The Effect of Master Apical Preparation Size on Healing Outcomes in Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the existing literature and examine whether or not the size of apical enlargement during mechanical preparation affects the outcome of treatment in patients undergoing nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT). METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, and gray literature were searched (January 2000-May 2023). Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Eligible studies were critically appraised for risk of bias and quality of evidence and were meta-analyzed to estimate the treatment effects. RESULTS: Two studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled success rate was 75.8%. The success rates of treatment with an apical size ≥ 30 and < 30 were 80.9% and 52.9%, respectively. Cases with an apical size ≥ 30 demonstrated significantly more favorable results (RR = 0.63, 95% Confidence Interval 0.46-0.79, P < .05). The overall quality of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: With a low certainty of evidence, master apical preparation size ≥ 30 may result in an increased healing outcome in terms of clinical and radiographic evaluations.

Cell-Based Regenerative Endodontics for the Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis: AnIn VivoInvestigation.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the ability of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) to enhance the regeneration of pulp-dentin complex in immature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: A total of 32 mandibular premolar teeth with immature apices in 5 dogs were used in this in-vivo randomized controlled trial (RCT). Eight healthy teeth without pre-existing pathosis served as the positive control samples and received no treatment, while in another 8 teeth, the pulp was completely extirpated (negative control). Class V cavities were prepared to induce inflammation in the remaining 16 teeth (groups 3 and 4) and the pulp was extirpated 2-4 mm short of the radiographic apex. Of the 16, the 8 teeth in group 4 received 1 mL of cord blood stem cells with a hydrogel scaffold. Blood clots were covered with mineral trioxide aggregates at the cementoenamel junction in the experimental groups, and teeth were filled with RMGI and composite. Three months later, block sections were removed for histologic evaluations for the evaluation of postoperative apical closure, degree of inflammation, and presence of normal pulp tissue. The data were statistically analyzed with the chi-square test (P < .05). RESULTS: All teeth with complete pulp extirpation demonstrated pulpal necrosis with no postoperative closure of their apices, while apical closure was seen in all the teeth in the remaining groups. There was a statistically significant (P < .001) difference in the presence of inflammation and normal pulp tissue between the experimental groups. The teeth in group 3 showed normal pulp tissue extending to the level of MTA, but there was inflammation within the canal space. In contrast, the teeth in the UC-MSC group demonstrated organized, normal pulp tissue with no inflammation. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the regeneration of the pulp-dentin complex is possible with no inflammation when UC-MSCs are used and 2-4 mm of the apical pulp remains intact in immature teeth with irreversible pulpitis.