Tretinoin Enhances the Effects of Chemotherapy in Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia Using an Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Assay.

PURPOSE: Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is an aggressive pediatric malignancy with myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. Curative treatment is restricted to hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Fludarabine combined with cytarabine (FLA) and 5-azacitidine (AZA) monotherapy are commonly used pre-transplant therapies. Here, we present a drug screening strategy using a flow cytometry-based precision medicine platform to identify potential additional therapeutic vulnerabilities. METHODS: We screened 120 dual- and 10 triple-drug combinations (DCs) on peripheral blood (n = 21) or bone marrow (n = 6) samples from 27 children with JMML to identify DCs more effectively reducing leukemic cells than the DCs' components on their own. If fewer leukemic cells survived a DC ex vivo treatment compared with that DC's most effective component alone, the drug effect was referred to as cooperative. The difference between the two resistant fractions is the effect size. RESULTS: We identified 26 dual- and one triple-DC more effective than their components. The differentiation agent tretinoin (TRET; all-trans retinoic acid) reduced the resistant fraction of FLA in 19/21 (90%) samples (decrease from 15% [2%-61%] to 11% [2%-50%] with a mean effect size of 3.8% [0.5%-11%]), and of AZA in 19/25 (76%) samples (decrease from 69% [34%-100+%] to 47% [17%-83%] with a mean effect size of 16% [0.3%-40%]). Among the resistant fractions, the mean proportion of CD38+ cells increased from 7% (0.03%-25%; FLA) to 17% (0.3%-38%; FLA + TRET) or from 10% (0.2%-31%; AZA) to 51% (0.8%-88%; AZA + TRET). CONCLUSION: TRET enhanced the effects of FLA and AZA in ex vivo assays with primary JMML samples.

Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Correlates with Clinical Response and Supports Personalized Therapy in Pediatric AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease that accounts for ~20% of all childhood leukemias, and more than 40% of children with AML relapse within three years of diagnosis. Although recent efforts have focused on developing a precise medicine-based approach towards treating AML in adults, there remains a critical gap in therapies designed specifically for children. Here, we present ex vivo drug sensitivity profiles for children with de novo AML using an automated flow cytometry platform. Fresh diagnostic blood or bone marrow aspirate samples were screened for sensitivity in response to 78 dose conditions by measuring the reduction in leukemic blasts relative to the control. In pediatric patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, comprising cytarabine, daunorubicin and etoposide (ADE), ex vivo drug sensitivity results correlated with minimal residual disease (r = 0.63) and one year relapse-free survival (r = 0.70; AUROC = 0.94). In the de novo ADE analysis cohort of 13 patients, AML cells showed greater sensitivity to bortezomib/panobinostat compared with ADE, and comparable sensitivity between venetoclax/azacitidine and ADE ex vivo. Two patients showed a differential response between ADE and bortezomib/panobinostat, thus supporting the incorporation of ex vivo drug sensitivity testing in clinical trials to further evaluate the predictive utility of this platform in children with AML.

Ex vivo drug screening defines novel drug sensitivity patterns for informing personalized therapy in myeloid neoplasms.

Precision medicine approaches such as ex vivo drug sensitivity screening (DSS) are appealing to inform rational drug selection in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia, given their marked biologic heterogeneity. We evaluated a novel, fully automated ex vivo DSS platform that uses high-throughput flow cytometry in 54 patients with newly diagnosed or treatment-refractory myeloid neoplasms to evaluate sensitivity (blast cytotoxicity and differentiation) to 74 US Food and Drug Administration-approved or investigational drugs and 36 drug combinations. After piloting the platform in 33 patients, we conducted a prospective feasibility study enrolling 21 patients refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) to determine whether this assay could be performed within a clinically actionable time frame and could accurately predict clinical responses in vivo. When assayed for cytotoxicity, ex vivo drug sensitivity patterns were heterogeneous, but they defined distinct patient clusters with differential sensitivity to HMAs, anthracyclines, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and kinase inhibitors (P < .001 among clusters) and demonstrated synergy between HMAs and venetoclax (P < .01 for combinations vs single agents). In our feasibility study, ex vivo DSS results were available at a median of 15 days after bone marrow biopsy, and they informed personalized therapy, which frequently included venetoclax combinations, kinase inhibitors, differentiative agents, and androgens. In 21 patients with available ex vivo and in vivo clinical response data, the DSS platform had a positive predictive value of 0.92, negative predictive value of 0.82, and overall accuracy of 0.85. These data demonstrate the utility of this approach for identifying potentially useful and often novel therapeutic drugs for patients with myeloid neoplasms refractory to standard therapies.

Comprehensive Transcriptome Profiling of Cryptic CBFA2T3-GLIS2 Fusion-Positive AML Defines Novel Therapeutic Options: A COG and TARGET Pediatric AML Study.

PURPOSE: A cryptic inv(16)(p13.3q24.3) encoding the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion is associated with poor outcome in infants with acute megakaryocytic leukemia. We aimed to broaden our understanding of the pathogenesis of this fusion through transcriptome profiling. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Available RNA from children and young adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML; N = 1,049) underwent transcriptome sequencing (mRNA and miRNA). Transcriptome profiles for those with the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion (N = 24) and without (N = 1,025) were contrasted to define fusion-specific miRNAs, genes, and pathways. Clinical annotations defined distinct fusion-associated disease characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: The CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion was restricted to infants <3 years old (P < 0.001), and the presence of this fusion was highly associated with adverse outcome (P < 0.001) across all morphologic classifications. Further, there was a striking paucity of recurrent cooperating mutations, and transduction of cord blood stem cells with this fusion was sufficient for malignant transformation. CBFA2T3-GLIS2 positive cases displayed marked upregulation of genes with cell membrane/extracellular matrix localization potential, including NCAM1 and GABRE. Additionally, miRNA profiling revealed significant overexpression of mature miR-224 and miR-452, which are intronic miRNAs transcribed from the GABRE locus. Gene-set enrichment identified dysregulated Hippo, TGFß, and hedgehog signaling, as well as NCAM1 (CD56) interaction pathways. Therapeutic targeting of fusion-positive leukemic cells with CD56-directed antibody-drug conjugate caused significant cytotoxicity in leukemic blasts. CONCLUSIONS: The CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion defines a highly refractory entity limited to infants that appears to be sufficient for malignant transformation. Transcriptome profiling elucidated several highly targetable genes and pathways, including the identification of CD56, providing a highly plausible target for therapeutic intervention.

Patient-derived xenografts, the cancer stem cell paradigm, and cancer pathobiology in the 21st century.

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease manifest in many forms. Tumor histopathology can differ significantly among patients and cellular heterogeneity within tumors is common. A primary goal of cancer biologists is to better understand tumorigenesis and cancer progression; however, the complex nature of tumors has posed a substantial challenge to unlocking cancer's secrets. The cancer stem cell (CSC) paradigm for the pathobiology of solid tumors appropriately acknowledges phenotypic and functional tumor cell heterogeneity observed in solid tumors and accounts for the disconnect between drug approval based on response and the general inability of approved therapies to meaningfully impact survival due to their failure to eradicate these most important of cellular targets. First proposed to exist decades ago, CSC have only recently begun to be precisely identified due to technical advancements that facilitate identification, isolation, and interrogation of distinct tumor cell subpopulations with differing ability to form and perpetuate tumors. Precise identification of CSC populations and the complete hierarchy of cells within solid tumors will facilitate more accurate characterization of patient subtypes and ultimately contribute to more personalized and effective therapies. Rapid advancement in the understanding of tumor biology as it exists in patients requires cooperation among institutions, surgeons, pathologists, cancer biologists and patients alike, primarily because this translational research is best done with patient-derived tissue grown in the xenograft setting as patient-derived xenografts. This review calls for a broader change in the approaches taken to study cancer pathobiology, highlights what implications the CSC paradigm has for pathologists and cancer biologists alike, and calls for greater collaboration between institutions, physicians and scientists in order to more rapidly advance our collective understanding of cancer.