Examination Scores but not Clinical Performance Correlate With Duration of Preclinical Didactic Time: A Synchronous Comparison of Second- Versus Third-Year Medical Students on the Surgery Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous institutions have reduced preclinical didactic time to facilitate earlier clinical exposure during the second year of medical education. However, the effects that shortened preclinical education may have on performance in the surgery clerkship are unclear. This study aims to compare the clinical and examination performance of second- (MS2) and third-year (MS3) students synchronously completing an identical surgery clerkship. DESIGN: All students completing the surgery clerkship (identical didactics, examinations, clinical rotations, etc.) were included. MS3s received 24 months of preclinical education, whereas MS2s received 14 months. Performance outcomes included weekly quizzes based on lectures, NBME Surgery Shelf Exam, numeric clinical evaluations, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores, and overall clerkship grades. SETTING: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: All second- (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students completing the Surgery Clerkship over 1 year (n = 395). RESULTS: There were 199 MS3 (50%) and 196 MS2 (50%) students. MS3s demonstrated higher median shelf exams (77% vs 72% MS2s), weekly quiz score averages (87% vs 80% MS2s), clinical evaluations (96% vs 95% MS2s), and overall clerkship grades (89% vs 87% MS2s), all p < 0.020. There was no difference in median OSCE performance (both 92%; p = 0.499). A greater proportion of MS3 students performed in the highest 50% of weekly quiz scores (57% vs 43% MS2), NBME shelf exams (59% vs 39% MS2), and overall clerkship grades (45% vs 37% MS2), all p < 0.010. No significant difference in the proportion of students placing in the top 50% of clinical parameters including the OSCE (48% MS3 vs 46% MS2; p = 0.106) and clinical evaluations (45% MS3 vs 38%; p = 0.185) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the duration of preclerkship education may correspond to examination scores, MS2s and MS3s perform similarly on clinical metrics. Future strategies to enhance available preclinical didactic time and preparation for examinations are needed.

Implementation of a Surgical Problem-Based Learning Curriculum: A One-Year Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has become an integral part of medical student education for preclinical curricula, but few studies have evaluated the benefits of a PBL curriculum for clinical education. This study aims to assess the 1-year experience after implementing a resident-led PBL program for the third-year (MS3) surgery clerkship and compare students' self-reported preparedness following PBL sessions to traditional faculty-led lectures. METHODS: Surgical faculty and residents developed a PBL curriculum to address common topics in surgical education. Pandemic requirements necessitated a switch from in-person to virtual sessions during the experience. Students enrolled in the MS3 surgical clerkship were asked to participate in a survey. Demographics and clerkship data were obtained. Quality of PBL and faculty-led lectures were assessed using a ten-point Likert scale, and standard statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 165 students rotated through surgery, of which 129 (78%) responded to the survey (53% female, 59% white). PBLs were held in-person (53%), exclusively virtual (32%) or hybrid (15%) platforms. In-person PBLs were preferred to faculty-led lectures for preparing students for NBME examinations (6.9 vs 6.0), oral examinations (7.8 vs 6.3), and surgical cases (6.3 vs 5.8), all P < .001. Virtual PBLs were also preferred to lectures for preparing students for NBME examinations (6.8 vs 5.8, P < .001) and surgical cases (5.6 vs 4.8, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: PBL is a valuable adjunct for medical student education. Resident-led PBLs were preferred to faculty-led lectures for preparing students for examinations and clerkship experiences and may be useful adjuncts to clinical education.

Effects of Recorded versus Live Teleconference Didactic Lectures on Medical Student Performance in the Surgery Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous institutions converted medical education didactics to electronic formats including both live teleconference didactics and recorded faculty lectures. This study aims to compare the effect of recorded versus live teleconference didactic lectures on medical student examination scores during the surgery clerkship. DESIGN: Medical students completing the Surgery Clerkship received a weekly series of didactic lectures taught by faculty via a teleconference (2020-2021 academic year) or recorded format (2021-2022 academic year). Performance outcomes included weekly quizzes, National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Surgery Shelf Exam, and clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores. SETTING: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: All second- (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students completing the Surgery Clerkship over two academic years (n = 312). RESULTS: Students who received live teleconference lectures (n = 156) demonstrated higher average scores on weekly quizzes (89%) and the NBME shelf exam (76%) compared to those receiving recorded lectures (n = 156; 71% quiz, 70% shelf exam), both p < 0.001. There was a significant association with performance in the highest quartile (Q1) of weekly quiz scores and receiving live lectures (40% vs. recorded lectures 1%, p < 0.001). Comparing only MS3 students, mean weekly quiz scores and Q1 achievement were significantly higher (both p < 0.001) in the teleconference cohort with no significant difference in NBME shelf exam performance (p = 0.971). No difference in OSCE performance was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that synchronous teleconferences may be more effective than recorded lectures for achieving institutional learning objectives on the surgery clerkship without any negative impact on NBME shelf exam or clinical evaluation parameters. This information should be used to inform future institutional clerkship design and educational initiatives.

Comparison of procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is a common procedure performed by colorectal surgeons for screening, diagnosis, and surveillance of various colorectal diseases. Existing literature has conflicting data on quality outcomes of colonoscopies performed in the afternoon and the morning schedules and only includes colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists. We sought to analyze procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. DATA SOURCES AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A retrospective chart review of colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons at a tertiary care center from October 2018 through July 2020 was performed. Complete colonoscopies with documented times were included. Patients with colonic resection and incomplete colonoscopy were excluded. Main outcome measures adenoma and polyp detection rates and colonoscopy time variables were compared between morning and afternoon colonoscopies. RESULTS: A total of 781 patients were analyzed. Colonoscopies were evenly distributed during shifts (49% morning and 51% afternoon). The overall polyp and adenoma detection rates were 46% and 29%, respectively. There were no significant differences in adenoma and polyp detection rates and colonoscopy duration between morning and afternoon colonoscopies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that history of prior polypectomy was an independent predictor of adenoma detection rate (OR: 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.54, p = 0.002) and was associated with significantly increased colonoscopy times in afternoon shift. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in quality outcomes of adenoma and polyp detection rates between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. In addition to known predictors, cecal intubation time and history of polypectomy were also independent predictors of adenoma detection rate. Patients with prior polypectomy had increased colonoscopy times in afternoon shift. Since colorectal surgeons perform higher proportion of diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies, these patients may be better suited for colonoscopies in morning shift.

Surgical clerkship: Do examination scores correlate with clinical performance?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine if there are correlations between clinical performance and objective grading parameters for medical students in the third-year surgery clerkship. METHODS: Clerkship grades were compiled from 2016 to 2020. Performance on clinical rotations, NBME shelf exam, oral exam, and weekly quizzes were reviewed. Students were divided into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on clinical performance. Standard statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 625 students included in the study. Students in Q1+Q2 were more likely than those in Q3+Q4 to score in the top quartile on the shelf exam (29% vs. 19%, p = 0.002), oral exam (24% vs. 17%, p = 0.032), and quizzes (22% vs. 15%, p = 0.024). However, there was negligible correlation between clinical performance and performance on objective measures: shelf exam (R2 = 0.027, p < 0.001), oral exam (R2 = 0.021, p < 0.001), and weekly quizzes (R2 = 0.053, p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical performance does not correlate with objective grading parameters for medical students in the third-year surgery clerkship.

Medical Student Education During COVID-19: Electronic Education Does Not Decrease Examination Scores.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 emergency, medical students were mandated to remain home, creating challenges to providing education remotely for third-year clinical rotations. This study aims to assess student reception and investigate objective outcomes to determine if online learning is a suitable alternative. METHODS: Medical students enrolled in the third-year surgical clerkship during COVID-19 were asked to participate in a survey. 19 of 27 (70%) students participated. Content, faculty-led lectures, and resident-led problem-based learning (PBL) sessions were assessed using a ten-point Likert scale. National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) examination, weekly quiz, and oral examination scores were compared to previous years. Student t-tests compared the groups. RESULTS: The median age was 25 years. Comparing in-person to electronic sessions, there was no difference in effectiveness of faculty sessions preparing students for NBME (6.2 vs. 6.7, P = .46) or oral examinations (6.4 vs. 6.8, P = .58); there was also no difference in resident-led PBL sessions preparing students for NBME (7.2 vs. 7.2, P = .92) or oral examinations (7.4 vs. 7.6, P = .74). Comparing this group to students from the previous academic year, there was no difference in weekly quiz (85.3 vs. 87.8, P = .13), oral examination (89.8 vs. 93.9, P = .07), or NBME examination (75.3 vs. 77.4, P = .33) scores. DISCUSSION: Surgical medical didactic education can effectively be conducted remotely through faculty-led lectures and resident-led PBL sessions. Students did not have a preference between in-person and electronic content in preparation for examinations. As scores did not change, electronic education may be adequate for preparing students for examinations in times of crisis such as COVID-19.

Closure of a giant anterior sacral meningocele with an omental flap in a patient with Marfan syndrome: case report.

Anterior sacral meningoceles (ASMs) are rare lesions often associated with connective tissue disorders. These lesions are typically treated posteriorly via closure of the dural stalk. However, given their insidious nature, ASMs can be quite large on presentation, and this approach may not provide adequate decompression. In this case report, the authors describe the successful treatment of a large ASM through drainage and watertight closure of the cyst with an omental flap. A 43-year-old woman with a history of Marfan syndrome and a large ASM was referred for neurosurgical intervention. The ASM was filling the pelvic cavity and causing severe compression of the bladder. The patient underwent surgical decompression of the cyst through an anterior transabdominal approach and closure of the fistulous tract with a pedicled omental flap. This is the first reported case of successful closure of an ASM with an omental flap. At the 6-month follow-up, the ASM had not recurred on imaging and the patient's symptoms had resolved. Anterior sacral meningoceles are rare lesions that often require neurosurgical intervention. Although most can be treated posteriorly, large ASMs compressing the abdominal or pelvic organs may require a transabdominal approach. Moreover, ASMs with wide dural stalks may benefit from closure with an omental flap.

Underestimation of Unplanned Readmission after Colorectal Surgery: A National Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of postoperative readmission occurs at a different hospital and is therefore missed by current benchmarking. There are no national studies tracking readmission at different hospitals after colorectal surgery. This study aimed to determine the national burden of postoperative colorectal readmission, including readmission to a different hospital. STUDY DESIGN: The 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for adults undergoing colorectal surgery. The outcome of interest was 30-day unplanned readmission. Risk factors were identified. RESULTS: There were 79,098 patients admitted during the study period, with 7.1% (n = 5,591) readmitted and of those, 10.2% (n = 569) readmitted to a different hospital. Risk factors for readmission to a different hospital included admission to a high-volume hospital (odds ratio [OR] 1.49 [95% CI 1.17 to 1.91], p < 0.01), teaching hospital (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.59], p = 0.04), nonmetropolitan hospital (OR 2.75 [95% CI 1.95 to 3.89], p < 0.01), hospitalization more than 7 days (OR 1.67 [95% CI 1.33 to 2.10], p < 0.01), and elective admission (OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.22 to 2.02], p < 0.01). Predictors of readmission to a different hospital were different than predictors of readmission. The most common reason for readmission was infection (28.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of readmission to a different hospital after colorectal surgery is significant and disproportionately affects high-volume hospitals. Current quality metrics underestimate readmission, failing to capture the subpopulation readmitted to a different hospital. Interventions designed to prevent readmission need to be tailored to the unique risk factors described for different hospital readmission. Benchmarking not measuring different hospital readmission is inaccurate and should be modified.

Differential abundance of CK1α provides selectivity for pharmacological CK1α activators to target WNT-dependent tumors.

Constitutive WNT activity drives the growth of various human tumors, including nearly all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Despite this prominence in cancer, no WNT inhibitor is currently approved for use in the clinic largely due to the small number of druggable signaling components in the WNT pathway and the substantial toxicity to normal gastrointestinal tissue. We have shown that pyrvinium, which activates casein kinase 1α (CK1α), is a potent inhibitor of WNT signaling. However, its poor bioavailability limited the ability to test this first-in-class WNT inhibitor in vivo. We characterized a novel small-molecule CK1α activator called SSTC3, which has better pharmacokinetic properties than pyrvinium, and found that it inhibited the growth of CRC xenografts in mice. SSTC3 also attenuated the growth of a patient-derived metastatic CRC xenograft, for which few therapies exist. SSTC3 exhibited minimal gastrointestinal toxicity compared to other classes of WNT inhibitors. Consistent with this observation, we showed that the abundance of the SSTC3 target, CK1α, was decreased in WNT-driven tumors relative to normal gastrointestinal tissue, and knocking down CK1α increased cellular sensitivity to SSTC3. Thus, we propose that distinct CK1α abundance provides an enhanced therapeutic index for pharmacological CK1α activators to target WNT-driven tumors.

Perianal Crohn's disease: a review.

Perianal involvement in Crohn's disease (CD), which encompasses fistulas, ulcers, abscesses, strictures and cancer, can lead to significant impairment in quality of life. The objective of this article is to review the major perianal complications of CD and the current medical and surgical modalities used to treat them. Antibiotics are commonly used despite a lack of controlled trials to validate their use and should be used as a bridge to maintenance therapy. The anti-metabolites azathioprine and 6-MP have shown a positive response in terms of fistula closure, although these data are mostly from trials looking at this as a secondary endpoint. Infliximab is an effective agent for induction and maintenance of treatment of fistulizing CD. Further studies to evaluate the use of subcutaneous anti-tumor necrosis factors are needed to convincingly prove their efficacy for perianal fistulizing disease. In CD, clinicians should avoid surgery as a first-line approach for skin tags, hemorrhoids or fissures in the setting of proctitis. Surgery, particularly lateral internal sphincterotomy, in combination with medical therapy is associated with higher fissure healing rates in the absence of proctitis. Fistulotomy is curative for most simple low perianal fistulae, but complex fistulas often require sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. Less invasive approaches such as a chemical sphincterotomy should be used first, with therapy escalated only if this fails.

Liposome Bupivacaine for Postsurgical Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy: Results from Prospective Phase IV Sequential Cohort Studies Assessing Health Economic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-based postsurgical analgesia exposes patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to elevated risk for gastrointestinal motility problems and other opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs). The purpose of our research was to investigate postsurgical outcomes, including opioid consumption, hospital length of stay, and ORAE risk associated with a multimodal analgesia regimen, employing a single administration of liposome bupivacaine as well as other analgesics that act by different mechanisms. METHODS: We analyzed combined results from 6 Phase IV, prospective, single-center studies in which patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy received opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or multimodal analgesia incorporating intraoperative administration of liposome bupivacaine. As-needed rescue therapy was available to all patients. Primary outcome measures were postsurgical opioid consumption, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Secondary measures included time to first rescue opioid use, patient satisfaction with analgesia (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale), and ORAEs. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy and did not meet intraoperative exclusion criteria (PCA n = 56; multimodal analgesia n = 26). Compared with the PCA group, the multimodal analgesia group had significantly lower mean total postsurgical opioid consumption (96 vs 32 mg, respectively; P < 0.0001) and shorter median postsurgical hospital length of stay (3.0 vs 4.0 days; P = 0.0019). Geometric mean costs were $11,234 and $13,018 in the multimodal analgesia and PCA groups, respectively (P = 0.2612). Median time to first rescue opioid use was longer in the multimodal analgesia group versus PCA group (1.1 hours vs 0.6 hours, respectively; P=0.0003). ORAEs were experienced by 41% of patients receiving intravenous opioid PCA and 8% of patients receiving multimodal analgesia (P = 0.0019). Study limitations included use of an open-label, nonrandomized design; small population size; and the inability to isolate treatment-related effects specifically attributable to liposome bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with intravenous opioid PCA, a liposome bupivacaine-based multimodal analgesia regimen reduced postsurgical opioid use, hospital length of stay, and ORAEs, and may lead to improved postsurgical outcomes following laparoscopic colectomy.

Sacrectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy for the treatment of sacral chordomas: a single-center experience over 27 years.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort (case only). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results and survival determinants of 21 patients with sacral chordomas treated with en bloc resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few long-term studies on treatment of sacral chordomas with more than 20 patients, and factors related to survival are not fully understood. METHODS: Demographics, treatment, complications, and oncological outcomes were analyzed with summary statistics, hypothesis testing with Mantel-Haenszel-Cox analysis, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazard model, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates as applicable. RESULTS: There were 12 males and 9 females with mean age of 61 years (16-79) and mean follow-up of 5.8 years (2-19.2). Tumor stage was IB in 20 and IIIB in one; mean tumor size was 10.5 cm. Fourteen patients underwent combined anterior-posterior resection and 7 posterior resection alone; 18 received adjuvant radiotherapy. After treatment, bowel and bladder control were present in 4 and 5 patients, respectively. Complications included: wound infection (4), other wound complications (9), fistula (2), deep vein thrombosis (1), and pulmonary embolism (1). Median survival was 7.2 years. Eight (40%) had local recurrence and 4 (19%) metastatic disease. Mean disease-free interval before recurrence was 2.5 years (1-5). No patient (n = 8) treated in the past 9 years has had local or distant disease. Patients treated for recurrent tumor survived 5.7 years on average (range, 0.8-9) after the first recurrence. The only risk factor for tumor recurrence was proximal tumor extent (P = 0.05) There was a statistically significant association between recurrence and survival (RR = 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.3; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Despite the complications, increased long-term survival can be achieved with treatment. Proximal tumor extent may be related to recurrence and survival. Recurrence rates have diminished over time, emphasizing the importance of an experienced multidisciplinary surgical team. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Retention cuff pressure study of 3 indwelling stool management systems: randomized study of 10 healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare retention cuff pressures of 3 indwelling stool management systems while subjects assumed different body positions and while cuffs were inflated to different volumes. METHODS: Retention cuff pressure study of 3 indwelling stool management systems was a randomized, crossover, open-label pilot study of 10 healthy adult volunteers in 3 body positions (supine, right side, and left side), 3 head-of-bed elevations (20°, 30°, and 40°), and 3 cuff overfill volumes (5, 10, and 15 mL). The devices were DigniCare Stool Management System (device A; Bard Medical Division, C. R. Bard, Inc, Covington, Georgia), Flexi-Seal Fecal Management System (device B; ConvaTec, a division of E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Princeton, New Jersey), and ActiFlo Indwelling Bowel Catheter System (device C; Hollister, Inc, Libertyville, Illinois). We assessed cuff pressure by manometry and rectal mucosa by digital examination and small-diameter, flexible endoscopy. RESULTS: Cuffs were appropriately seated in the rectal vault for all 3 devices in all body positions and overfill volumes. Rectal mucosal abnormalities were observed in 4 of 10 subjects (40%) after removal of device A, 1 of 5 (20%) after removal of device B, and 3 of 5 (60%) after removal of device C. Retention cuff pressure was at least 2-fold lower for device A than for device B or C in all body positions, head-of-bed elevations, and device overfill volumes. For example, mean pressure while subjects were on their left sides was 25.0 mm Hg for device A, 79.2 mm Hg for device B, and 67.2 mm Hg for device C. Corresponding pressures at 15 mL of overfill were 52.5, 102.0, and 94.0 mm Hg. Subject comfort scores were comparable for all 3 devices. CONCLUSION: All devices appeared to seat well within the rectal vault, but device A was associated with cuff pressure measurements that were consistently lower than those of devices B and C. More studies are needed to elucidate the clinical relevance of these findings and whether they translate to differences in patient safety or comfort.

Does delay of adjuvant chemotherapy impact survival in patients with resected stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether delays in commencing adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of colon adenocarcinoma adversely impact survival. METHODS: Patients with stage II-III colon adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant chemotherapy at 2 centers were identified through the institutional tumor registry. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were calculated from the day of surgery. Patients were dichotomized into early (time to adjuvant chemotherapy ≤ 60 days) and late treatment (time to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days) groups. OS and RFS were compared using log-rank test and multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 186 patients included in the study, 49 (26%) had received adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days after surgical resection. Thirty percent of the delays were system related (eg, late referrals, insurance authorizations). Time to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days was associated with significantly worse OS in both univariate analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-4.36). Although difference in RFS between the 2 groups favored time to adjuvant chemotherapy <60, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy delay >60 days after surgical resection of colon cancer is associated with worse OS.

Preventing intra-abdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: an animal study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an absorbable polylactic acid film (SurgiWrap) in preventing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in an animal model. METHODS: Forty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent laparotomy with subsequent cecal wall abrasion and abdominal wall injury. Rats were divided equally between untreated and treated groups. Treated rats had a polylactic acid film (SurgiWrap) placed between the cecal and abdominal wall defects. Rats in the untreated group received no barrier material. The animals were killed on postoperative day 21. Two blinded observers, using predetermined criteria, graded the cecum-to-abdominal wall adhesions and estimated the percent of cecal surface area involved in the adhesion. The adhesions were classified as absent, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: Four rats died postoperatively. Of surviving rats, all of the rats in the untreated group had cecum-to-abdominal wall adhesions, whereas 42.1 percent of rats in the treated group had no adhesions between the cecum and the abdominal wall (two-tailed, P = 0.001). Altogether, 28.6 percent and 71.4 percent of untreated rats experienced moderate and severe adhesions, respectively, compared to 47.4 percent and 10.5 percent of treated rats (two-tailed, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Strategic placement of polylactic acid film during abdominal surgery is associated with a significantly reduced rate and severity of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in this model. A technique for film placement is suggested.

Colorectal malignancies in HIV-positive patients.

Due to the development of more effective medications, those infected with HIV are living longer. Consequently, more tumors and infections have been added to the AIDS-defining criteria in the last decade. Our aim was to review the occurrence and clinical course of colorectal (CR) malignancies in HIV infected/AIDS patients from a single institution. A retrospective review of HIV/AIDS patients with colorectal malignant tumors was undertaken. We included adult patients, with ELISA and Western blot test positive for HIV, and primary malignant tumors located in the colon or rectum. Malignant neoplasms of the anus were excluded for the purposes of this study. Twelve patients (9 males and 3 females), mean age 41 years, were identified with the following neoplasm: 6 adenocarcinomas (ACA), 5 non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and 1 small-cell carcinoma. Intravenous drug abuse was the main risk factor for HIV. No patient had identified risk factors for colorectal neoplasm. Five out of six patients with ACA had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. One patient with stage II ACA developed early liver metastases after colonic resection. Seven out of 12 patients underwent surgery. Six (85.7%) of these sustained postoperative complications, primarily wound infection. The overall survival in our series was dismal, averaging 20 months. For NHL average survival was 29 months, and 12 months for CR-ACA. This is the largest series of cases of colorectal cancer in the HIV/AIDS patient population published in the English language and the largest number of colorectal ACA reported in this unique population. Early in our experience, tumors frequently found in immunoincompetent patients were detected (NHL). More recently, we have only treated patients with colorectal ACA; none of them had no risk factors for colorectal cancer (family history, IBD, FAP, HNPCC). These patients developed tumors at earlier ages and were diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, these tumors may be associated with the grade of immunosuppression induced during the course of the HIV infection and with a tumorigenic effect of the HIV on the colonic epithelium. Consequently, a high index of suspicion when evaluating chronic abdominal complaints in such patients is warranted. The use of the new antiretroviral therapy regimens should be further evaluated to know its impact in the survival.