Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Clinical Practice Update on Optimal Post Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Cardiac Arrest Patient Care.

Survival to hospital discharge among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low and important regional differences in treatment practices and survival have been described. Since the 2017 publication of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society's position statement on OHCA care, multiple randomized controlled trials have helped to better define optimal post cardiac arrest care. This working group provides updated guidance on the timing of cardiac catheterization in patients with ST-elevation and without ST-segment elevation, on a revised temperature control strategy targeting normothermia instead of hypothermia, blood pressure, oxygenation, and ventilation parameters, and on the treatment of rhythmic and periodic electroencephalography patterns in patients with a resuscitated OHCA. In addition, prehospital trials have helped craft new expert opinions on antiarrhythmic strategies (amiodarone or lidocaine) and outline the potential role for double sequential defibrillation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest when equipment and training is available. Finally, we advocate for regionalized OHCA care systems with admissions to a hospital capable of integrating their post OHCA care with comprehensive on-site cardiovascular services and provide guidance on the potential role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. We believe that knowledge translation through national harmonization and adoption of contemporary best practices has the potential to improve survival and functional outcomes in the OHCA population.

Interhospital Variation in Admissions Managed With Critical Care Therapies or Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Units: An Analysis From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.

BACKGROUND: Wide interhospital variations exist in cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU) admission practices and the use of critical care restricted therapies (CCRx), but little is known about the differences in patient acuity, CCRx utilization, and the associated outcomes within tertiary centers. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of tertiary and academic CICUs in the United States and Canada that captured consecutive admissions in 2-month periods between 2017 and 2022. This analysis included 17 843 admissions across 34 sites and compared interhospital tertiles of CCRx (eg, mechanical ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, continuous renal replacement therapy) utilization and its adjusted association with in-hospital survival using logistic regression. The Pratt index was used to quantify patient-related and institutional factors associated with CCRx variability. RESULTS: The median age of the study population was 66 (56-77) years and 37% were female. CCRx was provided to 62.2% (interhospital range of 21.3%-87.1%) of CICU patients. Admissions to CICUs with the highest tertile of CCRx utilization had a greater burden of comorbidities, had more diagnoses of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or cardiogenic shock, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality (median, 12.7%) was 9.6%, 11.1%, and 18.7% in low, intermediate, and high CCRx tertiles, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences in adjusted mortality were observed across tertiles when admissions were stratified by the provision of CCRx. Baseline patient-level variables and institutional differences accounted for 80% and 5.3% of the observed CCRx variability, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a large registry of tertiary and academic CICUs, there was a >4-fold interhospital variation in the provision of CCRx that was primarily driven by differences in patient acuity compared with institutional differences. No differences were observed in adjusted mortality between low, intermediate, and high CCRx utilization sites.

Neuroprognostication in the Post Cardiac Arrest Patient: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement.

Cardiac arrest (CA) is associated with a low rate of survival with favourable neurologic recovery. The most common mechanism of death after successful resuscitation from CA is withdrawal of life-sustaining measures on the basis of perceived poor neurologic prognosis due to underlying hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Neuroprognostication is an important component of the care pathway for CA patients admitted to hospital but is complex, challenging, and often guided by limited evidence. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to evaluate the evidence underlying factors or diagnostic modalities available to determine prognosis, recommendations were generated in the following domains: (1) circumstances immediately after CA; (2) focused neurologic exam; (3) myoclonus and seizures; (4) serum biomarkers; (5) neuroimaging; (6) neurophysiologic testing; and (7) multimodal neuroprognostication. This position statement aims to serve as a practical guide to enhance in-hospital care of CA patients and emphasizes the adoption of a systematic, multimodal approach to neuroprognostication. It also highlights evidence gaps.

Patterns of Left-Ventricular Function Assessment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), guidelines recommend the assessment of left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Many patients with ACS undergo multiple assessments of LVEF, the clinical value of which is unknown. METHODS: Patients with ACS undergoing cardiac catheterization between 2012 and 2016 were evaluated and assessments of LV function identified. To evaluate changes in LVEF over time, available echocardiograms were reviewed in a subsample of patients with LVEF data available (n = 3221). Patients with ACS were classified into 3 groups: group 1 (LVEF > 50%), group 2 (LVEF 35% to 50%), and group 3 (LVEF < 35%). RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 8327 patients with ACS (76% men), presenting with a mean age of 62.4 ± 12.4 years. At index presentation, 66% of patients had an LVEF > 50%, 27% had an LVEF between 35% and 50%, and 7% had severely reduced LVEF of < 35%. More than half of the cohort (n = 4600) had follow-up assessment of LV function, performed over an average of 2.71 ± 1.31 years. In the subsample of 3221 patients, only 1.1% of those in group 1, and 5.1% of those in group 2, deteriorated to an LVEF < 35%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACS often undergo multiple assessments of LV function. Those with initially preserved EF rarely demonstrate a decline in EF to < 35%. A reduction in low-value cardiac tests may be an important first step in improving the quality of care for patients with ACS.

CONTEXTE: En cas de syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA), les lignes directrices recommandent d'évaluer la fraction d'éjection ventriculaire gauche (FEVG). Beaucoup de patients présentant un SCA subissent plusieurs évaluations de la FEVG, une pratique dont on ne connaît pas la valeur clinique. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons examiné les dossiers de patients atteints d'un SCA ayant subi un cathétérisme cardiaque entre 2012 et 2016 afin de relever les évaluations de la fonction ventriculaire gauche. Pour évaluer l'évolution de la FEVG au fil du temps, nous avons examiné les échocardiogrammes d'un sous-échantillon de patients pour lesquels des données sur la FEVG étaient disponibles (n = 3 221). Les patients présentant un SCA ont été divisés en trois groupes : groupe 1 (FEVG > 50 %), groupe 2 (FEVG de 35 à 50 %) et groupe 3 (FEVG < 35 %). RÉSULTATS: Notre cohorte comprenait 8 327 patients présentant un SCA (proportion d'hommes : 76 %), dont l'âge moyen était de 62,4 ± 12,4 ans. Au moment de la manifestation de référence, 66 % des patients avaient une FEVG > 50 %, 27 %, une FEVG de 35 à 50 % et 7 %, une FEVG gravement réduite < 35 %. Plus de la moitié des patients de la cohorte (n = 4 600) ont subi une évaluation de suivi de la fonction ventriculaire gauche, effectuée sur une période de 2,71 ± 1,31 ans en moyenne. Dans le sous-échantillon de 3 221 patients, seulement 1,1 % des patients du groupe 1 et 5,1 % de ceux du groupe 2 ont vu leur FEVG se détériorer à une valeur < 35 %. CONCLUSIONS: Les patients présentant un SCA subissent souvent plusieurs évaluations de la fonction ventriculaire gauche. Ceux dont la fraction d'éjection était initialement préservée ont rarement présenté une réduction de la fraction d'éjection en deçà de 35 %. Une réduction du nombre d'évaluations cardiaques offrant peu de valeur pourrait constituer un premier pas important vers l'amélioration de la qualité des soins prodigués aux patients présentant un SCA.

Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Five-Year Single Canadian Center Initial Experience.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock (CS) with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (PVADs) has expanded rapidly, but there is a paucity of Canadian data. Conflicting observational reports have emerged regarding the benefit of PVADs in CS. We describe a 5-year experience with Impella CP for CS at a single Canadian tertiary care centre. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with CS supported with Impella CP were included. Comprehensive clinical data and outcomes were retrospectively assessed. We evaluated patient characteristics, patterns of care, in-hospital outcomes, 6-month survival, and predictors of survival. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were supported with Impella CP for CS over 5 years. A majority had acute myocardial infarction (94%) with advanced CS (68% Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention [SCAI] stage D or E). Survival to discharge was 58%. In patients who survived to discharge, 6-month survival was 100% with excellent functional status. SCAI CS stage and initial serum lactate showed significant associations with survival. There was also a trend towards improved survival with shorter door-to-PVAD time. Clinically significant bleeding was common (26%), and 3 patients had device-related vascular complications. CONCLUSION: Impella CP may have a role in carefully selected patients with CS. The SCAI shock classification and serum lactate may facilitate patient selection, and minimizing door-to-support time as well as bleeding complications are important considerations. Further clinical investigations, particularly in a Canadian setting, will be necessary to establish the role of this new technology in CS.

CONTEXTE: L'assistance circulatoire mécanique en cas de choc cardiogénique (CC) avec des dispositifs d'assistance ventriculaire gauche percutanée s'est rapidement développée, mais les données canadiennes restent rares. Des rapports d'observation contradictoires ont émergé concernant les avantages des dispositifs d'assistance ventriculaire gauche percutanée en cas de CC. Nous décrivons une expérience de cinq ans avec l'Impella CP pour les CC dans un seul centre de soins tertiaires canadien. MÉTHODES: Des patients adultes assistés par l'Impella CP, consécutivement à un CC, ont été inclus. Les données et les conclusions cliniques détaillées ont été évaluées rétrospectivement. Nous avons évalué les caractéristiques des patients, les modèles de soins, les bilans en milieu hospitalier, la survie à six mois et les indicateurs de survie. RÉSULTATS: Trente-quatre patients ont été pris en charge avec l'Impella CP pour un CC sur une période de cinq ans. Une majorité d'entre eux ont subi un infarctus aigu du myocarde (94 %) avec un CC avancé (68 % au stade D ou E sur l'échelle de la Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention [SCAI]). La survie jusqu'au congé hospitalier était de 58 %. Chez les patients qui ont survécu jusqu'à leur congé de l'hôpital, la survie à six mois était de 100 % avec un excellent état fonctionnel. Le stade de leur CC selon la SCAI et le lactate sérique initial ont montré des associations significatives avec le taux de survie. On a également constaté une tendance à l'amélioration de la survie avec un temps de porte à dispositifs d'assistance ventriculaire gauche percutanée raccourci. Des hémorragies importantes étaient fréquentes (26 %) et trois patients présentaient des complications vasculaires liées au dispositif. CONCLUSION: L'Impella CP pourrait avoir un rôle chez des patients atteints de CC soigneusement sélectionnés. La classification du choc selon la SCAI et le niveau de lactate sérique peuvent faciliter la sélection des patients, et la réduction du temps de « porte à assistance ¼ ainsi que les complications hémorragiques constituent des considérations d'importance. D'autres investigations cliniques, en particulier dans un contexte canadien, seront nécessaires pour établir le rôle de cette nouvelle technologie dans le CC.

Incremental costs of high intensive care utilisation in patients hospitalised with heart failure.

AIMS: Registries have reported large inter-hospital differences in intensive care unit admission rates for patients with acute heart failure, but little is known about the potential economic impact of over-admission of low-risk patients with heart failure to higher cost intensive care units. We described the variability in intensive care unit admission practices, the provision of critical care therapies, and estimated the potential national cost savings if all hospitals adopted low intensive care unit admission practices for patients admitted with heart failure. METHODS: Using a national population health dataset, we identified 349,693 heart failure admission hospitalisations with a primary diagnosis of heart failure between 2007 and 2016. Hospitals were categorised as low (first quartile), medium (second and third quartile) and high (fourth quartiles) intensive care unit utilisation. RESULTS: The mean intensive care unit admission rate was 16.4% (inter-hospital range 0.3-51%) including 5.4% in low, 14.5% in medium and 30% in high utilisation hospitals. Intensive care unit therapies in low, medium and high intensive care unit utilisation hospitals were 54.5%, 45.1% and 24.1% (P<0.001), respectively and the inhospital mortality rate was not significantly different. The proportion of hospital costs incurred by intensive care unit care was 7.8% in low, 19.8% in medium and 28.2% in high (P<0.001) admission hospitals. The potential cost savings of altering intensive care unit utilisation practices for patients with heart failure was CAN$234.8m over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort of patients hospitalised with heart failure, we observed that low intensive care unit utilisation centres had lower hospital costs with no differences in mortality rates. The development of standardised admission criteria for high-cost and high acuity intensive care unit beds could reduce costs to the healthcare system.

Multiple Thromboembolic Events from a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device.

Left atrial appendage occlusion devices are an alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are at risk of ischemic stroke. Thromboprophylaxis after implantation is recommended, but the optimal regimen is unknown. We report a clinicopathologic case in which thrombus adherent to an incompletely endothelialized WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) resulted in multiple thromboembolic events, contributing to a fatal outcome. This case illustrates uncertainties regarding the device's endothelialization process.

From Coronary Care Units to Cardiac Intensive Care Units: Recommendations for Organizational, Staffing, and Educational Transformation.

Medical care in Canadian cardiac units has changed considerably over the past 3 decades in response to an increasingly complex and diverse patient population admitted with acute cardiac pathology. To maintain the highest level of care for these patients, there is a pressing need to evolve traditional coronary care units into contemporary cardiac intensive care units. In this article we aim to highlight the current variations in Canadian units, develop approaches to overcome logistical and infrastructural obstacles, and propose staffing and training recommendations that would allow for the establishment of contemporary cardiac intensive care units.

Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy.

The initial 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy in the Outpatient Setting were published in May 2011. As part of a planned re-evaluation within 2 years, we conducted an extensive literature search encompassing all topics included in the 2010 CCS Guidelines, and concluded that there were sufficient new data to merit revisiting the guidance on antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in the first year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting, and the interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. In addition, new clinical trials information about the efficacy and safety of combining novel oral anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy in ACS justified the addition of a new section of recommendations to the Guidelines. In this focused update, we provide recommendations for the use of clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel in non-ST elevation ACS, avoidance of prasugrel in patients with previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, higher doses of clopidogrel (j) /day) for the first 6 days after ACS, and the preferential use of prasugrel or ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS. For non-ACS stented patients, we recommend acetylsalicylic acid/clopidogrel for 1 year, with at least 1 month of therapy for bare-metal stent patients and 3 months for drug-eluting stent patients unable to tolerate year-long double therapy. We also consider therapy for patients with a history of stent thrombosis, the indications for longer-term treatment, discontinuation timing preoperatively, indications for changing agents, the management of antiplatelet therapy before and after bypass surgery, and use/selection of proton pump inhibitors along with antiplatelet agents.

Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can be used to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). Because it measures myocardial blood flow velocity in addition to measuring myocardial blood volume, it was hypothesized that it should have greater prognostic utility than single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), which measures only myocardial blood volume. Because blood flow mismatch precedes wall thickening (WT) abnormalities during demand ischemia, it was also postulated that perfusion on MCE would be superior to WT abnormalities on echocardiography for this purpose. METHODS: The incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death was determined in 261 patients with known or suspected CAD over a mean follow-up period of 14 months who underwent simultaneous dipyridamole stress MCE and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT. Comparisons of survival curves were conducted with stratified (and unstratified) log-rank tests. RESULTS: Abnormal results on MCE were found to be the best predictor of an adverse outcome (odds ratio, 23; 95% confidence interval, 6-201; P<.0001) and provided incremental prognostic value over clinical variables (age>60 years, the presence of >or=3 cardiac risk factors, known peripheral vascular disease, prior myocardial infarction, and left ventricular systolic function), inducible WT abnormalities, and SPECT. Prognoses were worst in patients who had both abnormal results on MCE and inducible WT abnormalities and best in those who had neither. Patients with abnormal results on MCE but no inducible WT abnormalities had intermediate outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients with known or suspected CAD undergoing dipyridamole stress, MCE provides powerful prognostic information that is superior to clinical variables, electrocardiography, left ventricular systolic function, WT analysis, and SPECT. MCE may therefore serve as a method of choice for myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with known or suspected CAD. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction the REFINE study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether combined assessment of autonomic tone plus cardiac electrical substrate identifies most patients at risk of serious events after myocardial infarction (MI) and to compare assessment at 2 to 4 weeks versus 10 to 14 weeks after MI. BACKGROUND: Methods to identify most patients at risk of serious events after MI are required. METHODS: Patients (n = 322) with an ejection fraction (EF) <0.50 in the initial week after MI were followed up for a median of 47 months. Serial assessment of autonomic tone, including heart rate turbulence (HRT), electrical substrate, including T-wave alternans (TWA), and EF was performed, interpreted blinded, and categorized using pre-specified cut-points where available. The primary outcome was cardiac death or resuscitated cardiac arrest. All-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Mean EF significantly increased over the initial 8 weeks after MI. Testing 2 to 4 weeks after MI did not reliably identify patients at risk, whereas testing at 10 to 14 weeks did. The 20% of patients with impaired HRT, abnormal exercise TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks post-MI had a 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 11.3, p < 0.001) higher adjusted risk of the primary outcome. This combination identified 52% of those at risk, with good positive (23%; 95% CI 17% to 26%) and negative (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%) accuracy. Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired HRT, abnormal TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks after MI reliably identify patients at risk of serious events. (Assessment of Noninvasive Methods to Identify Patients at Risk of Serious Arrhythmias After a Heart Attack; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00399503?order=1; NCT00399503).

Contrast echocardiography accurately predicts myocardial perfusion before angiography during acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can quickly and accurately assess myocardial perfusion and infarct-related artery (IRA) patency before emergency angiography during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Despite encouraging experimental and clinical studies, the reliability and practicality of MCE in predicting IRA patency during AMI before angiography has not been proven. METHODS: Two-dimensional echocardiography and MCE were performed in 51 patients with AMI just before emergency angiography. With knowledge of the electrocardiogram findings and regional wall motion, myocardial perfusion was assessed to predict IRA patency. RESULTS: Myocardial perfusion studies were adequate for interpretation in 40 patients. An occluded IRA was predicted in 28 patients; the artery was occluded in 22 patients, and six patients had Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 2 flow or less. A patent IRA was predicted in 12 patients; eight patients had TIMI grade 3 flow, one patient had TIMI grade 2 flow and the IRA was occluded in three patients. In one of the three patients, the appropriate view was not obtained. In another patient, collateral flow was adequate for near-normal regional wall motion, and in the last, the findings suggested reperfusion of the proximal artery with distal embolic occlusion. Taken together, MCE accurately predicted either TIMI grade 2 flow or less, or TIMI grade 3 flow in 36 of 40 patients. Sensitivity was 87.5%, specificity and positive predictive value were 100% and negative predictive power was 66.7% (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MCE, together with the electrocardiogram and regional wall motion, can be used to quickly and reliably predict IRA patency early during AMI and may be useful to facilitate a management strategy.