RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Böhler's angle (BA) is used for identifying calcaneal fractures and evaluating calcaneal collapse after reconstruction. This study investigates whether it is possible to determine BA with the help of Computed Tomography (CT). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to compare the BA on conventional radiograph (Gold Standard, GS) versus measurements on CT. Two groups were studied: one group consisted of 11 subjects with a diagnosed calcaneal fracture, the other group of 11 subjects with a fracture of the lower extremities but no calcaneal fracture. A lateral Böhler angle (LBA), central Böhler angle (CBA) and a medial Böhler angle (MBA) were defined on CT. Furthermore, BA was reconstructed out of a 3D reconstruction (3DBA). RESULTS: CBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 3.78° (95 %CI: 2.82-4.75) with no significant difference in variance (p = 1.000). 3DBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 2.14° (95 %CI: 1.57-2.70) with a significant difference in variance (p = 0.014). No relevant correlations were found between LBA/MBA and the GS. ICC between raters was considered as good or excellent for both CBA and 3DBA. CONCLUSION: Giving the high accuracy and better capability to visualize the anatomy in the case of severe injury, measuring BA on 3D reconstruction is a suggested alternative to the traditional technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective.
RESUMEN
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most clinically relevant complications and the use of prophylactic cefazolin is common practice. However, the knowledge about the pharmacological aspects of prophylactic cefazolin in the lower extremities remains limited. In this prospective cohort, a sub-study of the WIFI-2 randomized controlled trial, adults between 18 and 75 years of age who were scheduled for implant removal below the level of the knee and randomized for cefazolin, was included. A maximum of two venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue samples were taken during surgery. The primary outcomes were the cefazolin concentrations in venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue. A total of 27 patients [median (interquartile range) age, 42 (29-59) years; 17 (63%) male] with 138 samples were included in the study. A minimum of 6 weeks follow-up was available for all patients. The mean (SD) venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue concentrations were 36 (13) µg/mL, 29 (13) µg/mL, and 28 (13) µg/g, respectively, and the cefazolin concentrations between the different locations of surgery did not differ significantly in both target-site plasma and target-site tissue (P = 0.822 and P = 0.840). In conclusion, 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin demonstrates adequacy in maintaining coverage for a duration of at least 80 minutes of surgery below the level of the knee, significantly surpassing the MIC90 required to combat the most prevalent microorganisms. This study represents the first of its kind to assess cefazolin concentrations in the lower extremities by examining both plasma and tissue samples in this magnitude.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cefazolina , Extremidad Inferior , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Cefazolina/farmacocinética , Cefazolina/sangre , Cefazolina/administración & dosificación , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Femenino , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/sangre , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , AncianoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Management of pain after foot and ankle surgery remains a concern for patients and healthcare professionals. This study determined the effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade, compared to standard of care, on overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. We hypothesized that usage of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care. DESIGN: Single center, randomized, non-inferiority trial. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients were enrolled if ≥18 years and scheduled for elective inpatient foot or ankle surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade or standard of care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the difference in OBAS, which includes pain, side effects of analgesics, and patient satisfaction, measured daily from the first to the third day after surgery. A non-inferiority margin of 2 was set as the upper limit for the 90% confidence interval of the difference in OBAS score. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to analyze differences in OBAS scores over time. Secondary outcome was the difference in opioid consumption. MAIN RESULTS: Patients were randomized to standard of care (n = 22), or ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade (n = 22). Analyzing the first three postoperative days, the OBAS was significantly lower over time in the ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade group compared to standard of care, demonstrating non-inferiority (-1.9 points, 90% CI -3.1 to -0.7). During the first five postoperative days, patients with ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade consumed significantly fewer opioids over time compared to standard of care (-8.7 oral morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -16.1 to -1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care with single shot popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Tobillo , Pie , Bloqueo Nervioso , Dolor Postoperatorio , Nervio Ciático , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Tobillo/cirugía , Pie/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Países Bajos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: The sinus tarsi approach (STA) has gained popularity for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. No large studies comparing wound complications worldwide after STA surgery are available. The aim of this systematic review was to compare postoperative wound complication (POWC) and postoperative wound infection (POWI) rates following STA surgery between continents and countries and their differences in climate. Methods: A literature search was performed using the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies published before January 1, 2000, including < 10 patients and written in a language other than English were excluded. Results: In total, 86 studies containing 4,392 surgeries via STA from 20 different countries were included. The mean POWC was 5.9% and the mean POWI was 4.4%. The highest median POWC rate was in North America (8.5%) and the lowest in South America (2.0%). No significant differences were found in the POWC and POWI rates between countries (p = 0.178 and p = 0.570, respectively), but significant differences were found between the POWC and POWI rates between continents (p = 0.011 and p = 0.036, respectively). The number of surgeries per year and climate differences, as represented by mean local temperature, were not correlated with both the POWC/POWI rates and functional outcome scores. Conclusions: Significant differences between the POWC and POWI rates were found between continents but not between individual countries. With a mean POWC of 5.9% and a mean POWI rate of 4.4%, STA has an intrinsic low risk for complications given the minimally invasive nature of the approach and is inevitably becoming the gold standard for calcaneal surgery.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo , Calcáneo , Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas Intraarticulares , Humanos , Talón , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Calcáneo/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: During ankle fracture surgery, goals include accurate reduction and fixation of the fibula regarding rotation and fibular length. Bilateral postoperative computed tomography (CT) can be performed to assess fibular rotation using the talar dome angle, and fibular length. The aim of this study was to compare side-to-side differences of the fibular rotation and fibular length using bilateral CT scans of uninjured ankles. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Single center, Level I Academic Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with bilateral CT scans of uninjured ankles. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: External rotation using the Nault talar dome method and fibular length using the coronal method of Prior et al. The average, difference, and ratio (injured side/healthy side) and interobserver variability were calculated. RESULTS: There were 83 patients included (166 ankles, mean age 47 years, 77.1% male). A random set of 66 ankles (33 CT scans) were used to measure interobserver variability. The mean degrees of external rotation ranged from 6.6 to 7.7, mean difference ranged from 1.4 to 3.4 degrees, mean ratio ranged from 1.1 to 1.5, and interobserver variability ranged from 0.27 to 0.65. For fibular length, the mean ranged from 24.6 to 25.8 mm, mean difference in fibular length ranged from 0.5 to 2.1 mm, mean ratio ranged from 1.0 to 1.1 mm, and interobserver variability ranged from 0.45 to 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: Using bilateral ankle CT scans, mean differences in fibular rotation using the Nault talar dome method were 1.4-3.4 degrees. The distal fibular length had a mean difference between both sides of 0.5-2.1 mm. Although the intraclass correlation's were low, the interleg differences between patients were small, making them useful for clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo , Traumatismos del Tobillo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Peroné/lesiones , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Traumatic crush injuries of the lower limb often accompany severe complications. The incorporation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to standard trauma care may have the potential to diminish injury-related complications and improve outcome in such cases. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of severe lower limb soft tissue injuries. METHODS: The electronic databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies involving patients with crush-associated sever lower limb soft tissue injuries who received hyperbaric oxygen therapy in conjunction with standard trauma care. Relevant data on type of injury, hyperbaric oxygen therapy protocol and outcome related to wound healing were extracted. RESULTS: In total seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 229 patients. The studies included two randomized clinical trials, one retrospective cohort study, three case series and one case report. The randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial showed a significant increase in wound healing and decrease in the need for additional surgical interventions in the patient group receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy when compared to those undergoing sham therapy. The randomized non-placebo-controlled clinical trial revealed that early hyperbaric oxygen therapy reduces tissue necrosis and the likelihood of long-term complications. The retrospective cohort study indicated that hyperbaric oxygen therapy effectively reduces infection rates and the need for additional surgical interventions. The case series and case report presented beneficial results with regard to wound healing when hyperbaric oxygen therapy was added to the treatment regimen. CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is generally considered a safe therapeutic intervention and seems to have a beneficial effect on wound healing in severe lower limb soft tissue injuries when implemented as an addition to standard trauma care.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Humanos , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Lesiones por Aplastamiento/terapia , Traumatismos de la Pierna/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/lesionesRESUMEN
Aims: The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS). Methods: All patients included in the 'ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw' (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups. Results: The median OMAS score was 85.0 for patients treated with RR, and 90.0 for patients treated with ODR (p = 0.384), indicating no significant difference between ODR and RR. The secondary outcome measures included the AOFAS (88.0 in the RR group and 90.0 for ODR; p = 0.722), FAOS (87.5 in the RR group and 92.9 for ODR; p = 0.399), and EQ-5D (0.87 in the RR group and 0.96 for ODR; p = 0.092). Conclusion: This study demonstrated no functional difference comparing ODR to RR in syndesmotic injuries at a four year follow-up period, which supports the results of the primary RODEO trial. ODR should be the standard practice after syndesmotic screw fixation.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Complex trauma of the foot and ankle is characterized by fractures with severe soft tissue damage associated with neurovascular injury and joint involvement. These injuries are frequently present in the polytraumatized patient and are a predictor of unfavorable clinical outcome. In the initial approach to a patient with complex foot and ankle trauma, the decision between amputation and reconstruction is crucial. The various existing classification systems are of limited effectiveness and should serve as tools to assist and support a clinical decision rather than as determinants of conduct. In the emergency department, one of two treatment options must be adopted: early complete treatment or staged treatment. The former consists of definitive fixation and immediate skin coverage, using either primary closure (suturing) or flaps, and is usually reserved for less complex cases. Staged treatment is divided into initial and definitive. The objectives in the first phase are: prevention of the progression of ischemia, necrosis and infection. The principles of definitive treatment are: proximal-to-distal bone reconstruction, anatomic foot alignment, fusions in severe cartilage lesions or gross instabilities, stable internal fixation and adequate skin coverage. Level of evidence III, Systematic review of level III studies.
RESUMO O trauma complexo do pé e tornozelo, caracterizado por fraturas com dano grave aos tecidos moles, associado a lesões vasculares e nervosas e com acometimento articular, está presente com frequência no paciente politraumatizado e é preditor de desfecho clínico desfavorável. Na abordagem inicial de um paciente com trauma complexo do pé e tornozelo, a decisão entre amputação ou preservação do membro é crucial. Os diversos sistemas de classificação existentes são de eficácia limitada e devem servir como ferramentas que auxiliam e fortalecem uma decisão clínica, e não como determinantes de uma conduta. No atendimento de emergência, uma das duas opções de tratamento deve ser adotada: tratamento total precoce ou tratamento estagiado. O primeiro consiste na fixação definitiva e na cobertura cutânea imediata, seja por sutura primária ou por meio de retalhos, sendo geralmente reservado a casos menos complexos. O tratamento estagiado é dividido em inicial e definitivo, e o objetivo, na primeira fase, é a prevenção da progressão da isquemia, da necrose e da infecção. Os princípios do tratamento definitivo são: reconstrução óssea de proximal para distal, alinhamento anatômico do pé, fusões nas lesões graves da cartilagem ou nas instabilidades grosseiras, fixação interna estável e cobertura cutânea adequada. Nível de evidência III, Revisão sistemática de estudos de nível III.