-Cittert (RVC) approaches. The RVC and IY PVC approaches were applied to PET images to generate the reference images. The training of the U-Net network for the partial volume correction was trained twice, once without using the attention module and once with the attention module concentrating on the anatomical brain regions. RESULTS: Regarding the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and root mean square error (RMSE) metrics, the proposed ATB-Net outperformed the standard U-Net model (without attention compartment). For the RVC technique, the ATB-Net performed just marginally better than the U-Net; however, for the IY method, which is a region-wise method, the attention-based approach resulted in a substantial improvement. The mean absolute relative SUV difference and mean absolute relative bias improved by 38.02 % and 91.60 % for the RVC method and 77.47 % and 79.68 % for the IY method when using the ATB-Net model, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results propose that without using anatomical data, the attention-based DL model could perform PVC on PET images, which could be employed for PVC in PET imaging.