Cleaning of long oval canals with WaveOne Gold system associated with different irrigant agitation protocols

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the cleaning of mandibular incisors with WaveOne Gold® (WO) under different preparation techniques. Methods: A total of 210 human mandibular incisors were selected and divided into seven groups (n = 30), prepared by WO single-files (Small 20/.07 ­ WOS; Primary 25/.07 ­ WOP; Medium 35/.06 ­ WOM; or Large 45/.05 - WOL) and sequential-file techniques (WOS to WOP; WOS to WOM; and WOS to WOL). Further subdivision was made according to irrigation protocol: control group (manual irrigation - CON), E1 Irrisonic® - EIR, and EDDY® - EDD. Debris removal and the smear layer were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by using Spearman's correlation test. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: For debris and smear layer removal, WOS and WOP, EIR differed from CON and EDD (p <0.05). Conclusion: Regardless of the instrumentation used, the agitation of the irrigant solution provided better cleanability. These findings reinforce the need for agitation techniques as adjuvants in cleaning root canal systems in mandibular incisors

Effect of a vinegar-hydrogen peroxide mixture on the surface properties of a cobalt-chromium alloy: A possible disinfectant for removable partial dentures.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A vinegar-hydrogen peroxide mixture has been reported to be effective in eliminating Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus from acrylic resin, and its action has been reported to be comparable with that of sodium hypochlorite or peracetic acid. However, the effects of this mixture on cobalt-chromium alloys remain unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness, Knoop microhardness, surface free energy, and wettability of a cobalt-chromium alloy when exposed to a vinegar-hydrogen peroxide mixture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty specimens of cobalt-chromium alloy were fabricated and immersed for 900 minutes, simulating 3 months of a daily 10-minute immersion in the following chemical agents (n=10): distilled water (W); 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (H); 3% hydrogen peroxide and water dilution in 1:1 ratio (HP); white-wine vinegar and water dilution in 1:1 ratio (V); and vinegar and hydrogen peroxide mixture in 1:1 ratio (VHP). Surface roughness, Knoop microhardness, surface free energy, and wettability were measured with single blinding before and after immersions. Data were statistically analyzed by using 2-way repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS: The vinegar-hydrogen peroxide mixture did not affect the surface roughness or Knoop microhardness. However, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite significantly increased the roughness and decreased microhardness. Surface free energy and wettability increased after immersions, regardless of the types of solution. CONCLUSIONS: Immersion in a vinegar-hydrogen peroxide mixture did not affect the surface characteristics of a cobalt-chromium alloy.

Fluoride toothpastes containing micrometric or nano-sized sodium trimetaphosphate reduce enamel erosion in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of fluoride toothpastes supplemented with micrometric or nano-sized sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP or TMPnano, respectively) on enamel erosion in vitro, as well as the influence of salivary acquired pellicle and saliva. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bovine enamel blocks (n = 120) were randomly assigned into the following experimental toothpastes: no F/TMP/TMPnano (Placebo); 1100 ppm F (1100 ppm F); 1100 ppm F plus 3% TMP or 3% TMPnano (1100 TMP or 1100 TMPnano, respectively) and 5000 ppm F (5000 ppm F). Erosive challenge was performed by immersion of the blocks in citric acid for 5 min, followed by 2 h immersion in human or artificial saliva, 4×/day, during 5 days. After each erosive challenge, blocks were exposed to slurries of the toothpastes. Enamel erosion (µm), surface hardness (SHf) and cross-sectional hardness (ΔKHN) were analyzed as response variables and the data were submitted to two-way ANOVA, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test (p < .05). RESULTS: 1100 TMPnano significantly reduced enamel loss when compared to 1100 TMP (p = .002), reaching values similar to those promoted by 5000 ppm F (p = .96). 1100 ppm F presented significantly lower enamel loss than Placebo (p < .001), and higher than 1100 TMP (p < .001). Significantly higher SHf and lower ΔKHN was observed for 1100 TMPnano and 5000 ppm F when compared with the other groups (p < .001). The type of saliva did not influence enamel erosion, SHf and ΔKHN for the groups treated with TMP-containing toothpastes. CONCLUSION: The addition of 3% TMPnano to 1100 ppm F toothpastes significantly increases the protective effect against enamel erosion in vitro when compared with its counterparts with micrometric TMP or without TMP. This effect was not influenced by the presence of acquired enamel pellicle and saliva.