The Minnesota attributable risk of kidney donation (MARKD) study: a retrospective cohort study of long-term (> 50 year) outcomes after kidney donation compared to well-matched healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the long-term risks of living kidney donation. Well-designed studies with controls well-matched on risk factors for kidney disease are needed to understand the attributable risks of kidney donation. METHODS: The goal of the Minnesota Attributable Risk of Kidney Donation (MARKD) study is to compare the long-term (> 50 years) outcomes of living donors (LDs) to contemporary and geographically similar controls that are well-matched on health status. University of Minnesota (n = 4022; 1st transplant: 1963) and Mayo Clinic LDs (n = 3035; 1st transplant: 1963) will be matched to Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) controls (approximately 4 controls to 1 donor) on the basis of age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The REP controls are a well-defined population, with detailed medical record data linked between all providers in Olmsted and surrounding counties, that come from the same geographic region and era (early 1960s to present) as the donors. Controls will be carefully selected to have health status acceptable for donation on the index date (date their matched donor donated). Further refinement of the control group will include confirmed kidney health (e.g., normal serum creatinine and/or no proteinuria) and matching (on index date) of body mass index, smoking history, family history of chronic kidney disease, and blood pressure. Outcomes will be ascertained from national registries (National Death Index and United States Renal Data System) and a new survey administered to both donors and controls; the data will be supplemented by prior surveys and medical record review of donors and REP controls. The outcomes to be compared are all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and mortality, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectory and chronic kidney disease, pregnancy risks, and development of diseases that frequently lead to chronic kidney disease (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, and obesity). We will additionally evaluate whether the risk of donation differs based on baseline characteristics. DISCUSSION: Our study will provide a comprehensive assessment of long-term living donor risk to inform candidate living donors, and to inform the follow-up and care of current living donors.

A Comprehensive Review of Intranasal Insulin and Its Effect on the Cognitive Function of Diabetics.

Diabetes mellitus continues to be a disease that affects a good percentage of our population. The majority affected need insulin on a day-to-day basis. Before the invention of the first manufactured insulin in 1978, dealing with diabetes took a significant toll on patient's lives. As technology and human innovation prevail, significant advancements have taken place in managing this chronic disease. Patients have an option to decide their mode of insulin delivery. Intranasal insulin, one such form, has a rapid mode of action while effectively controlling postprandial hyperglycemia. It has also been proven to reduce hypoglycemia and insulin resistance problems, which seem to be the main adverse effects of using conventional insulin regularly. However, due to the large dosages needed and high incurring costs, Intranasal Insulin is currently being used as adjunctive therapy along with conventional insulin.  We conducted a literature search in PubMed indexed journals using the medical terms "Intranasal insulin," "diabetes," and "cognitive impairment" to provide an overview of the mechanism of action of Intranasal Insulin, its distinctive cognitive benefits, and how it can be compared to the standard parenteral insulin therapy. One unique feature of intranasal insulin is its ability to directly affect the central nervous system, bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Not only does this help in reducing the peripheral side effects of insulin, but it has also proven to play a role in improving the cognitive function of diabetics, especially those who have Alzheimer's or mild cognitive impairment, as decreased levels of insulin in the brain has been shown to impact cognitive function negatively. However, it does come with its limitations of poor absorption through the nasal mucosa due to mucociliary clearance and proteolytic enzymes, our body's natural defence mechanisms. This review focuses on the efficacy of intranasal insulin, its potential benefits, limitations, and role in cognitive improvement in people with diabetes with pre-existing cognitive impairment.

13q14 Deletion and Its Effect on Prognosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia affecting adults. CLL results due to uncontrolled accumulation of B lymphocytes in the body with the clinical spectrum ranging from comparatively benign disease to an aggressive form. The disease pathogenesis lies in molecular genetics, the most common alteration being the deletion in the long arm of chromosome 13, at position 14 (13q14) region. This deletion leads to the loss of important microRNAs which are involved in maintaining the critical balance of the apoptosis mechanism of cell death of B lymphocytes. As such, the imbalance contributes towards B cells' immortality and, thus, CLL arises. This significant 13q14 deletion contributes to CLL's pathogenesis and paves the way for CLL treatment, hence affecting the prognosis of the affected patients. Furthermore, the size of deletion of the long arm of chromosome 13 (13q) has a remarkable effect on its prognosis and therapeutic intervention. The minimal deleted region (MDR)/small deletion or long 13q loss/mutation, and biallelic 13q deletion or monoallelic 13q deletion are commonly seen. 13q14 deletion is an initiating defect targeting tumor suppressor gene locus deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 2 (DLEU2))/microRNA15A (MIR15A)/microRNA 16-1 (MIR 16-1). Regarding CLL treatment, conventional therapy with alkylating agents has been used for a long time, which reported low- to non-existent complete remission rates and adverse events after prolonged use. Moreover, research into the 13q14 deletion has also provided new insights into the molecular genetics and pathways that interact in such a way, making it possible to transform healthy cells into malignant cells in an entirely new fashion with a complete disregard to its original form, resulting in CLL.