Antimicrobial stewardship and education in optometry.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Antimicrobial stewardship aims to improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and used by patients, to ensure safe appropriate use, and to prevent and contain antimicrobial resistance. BACKGROUND: Australian optometrists can prescribe a range of antimicrobial agents, but to what extent they consider antimicrobial stewardship is not known. This study evaluated what final-year optometry students and optometrists understood about antimicrobial stewardship in eye care and considered relevance to oral prescribing and education. METHODS: A knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire was developed comprising four sections: i) demographic questions, ii) 10 multiple choice questions regarding Knowledge about antimicrobial agents and likely pathogens, diagnosis, treatment, and preventing resistance, iii) 10 Likert rating scale questions about thoughts and Attitudes, iv) mix of question types (5× MCQ: course of action, 16 Likert scale: confidence) related to Practice (diagnosis, management, and prescribing). Descriptive analyses were conducted (medians, mean±SD, and distributions). RESULTS: Thirteen students and 36 optometrists completed the survey. Both groups had a good understanding of microbial resistance and antibiotic prescribing for ocular conditions; average knowledge scores were 9.2 ± 0.7 and 8.7 ± 1.1 for students and practitioners, respectively. Scores were neutral to agree for questions related to the need for more educational programs. The answers of practice-related MCQs had a dichotomy of answers indicating a diversity of opinion, as can be the case in practice. Average total practice confidence scores were approximately 57/80 for students and 68/80 for optometrists. Optometrists and students were very confident in their ability to conduct an appropriate case history and use their knowledge and clinical skills, including slit lamp anterior eye assessment. The lowest confidence scores were for conducting microbial testing, i.e. taking swabs for pathology. CONCLUSION: Student and optometrist knowledge, attitudes, and practice around antimicrobial stewardship were high and in line with other health professions globally. There is scope for increased stewardship training.

Vision screening using the Acuidrive device.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding devices used for vision screening, including their potential utilisation and validity, will facilitate proper utilisation of this technology. BACKGROUND: The Acuidrive is a self-illuminated, hand-held, visual acuity screening device intended for use in policing, with visual acuity assessed roadside to identify drivers who may not meet vision standards for driving. The target is presented binocularly at 24 cm, and +4.00 D lenses eliminate the accommodation requirement. This study investigates its validity and applicability relative to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. METHODS: There were 36 participants, half younger adults aged 18-30 years and half older adults aged 50-70 years. The subjects underwent binocular visual acuity testing using the Acuidrive device and an ETDRS chart displayed on a monitor. Eyes were corrected for distance using lenses in a trial frame, and additional trial lenses provided four blur levels: zero, +0.50 DS, +1.00 DS and +1.50 DS. Luminances for the devices were similar at approximately 100 cd/m2. ETDRS chart measurements were conducted both with room lighting on and off. RESULTS: The Acuidrive device underestimated the ETDRS visual acuity across all blur levels, with mean differences of 0.24 ± 0.07 logMAR and 0.18 ± 0.10 logMAR for room lights on and off, respectively. To predict ETDRS visual acuity of poorer than 0.34 logMAR (6/12=), a screening level of 0.50 logMAR (6/19) with the Acuidrive device provided high sensitivity and specificity (86% and 79% with lights-on, and 85% and 78% with lights-off). Visual acuity was better for the older group than the younger group by approximately 0.10 logMAR. CONCLUSION: There was an offset of 0.2 logMAR (two lines) between visual acuity measures for the Acuidrive device and an ETDRS chart. The Acuidrive device has the potential to be a viable screening tool with refinement to its construction.

Regional Variations in Corneal Epithelial Cell Density and Morphology Assessed Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy.

AIM: To characterize the regional variations in corneal epithelial cell density and morphology using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). METHODS: Corneal imaging (IVCM) at 10 locations was performed; corneal apex (i.e., the center), immediately anterior to the corneal nerve whorl (i.e., slightly inferior to the apex), and four quadrants (superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal) both at 1.5 mm and 4.5 mm from the corneal apex (corresponding to 3 mm central and 9 mm peripheral diameter rings). The data of 21 young adults, aged 18 to 35 years, were analyzed. Cell morphometric parameters, including cell density, area, perimeter, Feret diameter, and circularity, were measured for basal and wing cells using Image J software. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in basal cell density (BCD) ( P <0.001) and wing cell density (WCD) ( P <0.001) for different corneal locations. The BCD (mean±SD: 8,839±416 cells/mm 2 ) and WCD (mean±SD: 5,932±310 cells/mm 2 ) were highest at the corneal nerve whorl compared with all other corneal locations. There were significant differences in wing cell area ( P <0.001), perimeter ( P <0.001), Feret diameter ( P <0.001), and circularity ( P <0.001) at varying corneal locations. CONCLUSION: There are significant regional variations in corneal epithelial cell density and morphology. The BCD and WCD was highest anterior to the corneal nerve whorl.

Clinical indicators for diabetic eyecare delivered by optometrists in Australia: a Delphi study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Valid and updated clinical indicators can serve as important tools in assessing and improving eyecare delivery. BACKGROUND: Indicators for diabetic eyecare in Australia were previously developed from guidelines published before 2013 and then used to assess the appropriateness of care delivery through a nationwide patient record card audit (the iCareTrack study). To reflect emerging evidence and contemporary practice, this study aimed to update clinical indicators for optometric care for people with type 2 diabetes in Australia. METHODS: Forty-five candidate indicators, including existing iCareTrack and new indicators derived from nine high-quality evidence-based guidelines, were generated. A two-round modified Delphi process where expert panel members rated the impact, acceptability, and feasibility of the indicators on a 9-point scale and voted for inclusion or exclusion of the candidate indicators was used. Consensus on inclusion was reached when the median scores for impact, acceptability, and feasibility were ≥7 and >75% of experts voted for inclusion. RESULTS: Thirty-two clinical indicators with high acceptability, impact and feasibility ratings (all median scores: 9) were developed. The final indicators were related to history taking (n = 12), physical examination (n = 8), recall period (n = 5), referral (n = 5), and patient education/communication (n = 2). Most (14 of 15) iCareTrack indicators were retained either in the original format or with modifications. New indicators included documenting the type of diabetes, serum lipid level, pregnancy, systemic medications, nephropathy, Indigenous status, general practitioner details, pupil examination, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography, diabetic retinopathy grading, recall period for high-risk diabetic patients without retinopathy, referral of high-risk proliferative retinopathy, communication with the general practitioner, and patient education. CONCLUSION: A set of 32 updated diabetic eyecare clinical indicators was developed based on contemporary evidence and expert consensus. These updated indicators inform the development of programs to assess and enhance the eyecare delivery for people with diabetes in Australia.

Fine visuomotor skills in amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Amblyopia is characterised by reduced visual acuity, poor binocular sensory fusion, and impaired or absent stereoacuity. Understanding the extent to which amblyopia affects everyday task performance is important to quantifying the disease burden of amblyopia and can assist clinicians to understand patients' likely functional capability. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified published studies comparing fine visuomotor performance in either children or adults with amblyopia and those with normal binocular vision. The included studies (22 studies involving 835 amblyopes and 561 controls) reported results of self-perception patient reported outcome measures, tests of motor proficiency and video recorded reaching and grasping. The outcomes of 17 studies were grouped into four meta-analyses, with pooled results reported as standardised mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% CI. RESULTS: Regardless of the cause of amblyopia (anisometropia, strabismus, mixed, deprivation), significant reduction in self-perception of physical competence and athletic competence (SMD=-0.74, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.25, p=0.003); fine motor skills scores (SMD=-0.86, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.45, p<0.0001); speed of visually guided reaching and grasping movements (SMD=0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.08, p<0.00001); and precision of temporal eye-hand coordination (SMD=0.75, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.25, p=0.003) occurred in amblyopes compared with those with normal visual development. CONCLUSION: Reports of the impact of amblyopia on fine motor skills performance find poorer outcomes in participants with amblyopia compared with those with normal vision development. Consistency in the outcome measure used to assess the functional impact of amblyopia would be valuable for future studies.

Corneal Epithelial Cell Density Is Reduced in Young Adults With Conjunctival Ultraviolet Autofluorescence.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of chronic ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure on the corneal microstructure using conjunctival UV autofluorescence (CUVAF) as a marker of exposure. METHODS: Young healthy adults aged 18 to 35 years were recruited. Participant's demographics and sun exposure behavior were recorded using questionnaires. Images of the bulbar conjunctiva from the right eye were captured and analyzed for the CUVAF area. Corneal microstructure was assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The presence of palisades of Vogt in all 4 limbal quadrants was recorded. RESULTS: CUVAF was observed in 31 of 52 eyes (60%), with a mean (±SD) nasal, temporal, and total CUVAF area of 5.39 ± 4.16 mm2, 4.29 ± 4.27 mm2, and 9.67 ± 7.01 mm2, respectively. Individuals with CUVAF were significantly more likely to report undertaking moderate-intensity to high-intensity outdoor exercise (P = 0.021). Individuals with CUVAF were less likely to have visible nasal and temporal palisades of Vogt (P = 0.011). Corneal basal cell densities anterior to the nerve whorl (P < 0.001) and nasally (P = 0.005) were lower in individuals with CUVAF. Wing cell density anterior to the nerve whorl was lower in individuals with CUVAF (P = 0.011). No significant changes in the central and limbal corneal epithelial thickness were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions in corneal epithelial cell density were observed in individuals with CUVAF, a biomarker of chronic UV exposure. This observation suggests that chronic UV exposure is damaging to the corneal microstructure.

IMI-Onset and Progression of Myopia in Young Adults.

Myopia typically starts and progresses during childhood, but onset and progression can occur during adulthood. The goals of this review are to summarize published data on myopia onset and progression in young adults, aged 18 to 40 years, to characterize myopia in this age group, to assess what is currently known, and to highlight the gaps in the current understanding. Specifically, the peer-reviewed literature was reviewed to: characterize the timeline and age of stabilization of juvenile-onset myopia; estimate the frequency of adult-onset myopia; evaluate the rate of myopia progression in adults, regardless of age of onset, both during the college years and later; describe the rate of axial elongation in myopic adults; identify risk factors for adult onset and progression; report myopia progression and axial elongation in adults who have undergone refractive surgery; and discuss myopia management and research study design. Adult-onset myopia is common, representing a third or more of all myopia in western populations, but less in East Asia, where onset during childhood is high. Clinically meaningful myopia progression continues in early adulthood and may average 1.00 diopters (D) between 20 and 30 years. Higher levels of myopia are associated with greater absolute risk of myopia-related ocular disease and visual impairment, and thus myopia in this age group requires ongoing management. Modalities established for myopia control in children would be options for adults, but it is difficult to predict their efficacy. The feasibility of studies of myopia control in adults is limited by the long duration required.

Effect of multifocal spectacle lenses on accommodative errors over time: Possible implications for myopia control.

The study purpose was to improve understanding of how multifocal spectacle lenses affect accommodative errors and whether this changes over time. Fifty-two myopes aged 18 to 27 years were allocated randomly to one of two progressive addition lens (PAL) types with 1.50 D additions and different horizontal power gradients across the near-periphery boundary. Lags of accommodation were determined with a Grand Seiko WAM-5500 autorefractor and a COAS-HD aberrometer for several near distances with the distance correction and the near PAL correction. For the COAS-HD the neural sharpness (NS) metric was used. Measures were repeated at three-month intervals over 12 months. At the final visit, lags to booster addition powers of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 D were measured. Except at baseline, both PALs' data were combined for analysis. For the Grand Seiko autorefractor, both PALs reduced accommodative lag at baseline compared with SVLs (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 at all distances for PAL 1 and PAL 2, respectively). For the COAS-HD, at baseline PAL 1 reduced accommodative lag at all near distances (p < 0.02), but PAL 2 only at 40 cm (p < 0.02). Lags measured with COAS-HD were greater for shorter target distances with PALs. After 12 months' wear, the PALs no longer reduced accommodative lags significantly, except at 40 cm distance, but 0.50 D and 0.75 D booster adds decreased the lags to those measured at baseline or less. In conclusion, for PALs to reduce accommodative lag effectively, addition power should be tailored to typical working distances and after the first year of wear should be boosted by at least 0.50 D to maintain efficacy.

Central and peripheral choroidal thickness and eye length changes during accommodation.

PURPOSE: Eye length increases during accommodation, both on-axis and in the periphery. The aim of this study was to determine whether the peripheral choroid thins with accommodation and to determine the relationship with eye length changes measured at the same location. METHODS: Subjects included 53 young adults in good ocular and general health, with 19 emmetropes and 34 myopes. Measurements from the right eye were made for 0 D and 6 D accommodation stimuli for ±30° horizontal visual field/retinal locations in 10° steps. Valid eye length and choroidal thickness measurements were obtained for 37 and 47 participants, respectively, and both measures were taken for 31 participants. 2.5% phenylephrine was instilled to dilate the pupils. Participants turned their eyes, without head movement, to fixate targets and to make the target 'as clear as possible' during measurements. Correction was made for the influence of lens thickness changing at different peripheral angles. Choroidal thickness was measured with a spectral-domain-Optical Coherence Tomographer. For peripheral images, the internal cross target on the capture screen was moved from the centre to 17.25° nasal/temporal positions. RESULTS: In accordance with previous literature, eye length increased with accommodation. The greatest change (mean ± SD) of 41 ± 17 µm occurred at the centre, with a mean change across the locations of 33 µm. There were no significant differences between emmetropes and myopes. Choroidal thickness decreased with accommodation, with changes being about two-thirds of those occurring for eye length. The greatest change of -30 ± 1 µm occurred at the centre, with a mean change of -21 µm. Greater choroidal thinning occurred for myopes than for emmetropes (23 ± 11 vs. 17 ± 8 µm, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: With accommodation, eye length increased and the choroid thinned, at both central and peripheral positions. Choroidal thinning accounted for approximately 60% of the eye length increase across the horizontal ±30°.

The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes.

PURPOSE: Multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated. METHODS: Participants were twenty-six myopes (19-25 years, spherical equivalent -0.50 to -5.75D), with normal binocular vision and no past myopia control. Pupil sizes were 4.4 ± 0.9 mm during distance viewing and 3.7 ± 0.8 mm at near. In random order, participants wore four MFCLs: Proclear single vision distance, MiSight concentric dual focus (+2.00D), distance center aspheric (Biofinity, +2.50D) (CooperVision lenses), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies). Testing included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), stereoacuity, accommodation response, negative and positive relative accommodation, horizontal phorias, horizontal fusional vergence and AC/A ratio, and a visual quality questionnaire. RESULTS: The four lenses differed in distance (p = 0.001) and near visual acuity (p = 0.011), and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.001). Compared with the single vision lens, the Biofinity aspheric had the greatest visual impact: 0.19 ± 0.14 logMAR distance acuity reduction, 0.22 ± 0.15 log contrast sensitivity reduction. Near acuity was affected less than distance acuity; the reduction was greatest with the NaturalVue (0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR reduction). The MFCLs altered the autorefraction measure at distance and near (p = 0.001); the accommodation response was less with aspheric lenses. Negative relative accommodation reduced with the aspheric lenses (p = 0.001): by 0.9 ± 0.5D with Biofinity and 0.5 ± 0.7D with NaturalVue. Exophoric shifts were greater with aspheric lenses (1.8 ± 2.4Δ Biofinity, 1.7 ± 1.7Δ NaturalVue) than with the concentric MiSight (0.5 ± 1.3Δ). CONCLUSIONS: MFCLs alter visual performance, refraction and vergence; two aspheric lenses had greater effect than a concentric lens.

Accommodation lags are higher in myopia than in emmetropia: Measurement methods and metrics matter.

PURPOSE: To determine whether accommodative errors in emmetropes and myopes are systematically different, and the effect of using different instruments and metrics. METHODS: Seventy-six adults aged 18-27 years comprising 24 emmetropes (spherical equivalent refraction of the dominant eye +0.04 ± 0.03 D) and 52 myopes (-2.73 ± 0.22 D) were included. Accommodation responses were measured with a Grand Seiko WAM-5500 and a Hartmann-Shack Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System aberrometer, using pupil plane (Zernike and Seidel refraction) and retinal image plane (neural sharpness-NS; and visual Strehl ratio for modulation transfer function-VSMTF) metrics at 40, 33 and 25 cm. Accommodation stimuli were presented to the corrected dominant eye, and responses, referenced to the corneal plane, were determined in the fellow eye. Linear mixed-effects models were used to determine influence of the refractive group, the measurement method, accommodation stimulus, age, race, parental myopia, gender and binocular measures of heterophoria, accommodative convergence/accommodation and convergence accommodation/convergence ratios. RESULTS: Lags of accommodation were affected significantly by the measurement method (p < 0.001), the refractive group (p = 0.003), near heterophoria (p = 0.002) and accommodative stimulus (p < 0.05), with significant interactions between some of these variables. Overall, emmetropes had smaller lags of accommodation than myopes with respective means ± standard errors of 0.31 ± 0.08 D and 0.61 ± 0.06 D (p = 0.003). Lags were largest for the Grand Seiko and Zernike defocus, intermediate for NS and VSMTF, and least for Seidel defocus. CONCLUSIONS: The mean lag of accommodation in emmetropes is approximately equal to the previously reported depth of focus. Myopes had larger (double) lags than emmetropes. Differences between methods and instruments could be as great as 0.50 D, and this must be considered when comparing studies and outcomes. Accommodative lag increased with the accommodation stimulus, but only for methods using a fixed small pupil diameter.

Ciliary Muscle Dimension Changes With Accommodation Vary in Myopia and Emmetropia.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether accommodation-induced changes in ciliary muscle dimensions vary between emmetropes and myopes, and the effect of the image analysis method. Methods: Seventy adults aged 18 to 27 years consisted of 25 people with emmetropia (spherical equivalent refraction [SER] +0.21 ± 0.36 diopters [D]) and 45 people with myopia (-2.84 ± 1.72 D). There were 23 people with low myopia (>-3 D) and 22 people with moderate myopia (-3 to -6 D). Right eye ciliary muscles were imaged (Visante OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec) at 0 D and 6 D demands. Measures included ciliary muscle length (CML), ciliary muscle curved length (CMLarc), maximum ciliary muscle thickness (CMTmax), CMT1, CMT2, and CMT3 (fixed distances 1-3 mm from the scleral spur), CM25, CM50, and CM75 (proportional distances 25%-75%). Linear mixed model analysis determined effects of refractive groups, race, and demand on dimensions. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Myopic eyes had greater CML and CMLarc nasally than emmetropic eyes. Myopic eyes had thicker muscles than emmetropic eyes at nasal positions, except CM25 and CMT3, and at CM75 temporally. During accommodation and only nasally, CML reduced in emmetropic and myopic eyes, and CMLarc reduced in myopic eyes only. During accommodation, both nasally and temporally, muscles thickened anteriorly (CMT1 and CM25) and thinned posteriorly (CMT3 and CM75) except for temporal CM75. Moderate myopic eyes had greater temporal CMLarc than low myopic eyes, and the moderate myopes had thicker muscles both nasally and temporally using fixed and proportional distances. Conclusions: People with myopia had longer and thicker ciliary muscles than people with emmetropia. During accommodation, the anterior muscle thickened and the curved nasal muscle length shortened, more in myopic than in emmetropic eyes. The fixed distance method is recommended for repeat measures in the same individual. The proportional distance method is recommended for comparisons between refractive groups.

Segmentation methods and morphometry of confocal microscopy imaged corneal epithelial cells.

PURPOSE: To develop and explore automated cell identification and segmentation methods for morphometry of confocal microscopy imaged corneal epithelial cells using ImageJ software. METHODS: In vivo confocal microscopy images of the intermediate (wing) and basal cell layers of the central and peripheral corneas of 20 healthy participants were analysed. The intermediate and basal cell areas obtained using the two new techniques (i.e., manual- and auto- thresholding) were compared with the widely used manual tracing technique. A predefined range of epithelial cell morphometric parameters was used as image descriptors to improve cell identification and segmentation. RESULTS: The mean intermediate cell area obtained using the manual tracing (central; 120 ± 14 µm2, peripheral; 123 ± 15 µm2) was statistically similar (p > 0.05) to the manual thresholding (central; 119 ± 7 µm2, peripheral; 119 ± 8) but not with the auto thresholding technique (central; 101 ± 8 µm2, peripheral; 101 ± 7 µm2). Bland-Altman limits of agreement for the mean difference (measurement bias) in central and peripheral intermediate cell area determined via manual tracing and manual thresholding techniques were 1 µm2 (+25 to - 23 µm2) and 4 µm2 (+29.8 to - 21.9 µm2). There were statistically significant differences in basal cell area between the three methods. CONCLUSION: The manual thresholding technique may be used for automated identification and segmentation of corneal epithelial intermediate cells (central and peripheral) for assessing various morphometric parameters. However, measurement of the corneal epithelial basal cells is less reliable using thresholding techniques.

The effects of optically and digitally simulated aniseikonia on stereopsis.

PURPOSE: To simulate both lens-induced and screen-induced aniseikonia, and to assess its influence on stereopsis. Additionally, to determine if screen-based size differences could neutralise the effects of lens-induced aniseikonia. METHOD: A four-circle (4-C) paradigm was developed, where one circle appears in front or behind the others because of crossed or uncrossed disparity. This stereotest was used for three investigations: (1) Comparison with the McGill modified random dot stereogram (RDS), with anisometropia introduced with +2 D spheres and cylinders, and with aniseikonia introduced with 6% overall and 6% meridional (×180, ×90) magnifiers before the right eye; (2) Comparison of lens-induced and screen-induced 6% overall and meridional magnifications and (3) Determining if lens and screen effects neutralised, by opposing 6% lens-induced magnification to the right eye with screen-inducements of either 6% left eye magnification or 6% right eye minification. A pilot study of the effect of masking versus not masking the surround was also conducted. RESULTS: The 4-C test gave higher stereo-thresholds than the RDS test by 0.5 ± 0.2 log units across both anisometropic and aniseikonic conditions. However, variations in power, meridian and magnification affected the two tests similarly. The pilot study indicated that surround masking improved neutralisation of screen and lens effects. With masking, lens-induced and screen-induced magnifications increased stereo-thresholds similarly. With lens and screen effects opposed, for most participants stereo-thresholds returned to baseline for overall and ×180 magnifications, but not for ×90 magnification. Only three of seven participants showed good compensation for ×90 magnification. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of lens-induced aniseikonia on stereopsis cannot always be successfully simulated with a screen-based method. The ability to neutralise refractive aniseikonia using a computer-based method, which is the basis of digital clinical measurement, was reasonably successful for overall and ×180 meridional aniseikonia, but not very successful for ×90 aniseikonia.

Lid Margin Score Is the Strongest Predictor of Meibomian Area Loss.

PURPOSE: Although meibography provides direct evidence of gland dropout in meibomian gland dysfunction, this specialized technique is not available in most clinics. The primary aim was to determine which clinical ocular marker was most related to meibomian area loss. A secondary aim was to determine associations with confocal microscopy imaging of the lid margin. METHODS: One hundred participants from age 18 to 65 years were recruited. Measurements of the right eye and its upper eyelid, where relevant, included noninvasive tear break-up time, bulbar and limbal redness scores, blepharitis score, lipid layer thickness, number of parallel conjunctival folds, tear osmolarity, corneal fluorescein staining, phenol red thread test, lid margin score, meibography, and in vivo confocal microscopy. Participants also completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire. The relationships between the measurements were determined using the Spearman correlation. The receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to determine the cutoff value of clinical markers. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between meibomian area and lid margin score (r = -0.47, P < 0.01), and meibomian tortuosity and lid signs of blepharitis (r = -0.32, P < 0.01). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a lid margin score of ≥1.70 detected meibomian area loss with a sensitivity of 0.58 and a specificity of 0.86. There were significant correlations between meibomian area and orifice area at 30 µm depth (r = -0.25, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The lid margin score was most related to the meibomian area and thus the best predictor of undiagnosed meibomian area loss.

Multifocal contact lens design, not addition power, affects accommodation responses in young adult myopes.

PURPOSE: Prolonged nearwork has been implicated in myopia progression. Accommodation responses of young-adult myopes wearing different multifocal contact lenses were compared. METHODS: Twenty adults, 18-25 years, with myopia (spherical equivalent refraction -0.50 to -5.50 D, mean -2.1 ± 1.6 D) wore five lens types in random order: Proclear single vision distance (SV), MiSight concentric dual-focus +2.00 D Add (MS), Biofinity aspheric centre distance +1.50 D Add (CD1) and +2.50 D Add (CD2) (all Coopervision), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies) (NVue). Using a Grand-Seiko WAN-5500 autorefractor with binocular correction and viewing right eye accommodative responses were measured after a 10 min adaptation period at 4.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.33 and 0.25 m distances. Dynamic measurements were taken for 4 s at 6 Hz. Accommodative stimuli and responses were referenced to 4 m (i.e., refraction differences between 4 m and nearer distances). Accommodation lags and refraction instabilities (standard deviations of dynamic responses) were determined. For comparison, results were obtained for an absolute presbyopic eye, where trial lenses counteracted the accommodation stimulus. RESULTS: For SV and MS, accommodation responses were similar to the stimulus values. For aspheric lenses CD1, CD2 and NVue, accommodation responses were approximately 1.0 D lower across the stimulus range than with SV and MS, and rates of change were approximately 0.84 D per 1 D stimulus change. MS produced greater refraction instabilities than other lenses. For the presbyope, changes in refraction matched the trial lenses, indicating that corrections due to measurement through the different lenses were not needed. CONCLUSION: Reductions in accommodation response occurred in young myopes wearing aspheric multifocal contact lenses independent of the labelled 'add' power. The concentric dual-focus MS lens produced minimal lags but had greater instability than the other lenses. The results indicate that the mechanism of multifocal contact lenses slowing myopia progression is unlikely to be through relaxing accommodation, at least in young adults.

IMI Accommodation and Binocular Vision in Myopia Development and Progression.

The role of accommodation in myopia development and progression has been debated for decades. More recently, the understanding of the mechanisms involved in accommodation and the consequent alterations in ocular parameters has expanded. This International Myopia Institute white paper reviews the variations in ocular parameters that occur with accommodation and the mechanisms involved in accommodation and myopia development and progression. Convergence is synergistically linked with accommodation and the impact of this on myopia has also been critiqued. Specific topics reviewed included accommodation and myopia, role of spatial frequency, and contrast of the task of objects in the near environment, color cues to accommodation, lag of accommodation, accommodative-convergence ratio, and near phoria status. Aspects of retinal blur from the lag of accommodation, the impact of spatial frequency at near and a short working distance may all be implicated in myopia development and progression. The response of the ciliary body and its links with changes in the choroid remain to be explored. Further research is critical to understanding the factors underlying accommodative and binocular mechanisms for myopia development and its progression and to guide recommendations for targeted interventions to slow myopia progression.

Association between greater residential greenness and decreased risk of preschool myopia and astigmatism.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid urbanization has led to reduced greenness in many areas, this has been linked to adverse health outcomes. The aim was to determine the association between residential greenness experienced during very early childhood with preschool myopia and astigmatism and to explore the potential mediating role of screen time on any associations. METHOD: Information regarding socio-demographic characteristics, home address, screen time during early childhood, and refraction data from vision screenings of 53,575 preschoolers from Longhua Child Cohort Study were collected via questionnaires. Residential greenness was calculated as the average of satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index in buffers of 100, 250, and 500 m around each child's home address. Logistic and linear regression models were used to examine the relationships between residential greenness, screen time, and preschool myopia and astigmatism. RESULT: The mean (SD) age of the 53,575 preschoolers was 5.0 (0.7) years, and 24,849 (46.4%) were girls. A total of 1236 (2.3%) preschoolers had myopia and 5347 (10.0%) had astigmatism. In the adjusted model, a higher neighborhood greenness level within 100 m buffers around the home address was associated with decreased risk of myopia (adjusted odds ratios (AOR): 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.99), and higher neighborhood greenness levels within 100, 250, and 500 m decreased the risk of astigmatism, and their AORs (95% CIs) were 0.55 (0.43-0.70) for 100 m, 0.59 (0.41-0.83) for 250 m, 0.61 (0.42-0.90) for 500 m, respectively. Greater screen time during early childhood increased the risk of myopia (AOR = 1.33) and astigmatism (AOR = 1.23). Reduction in screen time fully mediated the benefits of greater residential greenness on preschool myopia, but partially mediated that on preschool astigmatism (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher residential greenness reduces the risk of preschool myopia and astigmatism; the benefits of residential greenness were mediated through reduced daily screen time.