Treatment of steroid-induced elevated intraocular pressure with anecortave acetate: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The present study is the first randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of anecortave acetate (AA) administered at 3 doses (3, 15, or 30 mg) as an anterior juxtascleral depot (AJD) in patients experiencing elevated IOP due to corticosteroid therapy. METHODS: This was a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel group trial. Eligible patients had an IOP of at least 24 mmHg and an IOP increase of at least 10 mmHg relative to their IOP before treatment with steroids. A target IOP was established for each patient at baseline. Patients were randomized to 1 of the 4 treatment groups: vehicle, 3 mg AA, 15 mg AA, or 30 mg AA. All patients then received a 0.5 mL AJD of the assigned treatment. Patients returned for scheduled examination visits at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, months 3, 4, 5, and 6. IOP was measured at each visit as well as best corrected visual acuity (logMAR), ocular motility, eyelid responsiveness, slit lamp examination, and assessment of any adverse events. In addition, at baseline and at exit, a dilated fundus examination was carried out and the lens was examined using LOCS II criteria. RESULTS: Seventy patients were randomized to treatment. At week 4, eyes in the vehicle group showed a 3.4 mmHg (9.1%) decrease from baseline. Reductions for the 3 mg AA (3.1 mmHg, 10.7%) and the 30 mg AA groups (5.4 mmHg, 16.6%) were not significantly different than for vehicle control. However, IOP for the 15 mg AA group at week 4 was reduced 11.5 mmHg (31.3%) from baseline, which was statistically significant (P=0.0487). The mean time to treatment failure was 32.2, 38.9, 56.3, and 32.6 days for the vehicle, 3 mg AA, 15 mg AA, and 30 mg AA groups, respectively. Adverse events were assessed at each post-treatment visit. There were no serious adverse events that were determined to be related to the test article or its administration. CONCLUSIONS: AA can be of benefit to some patients requiring treatment with corticosteroids, but suffering from the side effect of elevated IOP.

Betaxolol hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension 0.25% and timolol gel-forming solution 0.25% and 0.5% in pediatric glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To describe the safety profile and clinical response on elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) of betaxolol hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension 0.25% (betaxolol) and timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution (TGFS) (0.25% and 0.5%), in subjects under 6 years of age. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to betaxolol 0.25% (twice daily) or TGFS (daily) (0.25% or 0.5%) in this double-masked study. IOPs were obtained at the same time of day (9 AM) at 2 baseline visits and weeks 2, 6, and 12. Mean change from baseline in IOP was the primary efficacy parameter. RESULTS: One hundred five subjects were randomized (34 to betaxolol, 35 to TGFS 0.25%, 36 to TGFS 0.5%). Betaxolol, TGFS 0.25%, and TGFS 0.5% produced statistically significant mean reductions in IOP; mean reductions after 12 weeks of treatment were 2.3, 2.9, and 3.7 mm Hg, respectively. In subjects who were not being treated with topical IOP-lowering medication at baseline, mean IOP reductions after 12 weeks of treatment were 3.1, 4.8, and 3.8 mm Hg, respectively. In patients discontinuing 1 or more topical IOP-lowering medications at baseline, mean IOP reductions at Week 12 were 1.8, 1.8, and 3.7 mm Hg, respectively. Responder rates (> or =15% reduction from baseline) for betaxolol, TGFS 0.25%, and TGFS 0.5% were 38.2, 45.7, and 47.2%, respectively. Adverse events were predominantly nonserious and did not interrupt patient continuation in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Betaxolol ophthalmic suspension 0.25%, TGFS 0.25%, and TGFS 0.5% were well tolerated. Despite low responder rates, all 3 treatments produced statistically significant mean reductions in IOP in pediatric glaucoma subjects.

Anterior juxtascleral delivery of anecortave acetate in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma: a pilot investigation.

PURPOSE: To describe the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) after treatment with an anterior juxtascleral depot of anecortave acetate. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Seven eyes of six subjects with OAG, with uncontrolled IOP while being administered one or more topical medications, received 24 mg anecortave acetate delivered by anterior juxtascleral depot. IOP was assessed at baseline and regularly after treatment for up to 24 months. RESULTS: Mean IOP before anecortave acetate treatment was 31.3 +/- 11.3 mm Hg and dropped by 9.5 +/- 4.5 mm Hg (32.7% +/- 16.8%) within one week after treatment. This IOP reduction was sustained through six months (8.4 +/- 5.4 mm Hg [29.6% +/- 12.4%]) and 12 months (9.5 +/- 5.7 mm Hg [34.0% +/- 15.9%]) after a single anecortave acetate treatment. The injection process was well tolerated, and no eyes experienced any injection-related or drug-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both the anterior juxtascleral depot of a drug and anecortave acetate may be promising candidates for IOP reduction in eyes with OAG. Additional studies are required to establish better their efficacy and safety, optimal dosing frequency, mechanism of action, and potential additivity to other IOP-lowering therapies.

Efficacy of brinzolamide and levobetaxolol in pediatric glaucomas: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To describe the safety and clinical response on elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) of brinzolamide and levobetaxolol in pediatric patients under 6 years of age. METHODS: A double-masked, randomized design. Pediatric patients were randomized to brinzolamide suspension, 1%, or levobetaxolol suspension, 0.5%, both dosed twice daily. IOPs at 9 AM were taken at screening, baseline, and weeks 2, 6, and 12. A descriptive study with mean change from baseline IOP, the primary efficacy parameter. RESULTS: Seventy-eight evaluable patients (32 brinzolamide and 46 levobetaxolol). Patients on no prestudy IOP-lowering therapy randomized to brinzolamide had mean IOP change from baseline ranging from -4.1 mm Hg (week 2) to -5.0 mm Hg (week 6). When all brinzolamide patients are considered, there was little mean change from baseline IOP due to the large number of patients enrolled without a washout of prior IOP-lowering therapy. Levobetaxolol patients had mean change from baseline, ranging from -1.8 mm Hg (week 6) to -2.9 mm Hg (week 2). Levobetaxolol patients on no prestudy therapy had mean IOP change from baseline ranging from -2.9 mm Hg (week 12) to -4.0 mm Hg (week 2). Brinzolamide was more efficacious for glaucoma associated with systemic or ocular abnormalities and less efficacious for primary congenital glaucoma. Levobetaxolol was most efficacious for primary congenital glaucoma. Adverse events were predominantly nonserious and did not interrupt patient continuation in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Both brinzolamide and levobetaxolol were well tolerated. Both drugs provided clinically relevant IOP reductions for patients not on a previous medication, although efficacy is, in part, contingent upon diagnosis.

Anti-inflammatory effects of topical ocular MAXIDEX administration to rabbits following vitrectomy or lensectomy.

We conducted a series of surgical studies (n=155) to find out the possible utility of the Dutch Belted rabbits as an ocular test model. Following either vitrectomy (n=59) or lensectomy (n=96) studies using either BSS or BSS Plus, we characterized the corresponding magnitude and duration of inflammatory response of selected endpoints over a one-week period. Preoperative Dutch Belted rabbits served as controls for baseline determination (n=27). Inflammatory endpoints included clinical inflammation, blood aqueous barrier (BAB) changes measured by particle-scatter and fluorophotometry, corneal edema, and prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2). Topical ocular 0.1% dexamethasone (MAXIDEX) served as a positive treatment group. We compared the inflammatory features (treated and untreated) to determine significance. Using either irrigating solution, the endpoints (n=101) were shown increased in both models. While the clinical scores were similar following both types of surgery (ns; p=0.51), the lensectomy study caused a more marked effect on corneal edema (p=0.0004) and PGE2 production (p=0.002) compared with the vitrectomy study. After the lensectomy procedure, BSS Plus (n=52) compared with BSS (n=24) showed a significant improvement (p=0.004) of clinical score during the recovery phase. Further improvement was gained over BSS Plus (n=52) using MAXIDEX treatment. Topical MAXIDEX (lensectomy, n=20/group; vitrectomy, n=12/group) reduced clinical score (p<0.001), decreased BAB breakdown to fluorescein (p<0.01), lessened particle flare (p<0.05), inhibited aqueous PGE2 levels (p<0.001), and reduced corneal edema (p=0.01) in the lensectomy group. The use of the rabbit model offers a convenient test to identify therapeutic agents that could lessen ocular complications after these common ocular surgeries.